Trump spares Russia from tariffs, but oil price plunge could wreck war economy regardless
U.S. President Donald Trump has inadvertently hit Russia's economy after his "Liberation Day" tariffs caused oil prices to drop drastically on April 7, with potentially massive ramifications for the Kremlin's ability to fund its ongoing war in Ukraine.
Russia has so far failed to agree to a full ceasefire, and while Trump has been vocal about being "pissed off" and "very angry" with the Kremlin, he is yet to take any concrete action to force Russia to end its full-scale invasion.
He has multiple forms of leverage he could use against the Kremlin — increasing military aid to Ukraine, strengthening the enforcement of existing sanctions, or imposing additional tariffs on countries that buy Russian oil.
So far, he has not used any of it, but his "Liberation Day" tariffs imposed on nearly every country in the world — but notably not Russia — may end up forcing Russian President Vladimir Putin to reconsider his options — and the Kremlin is already panicking.
Russia's economy is heavily dependent on oil revenues, which make up around 30% of its total state budget.
As the war in Ukraine has dragged on, the Kremlin has massively increased defense spending, and 32% of the 2025 budget expenditure was allocated to the military and its war machine in Ukraine.
But there's an issue — when drawing up the 2025 budget, the Kremlin budgeted for an oil price of $70 per barrel. But on April 7, the price of Russian Urals oil tumbled to a 21-month low of $51.54 per barrel on the Baltic port of Primorsk, according to Argus Media. "If the average price is lower (than $70 per barrel) throughout the year, Russia will have less money to earn and spend, especially to cover growing expenses connected to illegal actions against Ukraine," Wojciech Jakobik, a Warsaw-based energy analyst, told the Kyiv Independent."Russia's National Wealth Fund would be depleted faster, and Russia would need a truce quicker," he added.
Ukraine has long been targeting Russian oil assets with drones in an attempt to deplete the Kremlin's oil revenue, but Trump has done a more effective job in recent days by dragging the world into economic uncertainty. Trump's 34% tariffs on China caused Beijing to retaliate with its own 34% tariffs on American goods. The White House responded on April 7 by saying it would add an additional 50% tariff to Chinese goods on top of last week's 34% tariff and the previous 20% tariff, bringing the total to over 100%. The EU, which was slapped with 20% tariffs on its goods, has also threatened retaliation.
Trump's actions sparked concerns of a global recession, leading global oil prices to plunge in anticipation of a slowdown in economic activity.
So while Russia was spared the imposition of tariffs, it's now suffering heavily due to the global ramifications of the unfolding global trade war.
The price drop ignited panic in Moscow, and the Kremlin is monitoring the "extremely turbulent, tense" situation, Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov told Interfax on April 7.
"Our economic authorities are monitoring this situation very closely and, of course, are doing and will do everything necessary to minimize the consequences of this international economic storm for our economy," he added.
Peskov laid the blame squarely on Trump's tariffs but there are other factors contributing to the drop in oil revenue for Russia.
Russian fossil fuel revenues were declining even before the tariffs, partly due to American and British sanctions in January which caused "shadow fleet" shipments to drop by 21% in February, the Center for Research on Energy and Clear Air (CREA) reported. The sanctions have also lowered demand for Russian crude in China and India — Moscow's main markets. On top of this, Trump's tariffs are likely to hurt China's economy in particular and consequently, its oil demand. "Since the start of the war with Ukraine, Russia has become significantly dependent on China. Therefore, it's more vulnerable to the health of the Chinese economy," Lilit Gevorgyan, associate director of economics at S&P Global Market Intelligence, told the Kyiv Independent.
Additionally, the OPEC+ oil cartel, of which Russia is a member, has recently unwound restrictions on oil production faster than expected, John Gawthrop, editor at Argus Eurasia Energy, told the Kyiv Independent.
Trump previously said Russia's war could end "immediately" if OPEC+ lowered oil prices. The cartel, consisting of 12 countries, accounts for 40% of the global oil production and 60% of global oil trade.OPEC+ pledged to increase oil production by 411,000 barrels per day instead of the expected 140,000 per day, starting next month. This will push down prices as there is more oil on the market. "There's massive uncertainty about what's going on in the global economy and you've also got more oil coming out into the market. It creates the perfect storm," Gawthrop said.
Banks have cut forecasts for Brent crude, the global benchmark, to as low as $60 per barrel. As recently as late March, Brent prices reached $72.52 a barrel.
Read also: As Ukraine, Russia agree to ceasefire at sea, Moscow's battered Black Sea Fleet is set to get a reprieve
It doesn't look good for Russia — reduced income from energy would add additional pressure to its already strained economy. Moscow is balancing funding living standards, a war, and macroeconomic stability.
Sanctions alone haven't yet toppled its economy largely due to the Russian energy sector raking in cash.
Russia's state budget earned around $100 billion from crude exports alone in 2024, according to S&P Global Market Intelligence."If you take out a big chunk of revenue that had been expected, it becomes harder to maintain that already precarious balance. Something may have to give," Gawthrop said. Russia could cut social spending and investment activities to fund its war machine, but continued prices below $70 per barrel could affect its ability to do so in the longer term, Jakobik said.
And if oil prices fall even further, it could force Moscow into seeking a truce with Ukraine quicker, he added.
Banks don't expect Brent prices to come back this year or next. Goldman Sachs forecast Brent prices would be $62 per barrel by December 2025 and $55 by December 2026, Reuters reported. With OPEC+ increasing oil production, it could push down prices even more. If the cartel goes further into a "price war," it runs the risk of dragging global oil prices below $60 per barrel, which will bring Russian oil down too, Jakobik said. In 2020, during the COVID-19 pandemic, Riyadh faced off with Moscow, drastically increasing oil production and causing prices to drop below sustainable levels for producers. The Russian ruble fell 7% against the dollar as a result. Another face-off between Moscow and Riyadh is unlikely as Russia is complying more with OPEC+ regulation, Gawthrop said.
But Kazakhstan has ramped up production recently, which could cause prices to fall to a painful level for Russia. "If oil prices fall to a level that is deemed to be too uncomfortable, OPEC+ will probably rein in production again. Although when we talk about uncomfortable price levels, the Saudis can take much more pain in terms of low oil prices than Russia can," Gawthrop said.Trump is dragging the world into another unprecedented economic catastrophe that could mirror the 2008 financial crash or pandemic, Gawthrop added.
Unless the U.S. reverses its tariff policy, he doesn't expect the market to rebound anytime soon.
Read also: Putin issued a decree. Now, millions of Ukrainians face an impossible decision
We've been working hard to bring you independent, locally-sourced news from Ukraine. Consider supporting the Kyiv Independent.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Associated Press
22 minutes ago
- Associated Press
Electra Wins Audience Prize at WMF 2025 for Advancing Battery Intelligence with AI
BOSTON, MA, UNITED STATES, June 9, 2025 / / -- Electra, the Boston-based company leader in AI-driven battery intelligence, has been awarded the Audience Prize at WMF - We Make Future 2025, Italy's largest innovation and technology festival. Selected as one of six international finalists from thousands of applicants, Electra presented on the event's Mainstage in front of more than 5,000 attendees and a global audience from over 90 countries. During the high-stakes startup competition, Electra's CMO Giovanni Rossi delivered a three-minute pitch focused on one of the most pressing challenges of the energy transition: making battery systems more intelligent, reliable, and efficient. 'As solar and wind become central to global energy production, the role of batteries in storing and delivering energy at the right time is more critical than ever,' said Giovanni Rossi during his pitch. 'However, today's systems suffer from limited monetization potential, unpredictable failures, and slow innovation cycles'. Electra tackles today's battery system challenges with two proprietary software platforms. EnPower is a digital twin solution that accelerates the design, testing, and integration of advanced battery systems, while EVE-Ai is a real-time engine that continuously monitors, optimizes, and controls battery performance. Together, they empower manufacturers and operators to cut development time and costs, predict faults up to three months in advance, extend battery lifespan up to 40%, enhance safety and reliability, and unlock new revenue opportunities (up to a 15% annual increase in ROI). Fully chemistry-agnostic, the system supports a wide range of applications, from electric vehicles to e-mobility to grid-scale energy storage (BESS). Electra's offering stands out in a fragmented battery software market by combining modeling, analytics, and control in a unified platform. The Volta Foundation also recognized the company as one of the few global leaders at the intersection of AI and battery technology. Founded in Boston by Fabrizio Martini, a former NASA engineer, Electra now operates across the United States, Europe, India, and South Korea. Following a successful $21 million Series A, the company is now scaling its international presence and fast-tracking product innovation to support the next phase of growth. Electra shared the WMF 2025 stage with five other finalist startups: Invigilo AI, ALBA Robot, Helix Carbon, CircularPlace, and AndromedAI. The event was hosted by Veronica Maffei and Tiarne Hawkins, and organized by Search On Media Group. The pitch is available to watch here on YouTube. About Electra Vehicles Electra Vehicles is the leading AI-driven cleantech and B2B software company dedicated to unlocking the full potential of battery technology. Our mission is to drive society forward by powering a sustainable, electric future. We deliver cutting-edge AI/ML-enabled solutions and advanced data analytics to Automotive OEMs, Tier 1 Suppliers, Battery Manufacturers, Fleet Operators, and BESS Operators. By transforming battery performance, safety, and efficiency, we empower key stakeholders to lead the transition toward a cleaner, electrified world. Giovanni Rossi Electra Vehicles +1 617-741-8736 [email protected] Legal Disclaimer: EIN Presswire provides this news content 'as is' without warranty of any kind. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images, videos, licenses, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information contained in this article. If you have any complaints or copyright issues related to this article, kindly contact the author above.


Politico
22 minutes ago
- Politico
‘It's made up': Democrats say Rubio isn't playing it straight about foreign aid cuts
Democrats are accusing the Trump administration of lying about the state of America's top global health program following massive cuts to foreign aid led by Elon Musk and his Department of Government Efficiency. The administration has cut more than a hundred contracts and grants from the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief, the HIV and AIDS program credited with saving millions of lives in poor countries. President Donald Trump has shut down the agency that signed off on most PEPFAR spending and fired other staffers who supported it. But Secretary of State Marco Rubio suggested Democrats' concerns are overblown, considering that PEPFAR remains '85 percent operative.' Rubio has made the claim repeatedly in budget testimony before Congress, but neither he nor the State Department will provide a detailed accounting to back up the figure. For flummoxed Democrats, it indicates a broader problem: How to respond to Trump's budget requests when his administration refuses to spend the money Congress has provided. Trump last month asked Congress to cut PEPFAR's budget for next year by 40 percent. 'It's made up,' Hawaii Sen. Brian Schatz said when asked by POLITICO about the 85 percent figure. 'It's the most successful, bipartisan, highly efficient life-saving thing that the United States has ever done and Elon Musk went in and trashed it.' Schatz confronted Rubio about the cuts at a Foreign Relations Committee hearing in May, telling him: 'You are required to spend 100 percent of the money.' Rubio said the 15 percent cut targeted programs that weren't delivering the services the government was paying for. He pointed to fraud in Namibia and armed conflict in Sudan as reasons for slashed funding, although it isn't clear those instances were related to PEPFAR. Asked repeatedly by POLITICO for more clarity on what the 85 percent figure represents, a State Department spokesperson said that 'PEPFAR-funded programs that deliver HIV care and treatment or prevention of mother to child transmission services are operational for a majority of beneficiaries.' Data collection is ongoing to capture recent updates to programming, the spokesperson also said, adding: 'We expect to have updated figures later this year.' The day after his exchange with Schatz, Rubio told the House Foreign Affairs Committee that he meant 85 percent of PEPFAR's beneficiaries were still getting U.S. assistance. But the goal, he said, was to pass off all of the work to the countries where the beneficiaries live. 'We're by far the most generous nation on Earth on foreign aid, and will continue to be by far with no other equal, including China, despite all this alarmist stuff,' he said. People who worked on implementing PEPFAR, both inside and outside the government, as well as advocates for HIV prevention and care, are alarmed nonetheless. A State Department report from the month before Trump took office underscores the breadth of its services. In fiscal 2024, the report says, PEPFAR provided medication to 20.6 million people, including 566,000 children, HIV prevention services to 2.3 million girls and women, and testing for 83.8 million. After DOGE dismantled the U.S. Agency for International Development in February, several recipients of PEPFAR grants and contracts said they'd had to lay off staff even as Rubio insisted that life-saving aid was continuing. Rubio's skeptics point to the Trump administration's cancellation of more than 100 HIV grants and contracts, representing about 20 percent of PEPFAR's total budget, according to an analysis by the Center for Global Development, an anti-poverty group. In addition to shutting down USAID, the agency that dispensed and monitored much of that funding, the administration fired experts from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's global health division who worked on the program, including those specializing in maternal and child HIV. 'I'm not sure where he got these numbers,' Delaware Sen. Chris Coons, a senior Democrat on the Foreign Relations Committee, said of Rubio's 85 percent claim. The lack of clarity has angered HIV activists, who protested against the PEPFAR cuts during the budget hearings where Rubio testified. 'It's unconscionable and alarming to know that 130 days into this administration, Rubio has overseen the completely unnecessary decimation of life-saving services to millions of people, then lying about that fact over and over again,' said Asia Russell, executive director of Health GAP, a nonprofit working on access to HIV treatment in developing countries. Russell was among those arrested for disrupting Rubio's House Foreign Affairs hearing. The confusion around how much of America's celebrated global health program is still operational adds to the uncertainty about the Trump administration's spending plans for the funds Congress appropriated for 2025. And it comes as Congress gears up to consider the president's 2026 budget request. Last month, Trump asked Congress to reduce the PEPFAR budget from $4.8 billion this year to $2.9 billion next. And on Tuesday, the White House asked Congress to claw back $900 million Congress had provided for HIV/AIDS services and other global health initiatives this year, but insisted that it was keeping programs that provide treatment intact. Even if the Trump administration isn't cutting treatment funding, it has cut other awards that ensure drugs reach people, Russell said. She pointed to a terminated USAID award that was delivering drugs to faith-based nonprofit clinics in Uganda. 'The medicine is literally languishing on shelves in a massive warehouse behind the U.S. embassy,' Russell said. Coons said prevention, if that's what's on the chopping block, is as important as treatment: 'For us to step back from supporting not just treatment but prevention puts us at risk of a reemergence of a more lethal, drug resistant form of HIV/AIDS.' Leading Republicans aren't objecting, even though PEPFAR was created by then-President George W. Bush and long enjoyed bipartisan support. Senate Foreign Relations Chair Jim Risch of Idaho declined to comment when POLITICO asked him about the program. Earlier this year, Risch said PEPFAR was 'in jeopardy' after the Biden administration acknowledged that Mozambique, a country in east Africa, had misused program funds to provide at least 21 abortions. Rep. Brian Mast (R-Fla.), who leads the House Foreign Affairs Committee, said he agrees with the cuts Trump has made and suggested he would want more in the future. 'We also need to be asking the question: How long should American taxpayers borrow money to fund HIV medication for 20 million Africans?' Mast said. The top Democratic appropriators in the House and Senate accused the White House in late May of failing to provide detailed and legally required information about what the administration is doing with billions of dollars Congress directed it to spend. Sen. Patty Murray of Washington and Rep. Rosa DeLauro of Connecticut wrote to the White House Office of Management and Budget that the administration's decision to not abide by a funding law Trump signed in March has 'degraded Congress' capacity to carry out its legislative responsibilities' and move forward with fiscal 2026 spending bills. It has also clouded plans for reupping the law that directs the PEPFAR program. It expired in March. Mast has said that Congress would consider PEPFAR's future by September, as part of a larger debate about State Department priorities. But Democrats wonder how they could move forward with reauthorizing the program given the uncertainty surrounding it, said a Senate Democratic aide speaking anonymously to share internal debates.
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Shell Approves Final Investment Decision for Aphrodite Field
Shell plc SHEL, a London-based integrated oil and gas company, has officially sanctioned the final investment decision for its Aphrodite gas project, located offshore Trinidad and Tobago. This is a significant step in the multinational energy producer's strategy to secure long-term supply for its regional liquefied natural gas ('LNG') operations. The move signals renewed confidence in the country's gas-producing potential and aligns with Shell's global ambition to expand its integrated gas business. Shell expects the first gas from the Aphrodite field by 2027, with peak production estimated at around 18,400 barrels of oil equivalent per day (boe/d). Situated in the East Coast Marine Area ('ECMA'), one of the richest hydrocarbon zones in Trinidad and Tobago, the Aphrodite field will serve as a critical backfill source for the Atlantic LNG facility, which has been grappling with persistent natural gas shortages. The Atlantic LNG plant, in which Shell holds a 45% equity stake, possesses an installed capacity of 12 million metric tons per annum (mtpa) of supercooled gas. However, chronic supply constraints have prevented the company from realizing its full potential of 5.5 mtpa LNG share. With the Dragon gas project in Venezuela remaining inaccessible following U.S. license revocations, the Aphrodite development emerges as a strategic substitute to stabilize and possibly enhance feedstock volumes for Atlantic LNG. Shell underlined the significance of Aphrodite in extending its gas production footprint within the ECMA, which is already home to flagship assets such as Dolphin, Starfish, Bounty and Endeavour fields. Currently, Shell's daily natural gas production in Trinidad is more than 600 million cubic feet per day. The development of the Aphrodite field supports greater use of existing offshore facilities and improved asset performance. The final investment decision not only highlights Shell's commitment to Trinidad and Tobago's energy sector but also signals its continued confidence in the island nation's fiscal and regulatory environment. Trinidad remains a strategic hub in Shell's global LNG supply chain, offering proximity to North America and Europe's gas markets and access to an established LNG export infrastructure. Shell aims to improve Atlantic LNG's operational reliability by increasing gas supply from Aphrodite, helping to address years of underutilization. This aligns with broader objectives to decarbonize the global energy system while meeting rising demand for low-carbon, transition fuels. The East Coast Marine Area plays a vital and ongoing role in Trinidad's gas production landscape. Shell's renewed focus on ECMA, through capital-efficient developments like Aphrodite, underscores the area's robust production potential and geological promise. ECMA fields have delivered consistent output and high uptime, ensuring Shell maintains a reliable production base that complements its LNG export ambitions. With the addition of Aphrodite, Shell is leveraging economies of scale and synergies with adjacent infrastructure, thereby lowering unit development costs and enhancing project returns. This smart capital allocation strategy is reflective of Shell's disciplined approach to upstream investments. Natural gas continues to play a vital role in global decarbonization strategies as it provides a cleaner-burning alternative to coal and oil. Shell's investment in the Aphrodite field represents a deliberate move to secure low-carbon energy sources that are reliable, flexible and readily marketable in high-demand regions. With long-term LNG contracts and new spot-market opportunities emerging globally, Shell is positioning itself as a leader in clean energy transitions. Aphrodite will contribute directly to this mission by supplying stable gas volumes to both domestic and export markets. While the Aphrodite project moves forward, Shell remains cautious about regional geopolitics. The revocation of licenses for the Dragon gas field in Venezuela has limited access to significant untapped reserves. Consequently, Shell has realigned its portfolio to prioritize value generation from proven reserves in geopolitically stable areas, including Trinidad and Tobago. This strategic redirection illustrates Shell's agile resource planning and responsiveness to evolving international policy constraints, ensuring project continuity while minimizing geopolitical exposure. Shell has committed to deploying advanced subsea and drilling technologies in the development of the Aphrodite field. Emphasis will be placed on minimizing the project's environmental footprint, with strict adherence to Trinidad's environmental regulations and global ESG best practices. Sustainable development remains a top priority. Shell aims to achieve this through reduced flaring, efficient resource utilization and integration of digital monitoring systems to track emissions and equipment performance in real-time. The Aphrodite project is poised to bring substantial economic benefits to Trinidad and Tobago, including job creation, increased government revenues and long-term energy security. With declining production from mature fields, new projects like Aphrodite are essential for sustaining output levels and maintaining the country's reputation as a reliable LNG exporter. Furthermore, Shell's investment will likely stimulate ancillary services, subcontractor activity and skills transfer within the local workforce, cementing its role as a partner in national energy development. Shell's final investment decision on the Aphrodite gas project reaffirms its dedication to growing the LNG supply base while strengthening Trinidad's position in the global energy value chain. With production set to commence in 2027 and infrastructure already in place, Aphrodite is poised to become a critical supply source for the region's LNG markets. As global energy dynamics evolve, projects like Aphrodite will play a central role in enabling energy security, advancing clean energy transitions and ensuring reliable LNG delivery across international markets. Currently, SHEL has a Zacks Rank #4 (Sell). Investors interested in the energy sector might look at some better-ranked stocks like Subsea 7 SUBCY, which sports a Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy), Paramount Resources Ltd. PRMRF and RPC, Inc. RES, each holding a Zacks Rank #2 (Buy) at present. You can see the complete list of today's Zacks #1 Rank stocks here. Subsea 7 is valued at $5.26 billion. The company is a global leader in delivering offshore projects and services for the energy industry, specializing in subsea engineering, construction and installation. Headquartered in Luxembourg, Subsea 7 supports both the oil & gas and renewable energy sectors with integrated solutions, including subsea infrastructure, heavy lifting and life-of-field services. Paramount Resources is valued at $2.04 billion. It is a Calgary-based energy company engaged in the exploration and development of conventional and unconventional petroleum and natural gas reserves across Canada. Paramount Resources' key assets include significant holdings in the Duvernay, Montney, Muskwa and Besa River formations located in Alberta and northeast British Columbia. RPC is valued at $ 992.54 million. The company provides a wide range of oilfield services and equipment to support the exploration, production and maintenance of oil and gas wells globally. RPC operates through Technical Services—offering pressure pumping, cementing, and well control—and Support Services, which rents tools and provides pipe handling and inspection. Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report RPC, Inc. (RES) : Free Stock Analysis Report Subsea 7 SA (SUBCY) : Free Stock Analysis Report Paramount Resources Ltd. (PRMRF) : Free Stock Analysis Report Shell PLC Unsponsored ADR (SHEL) : Free Stock Analysis Report This article originally published on Zacks Investment Research ( Zacks Investment Research