SC rejects convicts' plea against 2-judge bench hearing Godhra train burning appeals
'Suppose, this bench of two judges decides to award death penalty to some accused then it has to be re-argued before another bench of three judges,' the senior lawyer said.
Senior advocate Sanjay Hegde, appearing for two convicts, told a bench comprising Justices J K Maheshwari and Aravind Kumar that it has been held in the Red Fort terror attack case, in which Mohammad Arif alias Ashfaq was handed down the death penalty, that a three-judge bench has to hear cases pertaining to award of the capital punishment.
New Delhi, May 6 (PTI) The Supreme Court on Tuesday rejected the vehement submissions of few convicts that a two-judge bench cannot hear their appeals against conviction as the matter pertained to the award of death penalty to 11 accused in the 2002 Godhra train burning case.
A Constitution bench of the apex court had in its September 2014 judgement concluded that in all cases in which death sentence was awarded by the high court, such matters be listed before a bench of three judges.
Dismissing the submissions, the bench referred to relevant Supreme Court rules and the judgement, and said a three-judge bench has to hear appeals in cases where the high courts have either confirmed death penalty or awarded it after hearing the appeals of parties.
'The Gujarat High Court, in the present case, commuted the death penalty of 11 convicts into life imprisonment and did not award the death penalty…The trial court had awarded the death penalty in this case,' Justice Maheshwari said, adding the rule and the apex court judgement did not bar hearing of the appeals in the present case by a two-judge bench.
'The objection is repelled,' the bench said and commenced the final hearing in the case.
Earlier on April 24, the top court said it will commence final hearing on May 6 and 7 on the appeals filed by the Gujarat government and several other convicts in the 2002 Godhra train burning case.
On February 27, 2002, 59 people were killed when the S-6 coach of the Sabarmati Express was burnt at Gujarat's Godhra, triggering riots in the state.
Several appeals have been filed in the apex court challenging the October 2017 verdict of the Gujarat High Court which had upheld the conviction of several convicts and commuted the death penalties of 11 people to life term.
The high court had upheld the 31 convictions in the case and commuted the death penalties of the 11 convicts to life term, the counsel had said.
While the state has appealed against the commutation of death penalty to life term for the 11 convicts, several convicts have challenged the high court's verdict upholding their convictions in the case. PTI SJK SJK DV DV
This report is auto-generated from PTI news service. ThePrint holds no responsibility for its content.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NDTV
an hour ago
- NDTV
Siddaramaiah, DK Shivakumar To Brief Congress High Command On Stampede Incident
Bengaluru: Karnataka Chief Minister Siddaramaiah and Deputy Chief Minister DK Shivakumar will meet the Congress high command in New Delhi on Tuesday to discuss various developments, including June 4 stampede in Bengaluru that killed 11 people. The Congress government in the state has come under sharp criticism in the wake of the incident, with opposition BJP and JD(S) holding both CM and Deputy CM directly responsible and demanding their resignation. 'Siddaramaiah will meet party leadership in Delhi and will brief them on the latest developments,' the Chief Minister's office said in a statement. Mr Shivakumar, who had returned from Delhi after visiting Delhi Muncipal Corporation regarding Muncipal Governance and Solid Waste Management along with Officers of Greater Benagluru Authority (GBA), is heading back to Delhi, according to his office. Mr Shivakumar is also the state Congress President. The stampede occurred on June 4 evening in front of the Chinnaswamy stadium here, where a large number of people thronged to participate in the RCB team's IPL victory celebrations. Eleven people died and 56 were injured in the incident. Siddaramaiah had on Sunday denied reports that the Congress high command had sought information from him regarding the stampede incident. According to sources, the four names recommended to the Governor for nominations to the Legislative Council, but reportedly withheld after directions from the party high command, is also likely to come up for discussions.
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
Power bill demand of Rs 1.91 crore ‘wholly unnatural and arbitrary', Allahabad High Court gives relief to Sambhal MP, directs that electricity supply be restored
The Allahabad High Court has directed the Uttar Pradesh Power Corporation Ltd (UPPCL) to restore power supply at the house of Sambhal Member of Parliament, Zia Ur Rehman Barq. In a significant relief to the Samajwadi Party MP, the Allahabad High Court also stayed the operation of an electricity bill demand of Rs 1.91 crore raised by the UPPCL, terming it 'wholly unnatural and arbitrary', in its June 4 order. The matter was heard by a division bench comprising Justices Saumitra Dayal Singh and Sandeep Jain. The court was hearing a writ petition filed by the Sambhal MP challenging the assessment order dated May 15, 2025. The court also directed the restoration of the electricity connection, subject to a deposit of Rs 6 lakh and timely payment of future bills. 'Subject to the petitioner depositing Rs.6 lakhs within a period of two weeks from Wednesday, the effect and operation of order dated 15.05.2025, shall remain stayed and the electricity connection of the petitioner, that may have been temporarily disconnected, may be restored forthwith and be maintained subject to timely payment of future bills,' read the court order. Barq was represented by advocates Bidhan Chandra Rai and Stuti Rai, who argued that the UPPCL lacked jurisdiction to assess electricity usage for 'a period of 12 years', asserting that the maximum permissible assessment period under the law is one year. 'Submission is that even if the inspection report and adverse facts allegedly found therein are accepted, no jurisdiction arose with the respondent authorities to make assessment for a period of 12 years,' the court order read. The order further said that the maximum period for which assessment may have been made could not exceed one year. 'By breaching the statutory period of assessment, wholly unnatural and arbitrary demand of Rs.1 crore 91 lacs has been raised. The petitioner cannot be made to deposit 50% of such illegal demand to maintain an appeal,' said the order passed on June 4. The court granted three weeks to the UPPCL to respond and fixed the date of next hearing as July 2, 2025. The fine was imposed on the MP after allegations of power theft at his residence, on December 19. On the same day, he was charged with large scale electricity theft and the power supply to his residence was disconnected.
Hindustan Times
2 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
5 chilling details in Raja Raghuvanshi's murder in Meghalaya: What police said about wife Sonam Raghuvanshi
A honeymoon trip to Meghalaya turned into a full-blown murder mystery when an Indore-based businessman, Raja Raghuvanshi, was found dead days after he and his wife went missing. According to the Meghalaya Police, it was Raja's wife, Sonam, who orchestrated the murder and allegedly conspired with her boyfriend, Raj Kushwaha, to do so. A total of five arrests have been made in the case, so far – Sonam Raghuvanshi and four men, including Raj Kushwaha, Akash Rajput, Vishal Singh Chauhan, and Anand Kurmi. While Sonam was arrested from a dhaba in Uttar Pradesh during the early hours of Monday, three out of the four men were arrested from Madhya Pradesh, except Akash Rajput, who was arrested from Uttar Pradesh's Lalitpur. Also read: Meghalaya murder: How one mistake by Sonam, her lover led to their arrest in Raja Raghuvanshi killing It all started after Sonam and Raja Raghuvanshi, who had got married on May 11, went for their honeymoon to Meghalaya. However, on May 23, the couple went missing, prompting a manhunt by local authorities. Days later, on June 2, Raja's body was recovered in a gorge near Weisawdong Falls in the East Khasi Hills district of Meghalaya. A week after the body was recovered, the Meghalaya Police reached a major breakthrough on Monday and made a series of arrests in the case. All the accused are being taken to Meghalaya for investigation. Also read: Meghalaya honeymoon murder: Raj Kushwaha drove people to Raja Raghuvanshi's funeral, says eyewitness It was a local guide in Meghalaya who possibly helped crack the case by giving a major clue to the police. Albert Pde told police on Monday, June 7, that the couple – Sonam and Raja Raghuvanshi – were accompanied by three male tourists on the day they went missing from Meghalaya's Sohra area on May 23. Pde said the three men accompanied the couple as they were climbing up over 3,000 steps from Nongriat to Mawlakhiat around 10am on May 23, and added that Raja was talking to the men in Hindi. "The four men were walking ahead while the woman was behind. The four men were conversing in Hindi, but I could not understand what they were speaking as I know only Khasi and English," Pde told PTI. Also read: What Raj Kushwaha's distraught mother said on Sonam Raghuvanshi affair charge A day after Raja Raghuvanshi's body was found on June 2, the police made another discovery which acted as a major clue into the murder - a bloodstained machete. A raincoat was also recovered two days later, which looked similar to the one used by the couple. The raincoat was found in Mawkma village, which is halfway between Sohrarim and the gorge where Raghuvanshi's body was found. According to a Meghalaya Police officer, 'It was not a machete used in the region. It led to our suspicion that someone from outside the region was involved. We decided to check the call details of the couple.' The police also revealed on Monday that two sharp cut wounds have been found on the front and back of Raja's head, as revealed in his autopsy. The police suspect that the wounds were inflicted by the same machete. Also read: Meghalaya murder: How a couple's first trip to the hills set the stage for a killing According to the police, one of the accused who has been arrested, Raj Kushwaha, is allegedly Sonam's boyfriend and conspired with her to commit the crime. According to an Indore police officer who is aware of the investigation, 'Kushwaha was in contact with the killers for some weeks.' The three killers hired for the murder left for Meghalaya on May 17 and carried a phone provided by Kushwaha, according to the cop. Also, Sonam's call records indicate that she was in touch with Kushwaha while on the honeymoon and shared her last location with him before the couple went missing, according to a Meghalaya Police officer. Sonam's alleged boyfriend Raj Kushwaha reportedly drove a vehicle to transport people to Raja Raghuvanshi's funeral, said an eyewitness. Lakshman Singh Rathore, a man who attended Raja's funeral, told PTI that it was Raj Kushwaha who drove the vehicle arranged by Sonam's family. "When Raja's body arrived here, Sonam's family, whose home is in Govind Nagar Kharcha area, had arranged four-five vehicles for people to attend the funeral. Kushwaha was driving the four-wheeler in which I went, though we did not talk. Only after seeing his photograph in the media post his arrest, I recollected this episode,' PTI quoted him as saying. According to Raja's mother Uma Raghuvanshi, it was Sonam who insisted on the honeymoon. Sonam also allegedly took ₹9 lakh from Raja for the honeymoon and also carried some jewellery, said the mother. When Uma asked her son when they were planning on returning, Raja told her that they had not booked return tickets yet and added that they might return within a week.
