Pair of Rhode Island senators pitch gas tax fix, rideshare fee to shore up RIPTA's finances
A Rhode Island Public Transit Authority bus stops on Pocasset Avenue in Providence on Jan. 30, 2025. (Photo by Christopher Shea/Rhode Island Current)
As Rhode Island's statewide bus agency stares down a $32.6 million budget gap heading into the next fiscal year, two lawmakers are looking at ways to fill the gap without drawing from the state's general revenue fund.
A bill sponsored by Sen. Sam Zurier, a Providence Democrat, reforms how the state's gas tax is allocated to the Rhode Island Public Transit Authority (RIPTA), while another from Sen. Megan Kallman, a Pawtucket Democrat, would impose a new fee on rideshare services.
Zurier's bill would increase RIPTA's share of the state's annual gas tax revenue, which has never kept pace with inflation, he said.
When the General Assembly set the tax at 32.5 cents per gallon in 2015, the agency was allocated 9.75 cents per gallon — at the time a 30% share. But as the gas tax has since increased to 38 cents, RIPTA's share of the pot has since decreased by 4% to 26%, which Zurier said has cost the bus agency $5 million in annual revenue.
'The program they set up in 2015 was supposed to adjust for inflation,' Zurier said in an interview.
RIPTA's incoming deficit is the result of federal pandemic relief aid drying up. Last year, the General Assembly gave the statewide bus agency $15 million in unspent federal COVID funds to help plug its budget hole.
'But we know for a fact that money is not around this year,' Zurier said. 'And we know it would be difficult just to plug it with general revenues because we have a projected deficit.'
And no relief is coming from Gov. Dan McKee, at least until RIPTA submits a report on its operations to the governor, House speaker, and Senate president by March 1, as stipulated in the bus agency's fiscal 25 budget.
McKee's proposed fiscal 2026 budget allocates $126.6 million to RIPTA, despite $159.1 million in projected expenditures. RIPTA had a budget of $153.4 million for fiscal 2025.
The gas tax itself is based on the gallons of gas purchased in Rhode Island — a source that will become less stable as drivers shift to more fuel-efficient and electric vehicles.
'That's something that is a positive in terms of our environmental goals, but it has a practical downside when you rely on those gas tax proceeds to fund critical transportation infrastructure,' GrowSmart RI Deputy Director John Flaherty said in an interview.
RIPTA now gets about $40 million in annual gasoline tax revenues, based on its existing allocation of 9.75 cents per gallon. But that revenue is projected to drop over $1 million when fiscal year 2026 starts this July, according to projections from the Rhode Island Department of Revenue.
If RIPTA's share of the gas tax remains unchanged, revenues are expected to drop to $32.9 million by fiscal year 2030 even as projections show the Rhode Island Department of Transportation's (RIDOT) share of the gas tax increasing one cent every other year.
McKee's proposed budget leaves public transit advocates fuming over RIPTA's $32M deficit
RIDOT's share goes from 22.25 cents per gallon for fiscal years 2026 and 2027 and increases to 24.25 cents by fiscal 2030. State projections show RIDOT will receive $94 million in revenue for fiscal 2026 and drop to $86.6 million by fiscal 2030.
Another part of the gas tax problem, Flaherty said, is how the state calculates increases. The Department of Revenue adjusts the gas tax to account for inflation every two years, but only considers inflation from the previous year.
Zurier said he plans to correct that with a separate bill mandating the state consider both years.
The proposed changes are welcomed by RIPTA as it seeks to close its budget deficit.
'I would like to thank Senator Zurier for his support and look forward to collaborating with the governor and General Assembly to identify a sustainable financial plan for RIPTA that allows us to fulfill our mission,' RIPTA CEO Christopher Durand said in an emailed statement.
Zurier admits there is a slight wrinkle in his tax plan for RIPTA: McKee's budget proposal to charge electric vehicle owners higher with registration fees. The governor's proposal calls for using any revenue from EV registration to help support municipal road repairs, which until now have been funded using federal pandemic aid.
Zurier's gas tax allocation bill seeks to allocate 30% of those fees toward funding RIPTA — granted the registration fees are even approved by the legislature.
'It's a controversial measure and I'm not sure if it's going to make it into the final budget,' the senator said. 'And I still haven't developed my own position on that yet.'
Both of Zurier's bills, which were introduced on Jan. 23, were referred to the Senate Committee on Finance, where they have yet to be scheduled for an initial hearing. Companion legislation has not yet been filed in the House.
More help for RIPTA could come from a proposed tax on Uber and Lyft rides. Kallman's legislation would add a 75 cent fee to each fare collected by rideshare companies — half of which would go toward funding statewide transit.
The bill would also direct sales tax revenue already being collected from rideshare companies to a restricted receipt account to fund RIPTA.
'Whether it's reducing our greenhouse gas emissions, making Rhode Island more attractive to employers or increasing workforce participation, we cannot make progress without a healthy RIPTA,' Kallman said in a statement. 'RIPTA needs steady and diverse funding streams that will allow it to operate smoothly year-to-year and expand its services to meet the transit needs of Rhode Islanders.'
Kallman introduced the same legislation last year, where it was held for further study by the Senate Committee on Finance. The latest bill was filed Jan. 31 and was referred to the same committee, where it has yet to be scheduled for a hearing.
A similar rideshare surcharge was put in place in Massachusetts in 2016 as a way to fund local road maintenance — something the Save RIPTA coalition highlighted on X Tuesday in celebrating Kallman's bill.
'It's time to do this in RI,' the coalition posted.
Durand said he was grateful for Kallman's support of public transit.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
38 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Challenge to Tampa Bay Senate seat revisits how it was created in 2022
The federal courthouse in Tampa on June 11, 2025. (Photo by Mitch Perry/Florida Phoenix) Day Three of the federal lawsuit alleging that a Tampa Bay area state Senate district was racially gerrymandered focused in part on how that district was created in 2022. The suit, filed by the ACLU of Florida and the Civil Rights & Racial Justice Clinic at New York University on behalf of three residents of Tampa and St. Petersburg, alleges the Legislature packed Black voters into District 16 to reduce their influence in nearby District 18, in violation of their equal-protection rights. Democrat Darryl Rouson serves in SD 16, while Republican Nick DiCeglie is the incumbent in SD 18. The defendants are Senate President Ben Albritton and Florida Secretary of State Cord Byrd, and their attorneys began their defense on Wednesday, bringing Jay Ferrin back to the witness stand in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida in Tampa. Ferrin is now a senior adviser to the Florida Senate, but he served as staff director of the Florida Senate Committee on Reapportionment in the fall of 2021, when the districts lines were created. He discussed how he and his staff went about drawing up the Senate districts that year and the guidelines they followed. The reapportionment process beginning that fall was taking place under the guidance of Ray Rodrigues, who chaired the Senate Reapportionment Committee. Defense attorneys aired several Florida Channel video excerpts on Wednesday showing Rodrigues explaining how 'hard lessons were learned' following the Florida Supreme Court's decision in 2015 to throw out the GOP-controlled Legislature's maps after deeming them unlawful under the Fair Districts constitutional amendments adopted by voters in 2010. Rodrigues was insistent that he wanted the 2022 Legislature to conduct itself in such a fashion that the courts would not reject the maps lawmakers would produce. 'This map will withstand a court challenge,' Rodrigues declared on the floor of the Senate. That's what the trial taking place this week will ultimately determine. Ferrin testified that, after his staff created other Senate districts in the Tampa Bay area, there remained about 100,000 residents in Pinellas County who would have to be inserted into another Senate district. (With the population of Florida in 2021 at 21.5 million people, Ferrin said, his staff were tasked to draw approximately 538,438 voters into each of the 40 Senate districts). The resultant SD 16, which encompasses parts of St. Petersburg and Hillsborough County, is similar to the 'benchmark' map created in 2015 that was then known as Senate District 19. Ferrin denied that he was instructed to maintain that same configuration. He also said that under the rules promulgated by Rodrigues, he and his fellow staffers could speak about any new maps only with either the Senate's general counsel or other Senate members — and not the general public. He was not supposed to review public submissions. Florida senators were allowed to propose amendments during the reapportionment process, to add their own maps. Rodrigues and Democratic Sen. Audrey Gibson had filed such amendments, Ferrin said, but no senator had asked him to directly to create any Senate maps. ACLU attorney Nicholas Warren said at the beginning of the morning that he had sought to depose Rodrigues and fellow Republican and committee member Danny Burgess before the trial, but both had asserted legislative privilege, which shields them having to testify in certain lawsuits. In the afternoon, the defense called two expert witnesses who criticized the expert witness testimony and voting analysis that came from the plaintiffs on Tuesday. Steven Voss is a political science professor at the University of Kentucky. When asked to break down the political partisanship of the Tampa Bay area, he included four counties that make up the Tampa Bay metropolitan statistical area — Hillsborough, Pinellas, Polk and Hernando. Based on population, he said, five Senate districts could be folded into the area, and that three historically were reliably Republican while two would favor Democrats. Currently, that breakdown is four Republican districts and one Democratic — with Senate District 14, which Voss said historically favored Democrats, going to the GOP in 2022. Voss took aim at the alternative voting maps produced for the ACLU by Penn State University professor of statistics Cory McCartan. Those maps showed that a district could have been fairly drawn up exclusively in Hillsborough County while still protecting Tier-1 standards there and in Pinellas County. (That involves the Florida Constitution's Fair District Amendment, which says that districts shall not be drawn with the intent or result of denying or abridging the equal opportunity of racial or language minorities to participate in the political process or diminish their ability to elect representatives of their choice). Voss said that the result of McCartan's work was that he was 'cracking and packing' voters in his maps to ultimately help Democrats at the voting booth. Sean Trende, senior elections analyst for RealClearPolitics, also testified for the defense. He praised the composition of the Senate maps passed by the Legislature in 2022, saying it was 'pretty incompetent racial gerrymandering, if that's what's going on.' The trial is expected to conclude on Thursday. SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Yahoo
38 minutes ago
- Yahoo
David Hogg exits DNC
David Hogg ended his 130-day tenure at the Democratic National Committee on Wednesday, opting not to run again for vice chair after DNC members voted to hold a re-vote for the job. 'I have decided to not run in this upcoming election so the party can focus on what really matters,' Hogg wrote in a letter announcing his decision. The news that Hogg would not seek the role again was first reported by Semafor. Hogg's decision ended a months-long saga that began with a botched Feb. 1 election, continued with a challenge by one of the Democrats who lost to him, and turned into a widely-covered argument about the future of the party. The 25-year-old Democrat, who frustrated some in the party when he told The New York Times that his political PAC would intervene in Democratic primaries, clashed with DNC Chair Ken Martin over a plan to bar that sort of politicking by committee members. 'I commend David for his years of activism, organizing, and fighting for his generation,' Martin said in a statement. 'While I continue to believe he is a powerful voice for this party, I respect his decision to step back from his post as vice chair. I have no doubt that he will remain an important advocate for Democrats across the map. I appreciate his service as an officer, his hard work, and his dedication to the party.'Last month, the DNC's rules and bylaws committee recommended that the full party vote to hold new elections, siding with Democratic activist Kalyn Free, who'd lost the Feb. 1 election for vice chair. On Wednesday afternoon, the DNC announced that the party had voted to approve Free's challenge by a 294-99 margin, and would hold new elections on the grounds that the Feb. 1 vote had violated its rules. In the new election, under the party's gender parity rules, one vice chair slot would be reserved for a male candidate, and one slot could go to a candidate of any gender. Malcolm Kenyatta, who was elected to the male vice chair slot on Feb. 1, had won more votes than Hogg that day; Hogg won the second slot over Free and two other female candidates. The re-vote loomed as much more difficult for Hogg. On Thursday, California DNC members held a call about their plans for this week's votes. Most did not favor holding a new election. But if one was held, several members who had supported Hogg before intended to support someone else, with several favoring Washington state Democratic chair Shasti Conrad, the runner-up to Hogg in February. 'I appreciate that DNC members wanted to rectify the issues with balloting in the previous election,' Conrad told Semafor. 'I'm looking forward to putting this all behind us, and getting back to the work of electing Democrats.' On Sunday, Politico published audio of a May 15 meeting between DNC officers, including Hogg, where Martin said that the vice chair had 'essentially destroyed any chance I have to show the leadership that I need to' at a crucial time for the party. Hogg denied being the source of the leak, but that weakened his position with party members further, with several saying on the record, and on social media, that Hogg could not be trusted. That led to Wednesday's lopsided online vote for a new election. Candidates who had competed for the roles in February were allowed to run again, and to submit one-minute videos making their cases. According to several DNC members, Hogg was the only potential candidate who did not submit a video. The online election for the male vice chair role will be held as scheduled, ending on Saturday. Kenyatta will be the only candidate on the ballot, and the election for the other vice chair role will be held between Sunday and all that? Hogg's win on Feb. 1 came at the end of a long day when DNC members agreed to rush their final vote and get it over with. No one in the room expected this to happen next. Hogg had been clear that he co-led The Future We Deserve, a PAC that spent money to elect Democratic candidates. Free had filed her challenge to the vote weeks later. But not until April 15, when Shane Goldmacher of The New York Times reported that the PAC could spend money on primary challengers, did this explode into a controversy. Martin, who himself had once endorsed candidates as the chair of Minnesota's Democratic Farmer-Labor Party, was dead set on a rule banning party members from doing that in the future. This was, in part, a legacy of the 2016 presidential primary, where Hillary Clinton's early support from party members infuriated supporters of Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), who called the primary rigged — even though Clinton would end up with more votes and more delegates elected in the primaries and caucuses. Ahead of the 2020 primary, Democrats changed their rules to prevent 'superdelegates' (DNC members not elected in primaries) from voting on the first ballot at a national nominating convention. And before the 2024 primary, the DNC voted to endorse Joe Biden as its nominee — a decision that complicated things for any potential Biden challenger, and the three who did run. A few states opted not to hold primaries altogether, pledging their delegates to Biden — who, of course, ended up bowing out before the convention, after the most damaging debate in the history of presidential elections. When will Democrats get past the party's internal struggles, all of them distractions from the work of opposing the Trump administration and beating Republicans? Today, they hope. The Hogg drama really didn't have any effect on Democrats' ability to win elections this year, like Wisconsin's state supreme court race and an Iowa state Senate election that flipped back a GOP-held seat. As Martin said on the call, obtained by Politico's Holly Otterbein, the story made Democrats look bad, distracted from their work, and made life easier for Republicans. But Hogg made his point, one that a lot of Democrats do agree with: There are a great many elderly incumbents who aren't doing much for the party, and they create problems for the people they want to serve when they die in office instead of letting new talent rise the Times, Goldmacher has more on Hogg's decision. 'It is clear that there is a fundamental disagreement about the role of a Vice Chair — and it's OK to have disagreements. What isn't OK is allowing this to remain our focus when there is so much more we need to be focused on.' In Fast Company, before the vote, Devin Gordon talked to Hogg about what might happen with his challenge to the party.
Yahoo
38 minutes ago
- Yahoo
RFK Jr.'s newest CDC vaccine panel includes critics of COVID shots, lockdowns
The Brief U.S. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has replaced the government's vaccine advisory panel with eight new appointees. The new members include vocal critics of COVID-19 vaccines and pandemic lockdowns, such as Dr. Robert Malone and Dr. Martin Kulldorff. Public health groups have raised concerns that Kennedy's changes could undermine long-standing vaccination policies. NEW YORK - U.S. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has named eight new vaccine policy advisers to replace the panel that he abruptly dismissed earlier this week. His selections include a scientist who researched mRNA vaccine technology and transformed into a conservative darling for his criticisms of COVID-19 vaccines, and a leading critic of pandemic-era lockdowns. RELATED: RFK Jr. ousts entire CDC vaccine panel Kennedy made the announcement in a social media post on Wednesday. The backstory Kennedy's decision to "retire" the previous 17-member panel was widely decried by doctors' groups and public health organizations, who feared the advisers would be replaced by a group aligned with Kennedy's desire to reassess — and possibly end — longstanding vaccination recommendations. Dig deeper The new appointees to the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices include Dr. Robert Malone, the former mRNA researcher who emerged as a close adviser to Kennedy during the measles outbreak. Malone, who runs a wellness institute and a popular blog, rose to popularity during the COVID-19 pandemic as he relayed conspiracy theories around the outbreak and the vaccines that followed. He has appeared on podcasts and other conservative news outlets where he's promoted unproven and alternative treatments for measles and COVID-19. He has claimed that millions of Americans were hypnotized into taking the COVID-19 shots. He's even suggested that those vaccines cause a form of AIDS. He's downplayed deaths related to one of the largest measles outbreaks in the U.S. in years. Other appointees include Dr. Martin Kulldorff, a biostatistician and epidemiologist who was a co-author of the Great Barrington Declaration, an October 2020 letter maintaining that pandemic shutdowns were causing irreparable harm. Dr. Cody Meissner, a former ACIP member, also was named. Big picture view The committee, created in 1964, makes recommendations to the director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. CDC directors almost always approve those recommendations on how Food and Drug Administration-cleared vaccines should be used. The CDC's final recommendations are widely heeded by doctors and determine the scope of vaccination programs. The Source The Associated Press contributed to this report. The information in this story comes from a social media announcement made by U.S. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. on Wednesday, in which he introduced eight new members to the federal vaccine advisory panel. This story was reported from Los Angeles.
