
US shrimp fishers see Trump tariffs as a lifeline: ‘We're basically on our knees'
Sandy Nguyen has strong opinions about where the best shrimp in the US is produced.
A second-generation shrimper in New Orleans, Nguyen maintains 'our [Louisiana] shrimp tastes better than Florida shrimp or Mississippi shrimp or Texas shrimp'. Her family moved to the Gulf Coast from Vietnam during the Jimmy Carter administration, and her dad, like many such immigrants to the area, worked as a fisher. The business gave Nguyen a front-row seat to one of the nation's most abundant sources of seafood.
Shrimp thrive in brackish waters, and Louisiana has the largest delta on the continent, where fresh water from the Mississippi River mixes with the Gulf of Mexico's saltwater. In part due to the sheer expanse of this delta, Louisiana shrimpers provide nearly a quarter of all shrimp caught in the US, supplying an estimated 72m lbs of shrimp in 2023 – the largest share of any state.
But things have changed drastically since the 1980s, when the Nguyen family settled in Louisiana. Demand and prices dropped during the Covid-19 pandemic. A run of devastating hurricanes – Laura, Delta, Zeta and Ida – caused over half a billion dollars in losses to the state's seafood industry since 2020. Nguyen hoped that 2022 would be a turning point, but then Russia invaded Ukraine, and the price of diesel climbed, driving up the cost to operate trawlers. As inflation appeared to be climbing everywhere else, the wholesale price of shrimp declined.
All these factors were happening alongside another massive, decades-long change: a surge in imported shrimp from Asia and South America. Talk to most shrimpers and they will say this familiar foe is driving down the price of shrimp, making it nearly impossible for US shrimpers to hang on.
So when Donald Trump announced sweeping tariffs, a move that threw global markets into tumult and caused consternation among many industries, some American shrimpers instead expressed optimism.
'I know it's going to affect a lot of other industries. But for us, it's good,' said Aaron Wallace, who helps run Anchored Shrimp Company in Georgia.
The US shrimp industry pales in comparison to its counterparts in Ecuador, India, Indonesia and Vietnam. In those countries, aquaculture farms proliferate, churning out a prodigious volume of shrimp. Together, those four countries account for over 90% of shrimp imported to the US, or approximately 1.5bn lbs of shrimp in 2023. That's more than 20 times the amount of shrimp produced in Louisiana.
'Really, our battle is the farm-raised shrimp industry overseas,' Wallace added. 'We're basically on our knees [due to] what the imports do.'
'The farm-raised industry has created a market where shrimp is readily available anywhere, everywhere,' he continued. 'It's changed the way we view shrimp versus back in the day.'
Today, shrimp is the most widely consumed seafood in the US, outranking salmon, tuna and tilapia. Like chicken breast, it's a protein that people expect to buy cheaply and regularly. Unlike its crustacean cousins, lobster and crab, which are typically associated with luxurious feasts, shrimp is economical and ubiquitous. It's frequently found on the menus of chains like Popeyes to all-you-can-eat specials at Sizzler and, formerly, Red Lobster.
But shrimp's cheapness and commonplaceness have come with a cost. Consumers aren't often aware of the fact that most of the shrimp they consume is imported.
Acy Cooper, president of the Louisiana Shrimp Association and a fourth-generation shrimper, said that tariffs provide an opportunity for US shrimpers to regain a foothold in the domestic seafood industry.
'We are losing our local industry,' Cooper said. That moved Cooper to vote for Trump, hoping he would 'make America great again in all sectors', including shrimping.
When Cooper was growing up in the 1970s, shrimping was a good job, one that could easily support a family. Later, in the 1980s, when Cooper was first getting his start, he could get $1 per pound of small shrimp and $4.50 per pound of large shrimp. But last year, he could barely get $1 per pound from dockside buyers for his biggest shrimp.
'Look, I quit school in the eighth grade and went to work fishing because I made more money than college graduates at the time,' Cooper said. But his own son chose to leave the industry. 'He just broke the chain in my family,' Cooper said. 'He's got three kids in his household, and he couldn't make enough to survive.'
Deborah Long, a spokesperson for the Southern Shrimp Alliance, said: 'The problem is not cheap imports. The problem is the counterproductive trade policies we have that have led to cheap imports' and that other countries benefit from practices not allowed in the US.
Long pointed to the fact that many foreign aquaculture operations are subsidized by international financial institutions backed by taxpayer dollars and employ unpaid labor or using banned antibiotics. From Long's perspective, these factors allow foreign shrimp suppliers to undercut domestic shrimp suppliers' prices.
'When you look at trade data, you will find that the 1980s were the heydays for this industry,' Long said. 'Aquaculture came around, and shrimpers were able to compete against it. And around the early 2000s, you started seeing a flood of imports. That's where allegations of dumping – selling below fair value – came in.'
However, Martin Smith, a Duke University economist who studies fisheries and seafood markets, said it's not clear that Trump's recent broad-based tariffs – those that target a wide array of goods – are the right tool to address a flood of cheap shrimp imports.
He noted that the US Department of Commerce was already working on anti-dumping and countervailing duties, which aim to counteract the impact of dumping and governmental subsidies, on the biggest importers of shrimp. Already, those duties were showing modest improvements in ex-vessel prices, the prices that shrimpers are paid at the dock.
'In principle, the system had already addressed the aspects of competition that are unfair,' Smith said. 'This additional layer of broad-based tariffs is really just saying that we are now going to make it unfair for the rest of the world.'
Smith also cautioned that any efforts to bolster the prices of shrimp could risk reducing the overall demand for shrimp, which would also adversely impact domestic shrimpers.
'There's some real long-term risk here in using tariffs to try to elevate the prices of domestic product. … It could actually just push them back into being luxury goods,' Smith said.
Still, Long, of the Southern Shrimp Alliance, applauded Trump's tariffs, which she hoped would put a dent in imports, while also acknowledging that it wouldn't be a magic bullet for all of the issues facing shrimpers.
'It is a short-term measure that is desperately needed to support these guys and get them through other seasons while we address these systemic problems,' Long said.
But Nguyen remained skeptical as to whether the tariffs would actually help the industry to which she's dedicated her whole life.
'I'm not excited about anything that Trump does,' Nguyen said. 'Even though I'm broke, I can't trust that his tariffs are going to help us because I understand the economics of the industry.'
She pointed out that tariffs could cause the price of rope, steel or even nets to go up, making the work of shrimping even more costly.
Plus, from Nguyen's point of view, it's not just cheap imports driving down the prices; it's also the fact that there are fewer processors and wholesale distributors as the industry has consolidated, leaving shrimpers with little room to negotiate at the docks.
A report on the Louisiana shrimp value chain, produced for the Coalition to Restore Coastal Louisiana, recognized this disconnect, noting that shrimpers like Nguyen are at the bottom of a value chain that is trying to compete with low global prices. Shrimpers get the short end of the stick even when consumers are paying more for the shrimp at their supermarket or on their dinner plate.
Long, of the Southern Shrimp Alliance, echoed that point.
'While the prices collapsed from 2021 to 2023, and the industry lost more than half of its value – and the values of imports plunged $1.5bn as well – consumer prices, the retail price you would pay at a grocery store, reached record highs,' Long said. 'There's a big disconnect in the market there.'
Nguyen put it more bluntly.
'It's the big dogs, the big companies, that hurt us,' she said, referring to the dockside buyers, as well as to the network of processors, distributors and retailers. 'Part of the reason our prices went down drastically is that we're making enough shrimp for all of them to get filthy rich.'
In her opinion, tariffs won't fix that problem. And it won't fix the devastation she has seen among shrimpers fighting to survive.
By 2023, she noted shrimpers she knew had 'strokes, heart attacks, overdoses, domestic violence and children not being able to go to college', Nguyen said. 'An entire way of life was stripped from us for the last three years at no fault of our own.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
18 minutes ago
- The Independent
Trump's policies could have a major impact on your credit score. Here's how
Your support helps us to tell the story Read more Support Now From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging. At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story. The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it. Your support makes all the difference. Read more President Donald Trump returned to the White House this January with a flurry of sweeping orders – some of which may impact Americans' credit scores. Trump and his allies are set on enacting his 'One Big Beautiful Bill,' which would add trillions to the country's already sizable deficit and drive up interest rates, producing large-scale macroeconomic repercussions. Financial markets have already warned of the rising debt, with Moody's cutting its pristine 'Aaa' U.S. credit rating, which could take even further hits if the deficit continues to rise. To help pay for the bill, Republicans are looking to make cuts to Medicaid and food assistance programs, without which, more Americans are likely to go into medical debt. Some 15 million Americans with medical debt may suffer even greater consequences of Trump's policies after his administration paused a new Consumer Financial Protection Bureau rule that would ban the inclusion of medical debt on credit reports. As of now, medical debt can be included in credit scores and a significant amount of medical bills can drag down a credit score. A lower credit score means a person appears to be a bigger risk to a lender, such as a bank. That could lead to higher interest rates on loans, such as for a car or a home. open image in gallery President Donald Trump's spending bill will have far-reaching macroeconomic repercussions and likely impact Americans' credit scores. ( AP ) A Biden-era rule would have removed $49 million in medical debt from credit score records, but new leadership at CFPB appointed by Trump is attempting to reverse its course, NPR reported. In addition to the complete switch in its stance, the CFPB joined forces with plaintiffs who filed a lawsuit trying to stop the Biden ban. The rule has since been stuck in limbo, with Judge Sean Jordan from Texas' Eastern District federal court twice ordering a stay, delaying the rule's new start date until the end of July. The outcome of the lawsuit will have tremendous financial implications for millions of Americans whose medical debt has negatively impacted their credit scores. Meanwhile, consumer advocates have been speaking out on behalf of the medical debt rule, worried abandoning it would take away necessary consumer protections. "I'm disappointed for the 15 million Americans who have medical bills on their credit reports and have to suffer the consequences of poor credit scores because of it," Patricia Kelmar, senior director of health care campaigns at the U.S. PIRG Education Fund, told USA Today. open image in gallery Trump-appointed CFPB leaders is looking to reverse a Biden-era rule that would ban the inclusion of medical debt on credit reports. ( Copyright 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. ) In the lawsuit filed in April, CFPB along with plaintiffs, the Consumer Data Industry Association and the Cornerstone Credit Union League, asked the judge to abandon the medical debt rule 'because it exceeds the bureau's statutory authority.' "We believe that Congress is the only one who can act on this and determine whether or not it can be on the credit report," Dan Smith, CEO and president of the Consumer Data Industry Association, told NPR. "Our intention here is to protect the credit reporting system. To ensure that it is as complete and accurate as possible," he said. In the lawsuit, the groups also note that the three largest credit bureaus - Experian, TransUnion and Equifax – no longer list paid medical debts, unpaid medical debts less than a year old and medical debts less than $500. Americans' credit scores may also see some changes thanks to a proposal from Trump that would cap credit card interest rates at 10 percent – a significant reduction from the current average interest rate of about 21 percent. Lower rates mean people would be able to pay back credit card bills quicker, and improve their credit scores by having less debt. The proposal was touted as a solution to the debt many Americans owe due to high credit card interest rates, Newsweek reported. open image in gallery Americans held $45 billion more in credit card debt in 2024 than in 2023. ( Getty Images/iStockphoto ) Americans held $1.21 trillion in credit card debt as of December 2024 – an increase of $45 billion from September 2024, per New York Fed data. Data also shows that 7.18 percent of U.S. credit card debt is in serious delinquency, likely causing many credit scores to take a serious downward spiral. Following Trump's campaign promise, Reps Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-Ny) and Anna Paulina Luna (R-Fla) introduced legislation to cap credit card interest rates at a maximum of 10 percent. The measure would take the financial burden away from consumers, especially those with high-interest debt. The cap would last until January 1, 2031, according to the bill.


Reuters
18 minutes ago
- Reuters
US FDA puts on hold Rein Therapeutics' lung disease drug trial
June 12 (Reuters) - Rein Therapeutics (RNTX.O), opens new tab has paused patient enrollment and dosing in a mid-stage trial of its lung disease drug in the U.S. after the Food and Drug Administration placed a clinical hold, the drug developer said on Thursday. Shares of the company fell nearly 10% after the bell. The company was testing a drug named LTI-03 to treat patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). The disease causes scarring of the lungs that makes it harder for them to work properly. Rein said in a filing that it is actively working with the FDA to remove the clinical hold. The FDA and Rein did not immediately respond to Reuters' requests for comment on why the hold was placed. The drug was well-tolerated and safe in an early-stage study in patients with IPF, the company said in the filing. No drug-related serious adverse events have been reported in any studies treating patients with LTI-03, it added. Rein continues to study the drug and enroll patients in Australia and Europe.


Reuters
19 minutes ago
- Reuters
US initiates first step for potential mineral lease sale near American Samoa
WASHINGTON, June 12 (Reuters) - The U.S. Interior Department said on Thursday it was publishing a request for information and interest to explore the potential for seabed mineral leasing offshore American Samoa. The step will launch a 30-day public comment period and mark the first formal action toward what could be the first mineral lease sale in federal waters in over 30 years, the department said.