Pair of Rhode Island senators pitch gas tax fix, rideshare fee to shore up RIPTA's finances
As Rhode Island's statewide bus agency stares down a $32.6 million budget gap heading into the next fiscal year, two lawmakers are looking at ways to fill the gap without drawing from the state's general revenue fund.
A bill sponsored by Sen. Sam Zurier, a Providence Democrat, reforms how the state's gas tax is allocated to the Rhode Island Public Transit Authority (RIPTA), while another from Sen. Megan Kallman, a Pawtucket Democrat, would impose a new fee on rideshare services.
Zurier's bill would increase RIPTA's share of the state's annual gas tax revenue, which has never kept pace with inflation, he said.
When the General Assembly set the tax at 32.5 cents per gallon in 2015, the agency was allocated 9.75 cents per gallon — at the time a 30% share. But as the gas tax has since increased to 38 cents, RIPTA's share of the pot has since decreased by 4% to 26%, which Zurier said has cost the bus agency $5 million in annual revenue.
'The program they set up in 2015 was supposed to adjust for inflation,' Zurier said in an interview.
RIPTA's incoming deficit is the result of federal pandemic relief aid drying up. Last year, the General Assembly gave the statewide bus agency $15 million in unspent federal COVID funds to help plug its budget hole.
'But we know for a fact that money is not around this year,' Zurier said. 'And we know it would be difficult just to plug it with general revenues because we have a projected deficit.'
And no relief is coming from Gov. Dan McKee, at least until RIPTA submits a report on its operations to the governor, House speaker, and Senate president by March 1, as stipulated in the bus agency's fiscal 25 budget.
McKee's proposed fiscal 2026 budget allocates $126.6 million to RIPTA, despite $159.1 million in projected expenditures. RIPTA had a budget of $153.4 million for fiscal 2025.
The gas tax itself is based on the gallons of gas purchased in Rhode Island — a source that will become less stable as drivers shift to more fuel-efficient and electric vehicles.
'That's something that is a positive in terms of our environmental goals, but it has a practical downside when you rely on those gas tax proceeds to fund critical transportation infrastructure,' GrowSmart RI Deputy Director John Flaherty said in an interview.
RIPTA now gets about $40 million in annual gasoline tax revenues, based on its existing allocation of 9.75 cents per gallon. But that revenue is projected to drop over $1 million when fiscal year 2026 starts this July, according to projections from the Rhode Island Department of Revenue.
If RIPTA's share of the gas tax remains unchanged, revenues are expected to drop to $32.9 million by fiscal year 2030 even as projections show the Rhode Island Department of Transportation's (RIDOT) share of the gas tax increasing one cent every other year.
McKee's proposed budget leaves public transit advocates fuming over RIPTA's $32M deficit
RIDOT's share goes from 22.25 cents per gallon for fiscal years 2026 and 2027 and increases to 24.25 cents by fiscal 2030. State projections show RIDOT will receive $94 million in revenue for fiscal 2026 and drop to $86.6 million by fiscal 2030.
Another part of the gas tax problem, Flaherty said, is how the state calculates increases. The Department of Revenue adjusts the gas tax to account for inflation every two years, but only considers inflation from the previous year.
Zurier said he plans to correct that with a separate bill mandating the state consider both years.
The proposed changes are welcomed by RIPTA as it seeks to close its budget deficit.
'I would like to thank Senator Zurier for his support and look forward to collaborating with the governor and General Assembly to identify a sustainable financial plan for RIPTA that allows us to fulfill our mission,' RIPTA CEO Christopher Durand said in an emailed statement.
Zurier admits there is a slight wrinkle in his tax plan for RIPTA: McKee's budget proposal to charge electric vehicle owners higher with registration fees. The governor's proposal calls for using any revenue from EV registration to help support municipal road repairs, which until now have been funded using federal pandemic aid.
Zurier's gas tax allocation bill seeks to allocate 30% of those fees toward funding RIPTA — granted the registration fees are even approved by the legislature.
'It's a controversial measure and I'm not sure if it's going to make it into the final budget,' the senator said. 'And I still haven't developed my own position on that yet.'
Both of Zurier's bills, which were introduced on Jan. 23, were referred to the Senate Committee on Finance, where they have yet to be scheduled for an initial hearing. Companion legislation has not yet been filed in the House.
More help for RIPTA could come from a proposed tax on Uber and Lyft rides. Kallman's legislation would add a 75 cent fee to each fare collected by rideshare companies — half of which would go toward funding statewide transit.
The bill would also direct sales tax revenue already being collected from rideshare companies to a restricted receipt account to fund RIPTA.
'Whether it's reducing our greenhouse gas emissions, making Rhode Island more attractive to employers or increasing workforce participation, we cannot make progress without a healthy RIPTA,' Kallman said in a statement. 'RIPTA needs steady and diverse funding streams that will allow it to operate smoothly year-to-year and expand its services to meet the transit needs of Rhode Islanders.'
Kallman introduced the same legislation last year, where it was held for further study by the Senate Committee on Finance. The latest bill was filed Jan. 31 and was referred to the same committee, where it has yet to be scheduled for a hearing.
A similar rideshare surcharge was put in place in Massachusetts in 2016 as a way to fund local road maintenance — something the Save RIPTA coalition highlighted on X Tuesday in celebrating Kallman's bill.
'It's time to do this in RI,' the coalition posted.
Durand said he was grateful for Kallman's support of public transit.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNBC
6 minutes ago
- CNBC
Opendoor stock pops 10% as CEO resigns following investor pressure campaign
Opendoor shares popped about 10% on Friday after CEO Carrie Wheeler said she's resigning from the online real estate company, which has seen a surge in recent interest from retail investors. Pressure began building on Wheeler, who took over the top job in 2022, after the company's quarterly earnings report earlier this month failed to reassure investors that a turnaround is underway. The stock is up more than sixfold since bottoming out at 51 cents in June, a price that put the company at risk of being delisted from the Nasdaq. "The last weeks of intense outside interest in Opendoor have come at a time when the company needs to stay focused and charging ahead," Wheeler wrote in a post on X. "I believe the best thing I can do for Opendoor now is to accelerate my succession plans that I shared with the Board mid-year and make room for new leadership to take the reins." Opendoor's business involves using technology to buy and sell homes, pocketing the gains. In its latest earnings report, Opendoor said it expects to acquire just 1,200 homes in the third quarter, down from 1,757 in the second quarter and 3,504 in the third quarter of 2024. It's also pulling down marketing spending. Hedge fund manager Eric Jackson, who spearheaded Opendoor's stock jump in July, celebrated the news and told his new band of followers on X, "Let's start THINKING BIG AGAIN." Jackson said last month on X that his firm had taken a stake in the company and was betting it would be a "100-bagger over the next few years." Jackson has been a loud voice on X pushing for Wheeler's departure, and was recently joined by Opendoor co-founder and venture capitalist Keith Rabois, who posted on Aug. 13 that "not a single founder nor executive" who guided the company to its IPO supports Wheeler as CEO. Opendoor on Friday named technology chief Shrisha Radhakrishna as "president and interim leader" and said a CEO search is underway. Opendoor went public through a special purpose acquisition company in 2020, riding a SPAC wave supported by low interest rates and Covid-era market euphoria. The soaring inflation and rising interest rates that followed hit all of technology stocks, but had an outsized impact on Opendoor due it its direct exposure to mortgage rates. The company lost 99% of its value from early 2021 through its trough in June. With Friday's gains, its market cap stands at about $2.5 billion.
The Hill
8 minutes ago
- The Hill
Democrats introduce bill to block Trump DC police takeover
A band of Democratic lawmakers is introducing legislation to thwart President Trump's takeover of the D.C. police department, arguing the White House is exceeding its authority. The resolution would terminate Trump's Monday order, something the lawmakers say comes as 'the President has concocted a false narrative around the city's crime rates' which have been declining for two years, while violent crime has reached a 30-year-low. 'Under the D.C. Home Rule Act, Congress has given the president the power only to direct the Mayor to make the Metropolitan Police Department available for a specific federal purpose but has given him no power simply to take over the Department. In any event, there is no federal emergency justifying such a takeover even if Congress sought to use its lawmaking power to effectuate it,' Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Md.), the top Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee, said in a statement. 'Trump has made clear that his efforts in D.C., where 700,000 taxpaying American citizens lack the protections of statehood, are part of a broader plan to militarize and federalize the streets of cities around America whose citizens voted against him,' Raskin added, calling it a 'hostile takeover.' Trump also sent National Guard troops to the nation's capital, and tensions flared earlier in the week as officers set up checkpoints in the city. The Trump administration on Thursday escalated its takeover of the Metropolitan Police Department (MPD), with Attorney General Pam Bondi installing Drug Enforcement Agency Administrator Terry Cole as Washington's ' emergency police commissioner,' while rescinding policies that limited officers from taking policing actions purely for immigration enforcement purposes. 'President Trump's incursions against D.C. are among the most egregious attacks on D.C. home rule in decades,' said Del. Eleanor Holmes-Norton (D-D.C.). 'Our local police force, paid for by D.C. residents, should not be subject to federalization, an action that wouldn't be possible for any other police department in the country. No emergency exists in D.C. that the president did not create himself, and he is not using the D.C. Police for federal purposes, as required by law.' The legislation was also co-sponsored by House Oversight Ranking Member Rep. Robert Garcia (D-Calif.), but cannot be taken up during the August recess. Once lawmakers return, it's unlikely the GOP-controlled body would bring the legislation to the floor. Sen. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.) sponsored a companion bill in the Senate. The lawmakers argue Trump's police takeover is only the latest in a string of actions they say undermine effective governance of the city, including on crime, though D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser's budget fully funded MPD. Earlier this year, Congress failed to include in its stopgap funding bill language that would allow D.C. to continue spending its local budget at fiscal 2025 levels — restricting $1 billion in city coffers. 'While Trump claims that federal control of D.C. is necessary to combat crime, the President's own actions are what is jeopardizing public safety in the District. He and his allies in Congress refuse to allow the District to access the $1 billion in locally-raised revenue that would have funded D.C. police, fire and emergency response services, and other public safety efforts,' the lawmakers said in a joint release. 'He fired and demoted dozens of D.C.'s most experienced career prosecutors, contributing to a larger backlog of criminal cases being held up in court and longer wait times for crime victims to obtain justice.' Van Hollen said Trump was absent when D.C. 'actually needed support from the National Guard' on Jan. 6. 'His current takeover is an abuse of power and nothing more than a raw power grab,' he said in a statement. 'The District of Columbia has made important progress on public safety in recent years, and can do more if Trump and House Republicans get the hell out of their way and stop blocking D.C. from accessing $1 billion of its own funds to strengthen policing and provide other public services.'
Boston Globe
8 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Forget about Epstein. This 20-point polling gap should really worry Trump.
Almost impressively, Trump has gone on the offensive to push the Epstein story (and the awkward ties to his former friend) out of the daily news cycle. In recent weeks, we've seen aggressive ICE raids, threats to charge former President Barack Obama with treason, gerrymandering fights across the country, a federal takeover of the Washington police force, and now a high-profile meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin. The tactic seems to be working: Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up But Trump can't simply wish away persistent inflation concerns — both real and perceived. And in an environment where economic sentiment often drives elections, this could soon become a much bigger problem for Trump and Republicans. Advertisement The latest government report showed a key measure of inflation Advertisement Polls suggest voters have noticed. Trump's approval rating has been sliding since April. Today, about 46 percent of Americans approve of his job performance, while 52 percent disapprove, according to the In other words, the political danger here is not speculative. It's already measurable. It's also, like the Epstein problem, self-inflicted. Trump clearly fueled the Epstein controversy, both while out of office and now through his decision to break a campaign promise. Economists say his policies are doing the same for inflation. Tariffs have always been politically risky; they function as a tax on imports that eventually trickles down to consumers. Trump, however, has shown no sign of abandoning them. It's worth noting the contrast with Joe Biden's presidency, when inflation became a central political liability heading into the midterms and last year's election. Biden's inflation spike was largely attributed to snarled supply chains as the economy reopened from the pandemic and the spike in oil prices from the Ukraine war, exacerbated by the massive COVID relief spending he pushed. By comparison, Trump's inflation problem appears to be rooted more completely in his own policy choices, particularly on trade. Advertisement The irony is that Trump's 2024 victory was powered more by economic discontent than any other factor. Now, less than a year into his second term, those same voters may be reassessing that assumption as prices continue to rise. Two questions loom. First, what, if anything, will Trump do to bring prices down? So far, there's little indication he plans to soften his tariff stance. Second, will Democrats seize this moment to hammer inflation as a clear and objective failure of Trump's leadership? History suggests they might and that voters could respond. The Epstein headlines may fade, but prices for a wide variety of consumer goods don't appear to be. James Pindell is a Globe political reporter who reports and analyzes American politics, especially in New England.
