logo
Elections board member says she still believes rules were ‘beneficial' despite Supreme Court ruling

Elections board member says she still believes rules were ‘beneficial' despite Supreme Court ruling

Yahoo10-06-2025
In a massive 96-page ruling, the Georgia Supreme Court struck down four controversial rules on Tuesday that the State Election Board tried to implement right before last year's presidential election
The justices said the SEB went way beyond its authority when it required each precinct to hand count ballots and allowed local election board members to refuse to certify results.
Chief Justice Nels Peterson wrote, 'The SEB can pass rules to implement and enforce the election code, but it cannot go beyond, change, or contradict the law.'
Scot Turner heads a group of former GOP lawmakers who challenged the rules in court.
'I think it's a tremendous victory for conservatism,' Turner told Channel 2's Richard Elliot.
RELATED STORIES:
Lawsuit filed against State Election Board by Republicans to 'rein in unelected' members' authority
Raffensperger says voters 'should be concerned' over new, possibly illegal, Election Board rules
Secretary of State say State Election Board has overstepped legal authority over new rules
State elections board votes to require hand-counting of ballots at polling places
Georgia AG says new rules from State Election Board may 'conflict' with state election laws
Brad Raffensperger calls Georgia Election Rule Changes misguided, criticizes state board
Judge says new Georgia election rules are 'illegal, unconstitutional and void'
Georgia Election Board member's appearance at Trump rally sparks debate over code of conduct,
Other groups joined in later, including the ACLU and the NAACP.
Turner said the SEB basically tried to create laws, something blatantly unconstitutional.
'Nobody elected the State Election Board members, and they took it upon themselves to create new laws. That's a separation of powers issue. It becomes a major problem when you allow that to go unchecked,' Turner said.
Election board member Janelle King said she respects the ruling but still believes in the rules they tried to pass.
'I absolutely respect our judicial system,' King said.
King told Elliot that they'll now focus their attention on convincing lawmakers to either give the SEB the legal authority to make these rule changes or change the rules themselves.
'I still wholeheartedly believe that these rules are beneficial, useful, and the intent is still there. However, now the ball is in the court of our legislators,' King said.
Just hours after the Supreme Court announced its decision, the Georgia House announced its blue-ribbon study committee on election procedures will meet for the first time on July 17.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Newsom calls Nov. 4 special election to counter GOP redistricting push
Newsom calls Nov. 4 special election to counter GOP redistricting push

Yahoo

time26 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Newsom calls Nov. 4 special election to counter GOP redistricting push

California Gov. Gavin Newsom announced Thursday that his state would hold a special election on Nov. 4 to ask voters to approve a mid-decade redistricting plan. 'We can't stand back and watch this democracy disappear district by district," said Gov. Gavin Newsom in a press conference on Aug. 14 to announce the vote on California's Election Rigging Response Act. The proposed redrawn district maps could be released as early as Friday, Aug. 15, according to media reports. For weeks, Newsom and California Democratic lawmakers have been floating plans for this mid-decade redistricting. It's in response to Trump and White House officials who've urged Texas Republican leaders to redraw voting maps to gain five new Republican-friendly seats to the U.S. House of Representatives, USA TODAY reported. In California, congressional district maps are drawn by the independent California Citizens Redistricting Commission — not legislators — which was created when voters passed the Voters First Act in 2008. California has 52 congressional districts, nine of which are currently represented by Republican congressmen. 'We tried to play by a higher set of standards and rules with our independent redistricting, and we believe in that and we are not talking about eliminating that commission,' Newsom said in an earlier press conference on Aug. 8. 'We are talking about emergency measures to respond to what's happening in Texas and we will nullify what happens in Texas. We will pick up five seats with the consent of the people.' Polling shows that most Californians do not favor Newsom's proposed legislative redistricting, as they support the 2008 and 2010 initiatives that separated legislative officials from the drawing of congressional districts. Thus, Newsom is rallying Californians to support this initiative and trust officials to draw the state's lines. Here's what to know about the proposed plan to redistrict California. Newsom officially launches California's Election Rigging Response Act 'Today is liberation day in the state of California,' Newsom said at the beginning of his press conference speech. The Election Rigging Response Act would require a two-thirds vote in both chambers of the Legislature to appear on the ballot. If approved for the ballot, it would need a simple majority of voters to pass and would impact congressional elections in 2026, 2028, and 2030. Newsom made it clear that this proposal is a temporary pathway to combat the redistricting efforts of other states. Newsom emphasized that legislative control over redistricting in California is temporary and intended solely to counter Republican efforts to gain additional Congressional seats. He added that California would withdraw from this approach if Texas were to end its redistricting maneuvers. The move isn't just for California's benefit—it's meant to set an example for other states, Newsom said. He hopes blue states will respond to red-state redistricting in kind. While the plan shifts redistricting power to the government, Newsom emphasized it ultimately empowers voters. California's process will be transparent and public, unlike Texas's more private approach. Voters will see the proposed maps before casting ballots and have the final say on their adoption. 'We are about to get power back to the people. You have, on Nov. 4 in California, the power to stand up to Trump. You have the power to declare that you support a system that is not rigged." Who among California's elected officials support the Election Rigging Response Act? California Senators Alex Padilla and Adam Schiff both spoke at the conference in support of Newsom and the act. Padilla and Schiff agreed that California must fight against Donald Trump to defend democracy. Schiff said, 'You come after our votes in California, and we will fight you tooth and nail. Donald Trump, you do not poke the bear. Not while we are around.' Assembly member Isaac Bryan, member-elect of the California State Senate Sabrina Cervantes, and chairman of the House Democratic Caucus Pete Aguilar also gave speeches before Newsom's appearance. Cervantes said that if other states had established independent election committees like California's, this strategic redistricting would not be happening in red states. She also stated that the upcoming midterms could be the "last chance to check Trump's abuse of power." Who is not in support of the Election Rigging Response Act? In response to Newsom's announcement, Assemblywoman Alexandra Macedo, Vice Chair of the Assembly Committee on Elections, issued a statement calling the act a "power-grab" to make national headlines. 'Californians demand and deserve transparency from their government. Governor Newsom's sinister redistricting scheme is the opposite. There is no public input," read the statement. Additionally, Macedo said in the statement that Newsom is attempting to dismiss and take power away from the California Citizens Redistricting Commission. Who else spoke at Newsom's press conference? In addition to members of the California legislature, a series of speakers representing a diverse number of interest groups spoke at the press conference. Each speaker explained how different Americans could be affected if Republicans successfully take control of the House through redistricting measures. Jodie Hicks, president of Planned Parenthood Affiliates of California, spoke about the overturn of Roe v. Wade. She said that a federal abortion ban could happen if Republican states successfully redistrict to rig elections. To protect reproductive freedom, she said, fighting back with legislative redistricting is the answer. Hicks said, 'You take away our freedoms? We'll take away your seats.' Erika Jones, elementary school teacher and Secretary Treasurer of the California Teachers Association, spoke to how students are under the threat of ICE and Trump is defunding education. She said that, with more Republicans in the House, these conditions would worsen for her students. Lorena Gonzalez, president of the California Federation of Labor Unions, said that Trump is not pro-worker, and David Huerta, president of the Service Employees International Union, California, had a similar sentiment. He said that Republicans' goal is to silence working people and serve corporations. Huerta said, 'California voters must be allowed to save our democracy. And I trust that California voters will save our democracy.' When will the special election for the Election Rigging Response Act take place? Newsom called for a special election on Nov. 4, 2025, for voters to decide on the congressional maps before the 2026 midterms. These maps would remain through the 2030 elections. It would take a simple majority of voters to pass the redistricting act. What do California polls say about redistricting proposal? A recent POLITICO-Citrin Center-Possibility Lab poll shows that nearly two-thirds of Californians prefer to retain the independent commission, with only 36% supporting legislative control over redistricting. Newsom acknowledged the uphill battle but argued that 'inaction is not an option' if partisan gerrymandering continues unchecked in other states. What do current California congressional district maps look like? Sarah Sadhwani, commissioner from the California Redistricting Commission, spoke about how she drew the district lines that are currently in place. She claimed the maps are fair, nonpartisan, and competitive, but she said they must be redrawn to "level the playing field" in the next election cycle. Sadhwani said she is in support of Newsom's legislation 'with the expectation that this is a one-time occurrence. That this does not subvert the will of California.' See the current congressional district maps in California: Which California Congressional districts are represented by Republicans? California has 52 congressional districts, nine of which are currently represented by Republican congressmen: Doug LaMalfa, 1st Congressional District of California Kevin Kiley, 3rd Congressional District of California Tom McClintock, 5th Congressional District of California Vince Fong, 20th Congressional District of California David Valadao, 22nd Congressional District of California Jay Obernolte, 23rd Congressional District of California Young Kim, 40th Congressional District of California Ken Calvert, 41st Congressional District of California Darrell Issa, 48th Congressional District of California These lawmakers said in a joint statement in late July that they'd 'fight any attempt to disenfranchise California voters by whatever means necessary to ensure the will of the people continues to be reflected in redistricting and in our elections.' 'The Commission received feedback from tens of thousands of Californians as to their communities of interest, which shaped the current set of congressional districts,' they said. 'Districts that represent the local communities that they live in, rather than the whims of one political party. A partisan political gerrymander is NOT what the voters of California want, as they clearly stated when they passed the VOTERS FIRST Act and participated in the Citizens Redistricting Commission process.' This article originally appeared on Palm Springs Desert Sun: Newsom Announces Nov. 4 Vote on California Redistricting Plan

One-on-One: Secretary Condoleezza Rice: 'We Keep Striving'
One-on-One: Secretary Condoleezza Rice: 'We Keep Striving'

Fox News

time28 minutes ago

  • Fox News

One-on-One: Secretary Condoleezza Rice: 'We Keep Striving'

'The case for America is not that America is perfect. The case for America is we keep striving.' – Condoleezza Rice. In this exclusive interview, Bret speaks to the former Secretary of State to President George W. Bush, Condoleezza Rice, the first-ever Black American Woman to hold the title. Secretary Rice tells the story of how she was able to rise to prominence in an era where Jim Crow laws prohibited millions from a fair shot at the American dream, and why she grew to love her country despite that. Secretary Rice also discusses the difficulties she faced in helping run a nation with hundreds of conflicting views, the role America must play in international politics, and why millions across the globe still strive for American citizenship. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store