logo
Hong Kong's oldest pro-democracy party is shutting down as Beijing leaves no room for dissent

Hong Kong's oldest pro-democracy party is shutting down as Beijing leaves no room for dissent

Hong Kong
CNN —
Hong Kong's oldest and largest pro-democracy political party is moving to disband as Beijing's sweeping crackdown on the city leaves even moderate opposition groups with no room to operate.
The Democratic Party, one of the leading voices of opposition in the semi-autonomous city for the past three decades, has started the process of dissolution following recent warnings from Chinese government officials, two of its veteran members told CNN.
'The message was that the party has to be disbanded or there will be consequences,' said one of them, Yeung Sum, a former Democratic Party chairman.
Fred Li, a former lawmaker, said a Chinese official told him that the party should not remain until the end of this year, when an election will be held.
Founded by liberal lawyers and academics three years before the former British colony's 1997 handover to China, the Democratic Party had campaigned for universal suffrage and on matters from labor rights to conservation during a period when such issues were openly discussed in the city.
Widely seen as moderates willing to work with Beijing, Democratic Party leaders had spearheaded a significant voting bloc in the city's legislature and were regularly afforded space to critique local government policy, until mass pro-democracy protests in 2019 ushered in a new and more restrictive political era.
Beijing's crackdown in the years since, including the prosecution and jailing of pro-democracy leaders, has left the once-influential party rudderless as it contends with sweeping national security legislation and 'patriots only' electoral reforms enacted in 2021 that make it nearly impossible for opposition candidates to stand for the city's legislature.
Democratic Party chairman Lo Kin-hei told a news conference last Sunday that 90% of about 110 party members had voted to delegate power to a committee to start the dissolution process, adding he hoped a final vote would take place in the coming months.
'I hope Hong Kong's political parties… will continue to work for the people,' Lo said. 'We have always hoped to serve the Hong Kong people, and to do things that are good for society.'
Democratic Party chairman Lo Kin-hei, left, and Mok Kin-shing, vice chairman, speak at a press conference at the party's office in Hong Kong on April 13, 2025.
Chan Long Hei/AP
The Democrats' move to disband demonstrates Beijing's unwillingness to allow even the mildest of dissenting voices to be heard in Hong Kong, say analysts.
John Burns, emeritus professor at the University of Hong Kong (HKU), said the party had 'symbolized the promise of some kind of democratic development in Hong Kong, leading to universal suffrage as promised in the Basic Law,' referring to the city's mini-constitution.
'A dissolution of the party reflects official Hong Kong's turn away from popular participation, locally accountable government, and increased transparency toward more authoritarian rule,' Burns said.
Eric Lai, a research fellow at the Georgetown Center for Asian Law, said the Democrats' move 'shows there are no more feasible ways for groups to exist as an opposition party.'
'It's self-conflicting for the government to suggest that nothing has changed,' he said.
In a statement to CNN, a city government spokesperson said decisions by individual groups 'to disband or suspend operation are completely unrelated to the freedom or rights enshrined in Hong Kong law.'
Criticism of the government remains permitted in Hong Kong, 'however strong, vigorous or critical' it may be, so long as it is 'based on facts,' the spokesperson said. The Hong Kong government would 'continue to resolutely discharge the duty of safeguarding national security,' they added.
No space for compromise
The Democrats had enjoyed relative political freedom following Hong Kong's return to Chinese rule, even holding more seats than any other party in the mostly pro-Beijing legislature until 2004.
The party's leaders were often the figureheads of major demonstrations, including an annual June 4 vigil to commemorate the Tiananmen Square massacre and a well-attended pro-democracy march held every July. (Neither event would be permitted on the Chinese mainland, and both are now effectively banned in Hong Kong).
But support for the Democrats plunged in 2010 after its leaders negotiated directly for universal suffrage with officials from Beijing's liaison office in Hong Kong – a move seen as a betrayal by other pro-democracy groups.
The party was then pushed further to the sidelines by the emergence of a new generation of pro-democracy leaders and student activists during months-long protests for universal suffrage in 2014.
Democratic Party candidates for legislative elections show thank-you messages outside the legislature in Hong Kong on September 17, 2004.
Martin Chan/South ChinaDemocratic Party lawmaker Roy Kwong Chun-yu addresses crowds at a protest in Hong Kong on June 16, 2019.
Geovien So/SOPA Images/LightRocket/Getty Images
However, when anti-government demonstrators returned to Hong Kong's streets en masse in 2019, the Democrats' popularity resurged as many of its leaders stood on the front lines of the massive – and sometimes violent – protests that rocked the financial hub.
Later that year, the Democratic Party was the biggest winner in local district council elections. But its participation in the protests also drew the ire of Hong Kong authorities and Beijing, paving the way for its demise.
'The party made mistakes when it failed to draw a clear line between itself and radical separatists calling for Hong Kong's independence from 2014-2020,' said Burns, from HKU. 'Authorities have punished the party, jailing and chasing out Democratic Party leaders.'
Over the past five years, the space for the Democrats to maneuver has been increasingly squeezed by Chinese authorities.
In 2020, Beijing imposed a sweeping national security law on Hong Kong, introducing the maximum sentence of life imprisonment for four main crimes of secession, subversion, terrorism and collusion with foreign forces.
A year later, the Chinese government rewrote Hong Kong's electoral rules to require candidates to seek nomination from pro-Beijing groups, essentially excluding the opposition from elections. A legislature filled with Beijing loyalists last year unanimously passed a law expanding the scope of national security offenses.
Beijing and the Hong Kong government argued that the electoral changes had enhanced democracy and have repeatedly defended the security laws as restoring order and returning prosperity to the city. But critics say they have curtailed freedoms and had a 'chilling effect' on civil society, including independent institutions and the media.
Steve Tsang, director of the China Institute at SOAS University of London, said political and social protests seen as challenging state security are 'becoming increasingly if not well-nigh impossible.'
'Many other elements of civil rights, including that of speech and organizing political parties have also been severely curtailed,' he added.
Last year, five former Democratic Party lawmakers were among 45 opposition figures sentenced to prison terms of up to 10 years after they were found guilty of subversion for taking part in an election primary in 2020.
National security police have also placed HK$1 million ($129,000) bounties on pro-democracy activists who fled overseas, including an Australia-based former Democratic Party lawmaker accused of secession, subversion and collusion with a foreign country.
Meanwhile, the trial of media tycoon and outspoken democracy supporter Jimmy Lai is ongoing, more than four years after he was detained on charges of colluding with foreign forces, which he denies.
The Democratic Party's announcement last weekend follows the dissolution of almost 100 civil and pro-democracy organizations in Hong Kong in the wake of Beijing's crackdown.
The party had tried to survive as a civic group in recent years but struggled to raise funds as multiple private venues canceled their events, often at the last minute.
Former Democratic Party lawmaker Emily Lau said the party's move to disband was 'very sad.'
'We've been around for over 30 years, and we've got the support of many Hong Kong people,' she told CNN outside court in February, before another former party lawmaker was jailed on charges of rioting during the 2019 protests.
'I don't know what they are thinking in Beijing. We have demonstrated, not just words, but by action, that we are reasonable. We are willing to talk, to negotiate, to compromise, reach a deal and go forward.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

WikiLeaks founder Assange joins massive pro-Palestinian protest in Sydney - War on Gaza
WikiLeaks founder Assange joins massive pro-Palestinian protest in Sydney - War on Gaza

Al-Ahram Weekly

time8 hours ago

  • Al-Ahram Weekly

WikiLeaks founder Assange joins massive pro-Palestinian protest in Sydney - War on Gaza

Tens of thousands of pro-Palestinian protesters including WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange marched across the Sydney Harbour Bridge on Sunday, closing the world famous landmark. Assange, who returned to Australia last year after his release from a high-security British prison, was pictured surrounded by family and marching alongside former Australian foreign minister and New South Wales premier Bob Carr. France, Britain and Canada have in recent weeks voiced, in some cases qualified, intentions to diplomatically recognise a Palestinian state as international anger and criticism have grown over starvation in Gaza. Australia has called for an end to the war in Gaza but has so far stopped short of a decision to recognise a Palestinian state. But in a joint statement with more than a dozen other nations on Tuesday it expressed the "willingness or the positive consideration... to recognise the state of Palestine as an essential step towards the two-State solution". The pro-Palestinian crowd braved heavy winds and rain to march across the bridge, chanting "ceasefire now" and "free Palestine". New South Wales police said it had deployed hundreds of extra staff across Sydney for the march. Mehreen Faruqi, the New South Wales senator for the left-wing Greens party, told the crowd gathered at central Sydney's Lang Park that the march would "make history". She called for the "harshest sanctions on Israel", accusing its forces of "massacring" Gazans, and criticised New South Wales premier Chris Minns for saying the protest should not go ahead. Dozens of marchers held up banners listing the names of thousands of Palestinian children killed by the Israeli army since the Gaza war broke out. Labor backbench MP Ed Husic attended the march and called for his ruling party, led by Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, to recognise a Palestinian state. Assange did not address the crowd or talk to the media. Israel is under mounting international pressure to end the bloodshed that has killed more than 60,000 Palestinians. The Harbour Bridge is over a kilometre long and was opened in 1932. Since then its twin parabolic arcs have become world famous, a symbol of both Sydney and of Australia. *This story was edited by Ahram Online. Follow us on: Facebook Instagram Whatsapp Short link:

Boiling Point in the Red Sea
Boiling Point in the Red Sea

Voice of Belady

time10 hours ago

  • Voice of Belady

Boiling Point in the Red Sea

Written by: Howaida Awad Ahmed The Red Sea has become an unsafe trap for any international ship passing through it on a round trip. A symbolic sign now reads: "Restricted Area", due to the complete control exerted by the Houthis in Yemen—who have come to the forefront of the scene after the temporary end of the war and conflict between Israel and Iran. The Houthis are proving their ability to continue the war independently of Iran, demonstrating their readiness and capability to launch fierce attacks and more strikes on the occupied territories. They are also effectively obstructing ships affiliated with the Israeli entity or the major powers that support it. On June 6, the Houthis attacked the Magic Seas ship, owned by a Greek shipping company and flying the Liberian flag. It was en route from the Chinese city of Zhuhai to the Suez Canal, naturally passing through the Red Sea. The Houthis attacked the ship using a small boat carrying armed pirates equipped with light weapons—rifles and RPGs. Drones and explosive boats later joined the attack, causing severe damage to the ship, bringing it close to sinking. The crew eventually abandoned it and left it stranded at sea. Days later, the Houthis attacked another ship named Eternity Sea, also Greek-owned and headed to Jeddah. Four of its crew members were killed, the ship was completely sunk, and the rest of the crew went missing after the Houthis detained six of them. On June 10, the Houthis launched a ballistic missile targeting Ben Gurion Airport in Tel Aviv. This indicates their continued targeting of the enemy's infrastructure, despite the end of the Iran-Israel conflict—where Iran is considered the Houthis' primary backer and motivator in Yemen. Two strikes within a single month on Ben Gurion Airport significantly harmed the Israeli economy, halting air traffic and causing substantial losses in the tourism sector. This forced international airlines to reconsider and adjust their operational plans within Israeli territory. These attacks, both maritime and aerial, have started to affect the global economy as a whole—and several countries, chiefly Egypt, are directly impacted. More than 75% of the Suez Canal's revenue has halted. The estimated loss of $7 billion from canal revenues may prompt the Egyptian state to seek alternative solutions if the canal remains inactive and ships continue to avoid this crucial global shipping route. To understand where things may be heading between the enemy and the Houthis, we must take a strategic analytical view of the escalating danger. The Houthis now have full control over all major Yemeni ports, including Ras Issa, Al-Salif, and the entire western coastline on the Red Sea. Additionally, the Houthis possess a sophisticated arsenal of ballistic missiles and drones. Their launches are systematic and carefully studied, carried out from fortified underground platforms that are difficult to detect even by satellites. They have learned their lessons well from the betrayals and espionage incidents inside Iran and have since changed and developed all of their strategies during the Iran-Israel war. One crucial card the Houthis now hold is the presence of Israeli and allied hostages in their custody. This gives them powerful leverage for negotiation and helps them solidify their presence domestically within Yemen and among the broader resistance axis, attracting more internal support and endorsement. Imposing an economic siege on Israel and pressuring the global economy is now part of the Houthis' broader strategy. These moves are costing the Israeli enemy billions of dollars. The port of Eilat has already declared bankruptcy as a result. This time, the enemy faces a distant and elusive foe, making it impossible to end the confrontation with a few air or naval strikes. A ground war is nearly impossible due to Yemen's rugged terrain—and should the enemy attempt such a move, not a single Israeli soldier would emerge from Yemeni soil. The psychological and material impact of the Houthi strikes on enemy airports and ports has reshaped global perceptions of the Israeli entity. It is now seen as an insecure state, making it an unattractive destination for investment or tourism—since critical targets could be struck at any moment. As a result, the Israeli government is trying to pressure Washington into launching another war on Yemen. However, the United States is adhering to the ceasefire agreement signed with the Houthis—unless American interests or citizens are directly attacked. Thus, Israel finds itself powerless and forced to deal with the Houthis alone—resorting to highly specific, calculated strikes aimed at disrupting Yemeni maritime navigation without engaging in a full-blown war or incurring further financial and military exhaustion. The fragile balance that Israel is attempting to maintain by targeting civilian infrastructure inside Yemen is pushing the Houthis into a state of maximum alert and readiness—likely resulting in further attacks against the entity and its colonial ambitions. The agreements between Israel, Iran, and the U.S. did not include the Houthi movement. Therefore, the Houthis operate with complete freedom—especially since their condition for ceasing attacks is the end of the occupation of Gaza. Israel's arrogance and refusal to include the Houthis in any treaties or negotiations may drag it into a dark tunnel of prolonged conflict with them. The Houthi ideology, which is triggering a painful global economic crisis, may ultimately yield results against Israel and its allies. Although Egypt is suffering from the temporary halt of a major investment—namely the Suez Canal—it appears to be a temporary issue. It may be resolved once the Israeli arrogance is broken, and their consecutive deep losses at the hands of the Houthis compel international pressure to put an end to the tragic situation in Gaza.

Which Products Could Get More Expensive under Trump's New Tariff Hikes?
Which Products Could Get More Expensive under Trump's New Tariff Hikes?

See - Sada Elbalad

time18 hours ago

  • See - Sada Elbalad

Which Products Could Get More Expensive under Trump's New Tariff Hikes?

Taarek Refaat The new round of tariffs, set to take effect next week, will immediately push up the cost of many imported goods from affected countries, with U.S. consumers likely to feel the impact in their wallets. While some companies have tried to absorb part of the costs, rising import duties may now force them to pass more of the burden onto customers. Here's what could get more expensive: Computers and Electronics Computers are among the most imported goods in the U.S., according to the Department of Commerce, with top suppliers including China, Mexico, Taiwan, Vietnam, and Malaysia. Chinese imports already face tariffs starting at 30%, which could rise further if no trade deal is reached by August 12. Imports from Taiwan, Vietnam, and Malaysia will see duties roughly double from current levels next week. India, while not a top-five supplier of computers, is a major source of electronics and will face tariffs of at least 25%. Prices for computers have already risen 5% year-on-year as of June, according to the Consumer Price Index. Yale University's Budget Lab estimates the new tariffs could drive electronics prices up 18.2% in the short term (2–3 years) and 7.7% in the long term (3–10 years). Clothing The U.S. heavily relies on imports for apparel, with China, Vietnam, Bangladesh, India, and Indonesia as major suppliers. Tariffs on these countries could raise clothing prices by 37.5% in the short term and 17.4% in the long term, adding pressure on households. Watches Swiss watches, worth over $4 billion in U.S. imports last year, are set to face 'reciprocal' tariffs of 39%. Leather goods, often tied to watch production, could see price hikes of 39.7% short term and 18.9% long term. Footwear China, Vietnam, and Indonesia dominate U.S. shoe imports, which will be hit with at least a 19% tariff starting next week. Leather-based products in this category could see similar price hikes to watches. Alcohol Imported wine and spirits account for around 35% of the U.S. alcohol market, according to the Wine & Spirits Wholesalers of America (WSWA). Tariffs on European Union imports — a key source of whiskey, vodka, and wine — will rise from 10% to 15%. Furniture Vietnam is the largest furniture supplier to the U.S., followed by China. The new tariffs are expected to lift import costs across this sector as well. Toys China and Vietnam lead U.S. toy exports. Industry groups warn that tariffs will increase retail prices, particularly as duties on Vietnamese goods add to existing levies on Chinese products. When Will Consumers Feel the Pinch? Many U.S. companies have stockpiled inventory in anticipation of higher import costs, delaying the immediate impact on retail prices. Goldman Sachs analysts estimate it could take roughly eight months for the full effect of tariffs to filter through to consumer prices. read more CBE: Deposits in Local Currency Hit EGP 5.25 Trillion Morocco Plans to Spend $1 Billion to Mitigate Drought Effect Gov't Approves Final Version of State Ownership Policy Document Egypt's Economy Expected to Grow 5% by the end of 2022/23- Minister Qatar Agrees to Supply Germany with LNG for 15 Years Business Oil Prices Descend amid Anticipation of Additional US Strategic Petroleum Reserves Business Suez Canal Records $704 Million, Historically Highest Monthly Revenue Business Egypt's Stock Exchange Earns EGP 4.9 Billion on Tuesday Business Wheat delivery season commences on April 15 News Israeli-Linked Hadassah Clinic in Moscow Treats Wounded Iranian IRGC Fighters Arts & Culture "Jurassic World Rebirth" Gets Streaming Date News China Launches Largest Ever Aircraft Carrier News Ayat Khaddoura's Final Video Captures Bombardment of Beit Lahia Business Egyptian Pound Undervalued by 30%, Says Goldman Sachs Videos & Features Tragedy Overshadows MC Alger Championship Celebration: One Fan Dead, 11 Injured After Stadium Fall Lifestyle Get to Know 2025 Eid Al Adha Prayer Times in Egypt Arts & Culture South Korean Actress Kang Seo-ha Dies at 31 after Cancer Battle Arts & Culture Lebanese Media: Fayrouz Collapses after Death of Ziad Rahbani Sports Get to Know 2025 WWE Evolution Results

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store