What happens if Palestine Action are banned under terrorism laws?
Home Secretary Yvette Cooper is expected to proscribe the activist group – which recently broke into RAF Brize Norton and vandalised military planes – by designating them a terrorist organisation.
How does the UK Government ban organisations?
The Terrorism Act 2000 gives the Home Secretary the power to proscribe organisations if they are considered to be engaged in terrorism.
The UK Government defines terrorism as 'serious' violence to people or damage to property, endangering the lives of others, creating a 'serious risk' to the health and safety of the public or significantly interfering with 'an electronic system'.
These actions must be designed to influence government policy or that of international governmental organisations. The actions can also be considered as terrorism if they are designed to intimidate the public or a section of the public. The Government must also believe that the actions are designed to advance 'a political, religious, racial or ideological cause'.
Can the Home Secretary ban Palestine Action?
The Home Secretary must believe that the statutory tests outlined above have been met and then is able to exercise her discretion in deciding whether to ban the group.
READ MORE: Police ban Palestine Action protest from taking place outside Westminster
Cooper (below) is likely to argue that Palestine Action's breaking into an RAF base and damaging British planes amounts to serious damage to property designed to influence the Government's position on Gaza.
Palestine Action has said that by taking two planes out of action, it had 'broken the chains of oppression'.
RAF Brize Norton is the largest military air station in Britain with 5,800 service personnel, 300 civilian staff and 1,200 contractors. Flights depart from there daily to RAF Akrotiri in Cyprus, which has been used as a launchpad for spy planes flying over Gaza.
What happens if Palestine Action are banned?
It is a criminal offence to belong or claim to belong to a proscribed organisation.
It is also a criminal offence to express support or invite support for a proscribed organisation and this is drawn broadly to include statements which could be read as giving 'moral support' to the group in question. It also outlaws wearing clothes or publishing images which could be considered as supportive.
Belonging to a banned group or expressing support for one carries a maximum prison sentence of 14 years, while wearing an item of clothing or publishing an image of an item of clothing, flags or logos interpreted as supportive can result in a prison sentence of six months and a fine of up to £5000.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News
38 minutes ago
- Sky News
Israeli ambassador says Hamas to blame as she is challenged on deaths of children in Gaza
Israel's ambassador to the UK has insisted children have "never" been targeted in Gaza and said Hamas should be blamed for every death. Tzipi Hotovely was challenged on the deaths of innocent civilians by Wilfred Frost after two British surgeons, who have worked in Gaza during the Israeli bombardment, filmed video blogs for Sky News. He asked how many children it is "legitimate and proportionate" to kill, including those being treated in hospital, in order to kill Hamas terrorists. Ms Hotovely said Israel was "not there to kill anyone" and "never targets civilians", with its attacks complying with international law. 27:55 Dr Victoria Rose, a consultant plastic surgeon, who has worked in Gaza hospitals for three separate periods, previously told Sky she felt the number of children coming through the doors was "barbaric". She said there were "more innocent children, let alone adults, that are dying per Hamas scalp that you see". Asked about her account, Ms Hotovely said: "We never targeted the children, it's Hamas that needs to be blamed…But they need to blame Hamas for creating this reality for the Palestinian people." She added: "For every life lost in Gaza, you need to blame Hamas for committing the crimes on 7 October and for committing the war crimes by using people as human shields." Hamas-led militants killed some 1,200 people, mostly civilians, and abducted 251 people in the October 7 2023 attack. The group is still holding 50 hostages, with less than half of them believed to be alive. Israel's retaliatory offensive has killed more than 55,000 Palestinians, according to the Hamas-run health ministry in Gaza, which has said women and children make up more than half of the dead. It does not distinguish between civilians and combatants. Ms Hotovely said Israel is "not interested in wars", adding: "So we are asking a very simple request from the international community - pressure Hamas to release our hostages and we will have a better condition to get to a ceasefire."
Sky News
38 minutes ago
- Sky News
Palestine Action to be proscribed - but what does that mean?
Palestine Action faces being proscribed as a terror group after activists broke into RAF Brize Norton and damaged two military aircraft. It was the latest law broken by the activist group. Metropolitan Police Commissioner Sir Mark Rowley said they are also alleged to have caused millions of pounds of criminal damage and assaulted a police officer with a sledgehammer. He said he was "shocked and frustrated" to learn that a protest in support of the group was being planned on Monday, but that the force had "no power in law" to prevent it. The group's proscription, however, would change that. But what is proscription, what effect does it have, and how many proscribed organisations are there? What is proscription? Proscription is the banning of an organisation based on an assessment that it commits or participates in, prepares for, promotes or encourages, or is otherwise concerned in terrorism, the Home Office says. 1:49 The home secretary can choose to proscribe an organisation if it is found to do any of the following: • Commits or participates in acts of terrorism • Prepares for terrorism • Promotes or encourages terrorism (including the unlawful glorification of terrorism); or, • Is otherwise concerned in terrorism. Any move to proscribe the group must be debated and approved by MPs and peers. When deciding to proscribe an organisation, the government takes into account: • The nature and scale of an organisation's activities • The specific threat that it poses to the UK • The specific threat that it poses to British nationals overseas • The extent of the organisation's presence in the UK • The need to support other members of the international community in the global fight against terrorism. What does proscribing a group do? It makes it illegal to show support for the proscribed group, with any offences punishable by a maximum of 14 years in prison. 2:45 Specifically, it is a criminal offence to: • Belong to a proscribed organisation • Invite support for a proscribed organisation • Recklessly express support for a proscribed organisation • Arrange a meeting in support of a proscribed organisation • Wear clothing or carry articles in public which arouse reasonable suspicion that an individual is a member or supporter of a proscribed organisation • Publish an image of an article such as a flag or logo in the same circumstances. The last two offences are less severe and punishable by up to six months in prison and/or a fine not exceeding £5,000. How many proscribed organisations are there? There are 81 organisations proscribed by the UK government under the Terrorism Act 2000, not including 14 organisations in Northern Ireland such as the Irish Republican Army (IRA) that were proscribed under previous legislation. The Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) is on the proscribed list and the most recent addition is The Terrorgram collective - an online transnational network of extreme right-wing terrorists which the government says wants to bring about the collapse of Western democracy and a "race war". You can see the full list by clicking here. Can a proscribed group be taken off the list? The group or someone deemed to be "affected" by a proscription can submit a written application to the home secretary requesting that they consider taking them off the list. If the application is refused, the applicant can appeal to the Proscribed Organisations Appeal Commission, which allows an appeal if it considers that the home secretary's decision to refuse de-proscription was "flawed".
STV News
39 minutes ago
- STV News
Free school meals rolled out to secondary pupils for first time, Swinney says
Free school lunches will be provided to some youngsters in Scotland's secondary schools for the first time in August – although First Minister John Swinney has said making the meals available to all would be 'desirable'. The First Minister said that 'in principle' the Scottish Government supported universal free school meals, saying he would 'prefer that to be the case'. But he added: 'I have got to live within the resources available to me.' Swinney said: 'Of course universal provision is desirable, but I have to deliver policy proposals within the resources the government has got available to it.' His comments came as the Scottish Government confirmed that from August a number of S1 to S3 pupils will be eligible for free school meals – with the First Minister saying that while there is already 'extensive free school meal provision' for primary school children 'this is the first time we have gone into the secondary sector'. The Scottish Government is investing £3 million in a trial project, which will see lunches provided for more than 6,000 high school students – taking the total of youngsters who can claim a free lunch to more than 360,000. The latest phase of the project will see lunches being provided for those students eligible for the Scottish Child Payment in almost 60 schools in eight local authority areas – Aberdeen, Comhairle nan Eilean Siar (the Western Isles), Fife, Glasgow, Moray, North Ayrshire, Shetland, and South Lanarkshire. Swinney said the measure was about 'making sure that poverty is not an impediment to the achievement and the performance of young people'. The trial project will be independently reviewed, with the First Minister saying uptake would be considered, along with the 'beneficial impact of free school meals on the learning opportunities for young people'. The First Minister spoke about the 'targeted intervention' as he visited Springburn Academy in Glasgow, where he ate lunch with some of the students. About 140 pupils at the school could benefit from the free lunches when the trial project comes into being from August. Speaking about the scheme, Swinney said: 'It's a measure designed to tackle the cost-of-living challenges families face, to tackle child poverty and to make sure that children have good health, nutritious food to strengthen their ability to learn in school.' The First Minister added: 'The free school meals programme is key in our national mission to eradicate child poverty, which saves families who take up the offer around £450 per eligible child per year. 'This next phase of the rollout will ensure that this offer is available to more families across the country. 'We know the positive impact that access to a healthy and nutritious meal can have on a pupil's learning and achievement in school. 'This demonstrates how important the programme is in our efforts to close the poverty-related attainment gap in Scotland, ensuring that every child is given an opportunity to succeed in education regardless of their background.' He continued: 'The Scottish Government will also continue its broader support to tackle the cost of the school day, including our £14.2 million School Uniform Clothing Grant and our investment in the £1 billion Scottish Attainment Challenge.' Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country
