Helen Goh's recipe for lemon meringue bombe alaska with pistachio cake
Prep 10 minFreeze 8 hr+
Cook 1 hr 30 min
Serves 8-10
For the pistachio cake40g shelled pistachio nuts60g plain flour
½ tsp baking powder
⅛ tsp fine sea salt
60g room-temperature unsalted butter60g caster sugar
Finely grated zest of 1 lemon 1 large egg, at room temperature ½ tsp vanilla extract
40ml milk
For the lemon ice-cream330g lemon curd (shop-bought or homemade)100g condensed milk
100g plain, unsweetened yoghurt
1 tbsp lemon juice
300ml double cream
For the meringue3 large egg whites (about 90g)
150g caster sugar
⅛ tsp cream of tartar
1 tsp lemon juice
1 tsp vanilla extract
Line the base and sides of a 20cm round cake tin with baking paper. Put the pistachios in a food processor and process until finely ground. Add the flour, baking powder and salt, and pulse to combine; transfer to a small bowl.
Heat the oven to 190C (170C fan)/375F/gas 5. Put the butter, sugar and lemon zest in the bowl of an electric mixer and beat with the paddle attachment on medium-high for about two minutes, until lightened. Beat in the egg and vanilla, then, on low speed, mix in the pistachio flour in three stages, alternating with the milk. Once just combined, scrape the batter into the lined tin and spread out evenly (it's a very shallow cake). Bake for 15-17 minutes, until light golden brown and a skewer inserted into the centre comes out clean. Transfer the tin to a rack for a few minutes, then unmould and leave to cool completely.
Line a one- to one and a half-litre pudding bowl with a few layers of clingfilm, making sure there is a generous overhang all around. Whisk the lemon curd, condensed milk, yoghurt and lemon juice in a medium bowl. Beat the cream to soft peaks, then fold into the lemon curd mix; be gentle but thorough – there shouldn't be any white streaks. Scrape into the lined pudding bowl, then place the cake on top. Fold over the overhanging clingfilm to cover, then freeze for eight to 12 hours, until firm.
Once the ice-cream has frozen, make the meringue. Find a saucepan on which your electric mixer bowl will sit stably. Fill the saucepan a quarter of the way up with water and bring to a simmer. Put the egg whites and sugar in the bowl and set it over the pan, making sure the base isn't touching the water. Whisk until the sugar dissolves and the mix is warm; rub a bit between your fingers: it's ready when it feels smooth and not gritty. Transfer the bowl to the mixer, and beat with the whisk attachment on medium-high for a minute. Add the remaining ingredients and beat for five minutes, until thick and glossy.
To serve, invert the ice-cream bombe on to a serving plate. Gently tug at the clingfilm to release the ice-cream, then lift off the bowl and remove and discard the clingfilm. Spoon the meringue generously over the bombe to cover it entirely, using a small spatula to create swoops and peaks (at this stage, it can go in the freezer until ready to serve). Just before serving, use a blowtorch to caramelise the meringue until golden brown, then slice into wedges with a hot knife (dip it in a jug of hot water first, and wipe dry).
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
The Confessions of Samuel Pepys by Guy de la Bédoyère review – journal of a predator
Samuel Pepys's diary, which covers 1660 to 1669, is regarded as one of the great classic texts in the English language. Words spill out of Pepys – 1.25m of them – as he bustles around London, building a successful career as a naval administrator while navigating the double trauma of the plague and the Great Fire of London. Historians have long gone to the diary for details of middle-class life during the mid‑17th century: the seamy streets, the watermen, the taverns and, as Pepys moves up the greasy pole, the court and the king. Best of all is his eye for the picturesque detail: the way, for instance, on the morning of 4 September 1666, as fire licks around his house, Pepys buries a choice parmesan cheese in the garden with the intention of keeping it safe. Not all of the diary is in English, though. Quite a lot of it is in French (or rather Franglais), Latin, Spanish and a curious mashup of all three. Pepys increasingly resorted to this home-brewed polyglot whenever the subject of sex came up, which was often. Indeed, sex – chasing it, having it, worrying about getting it again – dominated Pepys's waking life and haunted his dreams, many of them nightmares. Putting these anguished passages in a garbled form not only lessened the chance of servants snooping, but also served to protect him from his own abiding sense of shame. As an extra layer of concealment, Pepys wrote 'my Journall' using tachygraphy, an early form of shorthand. Pepys's diaries were published in bowdlerised form in the 19th century, and it was not until the 1970s that they became available in 11 unexpurgated volumes. Even then, explains Guy de la Bédoyère, there were many transcription errors and, crucially, no attempt was made to translate the coded passages into English. Historians knew about them, of course, not least because all you needed was a bit of classroom French and Latin to work out their meaning. On 25 March 1668, Pepys records that he has given 'Mrs Daniels' eight pairs of gloves 'for tocar my prick con her hand', which is hardly likely to keep anyone guessing for very long. All the same, it has been easy to lose sight of the sexual thread of Pepys's diary amid all the chatter about navy ships and expensive cheese. Which is why, for the first time, De la Bédoyère has gone back to the original manuscript and translated all of Pepys's coded entries, publishing them end-to-end with only a minimum of contextual information. The result is an extraordinarily detailed snapshot of life seen through the eyes of a man for whom no day was complete unless he had managed to fondle at least one woman's 'mameles' (breasts) on his way to or from work. In the past, people have blamed Pepys's bad behaviour on the Restoration. These were the years when the dour pieties of Oliver Cromwell had been replaced by Charles II's permissive libertarianism. But there is much more – and much worse – to the occluded parts of Pepys's diary than mere bawdiness. On 3 February 1664, for example, he is travelling in a carriage down Ludgate Hill when he witnesses three men raping a woman and wishes he could join in. On 1 December 1660, he beats his maid Jane savagely with a broom, though it is clear that he is eyeing her up for a future assignation. He often uses the words 'towsing' and 'tumbling' to describe what he is doing with women which sounds jolly and bucolic until De la Bédoyère explains that these terms are euphemisms for violence. The only occasion on which Pepys might hold back was if he knew a woman was single, which would make any pregnancy impossible to explain away. (It was a mercy that he didn't realise that an earlier operation for a bladder stone had probably left him sterile.) For that reason, he badgered any girl he wanted to sleep with regularly to get married, so he could carry on regardless. As news of his behaviour got around, so others would try to exploit it. On 11 August 1665, an old waterman called Delkes presented Pepys with his daughter-in-law, who was willing to sleep with him in return for a guarantee that her husband would not be pressed into naval service. And then there was his marriage. Pepys had wed Elizabeth when she was just 14. He was proud of her beauty, congratulating himself on how much prettier she was than the many grand ladies at court whom he encountered on his way to becoming secretary to the navy. Everything else about her frustrated him. He grumbled about her untidiness, extravagance, moodiness and the fact that her heavy periods and a recurrent labial abscess meant that she often wasn't available for sex. Most of all, he resented the way that she had taken to hiring plain maidservants in the hope that he would leave them alone (it didn't work). Inevitably he took out his frustrations with his fists: on 19 December 1664 he gave Elizabeth such a black eye that she was unable to go to church on Christmas Day for fear of what the neighbours would think. While Pepys's dark side has long been known, it is something else to be confronted with the evidence laid out quite so starkly. The man who emerges from De la Bédoyère's meticulous filleting is no Restoration roustabout but a chilling embodiment of male entitlement. This newly explicit view of Pepys does not negate the continuing value of his diary – which remains a magnificent historical resource – but from now on it will be impossible to go to it in a state of innocence, let alone denial. Sign up to Bookmarks Discover new books and learn more about your favourite authors with our expert reviews, interviews and news stories. Literary delights delivered direct to you after newsletter promotion The Confessions of Samuel Pepys: His Private Revelations by Guy de la Bédoyère is published by Abacus (£25). To support the Guardian order your copy at Delivery charges may apply.
BBC News
2 hours ago
- BBC News
Charity shreds 'irreplaceable' adoption files to save space
A charity has apologised for the "inexcusable" destruction of around 4,800 personal records linked to adoptions in Scotland, including irreplaceable photographs and handwritten letters from birth Birthlink has been fined £18,000 after shredding the files to free up space in its filing cabinets four years Information Commissioners' Office (ICO), which imposed the fine, described the lost material as "deeply personal pieces in the jigsaw of a person's history, some now lost for eternity".The charity's board said it was "deeply sorry" and that it was impossible to say how many people were affected. A statement added: "We want to assure everyone who's interacted with Birthlink that we will do everything in our power to ensure this does not happen again."A spokesperson for the Movement for Adoption Apology Scotland campaign said: "These items weren't stored out of administrative duty, but held in the hope that one day, someone would come looking. "That hope has now been shredded, quite literally."Birthlink did not keep a log of what was destroyed but it believes only "a very small proportion" of the records included personal documents, which do not exist in any form elsewhere. Files destroyed Since 1984, the company has operated the Adoption Contact Register for enables adopted people, birth parents and others to register their details with a view to being "linked" and potentially a connection was made, Birthlink retained what were called "linked records" - closed paper files stored in filing cabinets - in case they could be of further use in the by January 2021, the charity was running out of space and reviewed whether it could destroy the a board meeting, it was agreed that only replaceable records could be disposed of. A few months later, the contents of 24 filing cabinet drawers were bagged up and has estimated that personal data from around 4,800 individuals was destroyed and that less than 10% of the lost files contained "cherished items". These include photographs, handwritten letters from birth mothers and fathers to their children and handwritten letters from birth families to 8,300 files survived the process culling of the records only came to light two years later, after the Care Inspectorate carried out a short-notice inspection at Birthlink in September internal investigation, ordered by Birthlink's interim chief executive, found that a member of staff had expressed concern about shredding photographs and other records at the they were told "it needed to be done".Birthlink reported itself to the ICO, who said the charity could have prevented the destruction with "cost effective and easy to implement" policies and regulator imposed a £45,000 fine, later reduced to £18,000, to promote compliance with data protection and deter others from "making similar mistakes". 'Poor understanding' Sally Anne Poole, the ICO's head of investigations, said: "The destroyed records had the potential to be an unknown memory, an identity, a sense of belonging, answers."It is inconceivable to think, due to the very nature of its work, that Birthlink had such a poor understanding of both its data protection and records management process."The ICO welcomed the steps taken by Birthlink to ensure it does not happen again, including new policies and the appointment of a data protection officer. Birthlink's interim CEO Abbi Jackson told BBC Scotland News that the charity mainly worked with people affected by "historic forced adoption" between 1930 and said: "We want to reiterate our deepest and most sincere regret that this happened."We have failed people who put their trust in us. We want to urge anyone who thinks they should have had information on file to phone our helpline."We have a number of very experienced, knowledgeable staff who're there to help on each individual case."In 2023, the then First Minister Nicola Sturgeon issued a "sincere, heartfelt and unreserved" apology to people affected by the practice of forced Movement for Adoption Apology Scotland campaign said: "The emotional and historical significance of what was lost cannot be overstated."These were not administrative items, but the last remaining traces of relationships shattered by policies and practices that many now acknowledge as unjust and highly traumatising."Anyone worried about the loss of personal information can contact Birthlink's support service through dataprotection@
The Sun
4 hours ago
- The Sun
Lottery results LIVE: National Lottery Set For Life draw tonight, August 4, 2025
THE National Lottery Set For Life numbers are in and it's time to find out if you've won the top prize of £10,000 every month for 30 years. Could tonight's jackpot see you start ticking off that bucket list every month or building your own start-up as a budding entrepreneur? 1 You can find out by checking your ticket against tonight's numbers below. Good luck! The winning Set For Life numbers are: 11, 26, 28, 32, 39 and the Life Ball is 02. The first National Lottery draw was held on November 19 1994 when seven winners shared a jackpot of £5,874,778. The largest amount ever to be won by a single ticket holder was £42million, won in 1996. Gareth Bull, a 49-year-old builder, won £41million in November, 2020 and ended up knocking down his bungalow to make way for a luxury manor house with a pool. £1.308 billion (Powerball) on January 13 2016 in the US, for which three winning tickets were sold, remains history's biggest lottery prize £1.267 billion (Mega Million) a winner from South Carolina took their time to come forward to claim their prize in March 2019 not long before the April deadline £633.76 million (Powerball draw) from a winner from Wisconsin £625.76 million (Powerball) Mavis L. Wanczyk of Chicopee, Massachusetts claimed the jackpot in August 2017 £575.53 million (Powerball) A lucky pair of winners scooped the jackpot in Iowa and New York in October 2018 Sue Davies, 64, bought a lottery ticket to celebrate ending five months of shielding during the pandemic — and won £500,000. Sandra Devine, 36, accidentally won £300k - she intended to buy her usual £100 National Lottery Scratchcard, but came home with a much bigger prize. The biggest jackpot ever to be up for grabs was £66million in January last year, which was won by two lucky ticket holders. Another winner, Karl managed to bag £11million aged just 23 in 1996. The odds of winning the lottery are estimated to be about one in 14million - BUT you've got to be in it to win it.
