Spinons can travel solo, scientists confirm in quantum magnetism breakthrough
The discovery further enhances understanding of magnetism and could help pave the way for future technologies, including quantum computers and advanced magnetic materials.
Spinons are quasiparticles that arise as quantum disturbances behaving like individual particles within magnetic systems.
They emerge in low-dimensional quantum materials, particularly in one-dimensional (1D) spin chains, where electrons are arranged in a linear sequence and interact through their quantum spins.
In such systems, flipping a single spin doesn't just affect one electron; it creates a ripple across the chain. This ripple can act as a discrete entity, carrying a spin value of ½. That entity is the spinon.
Today, magnets are central to a wide range of technologies, including computer memory, speakers, electric motors, and medical imaging devices.
The idea of spinons dates back to the early 1980s, when physicists Ludwig Faddeev and Leon Takhtajan proposed that a spin-1 excitation in certain quantum models could fractionalize into two spin-½ excitations.
These were named spinons, which are considered exotic because they behave as if an indivisible quantum of spin has split into two.
However, all experimental observations until now had detected spinons only in pairs, reinforcing the belief that they could not exist independently.
That assumption has now been challenged.
In a new theoretical study, physicists from the University of Warsaw and the University of British Columbia showed how to isolate a lone spinon using a well-known model of quantum magnetism, the Heisenberg spin-½ chain.
By adding a single spin to this system, either in its ground state or in a simplified model known as the valence-bond solid (VBS), they demonstrated how a single unpaired spin can move freely through the spin chain, acting as a solitary spinon.
What makes the finding more impactful is that it's not purely theoretical. A recent experiment led by C. Zhao and published in Nature Materials observed spin-½ excitations in nanographene-based antiferromagnetic chains that reflect the lone spinon behavior described in the study.
This experimental validation confirms that the phenomenon can occur in real quantum materials, not just in simulations.
Understanding how a single spinon can exist has far-reaching implications. Spinons are closely linked to quantum entanglement, a core principle of quantum computing and quantum information science.
They're also involved in exotic states of matter like high-temperature superconductors and quantum spin liquids.
By gaining better control over spinon dynamics, scientists could open new pathways for developing advanced magnetic materials and potentially qubit systems for quantum computers.
'Our research not only deepens our knowledge of magnets, but can also have far-reaching consequences in other areas of physics and technology', said Prof Krzysztof Wohlfeld of the Faculty of Physics at the University of Warsaw.The study was published in the journal Physical Review Letters.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
San Francisco Chronicle
17 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Which choices contribute most to climate change? Most people miss the mark, one study found
It turns out many Americans aren't great at identifying which personal decisions contribute most to climate change. A study recently published by the National Academy of Sciences found that when asked to rank actions, such as swapping a car that uses gasoline for an electric one, carpooling or reducing food waste, participants weren't very accurate when assessing how much those actions contributed to climate change, which is caused mostly by the release of greenhouse gases that happen when fuels like gasoline, oil and coal are burned. "People over-assign impact to actually pretty low-impact actions such as recycling, and underestimate the actual carbon impact of behaviors much more carbon intensive, like flying or eating meat," said Madalina Vlasceanu, report co-author and professor of environmental social sciences at Stanford University. The top three individual actions that help the climate, including avoiding plane flights, choosing not to get a dog and using renewable electricity, were also the three that participants underestimated the most. Meanwhile, the lowest-impact actions were changing to more efficient appliances and swapping out light bulbs, recycling, and using less energy on washing clothes. Those were three of the top four overestimated actions in the report. There are many reasons people get it wrong Vlasceanu said marketing focuses more on recycling and using energy-efficient light bulbs than on why flights or dog adoption are relatively bad for the climate, so participants were more likely to give those actions more weight. How the human brain is wired also plays a role. 'You can see the bottle being recycled. That's visible. Whereas carbon emissions, that's invisible to the human eye. So that's why we don't associate emissions with flying,' said Jiaying Zhao, who teaches psychology and sustainability at the University of British Columbia. Zhao added it's easier to bring actions to mind that we do more often. 'Recycling is an almost daily action, whereas flying is less frequent. It's less discussed,' she said. 'As a result, people give a higher psychological weight to recycling.' Of course, there is also a lot of misleading information. For example, some companies tout the recycling they do while not telling the public about pollution that comes from their overall operations. 'There has been a lot of deliberate confusion out there to support policies that are really out of date," said Brenda Ekwurzel, a climate scientist with the Union of Concerned Scientists, a nonprofit. Why dogs have a big climate impact Dogs are big meat eaters, and meat is a significant contributor to climate change. That is because many of the farm animals, which will become food, release methane, a greenhouse gas that contributes to climate change. Beef is especially impactful, in part because around the world cattle are often raised on land that was illegally deforested. Since trees absorb carbon dioxide, the most abundant greenhouse gas, cutting them to then raise cattle is a double whammy. 'People just don't associate pets with carbon emissions. That link is not clear in people's minds,' Zhao said. Not all pets are the same, however. Zhao owns a dog and three rabbits. 'I can adopt 100 bunnies that will not be close to the emissions of a dog, because my dog is a carnivore,' she said. The owner of a meat-eating pet can lower their impact by looking for food made from sources other than beef. Zhao, for example, tries to minimize her dog's carbon footprint by feeding her less carbon-intensive protein sources, including seafood and turkey. Pollution from air travel Planes emit a lot of carbon dioxide and nitrogen oxides, also greenhouse gases. Additionally, planes emit contrails, or vapor trails that prevent planet-warming gases from escaping into space. A round-trip economy-class flight on a 737 from New York to Los Angeles produces more than 1,300 pounds of emissions per passenger, according to the International Civil Aviation Organization, a United Nations agency. Skipping that single flight saves about as much carbon as swearing off eating all types of meat a year, or living without a car for more than three months, according to U.N. estimates. Other decisions, both impactful and minor Switching to energy that comes from renewable sources, such as solar and wind, has a large positive impact because such sources don't emit greenhouse gases. Some of the biggest climate decisions individuals can make include how they heat and cool their homes and the types of transportation they use. Switching to renewable energy minimizes the impact of both. Recycling is effective at reducing waste headed for landfill, but its climate impact is relatively small because transporting, processing and repurposing recyclables typically relies on fossil fuels. Plus, less than 10% of plastics actually get recycled, according to the Environmental Protection Agency. Other decisions with overestimated impact, including washing clothes in cold water and switching to more efficient light bulbs, are relatively less important. That is because those appliances have a relatively small impact compared to other things, such plane flights and dogs, so improving on them, while beneficial, has a much more limited influence. Experts say the best way to combat the human tendency to miscalculate climate-related decisions is with more readily available information. Zhao said that people are already more accurate in their estimations than they would have been 10 or 20 years ago because it's easier to learn. The study backs up that hypothesis. After participants finished ranking actions, the researchers corrected their mistakes, and they changed which actions they said they'd take to help the planet. 'People do learn from these interventions,' Vlasceanu said. 'After learning, they are more willing to commit to actually more impactful actions.' ___
an hour ago
Which choices contribute most to climate change? Most people miss the mark, one study found
It turns out many Americans aren't great at identifying which personal decisions contribute most to climate change. A study recently published by the National Academy of Sciences found that when asked to rank actions, such as swapping a car that uses gasoline for an electric one, carpooling or reducing food waste, participants weren't very accurate when assessing how much those actions contributed to climate change, which is caused mostly by the release of greenhouse gases that happen when fuels like gasoline, oil and coal are burned. "People over-assign impact to actually pretty low-impact actions such as recycling, and underestimate the actual carbon impact of behaviors much more carbon intensive, like flying or eating meat," said Madalina Vlasceanu, report co-author and professor of environmental social sciences at Stanford University. The top three individual actions that help the climate, including avoiding plane flights, choosing not to get a dog and using renewable electricity, were also the three that participants underestimated the most. Meanwhile, the lowest-impact actions were changing to more efficient appliances and swapping out light bulbs, recycling, and using less energy on washing clothes. Those were three of the top four overestimated actions in the report. Vlasceanu said marketing focuses more on recycling and using energy-efficient light bulbs than on why flights or dog adoption are relatively bad for the climate, so participants were more likely to give those actions more weight. How the human brain is wired also plays a role. 'You can see the bottle being recycled. That's visible. Whereas carbon emissions, that's invisible to the human eye. So that's why we don't associate emissions with flying,' said Jiaying Zhao, who teaches psychology and sustainability at the University of British Columbia. Zhao added it's easier to bring actions to mind that we do more often. 'Recycling is an almost daily action, whereas flying is less frequent. It's less discussed,' she said. 'As a result, people give a higher psychological weight to recycling.' Of course, there is also a lot of misleading information. For example, some companies tout the recycling they do while not telling the public about pollution that comes from their overall operations. 'There has been a lot of deliberate confusion out there to support policies that are really out of date," said Brenda Ekwurzel, a climate scientist with the Union of Concerned Scientists, a nonprofit. Dogs are big meat eaters, and meat is a significant contributor to climate change. That is because many of the farm animals, which will become food, release methane, a greenhouse gas that contributes to climate change. Beef is especially impactful, in part because around the world cattle are often raised on land that was illegally deforested. Since trees absorb carbon dioxide, the most abundant greenhouse gas, cutting them to then raise cattle is a double whammy. 'People just don't associate pets with carbon emissions. That link is not clear in people's minds,' Zhao said. Not all pets are the same, however. Zhao owns a dog and three rabbits. 'I can adopt 100 bunnies that will not be close to the emissions of a dog, because my dog is a carnivore,' she said. The owner of a meat-eating pet can lower their impact by looking for food made from sources other than beef. Zhao, for example, tries to minimize her dog's carbon footprint by feeding her less carbon-intensive protein sources, including seafood and turkey. Planes emit a lot of carbon dioxide and nitrogen oxides, also greenhouse gases. Additionally, planes emit contrails, or vapor trails that prevent planet-warming gases from escaping into space. A round-trip economy-class flight on a 737 from New York to Los Angeles produces more than 1,300 pounds of emissions per passenger, according to the International Civil Aviation Organization, a United Nations agency. Skipping that single flight saves about as much carbon as swearing off eating all types of meat a year, or living without a car for more than three months, according to U.N. estimates. Switching to energy that comes from renewable sources, such as solar and wind, has a large positive impact because such sources don't emit greenhouse gases. Some of the biggest climate decisions individuals can make include how they heat and cool their homes and the types of transportation they use. Switching to renewable energy minimizes the impact of both. Recycling is effective at reducing waste headed for landfill, but its climate impact is relatively small because transporting, processing and repurposing recyclables typically relies on fossil fuels. Plus, less than 10% of plastics actually get recycled, according to the Environmental Protection Agency. Other decisions with overestimated impact, including washing clothes in cold water and switching to more efficient light bulbs, are relatively less important. That is because those appliances have a relatively small impact compared to other things, such plane flights and dogs, so improving on them, while beneficial, has a much more limited influence. Experts say the best way to combat the human tendency to miscalculate climate-related decisions is with more readily available information. Zhao said that people are already more accurate in their estimations than they would have been 10 or 20 years ago because it's easier to learn. The study backs up that hypothesis. After participants finished ranking actions, the researchers corrected their mistakes, and they changed which actions they said they'd take to help the planet. 'People do learn from these interventions,' Vlasceanu said. 'After learning, they are more willing to commit to actually more impactful actions.'
Medscape
a day ago
- Medscape
Long-Acting Contraception Rates Rose 49% With No-Cost Policy
After British Columbia (BC) made long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) free in April 2023, LARC dispensations, which had been declining steadily, went up by 49%, data indicated. The findings underscored the importance of removing the cost barrier for birth control, according to the authors. The data are particularly important because LARC, which includes intrauterine devices (IUD) and subdermal implants, is the most effective type of contraception, study author Laura Schummers, ScD, assistant professor of health outcomes at the University of British Columbia in Vancouver, told Medscape Medical News. The research was published on July 28 in The BMJ . Immediate LARC Increase 'These methods are at least 10 times as effective as other kinds of contraception,' Schummers said. With LARC, 'less than 1% of users become pregnant each year of use.' For comparison, the pill, patch, or ring have failure rates near 6%-9%, she noted. In addition, LARC can last for 3-10 years, and its effectiveness does not depend on the user. More than 40% of pregnancies worldwide are unintended, including 48% of pregnancies in North America, according to the researchers. They examined the numbers of monthly dispensations for all contraception prescriptions, including LARC, in the years before and after a universal contraception coverage policy was instituted in BC in April 2023. Under this policy, the public insurer pays 100% of prescription costs. The researchers tracked contraception prescriptions that were given to 859,845 reproductive-aged female residents of BC (age, 15-49 years) between April 1, 2021, and June 30, 2024. They compared these prescriptions with those given to a control group derived from the nine other Canadian provinces that did not dispense contraception for free. Without this no-cost intervention, most Canadian insurance plans require copayments, coinsurance, or annual deductibles, and many don't cover contraception at all. In April 2023, when the new policy took effect, 'we saw an immediate increase by over 1050 additional dispensations per month,' Schummers said. 'By June 2024, there were almost 1300 additional dispensations per month for LARC that amounted to a 49% increase in what we observed vs what was expected, based on the pre-policy trends. That really tells us there was an unmet need for the most effective forms of contraception and that costs were driving contraceptive choices, as well as contraceptive use overall.' Upfront costs are likely a barrier to the adoption of LARC, said Schummers. Though prescriptions increased for all forms of contraception, 'we found almost all of the increase in use was concentrated in the LARCs,' she said. That difference likely has to do with cost structure. Even though the contraceptive pill is a monthly payment for years, it is a low payment, typically $20-$25. A low payment per month over years may be perceived as easier to pay than the one-time $350-$450 upfront for LARC, said Schummers. The findings 'confirm that this was a smart policy decision,' according to Schummers. They also may help encourage the policy's adoption in other provinces. Canada is 'in a period of evolving discussions about contraception coverage and prescription coverage more generally,' Schummers observed. BC was the first province to make the policy change, and Manitoba, Yukon, and Prince Edward Island have followed suit. 'But the remaining provinces do not yet have an agreement in place,' Schummers said. 'Our study provides timely evidence to support those discussions and to guide decisions to follow what BC has done across all the provinces.' Promoting LARC Uptake Commenting on the findings for Medscape Medical News, Dustin Costescu, MD, obstetrician/gynecologist and family planning specialist in Hamilton, Ontario, said that despite LARC methods' many advantages, many barriers limit its uptake. This study demonstrates the magnitude of the financial barrier and the rapid increase in uptake when it is removed, he said. 'Moving the needle on LARC uptake is not an easy task. With millions of BC residents, increasing LARC uptake by 1.9% means tens of thousands of individuals have accessed an IUD or implant where previously they could not. While not captured in this study, that translates to a reduction of unintended pregnancies, unplanned births, and abortion by a magnitude of thousands.' One of the reasons the federal government has prioritized universal access to contraception is that access to birth control has demonstrated cost savings globally, Costescu said. 'The work of the authors, many of whom are primarily responsible for the work to build universal coverage in BC, cannot be overstated and demonstrates the need and demand for LARC access in Canada,' he said. The study was supported by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research. Schummers reported having no relevant financial relationships. Costescu reported relationships with Searchlight, Organon, Bayer, and Duchesnay.
