Trump denies discussing ceasefire with Zelensky
US President Donald Trump has denied discussing a Ukraine ceasefire during his meeting with Vladimir Zelensky on the sidelines of the NATO summit in The Hague, directly contradicting the Ukrainian leader's earlier remarks.
Zelensky had described the meeting as 'long and substantive,' claiming the two leaders had discussed ways to 'achieve a real peace.'
Speaking to reporters on Wednesday, Trump said the topic was not part of the conversation. 'No, no, I just… wanted to know how he's doing,' he said.
Trump added that he planned to speak with Russian President Vladimir Putin in hopes of bringing the conflict to an end, though he did not specify when the conversation might take place.
When pressed on his past claim that he could end the war within 24 hours, Trump said the comment had been 'sarcastic.' He acknowledged that resolving the conflict would not be easy, describing Putin as 'more difficult' than anticipated and admitting he 'had some problems with Zelensky' as well.
Asked if the US would contribute to the $5 billion in military aid pledged to Ukraine by other NATO countries, Trump reiterated only that the conflict must end.
In another exchange, a BBC Ukraine journalist asked whether the US would sell Patriot missile systems to Ukraine. Trump replied that the systems were 'very hard to get' and that the US also needed them. He noted that Washington was supplying Patriots to Israel but would 'see if we can make some available.'
Since taking office in January, Trump has repeatedly called for a negotiated settlement to the Ukraine conflict. Earlier this week, he said he hoped to reach a 'deal with Russia' to stop the fighting.
Moscow has maintained that it is willing to hold talks 'without preconditions,' but insists that any lasting agreement must reflect the current battlefield realities and Ukraine's neutrality.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Russia Today
3 hours ago
- Russia Today
Trump to consider future Ukraine aid
US President Donald Trump says he will think about whether or not to supply more Patriot air defense systems to Ukraine, as Kiev has been requesting. Speaking at a press conference in The Hague after meeting with Ukraine's Vladimir Zelensky on the sidelines of the NATO summit, Trump was asked by a BBC Ukraine journalist whether Washington would be providing the missiles. 'The systems are very hard to get,' he replied, adding that the US also needs them. Noting that some Patriots were being sent to Israel, Trump said the administration would 'see if we can make some of them available.' Ahead of the meeting, Zelensky said that Kiev was ready to buy the systems and 'support American weapons manufacturers' if Washington refused to donate them. The Ukrainian leader has previously asserted that the Patriot was the only system that could viably counter Russian missiles. However, Moscow has disputed claims about the Patriot's effectiveness, and even Ukrainian Air Force spokesman Yury Ignat acknowledged in an interview with Le Monde last month that the American system has shown critical limitations against Russia's weaponry. As of May, Ukraine reportedly had six operational Patriot systems, most of which were donated by the US and Germany, with additional components provided by the Netherlands and Romania. Zelensky has previously stated that Ukraine aimed to acquire a total of 25 units and urged Kiev's European backers to fund the purchase of another ten at a cost of $15 billion. The Trump administration had dismissed the proposal as a pipedream. When asked directly whether the US would contribute to the $5 billion in military aid pledged to Ukraine by other NATO countries, Trump only told reporters that the hostilities must end. Trump has pushed for a negotiated settlement to the Ukraine conflict since taking office in January, while voicing frustration over the slow pace of peace talks. On Wednesday, he said that he planned to speak with Russian President Vladimir Putin in hopes of bringing the conflict to an end, though he did not specify when the conversation might take place. Earlier this week, he said he hoped to reach a 'deal with Russia' to stop the fighting. Moscow has maintained that it is willing to hold talks 'without preconditions,' but insists that any lasting agreement must reflect the current realities on the battlefield and establish Ukrainian neutrality.
Russia Today
4 hours ago
- Russia Today
How the woke left abandoned feminism, labor, and the planet to globalism
What do Greta Thunberg, Simone Biles, and the American anti-ICE protesters have in common, besides a flair for theatrics and a knack for setting fire (sometimes literally) to the causes they claim to champion? The latest chaos gripping California like a leftist would a reusable tote bag containing oat milk and guilt, started at Home Depot in California. Immigration authorities raided one of the chain's parking lots in Los Angeles, which quickly escalated from 'can I help you find a hammer?' to full-blown urban dystopia. The next thing you know, someone's standing on a flaming car waving a Mexican flag like they just unlocked a Grand Theft Auto achievement. But let's rewind. Why Home Depot? Because, according to the Wall Street Journal, the White House instructed Immigration and Customs Enforcement to target undocumented workers hanging out in those parking lots. Think of them as the gig economy's open-air waiting room, just like the food delivery platform guys perched outside McDonald's, only with more drywall experience. They're trying to land quick jobs from people who'd rather pay under the table than decode a Swedish or Chinese manual to assemble one. And just like that, the entire progressive apparatus decided this was the next hill to die on. 'These are hardworking members of our community!' they cried. 'They do the jobs Americans won't do!' Hold up. When did defending a labor underclass become progressive chic? Didn't the left used to rage against this kind of exploitation? Corporate America must be thrilled that the revolution now comes with a free supply of cheap, compliant labor and a hashtag campaign to promote the idea that if you're against it, then you're a fascist. So congrats, leftists. You've handed the working class over to the pro-Trump populists like a party favor. Want to actually help undocumented foreigners in America? Try opposing the foreign policy dumpster fire that helped displace them: sanctions, economic sabotage, CIA meddling, and those 'extraterritorial legal tools' that make doing any business with them back home feel like pulling the arm on a Vegas slot machine. Your activist forebears knew this. Cesar Chavez didn't just fast for farmworkers; he opposed the Vietnam War, because he understood exploitation doesn't stop at the border. Tom Hayden fought for unions and against war. Dorothy Day started the Catholic Worker Movement and still managed to call out empire. Today's left, meanwhile, is acting like unpaid NATO interns on social media, slapping flags on their bios and cheering military adventures in the name of 'human rights.' In 1999, if you protested globalism, you were a leftist. Today, you're more likely to get tackled by Antifa. Nowhere is this ideological faceplant more obvious than in modern feminism. Take the recent online cage match between Olympic legend Simone Biles and former swimmer turned women's sports defender Riley Gaines. It kicked off when a Minnesota girls' softball team won a championship with a male pitcher. Gaines tweeted, 'To be expected when your star player is a boy.' Biles vaulted into the culture war and landed face first: 'You're truly sick, all of this campaigning because you lost a race. Straight up sore loser. You should be uplifting the trans community and perhaps finding a way to make sports inclusive OR creating a new avenue where trans feel safe in sports. Maybe a transgender category IN ALL sports!!' Then she added, 'Bully someone your own size, which would ironically be a male.' And just like that, one of the most decorated female athletes on Earth decided that women's sports are too exclusionary. Simone Biles, icon of women's physicality, now dunking on other women to make room for men in their lanes. How very empowering. Simone Biles somersaulted right over feminism and landed in patriarchy's lap. Second-wave feminist icon, Gloria Steinem, who once dedicated a chapter to female physical strength in Moving Beyond Words, lamented how she 'spurned sports' and felt 'angry for and at myself' for denying her own physical potential. Now imagine what Steinem might have said if her shot at athletic expression had been stomped out by a guy in a ponytail and jock strap lapping her on the track. No one's saying trans-identified males can't enjoy sports. But sacrificing women's opportunities so Chad can pitch for the varsity women's team on a full scholarship isn't exactly progress. Even Biles once joked, back in 2017, 'ahhhh good thing guys don't compete against girls or he'd take all the gold medals !!' Well, now they do. And Biles is cheering them on. What a win for feminism. Look, this isn't complicated. It's not feminism if you need a prostate to qualify. Seems that the most fragile thing about a women's sports record these days is the ego of a man in a wig trying to beat it. How long before uterus-free 'women' decide abortion's not a women's issue? Or take women's seats in government or society? Or tell insurance companies to deny coverage for ovarian cysts because they don't personally have them? The slippery slope here is basically a gender neutral waterslide. Meanwhile, guess who just got deported from Israel? Greta Thunberg, the climate's poster child. 'We were 12 peaceful volunteers sailing on a civilian ship carrying humanitarian aid on international waters. We did not break laws. We did nothing wrong,' she said after landing in Paris. Turns out climate change, which tragically supplanted tangible environmental problems like water and air quality, isn't the media darling that it once was. Maybe because people are too busy surviving economic policies crafted by the same technocrats Greta once marched beside. Maybe she's realized that saving the planet from carbon means even less when the people on it are starving and getting bombed. So now Greta's gone from scolding world leaders at Davos to helping to ferry aid under siege. You know things are off the rails when she's one of the only ones on the left with the logical sense to ditch a nonsense globalist cause for a real one. Too bad she couldn't just ride around on Greenpeace ships and actually do useful things for the environment like document actual environmental crimes. Those causes have now been upstaged by hot air. Which brings us to the bigger picture of those real causes. Labor, feminism, and the environment have been hijacked, gutted, and replaced with mindless vibes, slogans, and slacktivist online moralizing. No wonder so many average voters with these leftist sensibilities feel politically orphaned, or have gravitated to the anti-establishment and anti-globalist Trump camp. Ask yourself how we got here. It didn't happen overnight. It was a slow, steady march, backed by the very establishment that now pretends to loathe itself. That is, until Trump wandered in and tipped over the whole display. Instead of fighting for their own interests, people are applauding their own decline, gaslit into believing that protecting labor rights is racist, defending women's spaces is bigotry, and questioning foreign military interventions makes you a fascist. The activism that used to scare the establishment has long since become it. The real revolution won't be televised — it will probably just be shadowbanned.
Russia Today
5 hours ago
- Russia Today
Trump denies discussing ceasefire with Zelensky
US President Donald Trump has denied discussing a Ukraine ceasefire during his meeting with Vladimir Zelensky on the sidelines of the NATO summit in The Hague, directly contradicting the Ukrainian leader's earlier remarks. Zelensky had described the meeting as 'long and substantive,' claiming the two leaders had discussed ways to 'achieve a real peace.' Speaking to reporters on Wednesday, Trump said the topic was not part of the conversation. 'No, no, I just… wanted to know how he's doing,' he said. Trump added that he planned to speak with Russian President Vladimir Putin in hopes of bringing the conflict to an end, though he did not specify when the conversation might take place. When pressed on his past claim that he could end the war within 24 hours, Trump said the comment had been 'sarcastic.' He acknowledged that resolving the conflict would not be easy, describing Putin as 'more difficult' than anticipated and admitting he 'had some problems with Zelensky' as well. Asked if the US would contribute to the $5 billion in military aid pledged to Ukraine by other NATO countries, Trump reiterated only that the conflict must end. In another exchange, a BBC Ukraine journalist asked whether the US would sell Patriot missile systems to Ukraine. Trump replied that the systems were 'very hard to get' and that the US also needed them. He noted that Washington was supplying Patriots to Israel but would 'see if we can make some available.' Since taking office in January, Trump has repeatedly called for a negotiated settlement to the Ukraine conflict. Earlier this week, he said he hoped to reach a 'deal with Russia' to stop the fighting. Moscow has maintained that it is willing to hold talks 'without preconditions,' but insists that any lasting agreement must reflect the current battlefield realities and Ukraine's neutrality.
