Photos Show New US Missiles Sent to China's Doorstep
Newsweek has reached out to the Chinese Defense Ministry for comment by email.
NMESIS stands for Navy-Marine Expeditionary Ship Interdiction System-a U.S. Marine Corps ground-based launcher armed with two Naval Strike Missiles, capable of striking sea targets 115 miles away. It is designed for maritime warfare operations in the Pacific Ocean.
During Exercise Balikatan 2025, held from April 21 to May 9 in the Philippines, the U.S. Marine Corps simulated anti-ship operations using NMESIS on Batan Island in the Luzon Strait-a key gateway for China's naval deployments beyond its surrounding waters.
The Philippines plays a significant role in America's Indo-Pacific strategy. It is one of three nations-alongside Japan and Taiwan-that form a containment strategy known as the First Island Chain, aimed at restricting China's naval access to the broader Western Pacific Ocean.
In a video released by the U.S. Marine Corps, a NMESIS launcher was shown being airlifted by a KC-130J transport aircraft to the Batanes Island chain-located north of the main Philippine island Luzon-on Sunday for the Maritime Key Terrain Security Operation.
The operation, aimed at rehearsing the defense of key maritime terrain, is part of Exercise KAMANDAG 9-a war game involving the U.S., the Philippines, Japan, South Korea and the United Kingdom, scheduled from Monday to June 6 and taking place across the Philippines.
Unlike Exercise Balikatan 2025, where no live missiles were launched by the NMESIS, the weapon will be employed in a live-fire drill during Exercise KAMANDAG 9 "if the weather permits," Philippine media outlet ABS-CBN reported, citing the country's marine corps.
KAMANDAG-an acronym for the Filipino phrase "Kaagapay Ng Mga Mandirigma Ng Dagat," which translates to "Cooperation of Warriors of the Sea"-is an annual bilateral drill led by the U.S. and Philippine marine corps since 2016 to strengthen the allies' capabilities.
This year's exercise underscored what the U.S. Marine Corps called the "global importance of maritime security," as well as the value of building "multinational maritime domain awareness," and a shared commitment to peace and stability in the Indo-Pacific region.
In addition to the Maritime Key Terrain Security Operation, the exercise featured defensive counter-landing live-fire drills, littoral maneuvers, amphibious operations, humanitarian assistance and disaster relief training, as well as various subject matter expert exchanges.
Colonel Jason C. Armas, commanding officer of the U.S. Marine Rotational Force-Darwin 25.3 Marine Air-Ground Task Force, said: "Training shoulder to shoulder with our Philippine Marine Corps partners isn't just about building interoperability-it's about forging trust in the crucible of shared hardship and preparing together to respond with speed and precision to any crisis, anywhere, anytime."
Major General Arturo G. Rojas, commandant of the Philippine Marine Corps, said: "This year's KAMANDAG is a testament to the enduring partnership between the Philippine Marine Corps and the United States Marine Corps. By operating jointly in complex environments, we are strengthening our capability to defend the archipelago and contributing to a secure and stable Indo-Pacific."
It was unclear whether the NMESIS will remain in the Philippines after the conclusion of the exercise. A U.S. Army Mid-Range Capability missile system, which was initially deployed for exercises, has been stationed in the Southeast Asian country since April of last year.
Related Articles
Iran Threatens Strike on Israel as US Talks Hang in BalanceUS Military Pullback in Africa Opens Door for China and RussiaTrump Says Iran Deal Close To Avoid 'A Lot of People Dead'List of Fast Food Chain Hours for Memorial Day 2025
2025 NEWSWEEK DIGITAL LLC.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
3 minutes ago
- USA Today
There's just a month until TikTok could be banned – again. Here's where things stand.
President Donald Trump has one month to finalize the sale of TikTok or the short-form video platform risks going dark in the U.S. – again. For months, Trump has said negotiations for the sale of TikTok have been ongoing with China, as the platform is owned by Beijing-based ByteDance. Since the platform went dark for less than 24 hours in January, Trump has extended the deadline on a ban of TikTok in the U.S. three times. And he may just conduct a fourth. In late July, U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said in a CNBC interview that if China did not approve a U.S.-drafted deal to sell the platform's American assets, the app would go dark again, once the next ban extension expires on Sept. 17. "If that deal gets approved by the Chinese, then that deal will happen. If they don't approve it, then TikTok is going to go dark," Lutnick previously said. "And those decisions are coming very soon, so let's see what the Chinese do. They've got to approve it. The deal is over to them right now." The White House did not immediately respond for comment when contacted by USA TODAY on Aug. 15. When could TikTok go dark (again) in the US? The next deadline for TikTok to be sold by ByteDance is Sept. 17. Why is TikTok at risk of getting banned? Some government officials are concerned that TikTok poses a national security threat, believing that ByteDance, which is based in Beijing, is sharing U.S. user data with China. TikTok has repeatedly denied these claims. In January, the platform went dark for less than 24 hours under federal legislation signed into law by former President Joe Biden in 2024. Trump has signed executive orders three times now that push back the deadline for when TikTok must be sold, promising that deals with China are on the horizon. The latest was in early July, when Trump told reporters aboard Air Force One that he was hopeful Chinese President Xi would agree to a deal to see the platform to the U.S. Greta Cross is a national trending reporter at USA TODAY. Story idea? Email her at gcross@
USA Today
an hour ago
- USA Today
Trump booed, cheered at Kennedy Center. Now opera house may be renamed for Melania
Will the opera house at the Kennedy Center in Washington, DC, honor its chair with the name change to 'First Lady Melania Trump Opera House?' When President Donald Trump and first lady Melania Trump visited the Kennedy Center last month to see 'Les Misérables,' part of the crowd booed when the couple stood up. Roughly six weeks later, a House panel voted to rename the Kennedy Center venue where Les Mis appeared "First Lady Melania Trump Opera House.' As president of the United States, it's not uncommon to have places, monuments and streets bearing your name. Earlier this month, the road in front of Donald Trump's private club, Mar-a-Lago, known as Southern Boulevard, was approved by Palm Beach County, Florida, commissioners to be renamed President Donald J. Trump Boulevard. Next month's release of Trump Mobile – complete with gold cell phone and monthly plan – is another example. More: Lawmakers vote to name Kennedy Center opera house after Melania Trump On June 11, the president and first lady attended the opening night of 'Les Misérables' at the Kennedy Center in Washington, D.C. Melania Trump stood alongside her husband when Donald Trump appeared on the balcony. A cacophony of jeers, cheers and claps broke out ahead of a "USA" chant, video posted on X (and in this story) shows. More: 'Oh really?': Trump says his wife Melania has some thoughts on Vladimir Putin On July 22, a House panel advanced a measure to rename a venue at the Kennedy Center in honor of Melania Trump. The measure was voted on as part of a larger amendment approved by the Appropriations Committee. The larger House and Senate still have to vote on the spending bill. The theater is presently designated as the "Opera House," located between the "Concert Hall" and the "Eisenhower Theater." Donald Trump had never attended a Kennedy Center show during his first term, but he has waged a conservative takeover on the institution since returning to the White House earlier this year. He designated himself chairman shortly after he took office. What is Trump's presidential salary? How much do US presidents make an hour? We did the math for you Contributing: Samantha Neely, USA TODAY Network-Florida
Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
Texas Attorney General Thinks DEI May Be Behind Devastating Fires
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton has launched an investigation into several utility companies linked to last year's destructive Smokehouse Creek and Windy Deuce fires, stating that they "possibly" prioritized environmental, social, and governance (ESG) or diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) agendas over safety and necessary maintenance. Newsweek has reached out to Paxton's office and the two listed utility companies for comment via email on Friday. Why It Matters Paxton, an ally of President Donald Trump who has launched a bid for the U.S. Senate in 2026, is an outspoken critic of DEI initiatives, which he has labeled "woke" and "discriminatory" policies. The Smokehouse Creek fire, which ignited in late February 2024, burned over one million acres, making it the state's largest wildfire. It scorched large swathes of Texas, killing thousands of livestock and downing hundreds of structures. Xcel Energy, a utility provider, said at the time that its facilities "appear to have been involved in an ignition of the Smokehouse Creek fire," while a Texas House committee confirmed a utility pole broke, exposing open power wires to dry grasses, sparking the flame. What To Know In a Friday press release, Paxton said his office is investigating several utility companies in relation to the fires, which caused severe ecological and infrastructure damage. He noted that nearby power facilities contributed to the outbreak, and some of these "companies may have acted negligently by failing to conduct necessary infrastructure maintenance and possibly prioritizing environmental, social, and governance ("ESG") or diversity, equity, and inclusion ("DEI") agendas over safety." Specifically, the office has issued civil investigative demand letters to utility companies Xcel Energy, it's subsidy Southwestern Public Services Company, and Osmose Utilities Services. A telephone pole burns from the Smokehouse Creek Fire, Feb. 28, 2024, in Canadian, Texas. A telephone pole burns from the Smokehouse Creek Fire, Feb. 28, 2024, in Canadian, Texas. AP Photo/David Erickson "It is unconscionable that utility companies might have sacrificed infrastructure maintenance, public safety, and the well-being of our Texas communities for radical ESG and DEI goals," he said in the press release. "If any companies connected to these devastating fires have violated Texas law, they will be held accountable. We will not stop fighting for those who were victimized by these fires," he concluded. Trump and his supporters have made dismantling DEI programs across the federal government a cornerstone of their political agenda, including signing executive orders on the matter. In response, major corporations have scaled back or eliminated their DEI programs. The investigation has been applauded by conservative groups like The Institute for Legislative Analysis (ILA), the Christian Employers Alliance (CEA), and the Center to Protect Ranchers (CPR). What People Are Saying Bram Browder, Director of the Center to Protect Ranchers, said in a Friday press release: "Ranchers are typically the most severely impacted by wildfires. This investigation is critical not only to exposing the real-world consequences of Xcel's radical DEI and ESG frameworks, but also to holding the company accountable for promises made over a year ago to compensate victims. Many of these ranchers lost generational farms—they simply can't wait any longer." Xcel Energy said in a March 2024 press release: "Xcel Energy has been cooperating with the investigations into the wildfires and has been conducting its own review. Based on currently available information, Xcel Energy acknowledges that its facilities appear to have been involved in an ignition of the Smokehouse Creek fire. Xcel Energy disputes claims that it acted negligently in maintaining and operating its infrastructure; however, we encourage people who had property destroyed by or livestock lost in the Smokehouse Creek fire to submit a claim to Xcel Energy through our claims process." What Happens Next Paxton and his team have requested documents from Xcel Energy, it's subsidy Southwestern Public Services Company, and Osmose Utilities Services, related to the fires to determine if any Texas state laws were violated.
