From Product to Practice: What Lawyers Really Want From AI, According to MiAI Law CEO Laina Chan
In the latest interview from Xraised, 'From Product to Practice: What Lawyers Really Want From AI', award-winning barrister and MiAI Law CEO Laina Chan breaks down the gap between traditional legaltech tools and the real-world demands of lawyers. Rather than hype, Chan brings a grounded, legal-first approach to AI—offering a clear vision of how Legal AI Research should serve the legal profession.
MiAI Law: The AI Built by a Barrister, Not Just Engineers
Founded by Laina Chan, a practicing construction law barrister with over two decades at the bar, MiAI Law was developed with one question in mind: What do lawyers actually need from AI?
'It's not just about getting quick answers,' Chan says. 'Lawyers need responses they can trust—rooted in legal principles, backed by citations, and structured to match the way we think.'
With a legal architecture designed by Chan herself, MiAI Law delivers fast, accurate, footnoted answers sourced from primary case law and legislation—removing the guesswork that plagues generic AI tools.
Chan did not build MiAI Law to impress VCs. She built it because she was sick of legal tech that couldn't reason—and wasting hours doing case law the hard way. Most tools were fast but shallow, smart-sounding but legally useless. MiAI Law is different: it thinks like a lawyer because it was built by one, with legal reasoning, traceability, and primary sources at its core—not shortcuts.
Real Legal AI Research, Not Just Flashy Tech
Many AI tools fail lawyers by focusing on form over function. They sound smart but miss legal nuance. MiAI Law changes that. The platform reasons from first principles, traverses full legal databases, and ties every conclusion to a verifiable source.
'Generic models hallucinate. MiAI Law doesn't,' Chan explains. 'It's been trained to think like a barrister, not a chatbot.'
In benchmark testing, MiAI Law answered 30 high-level legal questions in under two hours—research that previously took weeks of manual work. It's not about replacing lawyers. It's about giving them a competitive edge.
What Lawyers Really Want From AI: Speed With Substance
Chan highlights a key misconception: that lawyers simply want faster tools. In reality, MiAI Law focuses on transparency, accuracy, and efficiency—turning AI into a legal research partner, not a risk factor.
Every MiAI Law report includes footnotes and direct hyperlinks to relevant cases or statutes, allowing lawyers to verify and explore results with full context. Whether they're in a mediation, drafting pleadings, or validating strategy, users know exactly where the information comes from.
AI Is Not the Threat—It's the Ally
Chan addresses the lingering fear that AI could replace legal professionals:
'AI won't take your job. But someone using AI effectively might,' she notes. 'I built MiAI Law to help myself—not replace myself.'
Rather than automating legal judgment, MiAI Law frees up time so lawyers can focus on what truly matters: strategy, advocacy, and outcomes. It gives them the capacity to be sharper, faster, and better informed—without compromising ethics or quality.
See the Interview, Explore the Future
Watch the full conversation with Laina Chan and learn how MiAI Law is building the next generation of Legal AI Research:
From Product to Practice: What Lawyers Really Want From AI.
Learn more about MiAI Law's products and legal-first design:
🔗 https://miai.law
Media Contact:
Ethan Hunt
[email protected]
Gianmarco Giordaniello
Xraised
email us here
Visit us on social media:
X
Legal Disclaimer:
EIN Presswire provides this news content 'as is' without warranty of any kind. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images, videos, licenses, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information contained in this article. If you have any complaints or copyright issues related to this article, kindly contact the author above.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Associated Press
9 minutes ago
- Associated Press
Qantas fined $59M for illegal pandemic layoffs
MELBOURNE (AP) — A judge on Monday fined Qantas Airways 90 million Australian dollars ($59 million) for illegally firing more than 1,800 ground staff at the start of the Covid-19 pandemic. The penalty is in addition to the AU$120 million ($78 million) in compensation that Australia's biggest airline had already agreed to pay its former employees. Australian Federal Court Justice Michael Lee said the outsourcing of 1,820 baggage handler and cleaner jobs at Australian airports in late 2020 was the 'largest and most significant contravention' of relevant Australian labor laws in their 120-year history. Qantas agreed in December last year to pay AU$120 million ($78 million) in compensation to former staff after seven High Court judges unanimously rejected the Sydney-based airline's appeal against the judgment that outsourcing their jobs was illegal. The Transport Workers Union, which took the airline to court, had argued the airline should receive the largest fine available — AU$121,212,000 ($78,969,735). Lee ruled that the minimum fine to create a deterrence should be AU$90 million ($59 million), noting that Qantas executives had expected to save AU$125 million ($81 million) a year through outsourcing the jobs. Lee questioned the sincerity of Qantas's apology for its illegal conduct, noting that the airline later unsuccessfully argued that it owed no compensation to its former staff. 'If any further evidence was needed of the unrelenting and aggressive litigation strategy adopted in this case by Qantas, it is provided by this effort directed to denying any compensation whatsoever to those in respect of whom Qantas was publicly professing regret for their misfortune,' Lee said. 'I do think that the people in charge of Qantas now have some genuine regret, but this more likely reflects the damage that this case has done to the company rather than remorse for the damage done to the affected workers,' Lee added. Qantas chief executive Vanessa Hudson, who was the airline's chief financial officer during the layoffs, said in a statement after Monday's decision: 'We sincerely apologize to each and every one of the 1,820 ground handling employees and to their families who suffered as a result.' 'The decision to outsource five years ago, particularly during such an uncertain time, caused genuine hardship for many of our former team and their families,' she said. 'Over the past 18 months we've worked hard to change the way we operate as part of our efforts to rebuild trust with our people and our customers. This remains our highest priority as we work to earn back the trust we lost,' she added. Lee ruled that AU$50 million ($33 million) of the fine go to the union, because no Australian government agency had shown interest in investigating or prosecuting Qantas. 'But for the union … , Qantas' contravening conduct would never have been exposed and it would never have been held to account for its unlawful conduct,' Lee said. 'Hence the union has brought to the attention of the court a substantial and significant transgression of a public obligation by a powerful and substantial employer,' Lee added. A hearing will be held at a later date to decide where the remaining AU$40 million ($26 million) of the fine will go. Michael Kaine, national secretary of the union that represents 60,000 members, said he felt vindicated by Monday's ruling, which ends a five-year legal battle that Qantas had been widely expected to win. 'It is a significant — the most significant — industrial outcome in Australia's history and it sends a really clear message to Qantas and to every employer in Australia: Treat your work force illegally and you will be held accountable,' Kaine told reporters. 'Against all the odds, we took on a behemoth that had shown itself to be ruthless and we won,' Kaine added. Qantas has admitted illegally dealing with passengers as well as employees in its responses to pandemic economic challenges. Last year, Qantas agreed to pay AU$120 million ($78 million) in compensation and a fine for selling tickets on thousands of cancelled flights. The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission, a consumer watchdog, sued the airline in the Federal Court alleging that Qantas engaged in false, misleading or deceptive conduct by advertising tickets for more than 8,000 flights from May 2021 through to July 2022 that had already been canceled.
Yahoo
8 hours ago
- Yahoo
Centrelink reveals 'common misconception' about $1,732 pension payment as 'soft retirement' trend emerges
Retirement is often the last thing people want to think about. Life gets busy, and planning for something years, or even decades away, can feel overwhelming. But putting it off can lead to missed opportunities. For those approaching retirement age, the good news is that it's never too late to start. Sure, the best time to plan may have been 20 years ago, but the second-best time is now. Whether you're years away or just around the corner from retirement, Services Australia has helped me put together some important questions you need to ask yourself. When are you ready to retire? Ideally, you retire when you feel financially and emotionally ready. When you've built up the resources to enjoy the lifestyle you envision for your later years. That financial base may include superannuation or investments, and it may also include support from the Age Pension. Some people choose to retire gradually rather than stopping work altogether, often referred to as a 'soft retirement'. This can offer both financial flexibility and a smoother emotional transition to this stage of your life. Will you rely on Age Pension? To qualify for the Age Pension, you need to be 67 or older, meet our residence requirements, and have income and assets under the limits. If you're eligible, the amount you get will vary depending on your situation. For example, a couple could currently receive a maximum of $1,732.20 per fortnight. A common misconception is that you have to be fully retired to claim the Age Pension. In fact, you can continue working and still receive part of the Age Pension, depending on how much you earn. How can the Work Bonus help you? The Work Bonus is designed to support older Australians to keep working if they choose to, while they get Age Pension. It allows you to earn up to $300 per fortnight from employment without it being counted under the income test. If you don't work, you'll have $300 credit added to your Work Bonus balance each fortnight until it reaches the maximum of $11,800 credit. You can use your Work Bonus balance to offset eligible income if you start working. This gives you the flexibility to take on casual or part-time work while continuing to receive a pension payment. This 'soft retirement' approach can make a huge difference – not just to your bank account, but to your peace of mind. Staying engaged in the workforce can also provide social connection and a strong sense of purpose – which I can personally attest to. What about super and investments? Whether you've already thought about your superannuation or are just starting to consider it, it's worth exploring how your savings, investments and potential pension payments will work together to support you throughout retirement. You have two main options: Manage your own investments, using tools, calculators, and online information Seek professional financial advice, where a planner can guide you through options suited to your goals, risk tolerance, and income needs. Managing your own finances can be empowering but also comes with full responsibility. Professional help, while it may involve a fee, can simplify complex decisions and help create a tailored plan to suit your circumstances. For example, more conservative investors may prefer secure options like bank accounts and term deposits. This doesn't necessarily require financial advice but getting help to clarify your investment style and timeline can be worthwhile. What free financial help is available? If you're not ready to take the plunge into retirement investment strategy just yet, or you're not in a financial position to engage with a financial planner, there's free help available. Services Australia offers a free and confidential Financial Information Service (FIS). FIS can help you understand the financial side of retirement, including superannuation, pensions, investments, and more. The service doesn't provide personal financial advice, but it can provide factual, impartial information to help you make informed financial decisions. You can contact them by calling 132 300 and saying 'Financial Information Service' when prompted. If this all seems a bit daunting, a good place to start could also be the 'Retirement years' page on the Services Australia in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
8 hours ago
- Yahoo
ASX Penny Stocks To Watch In August 2025
Australian shares are poised for a modest rise, closing out the week with a slight advance, as investors remain largely unfazed by recent economic events and global market fluctuations. Despite this subdued backdrop, the allure of penny stocks persists, offering potential opportunities for those willing to explore beyond established names. Although the term "penny stocks" may seem outdated, it still captures the essence of investing in smaller or newer companies that could provide significant value when backed by strong financial health. Top 10 Penny Stocks In Australia Name Share Price Market Cap Financial Health Rating Alfabs Australia (ASX:AAL) A$0.445 A$127.53M ★★★★☆☆ EZZ Life Science Holdings (ASX:EZZ) A$2.39 A$112.74M ★★★★★★ GTN (ASX:GTN) A$0.405 A$77.22M ★★★★★★ IVE Group (ASX:IGL) A$2.99 A$461M ★★★★★☆ West African Resources (ASX:WAF) A$2.77 A$3.16B ★★★★★★ Regal Partners (ASX:RPL) A$3.12 A$1.05B ★★★★★★ Bravura Solutions (ASX:BVS) A$1.925 A$862.98M ★★★★★★ Austco Healthcare (ASX:AHC) A$0.37 A$135.23M ★★★★★★ Bisalloy Steel Group (ASX:BIS) A$4.62 A$219.22M ★★★★★★ CTI Logistics (ASX:CLX) A$1.82 A$146.59M ★★★★☆☆ Click here to see the full list of 451 stocks from our ASX Penny Stocks screener. Let's dive into some prime choices out of the screener. Emeco Holdings Simply Wall St Financial Health Rating: ★★★★★☆ Overview: Emeco Holdings Limited offers rental services for surface and underground mining equipment, along with complementary equipment and mining services in Australia, with a market cap of A$478.48 million. Operations: Emeco Holdings' revenue is primarily derived from its Rental segment, which generated A$579.43 million, and its Workshops segment, contributing A$292.97 million. Market Cap: A$478.48M Emeco Holdings Limited presents a compelling case among penny stocks with its strong financial health. The company trades at a significant discount to its estimated fair value and has demonstrated high-quality earnings. Its debt management is robust, with interest payments well-covered by EBIT and operating cash flow covering 84.3% of debt. The net debt to equity ratio stands at a satisfactory 26%, reflecting prudent financial handling, while short-term assets exceed short-term liabilities. However, the board's inexperience and low return on equity may pose challenges. Recent conference presentations highlight ongoing engagement with stakeholders and potential growth initiatives. Navigate through the intricacies of Emeco Holdings with our comprehensive balance sheet health report here. Gain insights into Emeco Holdings' future direction by reviewing our growth report. MFF Capital Investments Simply Wall St Financial Health Rating: ★★★★★★ Overview: MFF Capital Investments Limited is an investment firm manager with a market capitalization of A$2.68 billion. Operations: MFF Capital Investments Limited does not report specific revenue segments. Market Cap: A$2.68B MFF Capital Investments stands out in the penny stock arena with its robust financial health, boasting no debt and substantial short-term assets of A$2.9 billion that comfortably cover both short and long-term liabilities. Trading at a significant discount to its estimated fair value, MFF offers high-quality earnings despite a slight decline in revenue and net income over the past year. The company maintains stable weekly volatility and delivers a reliable 3.49% dividend yield. However, recent negative earnings growth contrasts with its strong five-year profit trajectory, while return on equity remains below the desired threshold. Click here to discover the nuances of MFF Capital Investments with our detailed analytical financial health report. Explore historical data to track MFF Capital Investments' performance over time in our past results report. Strickland Metals Simply Wall St Financial Health Rating: ★★★★☆☆ Overview: Strickland Metals Limited is an Australian company focused on the exploration of mineral resources, with a market cap of A$339.35 million. Operations: Strickland Metals Limited has not reported any revenue segments. Market Cap: A$339.35M Strickland Metals presents a complex picture in the penny stock landscape. The company is pre-revenue, with less than A$1 million in revenue, and remains unprofitable with increasing losses over the past five years. Despite being debt-free and having short-term assets of A$14.4 million that exceed both its short and long-term liabilities, Strickland faces challenges with a cash runway of less than one year if current free cash flow trends persist. The management team and board are relatively inexperienced, averaging 1.2 years in tenure, while recent significant insider selling may raise concerns about internal confidence in future prospects. Dive into the specifics of Strickland Metals here with our thorough balance sheet health report. Examine Strickland Metals' earnings growth report to understand how analysts expect it to perform. Next Steps Access the full spectrum of 451 ASX Penny Stocks by clicking on this link. Ready For A Different Approach? These 14 companies survived and thrived after COVID and have the right ingredients to survive Trump's tariffs. Discover why before your portfolio feels the trade war pinch. This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Companies discussed in this article include ASX:EHL ASX:MFF and ASX:STK. This article was originally published by Simply Wall St. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@ Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
