Teenage girl sues £34k-a-year private school after 'drug-laced vape' given to her by older boys left her 'high all weekend' and suffering from PTSD
Irune Pedrayes was only 14 and in her first weeks at the £34,000-a-year Buckswood School when she was supplied with vape liquid containing the stimulant mephedrone by senior boys at her school.
Miss Pedrayes, now 19, claims she spent a weekend vaping the Class B controlled substance and drinking with others on the rugby pitch at the school, which is near Hastings in East Sussex.
But the binge landed her in hospital after she suffered an extended 'psychotic outbreak' for which she blames the school's alleged lack of safeguarding - a claim denied by its lawyers.
Her parents were not told and the breakdown continued for weeks until she left the school to return to her native Spain, where she received antipsychotic medication.
She is now suing the school for £145,000 in compensation at the High Court, claiming its failure to properly supervise pupils led to her drug use and resulting psychotic breakdown and PTSD.
Miss Pedrayes' lawyers say she was a 'vulnerable' pupil with additional needs who should have been supported better, while adequate supervision of its pupils would have meant the three-day binge did not happen.
Prior to moving to the school from Spain, she had never used drugs and it was only when she arrived at Buckswood that she succumbed because of the 'easy access' to illicit substances there, they say.
However, the school - which caters for children aged 11-19 and calls itself a 'global school in the heart of the British countryside' with a 'safe, supportive and family-like atmosphere' - denies liability for her psychiatric conditions.
Lawyers for Buckswood say robust anti-drug policies were in place. The school's behaviour policy states that pupils face exclusion if caught with drugs.
Sitting at the High Court in London, Judge Geraint Webb KC was told that Miss Pedrayes had suffered with 'psychological problems' while in Spain, where she failed a year at school before moving to the UK.
But her behaviour when she moved to Buckswood was challenging, with repeated detentions, before being 'gated' - confined to school grounds at weekend - at the time of the drug incident.
Her barrister Meghann McTague said the pupil was given 'magic', a vape liquid containing mephedrone, by upper sixth boys in September 2019. The other students had allegedly ordered it online - delivered directly to the school.
The drug - known by the street names 'meow-meow', bubble and 'm-cat' - conjures feelings of euphoria and alertness, but can also cause anxiety and heart palpitations.
'The claimant spent that whole weekend - Friday, Saturday and Sunday - consuming a Class B drug that was supplied to her by older boys at the school, and drinking alcohol that was also supplied to her,' Ms McTague said.
'This drug use took place on the rugby pitch at the school. She was with four other students from the school. Nobody discovered those students.
'Nobody noticed, despite attending mealtimes and at bedtime, that she was high all weekend.'
The school accepts that Miss Pedrayes suffered a 'psychotic' incident as a result of her drug use, which led to her being taken to hospital.
She complained of visual hallucinations, deja vu, tearfulness and anxiety, but went back to school without her parents being informed. Instead, they were told she had been caught with a vape, Ms McTague told the court.
Her behaviour deteriorated, with a further incident of drug use, and she left Buckswood in November, returning to Spain where she received psychiatric treatment. She continues to deal with PTSD and anxiety.
Ms McTague said the school was at fault because a 14-year-old should not be able to take drugs on school grounds for three days without being seen.
'Whilst she was under Buckswood's care, she was able to consume drugs and alcohol with other children, as well as boys aged between 17 and 19 in the sixth form, on the school premises,' she added.
'It is Miss Pedrayes' evidence that there was "easy access" to drugs at the school and that 'surveillance varied in terms of strictness'.
'In her estimation, the use of drugs at the school was not something that was "very important" to the school.'
She accused the school of a 'total failure of supervision', adding: 'The students should have been supervised by the boarding house staff. If they had been supervised properly, this never would have happened.'
A 2019 Ofsted inspection report mentioned 'recent concerns about students using drugs'. The school is now assessed by the Independent Schools Inspectorate, which said in 2023 that safeguarding measures had been 'strengthened'.
'The claimant submits that this was far from a 'one-off' isolated incident,' she told the judge.
'Older students were having drugs delivered to the school and were able to use them in groups on the school premises with younger children.
'There was an endemic problem of substance abuse and a culture of tolerance.'
Barrister Nigel Edwards, for Buckswood, told the judge that the school denies breaching the duty of care owed to Miss Pedrayes, pointing out that she had been made aware of the school's ban on drugs and alcohol.
'The defendant avers that it complied with its obligations and put in place risk assessments, systems and rules to educate, discourage and try to prevent pupils accessing drugs,' he said.
'Staff were available night and day within the boarding house. School rules were in place expressly prohibiting illicit drugs.
'There was a behaviour policy in place. Staff could and did search pupils' rooms. Staff could and did search pupils.'
He added that the school would speak to the police about drug issues in the school, suspend pupils who used drugs and bring in sniffer dogs to check for drugs.
He concluded: 'The school had in place a reasonably adequate system of supervision...it is for the claimant to establish that the supervision provided fell below the reasonable standard.'
Part of Miss Pedrayes' case is that there were 'clear safeguarding risks' relating to her, including 'impulsive and negative behaviour,' but that she had been instead treated by the school simply as a 'badly behaved child.'
But the school's principal, Kevin Samson, told the judge there was no evidence before the incident that Miss Pedrayes was 'a cause for concern regarding vaping, smoking or drinking.'
He said the school had not told her parents about the incident after it happened because she had taken a urine test, which produced a negative result.
Continuing, he said he doubted that the drug use could have really happened on the rugby pitch, which is in plain sight, or whether Miss Pedrayes had really consumed drugs all weekend, as she claims.
He also insisted that adequate supervision was in place for pupils, adding: 'It's not realistic to have a member of staff next to every child 24 hours a day.'
Following a two-day trial, Judge Webb reserved his decision on the case until a later date.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
27 minutes ago
- The Independent
Why are protesters targeting a hotel in Essex?
Over 500 protesters gathered outside a hotel in Essex which houses asylum seekers on Sunday, with police condemning scenes which descended into 'mindless thuggery.' Six arrests were made following the violence, as participants injured a police officer and damaged a police vehicle outside the hotel in Epping. Essex Police say teams are still searching for three individuals in connection with the unrest. Footage from the scenes on Sunday shows rioters attacking police vans, with one man struck by a vehicle which was attempting to navigate the crowds. Later in the evening, two security guards working the Bell Hotel were also attacked at a bus stop, and are recovering in hospital. The attacked is being treated as a racist hate crime. The events marked the third time in a week that violent scenes unfolded outside the Bell Hotel, which is being used to temporarily house asylum seekers. Chief Supt Simon Anslow said: 'Disappointingly we have seen yet another protest, which begun peacefully, escalate into mindless thuggery with individuals again hurting one of our officers and damaging a police vehicle. 'For anyone who thinks we will tolerate their thuggery – think again.' Reports have varied as to the cause of the violence. Here is everything we know: Why did the protest happen? The events were organised in response to the arrest of an asylum seeker who was later charged with sexual offences against a teenager and adult in the town, eight days after arriving to the UK via boat. Hadush Kebatu, 38, from Ethiopia, denies the allegations and remains in custody. He is charged with three counts of sexual assault, alongside inciting a girl to engage in sexual activity and harassment without violence. On Thursday 10 July, Essex Police confirmed that the man had been arrested after being alerted to 'reports of a man acting inappropriately towards a teenager.' The initial protest on Sunday 13 July was sparked after Mr Kebatu was charged. Reports indicate that most of those in attendance at the protest were local people concerned about this incident and the location of the asylum accommodation. Signs reading 'Protect Our Kids' could be seen in the crowds during the hours that the protest was peaceful, with families in attendance with their children. Epping Forest District Council has called on the Home Office to close asylum seeker hotels, including the Bell Hotel. Following the disruption, council leader Chris Whitbread repeated concerns that its location is 'entirely unsuitable.' He added: 'I am deeply disappointed that during the demonstration outside the Bell Hotel in Epping on Thursday night, some individuals chose to engage in violent and disruptive behaviour. 'I condemn their actions. They not only undermined their message but also put fellow protesters, police officers and residents at risk.' Were the far-right involved? Experts from far-right research group Hope Not Hate say this series of gatherings which began with largely peaceful intent were co-opted by actors intent on causing violence. Several prominent members of the far-right were in attendance at the protest, analysis by the group's Right Response Team found, with figurehead Tommy Robinson drawing attention to the initial protest on Sunday. Footage and photography from Thursday and Sunday's events show people with links to groups such as the British National Party (BNP), Britain First, Patriotic Alternative and neo-nazi group Blood & Honour all in attendance. The Bell Hotel has regularly attracted anti-migrant protests organised by groups such as these since 2020, Hope Not Hate explains, with actors capitalising on the recent concern to reignite racial tensions. A report from the group reads: 'The events in Epping are a symptom of a recurring trend within the far right: co-opting the high emotions of local people to whip up hatred, pushing what could have been a peaceful protest towards violent disorder. 'The individuals engaging in violence are not representative of the people of Epping, who are understandably angry following the assault of a local girl. 'Instead, they sow division in the local area, which does nothing to assist the victims of sexual abuse.'
The Independent
27 minutes ago
- The Independent
Former Tory MP appears in court charged with having false passport
A former Conservative MP has appeared in court accused of having a false passport during the time she was sitting in Parliament. Katie Wallis, 41, of Butetown, Cardiff, the MP for Bridgend in South Wales from 2019 to 2024, became the first openly transgender MP in the House of Commons in 2022. Wallis, who uses female pronouns and was previously known as Jamie, appeared before Cardiff Crown Court on Monday representing herself. The charge was not read out in court, but the defendant previously appeared in Cardiff Magistrates' Court accused of having a false passport 'without reasonable excuse'. Wallis was alleged to be in possession of the document in April 2022, while she was still serving as a Conservative MP. Judge Tracey Lloyd-Clarke, the Recorder of Cardiff, adjourned the hearing for Wallis to either seek legal representation or make an informed decision on representing herself. The judge said: 'I'm going to adjourn this for a short period of time to enable you to decide whether you want to get at least some initial advice.' Wallis will next appear on August 15. Wallis, who appeared in court wearing a pink jacket, was released on bail until the next hearing.
The Independent
27 minutes ago
- The Independent
Mother jailed for killing four-month-old baby daughter
A mother who killed her four-month-old baby girl by violently shaking her has been jailed for 15 years. Melissa Wilband, 28, was found guilty by a jury of the manslaughter of Lexi Wilband, who collapsed at their home in Newent, Gloucestershire, in April 2020. Bristol Crown Court heard tests revealed how Lexi died following bleeding on her brain, likely caused by being violently shaken, both recently and on at least one earlier occasion. Lexi died at Bristol Children's Hospital, with a nurse holding her hand, on April 18 – six days after her collapse. Wilband's former partner, Jack Wheeler, 31, was acquitted of causing or allowing Lexi's death. Mr Wheeler had also been charged with Lexi's manslaughter but this was formally withdrawn during the trial after prosecutors offered no evidence against him. Passing sentence, Mr Justice Saini said he was satisfied Wilband had shaken Lexi twice. 'Lexi was about four-months-old when she died. She was a healthy baby,' he said. 'It is important that we recognise this is about her life being taken. 'You killed Lexi by violently shaking her at the family home in Newent. 'Lexi was killed by you when the country was in the first national Covid-19 lockdown. 'After the evening meal you were bathing Lexi and you shook Lexi, and immediately after this she went floppy. 'Your shaking of Lexi led to severe bleeding in her brain. 'I am sure on the evidence that Lexi had been shaken by you in another, less violent, incident before that Easter Sunday. 'Only you will know why you acted in the way you did. 'It is hard to imagine the pain that Lexi must have suffered both from the past violence and the violence that led to her death. 'She would have cried out in anguish.' During the trial, jurors were told that Wilband and Mr Wheeler were in a relationship for about three years, but Lexi was conceived with another man in early 2019. However, Wilband told Mr Wheeler, of Ledbury, Herefordshire, that he was the baby's biological father and presented him with a fake DNA certificate that claimed he was '100%' the 'farther' of her then-unborn child. A genuine DNA test after Lexi's birth in November 2019 confirmed that Mr Wheeler was not biologically related to her, but he remained with Wilband and brought up Lexi as if she were his own child. Jurors heard how Wilband, who had a volatile relationship with Mr Wheeler, took cocaine just six days after Lexi was born. On April 12 2020, Wilband made a 111 call from the new-build council house where she lived with Mr Wheeler and Lexi. She claimed Lexi had stopped breathing while in her bouncer chair. Lexi was taken to Gloucestershire Royal Hospital and was intubated, with Wilband asked if she would like to hold her baby before the procedure took place. She declined to do so. The infant was then transferred to Bristol Children's Hospital, where Wilband told medics that Mr Wheeler had been carrying Lexi in her bouncer chair and was swinging it. A decision was made to switch off Lexi's ventilator on April 17, following the results of an MRI scan. Jurors were told that Wilband spent three hours with Lexi that evening before leaving to go to sleep in a different part of the hospital. Jane Osborne KC, prosecuting, said Wilband was aware that her baby might die through the night but did not stay at her bedside. 'A staff nurse held Lexi's hand through the night and remained with her,' Ms Osborne said. 'On the morning of April 18, Lexi seemed to have longer pauses in her breathing. Ms Wilband was told to attend the ward. 'She arrived just after Lexi had ceased to show any signs of life and had stopped breathing.' A post-mortem examination gave Lexi's cause of death as bleeding to the brain, caused by a non-accidental traumatic event such as someone 'shaking her violently', Ms Osborne said. Further tests found the areas of bleeding in Lexi's eyes were 'too numerous to count', she added. Giving evidence, Wilband denied ever shaking Lexi and said she had a 'bad wrist' that meant she was physically unable to shake her, and sought to blame her partner. Mr Wheeler said he had no idea why Lexi had collapsed and denied carrying her in the bouncer chair.
