HC tells DDA not to act against Shahi Idgah over park use
Delhi High Court
on Thursday asked
Delhi Development Authority
not to take any action against the
Shahi Idgah
in the capital's
Sadar Bazar
area for using the adjoining park for a religious event last year.
Justice Vikas Mahajan also issued a notice to DDA on a petition filed by the Shahi Idgah managing committee and asked the authority for a response.
You Can Also Check:
Delhi AQI
|
Weather in Delhi
|
Bank Holidays in Delhi
|
Public Holidays in Delhi
"Renotify on Sept 10. In the meantime, having regard to the fact that the waqf tribunal is non-functional, where the petitioner instituted a suit, it is directed that DDA shall not take any action pursuant to its notice dated Feb 11, 2025," the court directed after hearing submissions from the parties.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Complete protection with iPru All-in-one Term Plan
ICICI Pru Life Insurance Plan
Get Quote
Undo
During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel said DDA's notice of Feb 11 demanded Rs 12 lakh for using the park surrounding the Idgah for holding
Ijtema
in Dec 2024. However, the counsel maintained that the park was part of the Idgah premises and DDA had no claim over it.
He further highlighted that the committee already filed a suit before the waqf tribunal against the land-owning authority's claim over it, but since the tribunal was non-functional due to a lack of enough members, DDA should hold its hand till the tribunal forms an opinion.
Opposing the plea, the counsel for DDA said a single judge of the high court already gave a finding on the park being DDA's property while dealing with the petitioner's plea for installing a Maharani Lakshmi Bai statue there. The lawyer said the single judge's decision was appealed against by the petitioner before a division bench, which did not intervene, finalising the authority of DDA over the park.
The civic agency claimed the religious function was held in its park without prior approval and demanded costs. On his part, the petitioner's counsel said the single judge had no power to rule on the issue of the title of the park, and the division bench left open all contentions of the parties.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
7 minutes ago
- Time of India
RTI Act amendment through data protection law balances it with privacy rights: Ashwini Vaishnaw
The amendment made in the RTI Act through the data protection law balances it with Right to Privacy , Parliament was informed on Wednesday. In response to a question on the impact of Digital Personal Data Protection (DPDP) Act, 2023 on Right to Information, Union minister Ashwini Vaishnaw in a written reply to the Lok Sabha said there is a provision available in the RTI that may allow access to information if the public interest in disclosure outweighs the harm to the protected interest. "The amendment to Section 8(1)(j) of the RTI Act through the DPDP Act balances the fundamental right to privacy, as affirmed by the Supreme Court in Justice K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India, with the right to information," Vaishnaw said. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Top 15 Most Beautiful Women in the World Undo The minister said the amendment aligns with established judicial reasoning on reasonable restrictions, codifies existing jurisprudence, and helps avoid potential conflicts between the laws. "Further, under Section 8(2) of the RTI Act, a public authority may allow access to information if the public interest in disclosure outweighs the harm to the protected interests," Vaishnaw said. Live Events As per Section 8(2) of the RTI Act if an information is not restricted under the official secret Act or is not exempted under the provision of RTI Act then a public authority may allow access to information, if public interest in disclosure outweighs the harm to the protected interests. "The said amendment does not restrict the disclosure of personal information; rather, it balances individuals' privacy rights with right to information. This ensures that the transparency framework under the RTI Act and privacy framework under the DPDP Act continue to exist harmoniously, preserving the balance between transparency and privacy," Vaishnaw said.
Time of India
17 minutes ago
- Time of India
HC orders screening of CCTV footage of Nainital poll counting
Dehradun: The Uttarakhand high court (HC) bench of Chief Justice G Narendar and Justice Subhash Upadhyay on Wednesday directed that CCTV footage of the zila panchayat president election counting in Nainital be screened. The court was hearing a petition filed by Poonam Bisht, one of the 22 voters in the election, who alleged that a ballot was tampered with during counting on the intervening night of Aug 14-15. The bench ordered that the footage, preserved in the treasury locker, be shown at 11 am on Thursday at the district magistrate's (DM) office. DM Vandana Singh will arrange for the screening and ensure videography of the process. Bisht's counsel has alleged that an officer tampered with a ballot paper, adding to the controversy surrounding the result. The HC directed that the petitioner, govt counsels, the State Election Commission's advocate and both presidential candidates -- Deepa Darmwal and Pushpa Negi -- be present during the review of CCTV and video recordings. The bench clarified that only nine individuals will attend the screening: three advocates from the petitioner's side, three from the govt, the SEC advocate, and the two candidates. Security for the process will be handled by SP (city) Jagdish Chandra. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like American Investor Warren Buffett Recommends: 5 Books For Turning Your Life Around Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo At the hearing earlier in the day, the DM informed the court that one voter had marked only a second preference without indicating a first choice, rendering the vote invalid under election rules. "The tally was equal, so a lottery was conducted to decide the winner. I saw the entire process, as did the observer and it is recorded in the CCTV footage," she told the court. Singh added that both candidates were given two opportunities to examine the process and review the ballots, once during the counting itself and again on Aug 19. The next hearing is scheduled for Thursday. Stay updated with the latest local news from your city on Times of India (TOI). Check upcoming bank holidays , public holidays , and current gold rates and silver prices in your area.
Time of India
17 minutes ago
- Time of India
Monsoon session ends on 2nd day as Congress MLAs continue protest
Gairsain: The monsoon session of the Uttarakhand assembly ended abruptly on Wednesday, just the second day of the four-day sitting, as Congress MLAs persisted with their protest over alleged rigging in the panchayat elections. The House was adjourned sine die before lunch, with proceedings lasting only two hours and 40 minutes. Congress legislators, demanding the resignation of the SSP and district magistrate of Nainital, had sought a discussion through an adjournment motion on the first day. When their demand was denied, they staged a sit-in inside the House and spent the night on the Assembly floor. On Wednesday, as proceedings were to begin at 11 am, Congress members stood before the Speaker's chair and as soon as she entered, they stormed into the well of the House, raised slogans, threw official papers in the air, and banged books on the secretary's table—repeating scenes from the first day. They also pressed for withdrawal of cases against senior leaders and a debate on the state's law and order. Senior Congress MLAs Pritam Singh and Leader of Opposition Yashpal Arya resigned from the Business Advisory Committee. Arya said, "One can understand the law and order situation of the state when MLAs are not being spared. We simply wanted a discussion so that our voice could reach people and some necessary action could be taken in the matter." by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Your Finger Shape Says a Lot About Your Personality, Read Now Tips and Tricks Undo Despite the chaos and repeated adjournments, eight bills and a supplementary budget of Rs 5,315 crore were passed without debate. Among the bills cleared were the Uttarakhand Minority Educational Institutions Bill, 2025, and two separate amendments to the Uttarakhand Freedom of Religion Bill, 2025. Reacting to the Congress protest, BJP legislators staged a march accusing the opposition of stalling proceedings. Parliamentary affairs minister Subodh Uniyal told TOI, "We tried our best, but Congress did not want the House to function. I don't know what they were trying to do by creating such a ruckus in the assembly. There were other ways through which they could have approached the House for a discussion, but they appeared more interested in grabbing the limelight through their act. " Stay updated with the latest local news from your city on Times of India (TOI). Check upcoming bank holidays , public holidays , and current gold rates and silver prices in your area.
