logo
‘Ours is the last generation to believe life's not only about loving your parents': Sudhir Mishra on rebellion being at the heart of his films

‘Ours is the last generation to believe life's not only about loving your parents': Sudhir Mishra on rebellion being at the heart of his films

Indian Express2 days ago

The filmmaker Sudhir Mishra talks about using the Emergency as a backdrop in his film Hazaaron Khwaishein Aisi and his new series, Summer of 76, to pay a heartfelt tribute to youth, curiosity and dissent.
Here's the except from his interview:
Your film 'Hazaaron Khwaishein Aisi' (2005) had the Emergency as a backdrop as does your upcoming eight-part series 'Summer of '76'. How do you look back at the events of those days?
Fifty years on, it's complicated when you look at it. You have to see that those who fought against it, what happened to them, were they very different from those they opposed? Of course, the imposition of the Emergency was, for want of a better word, a not-so-great chapter in Indian history. It gave permission to a lot of petty tyrants. There was a government and from the village-level up, there were tin-pot tyrants who ruled the roost. Anybody could arrest anyone, say he is a Naxal and shoot him. This is what caused the actual problem. What Mrs Gandhi and her people did not understand was that it was a 'conference of the upset' movement against the Emergency, against them. There was a whole disappointed generation. My series is about this moment. There was a generation that did not agree with the idea of India that was handed to them by their parents who had fought for freedom. They felt a sense of betrayal. Problem is those who rebelled didn't realise that those who took power after that were actually worse than those they were opposing.
What is the 'Summer of '76' about?
It draws from the autobiography of my maternal grandfather, DP Mishra, who had been in the Congress and had two stints as the chief minister of Madhya Pradesh. He was one of the few people who fought or manipulated — call it what you want — for Mrs Gandhi to be the prime minister. But he was a follower of Sardar Patel and was opposed to Nehru. He was the only one to resign from the Congress over Nehru but was brought back as chief minister, and then campaigned for Indira Gandhi. He was sort of a Centrist. However, a Left-wing fantasy had started that thought that through Mrs Gandhi, they could bring in a revolution. They became very disappointed during her imposition of the Emergency because of Sanjay Gandhi. He had started a coterie, which was non-democratic, entitled and had a 'Babalog view' of the world, which alienated the youth in non-metro India from the English-speaking upper class. My grandfather saw that there was a kind of undeclared emergency within the Congress and so before they could kick him out, he walked away. He had joined the Congress as a 20-year-old and was an understudy to Motilal Nehru, so he said he couldn't work under the great-grandson.
As with your film Hazaaron…, will youth be at the centre of Summer of 76 too?
Yes, but it's much wider. I follow people all over the country. 'Hazaaron…' is about these college students, 'Summer of '76' is about those who got involved in the JP movement. It's also about Ramesh Dixit, one of the students arrested in JNU (Jawaharlal Nehru University), and on Pushpesh Pant's book, 'Portrait of a Student Activist'. So, factual parts of it come from there, then there are a lot of stories, fiction and imagination. The series is about what happens to the passionate, who think they are not living in the best of all possible worlds and want to change it. It's an exciting journey of seven young people and the problems they will face. The Emergency is a metaphor. This is a story of any time. It's a tribute to youth, to curiosity, to rebellion, to holding each other's hands, to taking risks.
Rebellion is often at the heart of your films.
At the time of the Emergency, I was very young but I know how my grandfather felt about it. He died in 1988 and I was a filmmaker by then. I'm not a faithful family boy, I have a point of view and everything's filtered through my eyes. I'm a scientist's son, a mathematician's son. So when I see a hypothesis, I need to evaluate if it's true or not. And if it's not, then I look at it straight in the face.
We are, perhaps, the last generation that believes life is not only about loving your parents or obeying your parents. There were many rebellions happening at that time. Women were breaking free, landless peasants were attempting to break free, many lower castes were coming to the fore, claiming their place in India, the Dalit movement was gaining strength. This is what the Congress didn't see. Unfortunately, sometimes it ended up being led by the wrong people but that desire to break free was genuine.
Your films have captured the angst and idealism of a generation. Do you think people are less idealistic now?
I don't blame the youth because this is the world we gave them. The poor are bereft of one kind of nutrition; the upper class or the so-called middle class are bereft of another. The whole education system is geared to mugging up information and vomiting it out. It is not geared to create a mind which can analyse, understand and take things forward. Curiosity is not encouraged. So you have a nation of educated illiterates. You have prepared a world where anything can be said and the majority will believe it, which is why most of them will be replaced so easily by AI. There is extreme self-centeredness and a disrespect of any kind of idealism. It's not only that they do not want to be idealists but they disrespect them. And then there is a pseudo-Left, a cultural Left, which I think is the fig leaf of the Right. So there is actually no real opposition and everybody is the same.
The censorship that started then, do you see its shadow in current times?
Yes, a nation starts getting used to self-censoring. Anyway, it's not so difficult in our country because we always say, 'badon ke saamne aise nahi bolna chahiye' (you shouldn't speak like that before elders). We have a culture of censorship. Be polite, don't say this in front of your grandfather. If you have censorship in your head, then you cannot be scientific, right?
Do you think there are still ways of saying what you want to say?
Well, in Iran, filmmakers say what they want to say and make films. So, you can. If you have a negative mindset and say I cannot express myself, then what is the message you send to other people? You become a bore. You should keep expressing yourself in a rational, non-sensationalist way but you should be prepared for repercussions that may happen.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

How Zohran Mamdani turned his Hinge match into a political strategy for Gen Z voters
How Zohran Mamdani turned his Hinge match into a political strategy for Gen Z voters

Indian Express

time25 minutes ago

  • Indian Express

How Zohran Mamdani turned his Hinge match into a political strategy for Gen Z voters

When a political leader casually mentions meeting their spouse via an app-assisted meet-cute, it catches your attention. When they go on to say, 'There is still hope in those dating apps,' it screams #relatable. Zohran Mamdani, the Democratic candidate for New York's mayoral elections, an Internet sensation and the chosen Gen Z messiah, is proof that a politician's love life doesn't need to be a scandal or a secret. The 33-year-old Indian-American got one step closer to being the next mayor of NYC by winning the Democratic primary election on June 24 against his main challenger, and party veteran, Andrew Cuomo. His campaign strategy so far points to a fundamental shift in what it takes for younger generations to feel the sparks between them and their representatives. Mamdani shared that he met his partner, Syrian-American artist Rama Duwaji, on Hinge during a podcast interview. In another social media post with Indian comedian Kaneez Surka, Mamdani made modern-day romance (or the lack of it) an electoral matter. Surka rather cheekily asks Mamdani, 'New Yorkers want to know how are you going to help single people find love.' Mamdani reiterated how he met his partner, and added, 'The love of your life may currently be too stressed about whether they can afford the most expensive city in the US to find you. Affordability is about romance!' The answer hit more than just a campaign check box. It spoke to a generation which has just begun venturing into the political arena. A 2023 survey found that one-third of Gen Z voters wished they had known more about the candidates running in the 2022 US midterm elections, compared to 21 per cent of Millennials and 11 per cent of those from Generation X. A lot has already been written about Mamdani's earnest, no-holds-barred social media clips. The boomers may sneer at his 'flippant' campaign style, but the youngsters were hooked. Mamdani calls his approach the 'politics of no translation', meaning direct communication without intermediaries. As he explained to The Guardian: 'We believe in a politics of no translation, one that is both direct to the struggles of working people's lives and also delivered directly.' For decades, campaigns of largely older sections of political leaders operated through carefully controlled information flows: press releases and heavily media-trained public appearances. Personal details were either completely off-limits or structured to serve narratives. Politicians spoke about their families in terms that revealed nothing genuinely candid. Mamdani broke this mould. He has owned up to his immigrant story (he moved to New York when he was seven), cringed at his rap past as 'Mr Cardamom' and even used a mango lassi analogy to explain the electoral process to his desi voters. From Deewar edits and Karz dialogues to a reel making fun of himself for awkward hand-waving in videos, Mamdani is a man after the Gen Z heart. When Mamdani shared how he navigated (and successfully at that) the awkward realities of modern-day romance, he validated an entire generation's lived experiences. It is also a nod to a crucial demographic. Most dating app users are in their late 20s and early 30s, which overlaps almost perfectly with the age group now becoming the most politically active. A 2023 article on 'TikTok's influence over Generation Z's Political Behavior' in the Journal of Social Media in Society demonstrates that social media can be an important instigator of political participation, depending on how it is used. Mamdani's approach taps into this reality with an awareness that voters who meet partners online, build careers through LinkedIn, and organise communities via social media seek leaders operating in the same digital ecosystem. It's also a strategic recognition of the 'chronically online' Gen Z's tendency to form parasocial relationships with Internet icons, now including politicians. The generational disconnect isn't unique to New York City. In India, Parliament has been getting older significantly over time. The average age of elected representatives rose from 46.5 years in 1952 to 55.6 years in 2024. This growing gap explains the lack of youth participation both as leaders and voters. When enamoured young Indians comment, 'My mayor (I'm from India)' or 'I live in New Delhi. Can I still vote for him?' on Mamdani's posts on social media, they express a desire for political leaders who understand their reality. These voters are drawn to someone speaking their language, acknowledging the digital-first 'normal' we inhabit. The 'window' of possibilities Mamdani's Hinge story suggests that the 'Overton Window of Political Possibility', a model based on how ideas in society change over time and influence politics, has shifted. What could once be put away as 'too personal' for politics is now validating and even relatable. It points to a need to acknowledge that younger voters' 'normal' experiences include digital-mediated relationships and social media-driven community building. For information-hungry voters, the trust built by 'keeping it real' has the potential to extend credibility to policy discussions. Now, voters who believe the Democratic nominee is open enough to be honest about his dating life are more likely to listen keenly to his political platform about rent freezes, free city buses, and public childcare. When communication across the board is not conventionally packaged, complex policy stances feel accessible and urgent. Mamdani's success offers a blueprint for leaders to allow themselves to be real people with real experiences, even if that means a perfect 'swiped right' story. A generation growing up online demands leaders who meet voters where they are rather than where age-old political playbooks suggest they should be. Vibha B Madhava is a sub-editor at the news desk for She is interested in writing about gender, culture and politics of ableism. Having specialised in digital journalism, she is keen to explore various forms of interactive, multimedia storytelling. Apart from that, she also likes to experiment with social media. Qualification, Degrees/other achievements: Bachelor's degree in Media and Communication from Manipal Institute of Communication, Manipal Academy of Higher Education. PG Diploma in Integrated Multimedia Journalism from Asian College of Journalism, Chennai. With The Indian Express, this is Vibha's first stint in pursuing journalism in a full-time capacity. Previous internship experience: Deccan Herald, Bengaluru; The News Minute, Bengaluru; The Mojo Story; Radio Indigo 91.9 and Fever FM 94.3 (Hyderabad) You can find her on Twitter as @VibhaBMadhava , on LinkedIn (Vibha B Madhava), or write to her at ... Read More

Centre To Launch Public Outreach On Indus Waters Treaty Suspension, Highlight Gains For India
Centre To Launch Public Outreach On Indus Waters Treaty Suspension, Highlight Gains For India

News18

time28 minutes ago

  • News18

Centre To Launch Public Outreach On Indus Waters Treaty Suspension, Highlight Gains For India

Sources indicate the government intends to communicate directly with citizens, particularly in north India, where the potential for increased use of river water is being explored. In a significant policy move, the central government is set to launch a comprehensive public outreach campaign to explain the rationale behind putting the Indus Waters Treaty (IWT) in abeyance. This initiative aims to increase public awareness of the strategic and developmental benefits India stands to gain from suspending the decades-old agreement. Sources indicate that the government intends to communicate directly with citizens, particularly in northern Indian states, where the potential for increased use of river water is being explored. The outreach will focus on how the suspension of the treaty could enable India to exercise its rightful control over water resources and rechannel them for domestic agricultural and developmental use. The campaign will be spearheaded by senior Union ministers, including Agriculture Minister Shivraj Singh Chouhan, Jal Shakti Minister CR Patil, and Environment Minister Bhupender Yadav. These ministers will travel to key regions and engage with local communities in simple, accessible language to explain the government's stance, the reasoning behind the treaty's suspension, and the future roadmap. The larger objective, officials say, is to develop a long-term water management strategy that allows for optimal use of Indus river waters within India. Plans are underway to facilitate the movement of water from Jammu & Kashmir to Punjab, Haryana, and Rajasthan – states that are poised to benefit significantly from improved irrigation and water availability. As part of this effort, an extensive public awareness and engagement campaign will be rolled out in Punjab, Haryana, and Rajasthan. Ministers are expected to personally visit multiple districts and hold interactions with stakeholders, including farmers, local officials, and civil society groups, to ensure the message is effectively conveyed. This move reflects the government's intent to align national water security with geopolitical strategy, while also addressing growing domestic water demands. In the aftermath of the Pahalgam terror attack, Prime Minister Narendra Modi had reiterated that 'trade and terror, water and blood, bullets and dialogue cannot go together." India has since accelerated work on strategic water infrastructure linked to the Indus river system. Among the key initiatives is a 130-kilometre canal designed to link the Beas River to the Ganga Canal, with a proposed extension to the Yamuna River. The project spans nearly 200 kilometres and includes a 12-kilometre tunnel, potentially enabling Yamuna water to reach Gangasagar. States such as Delhi, Haryana, Punjab, and Rajasthan are projected to benefit from the initiative. The government has stated that the work is advancing rapidly and is expected to be completed within two to three years. A Detailed Project Report (DPR) is also in preparation. Sources suggest the suspension of the treaty could significantly affect Pakistan's rabi crops, with the kharif season remaining relatively unaffected. Beyond agriculture, the disruption could impact daily life, potentially leading to a water availability crisis. Pakistan has reportedly approached the World Bank to mediate in the matter. However, the World Bank has thus far declined to intervene in India's internal decision to suspend the treaty. India has emphasised the need to revisit and renegotiate the treaty to reflect 21st-century realities. The original treaty, crafted in the 1950s and 60s, is increasingly seen as outdated due to changing hydrological patterns, glacial melt, population growth, and the need for sustainable energy and water management. Despite India's push for modernisation, Pakistan has continued to resist renegotiation – a stance that, according to Indian officials, itself contravenes the treaty's provisions. Following the Pahalgam terror attack, India had announced a range of diplomatic and strategic responses, including placing the Indus Waters Treaty in abeyance. First Published: June 30, 2025, 14:13 IST

A road less Chinese? India may find a strategic path through Kazakhstan
A road less Chinese? India may find a strategic path through Kazakhstan

Time of India

time40 minutes ago

  • Time of India

A road less Chinese? India may find a strategic path through Kazakhstan

As China's Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) continues to expand its influence over global trade infrastructure, India is exploring alternative pathways that reduce reliance on Beijing-led corridors. One such emerging option is the Trans-Caspian Internationalindia-kazakhstan-middle-corridor-TITR-trade-route-alternative-to-china-briTransport Route (TITR), commonly known as the Middle Corridor, with Kazakhstan playing a central role in its development. India has long objected to key BRI components, especially the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), which cut through Pakistan-occupied Kashmir. The Indian government has consistently raised concerns over CPEC's implications for territorial sovereignty. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Trekking pants for mountain sports and adventure travel Trek Kit India Shop Now Undo Also Read: Kazakhstan, logistics hub of the Eurasia, rises on the world stage In 2024, Ministry of External Affairs spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal reiterated India's position in an interview with ANI, 'On PoK, we are very consistent in our position. We want to tell you, the whole of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh, the union territories, they are part of India, an integral part of India. They were an integral part of India. They are an integral part of India and they will remain an integral part of India.' Live Events 'Our position on CPEC also is well known to you. We are not in favour of it. We are against it. It goes against our territorial integrity and sovereignty,' he added. But now, a quieter alternative is gaining traction, and it doesn't start in Beijing. It begins in Kazakhstan. Kazakhstan's Middle Corridor According to The Economic Times, Kazakhstan is emerging as Eurasia's logistics pivot through the Middle Corridor. While India is not directly connected to this network, its rapid expansion presents a vital opportunity for New Delhi to reduce reliance on Chinese-dominated infrastructure and diversify its trade routes. The Middle Corridor spans over 4,250 km of rail and 500 km of seaway, connecting China, Central Asia, the Caspian Sea, the Caucasus, and Europe, bypassing both Russian and Chinese bottlenecks. As per Indian think tank Observer Research Foundation, the corridor was born out of geopolitical necessity following Russia's 2014 Crimea annexation, when Kazakhstan, Azerbaijan, and Georgia sought to hedge against dependence on unstable or adversarial routes. In 2017, the launch of the 826-km Baku-Tbilisi-Kars railway cemented the route's viability, allowing transit from China to Turkey in 12 days, and to Prague in 18. Kazakhstan's Transport Ministry reported that in 2024, traffic on TITR surged by 62%, reaching 4.5 million tonnes. Container transport grew by 170% to 56,500 TEUs, with 35,600 TEUs moved along the China-Europe leg, 27 times more than the previous year. The 2025 target is 5.2 million tonnes and 70,000 TEUs. But these numbers are just one part of the story. TITR's real significance lies in the infrastructure push that's coming, data suggests. As The Economic Times reported, Kazakhstan is investing massively in its logistics network. In 2025 alone, it plans to modernise 13,000 km of roads and 6,100 km of railways, expand six airports, and build new maritime terminals, including a container hub in Aktau with a capacity of 240,000 TEUs. By 2029, another 11,000 km of rail lines will be upgraded, and new corridors like 'North' and 'Sedmiddle' are in the works. President Kassym-Jomart Tokayev, speaking at the Foreign Investors' Council plenary on June 24 (as per Akorda, the official website of the Kazakh Presidency), described Kazakhstan's economic strategy as future-ready, sustainable, and globally integrated. The country reported a 6% GDP growth in the first half of 2025, driven by logistics, trade, and construction. This is the fastest in 12 years. In an interview with Al Jazeera, Tokayev projected GDP growth of at least 5.5% for 2025, but added that this was 'not such an ambitious outcome,' as the government seeks additional growth engines. Why TITR matters for India Although India is not directly linked to the Middle Corridor, several geopolitical and economic factors could make TITR relevant to Indian interests. As per rating agency ICRA, India relies heavily on maritime trade via the Suez Canal, a route that has become vulnerable due to Red Sea instability and Houthi attacks. 'The recent escalation of the conflict in the Red Sea has resulted in a 122% increase in freight cost in the past couple of months. As a result, the majority of global container shipping companies are deciding to avoid the Suez Canal and instead take the longer route around the Cape of Good Hope,' ICRA noted. According to the World Bank, 95% of India's foreign trade by volume and 67% by value is seaborne. The Suez route is crucial for trade with Europe, North Africa, and the Americas, regions accounting for over 35% of India's total foreign trade. The TITR offers a land-sea multimodal alternative that could ease maritime congestion, reduce freight costs, and benefit Indian exporters, particularly those targeting European markets. More importantly, TITR intersects with India's International North-South Transport Corridor (INSTC), a 7,200-km network linking Mumbai to Europe via Iran and Russia. While TITR and INSTC are separate, they share geographic nodes in the Caspian Sea and Caucasus, especially Azerbaijan. This overlap allows for synergy: Indian goods could travel via INSTC and switch to TITR segments to access Central Asia, Turkey, and Europe. Despite delays in INSTC, caused partly by sanctions on Iran and slow progress on the Chabahar-Zahedan railway, its relevance has only grown. According to ORF, INSTC, initially proposed in 2000, has been ratified by 13 countries and comprises road, rail, and sea links. Its Eastern Route, or KTI Corridor, runs through Iran, Turkmenistan, and Kazakhstan, connecting Russia's Finnish border to Iran's Bandar Abbas port. reports that Russia and Iran are now fast-tracking key INSTC links like the Rasht-Astara railway, expected to be completed by 2027. The convergence of INSTC and TITR could thus form a formidable trans-Eurasian grid, one that reduces India's reliance on China or the Suez Canal. Strategic autonomy: Beyond BRI India's objections to the BRI, especially CPEC, are rooted in sovereignty concerns. More broadly, New Delhi remains wary of BRI's debt-driven model and China's centralised control over participating nations. TITR stands apart. It is not dominated by any one country, and is increasingly backed by Western actors, including the EU, Turkey, and Georgia. In 2024, Kazakhstan hosted its first working group meeting with China on TITR freight movement. As per the Kazakh Ministry of Transport, both countries agreed to increase container traffic on the China-Europe route to 600 trains annually by 2025–26, and up to 3,000 trains by 2029. While China remains a partner, the corridor's multinational nature limits any single country's dominance. India's own connectivity vision, such as the India-Middle East-Europe Economic Corridor (IMEC) is aligned with this trend. Despite recent Middle East tensions slowing IMEC's momentum, a senior MEA official during the 2023 G20 Summit said that the project remains a priority, reported The Hindu. If TITR, INSTC, and IMEC develop in tandem, they could collectively serve as a resilient alternative to the BRI, multiplying India's strategic choices and reducing its vulnerability to chokepoints. Diplomacy in the Caspian Kazakhstan's reform-driven model further strengthens the case for deeper India-Caspian ties. According to the country's state news agency, President Tokayev has introduced a 'prosecutorial filter' to protect foreign investors and launched a National Digital Investment Platform. So far, 137 projects worth $70 billion have been facilitated, and 140 legal amendments initiated. For India, closer diplomatic and economic ties with Kazakhstan, Azerbaijan, and Georgia can help secure energy supplies, mineral access and geopolitical balance in a region of growing global relevance. India need not formally join TITR to benefit from it. What matters is that Kazakhstan's logistics vision, and the Middle Corridor it anchors, adds redundancy to the global trade architecture. The more corridors exist, the less India and others would need to depend on those dominated by strategic rivals.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store