Foreigners pay more in the city's restaurants, undercover reporters from French newspaper find
As for the water, the 'American' received no offer of a carafe, which is free, instead having to fork out a further €6 ($11.60) for a small bottle of Vittel.
The pair then walked to another nearby cafe-restaurant to test its policy on tipping.
When it was time to pay, the French customer received the bill, which includes an obligatory 10% service charge. However, the 'American' client was asked if he wished to tip because 'service isn't included'.
When he agreed to add a 10% tip via the card machine, he realised afterwards that the waiter had shielded the amount and discreetly increased this to 15%.
Last month, Paris cafes were caught cheating unsuspecting tourists out of good-quality wine.
An undercover sommelier ordered a glass of Chablis, costing around €9 ($17.50), but the wine being served was actually the cheapest on the menu – a €5 ($9.70) sauvignon. The customer was charged the higher amount.
Wine merchant Marina Giuberti said: 'It's a pity for the customer and for the image of the wine appellation, for the winemaker and for the restaurant owners, who do a good job.'
The Telegraph spoke to Joseph, a 21-year-old waiter who confirmed that some of the techniques were widespread.
'In one restaurant I worked I was instructed to bring spring water at €7 ($13.60) a bottle unless foreign customers specifically asked for a carafe,' he said.
'I confess I sometimes don't tell them that service included if they mention the word tip.'
Parisian cafes are overcharging tourists up to 50% more than locals, according to Le Parisien. Photo / Getty Images
Marc Mazière, the French customer, an economist, runs a blog called Radin Malin (shrewd miser), which helps people make savings in their everyday spending.
'It's daylight robbery,' he said. 'It's almost abuse of weakness. They know you're a tourist, you're probably tired and don't understand much. They exploit this to charge exorbitant prices.'
Several American tourists quizzed by Le Parisien on restaurant rules thought that you always had to pay for water, as that was their experience.
'Usually they bring a bottle of water you have to pay for even when we say still,' said one woman sitting on a bench in the Tuileries gardens.
Franck Trouet of GHR, a hotel and restaurant umbrella group, said: 'It's a disgrace to the profession. You can't even call these people waiters.
'You should know that in France, water and bread are free. One can refuse a bottle of water.
'The tip is to express thanks for the service if one is very satisfied. Above all, it is not compulsory. This is not the United States.'
He said waiters' eagerness to increase the tip had been supercharged when Emmanuel Macron, the French President, decided three years ago to waive taxes on 'le pourboire'.
Now, tips made in French restaurants and cafes using a bank card are no longer taxable.
The rise of new pay machines that automatically suggest a tip of at least 5% has accelerated the trend to try and squeeze more out of diners.
Many restaurants do respect the rules, however, and insiders say waiters in Paris' myriad of cafes, bars, and restaurants work hard for poor pay.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NZ Herald
17 hours ago
- NZ Herald
Balancing economic interests and security concerns, European officials said they got the best deal possible
European officials and analysts said the tentative agreement does not even end the uncertainty because so many details must still be worked out. To the harshest critics, including some in France who spoke of a 'capitulation' and 'humiliation', the agreement is proof of a deeply unbalanced alliance, and the latest example of European appeasement of Trump. At Nato, allies similarly strained to pledge a huge increase in military spending demanded by Trump. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, who announced the deal with Trump while sitting next to him at one of his golf resorts in Scotland, touted 'a huge deal' clearly playing to Trump's love of largeness. But at her news conference soon afterwards, von der Leyen appeared far more sober, calling the 15% tariffs she had accepted on European automobiles to be 'the best we could get'. The EU, and in particular Germany, its auto-making powerhouse had hoped to eliminate the 25% US car tariffs entirely. 'We should not forget where we came from,' von der Leyen said. 'Fifteen per cent is certainly a challenge for some, but we should not forget it keeps us the access to the American markets.' Trump indeed had threatened far worse, including a 30% across the board tariff that upended months of painstaking negotiations. Under the new deal, the US will now impose a 15% duty on most imports from the EU. The blanket rate foisted on the EU mirrors a US deal announced this month with Japan, another Group of Seven ally, but it is higher than the 10% that Britain secured earlier this year and that EU officials had grudgingly accepted in recent talks. Since World War II, trade agreements have largely sought to reduce the cost of buying and selling goods across borders. A 2017 deal the EU struck with Canada eliminated tariffs on most goods traded between them. An agreement signed with Vietnam in 2019 aims to phase out nearly all customs duties. Trump's accord with the EU goes in the opposite direction, raising tariffs, with some exceptions. Economists say the tariffs will increase costs for importers, who must pay the duties, and put upward pressure on inflation. Consumers and businesses will likely bear some of the extra costs, experts say. Reaction in EU countries In France, where President Emmanuel Macron had urged the EU to take a harder line, the deal drew sharp backlash. While Macron was quiet on today, Prime Minister Francois Bayrou said it was 'a dark day when an alliance of free people, brought together to assert their values and defend their interests, resigns itself to submission'. Von der Leyen's European Commission, the EU's executive body which negotiates trade policy for its 27 member nations, had faced calls from Germany and Italy, two countries that do outsize business with the US, for an accord that would limit damage to their export-dependent companies. But even capitals that had urged a conciliatory approach were not exactly celebrating today. 'The agreement successfully averted a trade conflict that would have hit the export-oriented German economy hard,' German Chancellor Friedrich Merz said. Still, members of the European Parliament from Germany blasted the deal even as it reduced Trump's tariff on cars, one of Germany's central demands. 'My first assessment: not satisfactory; this is a lopsided deal,' said Bernd Lange, who chairs the European Parliament's committee on international trade. 'Concessions have clearly been made that are difficult to accept. Deal with significant imbalance. Furthermore, lot of questions still open.' Workers at a Volkswagen factory in Zwickau, Germany. Photo / Ingmar Nolting, the New York Times Dutch Prime Minister Dick Schoof acknowledged that 'no tariffs would have been better' but called the deal 'vital for an open economy like ours'. Belgian Prime Minister Bart De Wever said: 'One thing is clear: This is a moment of relief but not of celebration'. Influence of security The talks laid bare the EU's queasiness at using its economic muscle, one of its few areas of leverage against Washington, at a time when allies have had to calibrate repeatedly to keep Trump on board as Russia wages war in Ukraine. Ultimately, after months of mixed signals and threats from Trump, EU leaders said they accepted a deal to give their industries a reprieve from the months of uncertainty that threatened to cripple business. Officials suggested they had relented out of concern that Trump was prepared to raise tariffs to a level that would effectively halt trade between Europe and the US. 'Let's pause for a moment and consider the alternative: A trade war may seem appealing to some but it comes with serious consequences,' said the EU trade commissioner, Maros Sefcovic, who shuttled to Washington in recent months for difficult talks with Trump officials. 'Our businesses have sent us a unanimous message: avoid escalation and work towards a solution that brings immediate tariff relief,' Sefcovic told reporters today. He said he and his team had travelled to Washington 10 times for a deal and said that the EU's calculations reached beyond trade. 'It's about security, it's about Ukraine, it's about current geopolitical volatility,' Sefcovic said. He said he couldn't go into detail on what was discussed in the room with Trump yesterday, 'but I can assure it was not just about the trade'. Details of the deal Now, nearly 70% of European goods will face the blanket tariff, a big increase in charges, according to a senior EU official who spoke on the condition of anonymity to speak frankly about the details of the deal, which is still under negotiation. The EU had sought carve-outs from the US tariff regime for key sectors including wine and spirits and aircraft parts. The announced agreement eliminates tariffs on airplane parts but a decision on wine and spirits was postponed. EU officials said talks will continue in the coming weeks. The two sides appeared to diverge on other details. The White House indicated that a 50% tariff on steel would remain in place, while EU officials said there would be further negotiations on lowering steel tariffs. Many officials and experts said that it was crucial to sort out the details. 'We need to understand what is included,' said Brando Benifei, an Italian member of the European Parliament and head of its delegation for relations with the US. Benifei and others questioned whether US probes into the national security aspect of trade relations might result in extra tariffs down the line, such as on EU pharmaceutical products. At first glance, Benifei said the deal 'seems very asymmetric'. 'The result is due in my view to the push by some governments to have a deal at any cost, which has weakened our stance,' he added. 'Because the US knew some governments wanted a deal whatever the cost.' Others noted that Trump's threats managed to shift the view on what constituted relief. Just a few weeks ago, EU and US negotiators neared an agreement that involved a blanket tariff of 10%, before a Truth Social post by Trump derailed them. Today, some investors saw benefits for Europe's key auto industry, for instance, which would see US car tariffs reduced to 15% from 25%. The tariffs, however, were at 2.5% before Trump's global trade blitz, and some industry groups noted their dismay. 'The US tariff rate of 15%, which also applies to automotive products, will cost German automotive companies billions annually and burdens them,' Hildegard Mueller, president of Germany's main auto industry group, the VDA, told Agence France-Presse. On some issues, the Europeans stood their ground. Trump officials had pressed the EU for concessions on tech industry regulations and on food standards, which the bloc insisted were non-negotiable. As part of the deal, Trump said Europe had committed to buying more US energy and weapons and boosting investment in the US. But those provisions are mostly aspirational promises without guarantees. European nations were already poised to buy more US weapons under an arrangement with Trump to continue arming Ukraine, and the bloc was already seeking alternative energy sources, including liquefied natural gas from the US, as part of its push to phase out Russian energy imports. More energy purchases and European investments would come from member states and companies which Brussels does not control. Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, seen as a close Trump ally in the EU, heralded the deal, while saying details still need to be worked out. 'I obviously welcome the fact that an agreement has been reached,' Meloni told reporters. Still, she added, 'we need to verify the possible exemptions, particularly for certain agricultural products. So there are a number of elements that are missing.'
NZ Herald
17 hours ago
- NZ Herald
Government extends tax break for Philip Morris heated tobacco products
'This Government has the wrong priorities. It is giving tax breaks to tobacco companies now valued at over $300 million and the evaluation they promised, to check that it was helpful, is a total sham.' Labour's Ayesha Verrall criticised the extension, citing health system strain and a $300 million cost. Photo / Getty Images Costello cut the HTP tax rate by 50% last year, with the aim that cheaper prices may encourage people to switch from cigarettes to HTPs. The cut was made despite health officials telling Costello there was no evidence HTPs worked to stop people smoking or were significantly safer than cigarettes. Costello told Cabinet she had her own 'independent advice', which, when she released it later, turned out to be five articles that were either about different products, outdated, or offered only weak support for her view. Treasury said Philip Morris had a monopoly in the HTP market in New Zealand and would be the main beneficiary of the move. NZ First's Casey Costello is under fire for extending HTP tax cuts for another year, favoring tobacco giant Philip Morris. Photo / Getty Images Costello's office told RNZ the tax cut trial would be extended because Philip Morris had to pull its IQOS device from sale last year, as it did not comply with requirements for vaping devices to have a removable battery. Last week, Costello ditched the requirement for removable batteries, saying Cabinet was advised this was the best way to resolve legal action from Mason Corporation, which owns the Shosha vape store chain. A spokesman for the minister said with HTPs off the market for months last year, the original plan for an evaluation after one year did not make sense. 'There wasn't an evaluation because of the withdrawal of HTPs from the market. Any report back would be meaningless as the cheaper HTPs were only available for two months,' the spokesman said. 'Cabinet agreed to extending the HTP review to July 2027 as there will be more market data available.' The spokesman said the evaluation would then be able to show whether 'a sustained price reduction encouraged uptake by smokers' and if it had helped reduce smoking. The assessment would also look at whether HTP use 'encouraged smokers away from vapes' and the extent of 'unintended uptake by young people'. A March 2025 Ministry of Health (MOH) briefing to Costello, focused on how to evaluate the HTP tax cut, said Philip Morris had not initially passed on the excise reduction to consumers. 'There was no price change passed through to customers for the first month, though this is an observation of value in and of itself,' the MOH said. The briefing, obtained by RNZ under the Official Information Act, said Philip Morris had to pull its IQOS device just three months into the tax cut trial. 'All HTP devices were removed from the market in New Zealand due to not meeting new safety regulations. This has meant there have been no HTP devices available for purchase for at least five months of the 12-month trial period.' Costello has said that HTPs 'have a similar risk profile to vapes', but officials from Treasury and Ministry of Health advised her they were much more harmful than vaping. In its March briefing, the MOH told Costello it would be difficult to assess whether people using HTPs had decreased their harm or not. 'While we will be able to assess whether the percentage of current or recent smokers who use HTPs increases, we will not be able to track whether those same people were previously using, or likely to use vapes, for example, whether they moved from a safer alternate product to a more harmful one.' Verrall said the onus should be on Philip Morris to prove its product was safe. 'There is no reason why the government should be running a study for Philip Morris to help get its products used,' she said. 'This product is not a health product. It is a harmful product.' Verrall said the latest update from the Treasury showed the HTP tax cut was forecast to cost up to $293m if continued until 2029. 'It's deeply worrying when our health system is underfunded that the Government is giving away $300m to the benefit of a single company with links to one of the coalition partners,' Verrall said. The extension of the tax break for the Philip Morris products comes after RNZ published documents alleging a close relationship between NZ First and the tobacco giant. The documents, released in litigation against US vaping company JUUL, allege Philip Morris pitched draft legislation to NZ First as part of a lobbying campaign for its HTPs. The documents claim Philip Morris corporate affairs staff 'reached out to NZ First to try and secure regulation to advantage IQOS'. A lobbying firm advising Juul claimed that NZ First leader Winston Peters had a relationship with Philip Morris and also that 'any regulation he champions is likely to be very industry-friendly and highly geared towards commercial interests in the sector'. Peters did not address the allegations that NZ First received material from Philip Morris, but said RNZ's story was a 'tissue of baseless accusations' and that engagement with the tobacco industry was legitimate. 'Multiple government departments have themselves proactively reached out to, and met with, 'big tobacco' for direct feedback and advice on tobacco legislation,' he said, in a post on X. Health Coalition Aotearoa and Vape-Free Kids want Prime Minister Christopher Luxon to strip NZ First of the tobacco and vaping portfolio but he says Costello is doing a great job.
Techday NZ
17 hours ago
- Techday NZ
Sourcing video data for AI training: overcoming the challenges of scale, safety and representation
As AI advances, its potential benefits to video security are undeniable. The market for AI-powered video analytics is predicted to grow from $32 billion in 2025 to over $133 billion by 2030, due to its wide-ranging applications in e.g. cities, retail, logistics and manufacturing, residential developments and transport., where it can increase operational efficiency, improve energy efficiency, deliver marketing and sales insights – and much more. To unlock these benefits, however, organisations must always err on the side of responsible use. Most importantly, this also extends to the data used to power and train AI models. Understanding data transparency and quality As a recent Amnesty International report highlighted, there needs to be transparency around the use of AI-powered video surveillance. However, to do so, it's vital that we go back a stage and closely consider the quality and origin of the data that an AI model has been trained and fine-tuned on. As AI-enabled video is rolled out, developers mustn't fall into the same trap as their colleagues working on the large language models (LLM) on which generative AI depends, namely, the challenge of sourcing enough data for AI model training. LLM developers, unfortunately, find themselves paying increasing amounts for large data sets, due to their scarcity, lack of privacy measures, or facing litigation from rights holders. Bias from unrepresentative data may have also tainted the implementations of AI, with knock-on impacts on people's trust in AI and the insights delivered. Building accurate video AI models In order to mitigate many of these challenges before they spread, considering how to gain access to high-quality, responsibly sourced, visual data to train AI video models is crucial. The datasets used to train AI models need to be representative, diverse to ensure accuracy and fairness, and legally sourced to respect data owners' IP rights. This is not a simple task to obtain, especially when dealing with sensors such as cameras that can collect a lot of personal or confidential information. One solution to this challenge is Project Hafnia; a platform developed by Milestone Systems in partnership with NVIDIA, leveraging NVIDIA NeMo Curator and AI model. Project Hafnia enables data generators to share and utilise their data and allows developers to access traceable and regulatory-compliant annotated video data, which thereby can be used to train AI models. One of the first data generators to the platform is the American city of Dubuque, Iowa. Along with AI analytics company Vaidio, Milestone built a collaborative visual language model that transformed Dubuque's raw video, via anonymization and curation, into powerful training material, improving AI accuracy from 80% to over 95%. This leap forward has enabled smarter traffic management, quicker emergency responses, and stronger public safety. All done responsibly and without massive infrastructure overhauls. With Milestone's recent acquisition of brighter AI, a company specializing in anonymization solutions, a further layer of data privacy has been added to Project Hafnia. Thus, brighter AI's technology automatically detects a personal identifier such as a face or a license plate and generates a synthetic replacement. Consolidating and curating data from multiple data generators is one way for developers to obtain enough visual data on to develop accurate AI models to detect events such as vandalism, vehicle accidents, and traffic flow. Synthetic data for hard-to-gather data sets Another solution comes in the form of synthetic data, which is artificially generated or augmented datasets that simulate or generalise real-world conditions. Using synthetic data, AI developers can train models on vast amounts of diverse and representative information while mitigating the ethical and legal concerns surrounding privacy and consent. For example, in Aalborg Harbour in Denmark, training an AI model to detect individuals falling into the harbour was not possible due to the dangers that would pose to human volunteers. The dataset also needed to include a diversity of human actors such as wheelchair users. Using dummies couldn't fully capture the full complexity, either. The best solution, therefore, was synthetic data that could expand the training dataset with diverse falling scenarios, avoiding safety or ethics concerns. The AI model developed through this process shows promising results to alert rescue teams if and when a person falls into the harbour, increasing the chances of survival by minimising response times and reducing cold water exposure. Unlocking the potential of AI in video AI holds great promise for our cities, buildings, and individual safety. Yet, this can only be realised with AI models that fully capture the complexities of our built environments and human behaviour. Video analytics developers should explore their options when trying to build a comprehensive data set for AI model training. New, responsible options are emerging - from consolidated data gathered across many data generators to synthetic data generators. It's just a matter of where to look.
