This new Joan Didion book should never have been published
This is Joan Didion's last book, until her estate finds something else on her hard drive. The publication of Notes to John, three years after the journalist, essayist and novelist's death in December 2021, comes as a surprise to those of us who thought she had published her last book of new writing a decade earlier. Blue Nights (2011) was Didion's account of her relationship with her adopted daughter Quintana, who died in 2005 at the age of 39 after a 'cascade of medical crises'. After that, she published only books that repackaged older work.
And that is what Notes to John is — sort of. It is not like any other Joan Didion book. In an important sense, it is not a Joan
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
AsiaOne
2 minutes ago
- AsiaOne
Men plead not guilty in NY to kidnapping, setting friend on fire with tequila for crypto
NEW YORK — Two men pleaded not guilty on Wednesday (June 11) to charges they kidnapped a friend for three weeks at a townhouse in Manhattan's upscale SoHo neighbourhood, cut him with a chainsaw and set him on fire after dousing him with tequila to try to get him to reveal his bitcoin password. Defendants John Woeltz, 37, and William Duplessie, 33, appeared in a Manhattan court before Justice Gregory Carro, who denied their request to be released on bail pending trial on charges that carry up to a life sentence if convicted. Their lawyers during the hearing disputed the prosecution account that the men had tortured the alleged victim, who was not identified by name in court. Duplessie's lawyer Sam Talkin said the alleged victim was "having the time of his life" and took part in a "sex orgy" while at the townhouse. The surge in the price of bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies in recent years has created a new group of wealthy investors who present tempting targets for criminals, according to security experts. Prosecutor Sarah Khan told the hearing that the defendants and the alleged victim were involved in cryptocurrency investing and had communicated with each other electronically for years. During an in-person meeting that began on May 6 in Manhattan, Duplessie and Woeltz took the alleged victim's devices and began a series of brutal beatings, Khan said. "They pistol whipped him with a gun, they cut him with a small chainsaw and they used various other instruments," Khan said. The defendants also urinated on the alleged victim to put out fires on his body that they set after dousing him with tequila, Khan said. After three weeks, the alleged victim and Woeltz left the SoHo townhouse to retrieve the man's phone so he could transfer his cryptocurrency, Khan said. The alleged victim managed to run away and found a uniformed police officer, Khan added. He was barefoot and bleeding when he escaped, Khan said. "He was in severe distress," Khan added. Khan said authorities found a chainsaw, a loaded pistol and a photograph of Duplessie pointing a gun at the alleged victim when they searched the townhouse. The alleged incident follows three cryptocurrency-linked kidnappings or kidnapping attempts in France this year. Woeltz and Duplessie have been detained since being arrested last month on kidnapping and other charges. Carro ordered them to be detained without bail at least until their next hearing on July 15. In urging Carro to release Duplessie on bail, Talkin said the alleged victim was free to leave the townhouse as he pleased. The man went out to church, clubs and dinners during the three weeks, according Wayne Gosnell, a lawyer for Woeltz. "He could have talked to any passerby and told them, 'I'm in trouble, I need help,'" Gosnell told the judge. [[nid:718002]]
Washington Post
5 minutes ago
- Washington Post
04_MONUMENT
RFK Jr. has big plans for your food. Here are the facts. May 2, 2025
The Guardian
5 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Federal watchdog finds ‘no corruption' in $2.4m settlement to Brittany Higgins following alleged rape
The federal anti-corruption watchdog has found there was 'no corruption issue' regarding the $2.4m settlement paid to Brittany Higgins following her alleged rape within Parliament House. The National Anti-Corruption Commission released the findings of its preliminary investigation into the matter on Thursday, concluding there was 'no inappropriate intervention' by the Labor government. In December 2022, Higgins signed a deed of settlement with the commonwealth when Labor's Mark Dreyfus was the attorney general. The former Liberal senator Linda Reynolds later accused Dreyfus of 'seeking to silence' her for not allowing her to defend herself against Higgins' claims. The Nacc found there was 'no material difference' in legal advice received by the former Coalition government before the May 2022 election and advice subsequently received by the newly elected Albanese government. The Nacc concluded: 'There was no inappropriate intervention in the process by or on behalf of any minister. The then attorney general approved the settlement in accordance with the departmental advice.' 'There is no evidence that the settlement process, including the legal advice provided, who was present at the mediation, or the amount, was subject to any improper influence by any Commonwealth public official,' the anti-corruption watchdog said in a statement. 'To the contrary, the evidence obtained reflected a process that was based on independent external legal advice, without any inappropriate intervention by any minister of either government. There is therefore no corruption issue.' Guardian Australia reported in September 2024 that Reynolds had referred the matter to the Nacc in October 2023 and was provided commonwealth assistance to fund the referral. The deed, released during Lehrmann's failed defamation case in December 2023, compensated Higgins for her loss of earning capacity, legal costs, medical expenses, domestic assistance and '$400,000 for hurt, distress and humiliation'. As part of Higgins' claim, she alleged the commonwealth had breached its duty of care because Reynolds and her staff mishandled the matter and did not adequately support her. The Nacc's finding comes as the WA supreme court prepares its judgment on Reynolds' defamation case against Higgins over a series of social media posts, published in July 2023, which the former minister claims damaged her reputation. In court in August 2024, Reynolds accused Dreyfus of 'seeking to silence' her. Sign up to Morning Mail Our Australian morning briefing breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters after newsletter promotion She said the claims that she had not given Higgins adequate support after her alleged rape in March 2019 were 'utterly defendable'. 'My defence was to be no defence … I was outraged.' Reynolds is separately suing the commonwealth over Higgins' settlement for taking over her defence in the mediation, which she publicly claimed amounted to 'egregious conduct'. Higgins alleged that she was raped by Bruce Lehrmann in the ministerial suite of the then defence minister, Reynolds, in 2019. The accusation spawned more than a dozen legal cases. In a criminal trial in 2022, Lehrmann pleaded not guilty to one charge of sexual intercourse without consent, denying that any sexual activity occurred. The trial was aborted after a juror obtained information outside the evidence presented in court and, in December of that year, prosecutors dropped charges against him for the alleged rape of Higgins, saying a retrial would pose an 'unacceptable risk' to her health. A federal court judge overseeing a defamation case launched by Lehrmann against Network Ten found in 2024 that Higgins was, on the balance of probabilities, raped by Lehrmann in the office. Lehrmann is appealing that verdict.
