logo
Venezuela's opposition leader: Democratic transition would unlock billions in investment

Venezuela's opposition leader: Democratic transition would unlock billions in investment

Miami Heralda day ago

Unveiling a sweeping reconstruction plan for a post-Maduro Venezuela, opposition leader María Corina Machado told a group of international allies, investors, and civil society partners that the country stands on the brink of historic change — and called on the world to support its transition from dictatorship to democracy.
'This is very exciting,' Machado said during a video conference organized in New York by the Americas Society/Council of the Americas. 'The potential is huge, not just for the Venezuelan people, but for democratic governments across the hemisphere and investors who understand what's possible once we reach a democratic government.'
Widely seen as the face of Venezuela's opposition, Machado delivered her remarks from an undisclosed location in the country. She went into hiding following the contested presidential election in July, amid a sweeping crackdown by the Nicolás Maduro regime that has led to more than 2,000 arrests of dissidents and opposition figures.
Though the regime declared Maduro the winner, polls show that nine out of ten Venezuelans believe opposition candidate Edmundo González won the election by a 2-to-1 margin. Many countries, including the United States, have publicly rejected the official results, describing the election as fraudulent.
Machado, a close ally and political mentor to González, said the Maduro regime is now more isolated than ever, noting diminishing support from traditional allies like Russia, Iran, and Syria. China, she added, has grown increasingly frustrated after being misled and financially harmed by the regime.
'China wants its debts repaid,' she said. 'But they're not taking new risks in Venezuela. They're investing in Guyana instead.'
Machado also pointed to growing fractures within Venezuela's military and ruling elite. 'Nobody wants to go down with a sinking ship,' she said. 'And that's exactly what Maduro's regime is.'
She described Maduro not merely as an autocrat, but as the head of a transnational criminal organization. As long as he remains in power, she warned, no meaningful economic or political progress is possible.
'Companies operating in Venezuela today are forced to partner with a criminal regime that offers no transparency, no legal protections, and no real opportunities,' Machado said. 'There is no way forward under Maduro.'
Yet her message was ultimately one of hope framed around what she called a 'win-win' future: the collapse of a dictatorship, the rebirth of a nation, and a unique opportunity for shared prosperity across the Americas.
Machado spoke of a country transformed by hardship. After years of repression, economic collapse, and mass migration, she said Venezuelans are now united not by ideology, but by shared values.
'There is no other society in the world today as united as the Venezuelan people,' she said. 'We've transcended religious, racial, and class divides. What unites us now are dignity, work, family, and freedom.'
Rather than food or financial aid, she said, Venezuelans are asking for just three things: trust, dignity, and the chance to work. 'And that's what we are going to offer.'
She also addressed the Venezuelan diaspora directly, calling them essential to the nation's reconstruction.
'Our diaspora is extraordinary,' she said. 'They've suffered, they've learned, they've built global networks—and they are desperate to come home.'
Education, she added, will be central to the country's revival. 'It's my passion and my obsession,' she said. 'And soon, we will see our schools flourish again.'
Machado praised recent U.S. sanctions — including the revocation of oil licenses — as vital in tightening the financial noose on Maduro's inner circle. She urged further action to cut off the regime's illicit income streams, including drug trafficking and gold smuggling.
Addressing international investors and energy companies, Machado promised a new Venezuela grounded in the rule of law and open to serious, long-term partnerships.
'We want you here,' she said. 'Not producing a couple hundred thousand barrels a day—but millions. Venezuela will become the energy hub and the most reliable supplier in the hemisphere.'
She pledged a transparent debt restructuring process and a return to international financial markets. 'Creditors know they won't be paid under Maduro,' she said. 'We will.'
Her message was clear: A post-Maduro Venezuela is not only a moral cause—it is a historic economic opportunity.
In closing, Machado returned to the theme of unity and the resilience of the Venezuelan people.
'We are a different society now,' she said. 'We've endured the worst—families torn apart, loved ones disappeared. But we've learned. We value freedom, justice, and dignity more than ever before.'
'This is the moment to act,' she added. 'We are ready to rebuild. We want to bring our children home. And we want to do it with you.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The post-Roe fight over data privacy
The post-Roe fight over data privacy

Politico

time2 hours ago

  • Politico

The post-Roe fight over data privacy

Hey everyone! I hope you are all having a lovely Pride Month. Thanks for reading Women Rule. We'll be on hiatus next week and back in your inbox on June 27. Reach out and say hello: klong@ and ecordover@ This week I had a chat with Rep. Sara Jacobs on her reintroduction of the My Body, My Data Act. The post-Roe era has elevated a new data privacy fight, as concerns grow over how reproductive and sexual health data is collected and disclosed. But the issue has been front of mind for Rep. Sara Jacobs for years, even prior to the Dobbs decision. The California Democrat reintroduced the My Body, My Data Act on Thursday, which aims to increase protections for those who use apps and sites that collect reproductive and sexual health data, such as period tracking apps. Jacobs points to certain instances where reproductive health data, which is not protected under HIPAA, has been used to investigate and prosecute users in states with strict abortion laws. Jacobs describes the push to protect reproductive and sexual health data as 'the abortion fight of the 21st century.' The bill, which was introduced in 2022 and then reintroduced the following year, would provide consumer protections for users who disclose their reproductive and sexual health data on apps and websites. This includes limiting the data that can be collected to only that which is necessary to provide a certain product or service, and bolstering transparency from companies on how that data is collected, retained and shared. Sens. Mazie Hirono (D-Hawaii) and Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) sponsored the bill's Senate counterpart. The legislation was introduced twice before, first in 2022 and again the following year, but made little headway. And with a Republican-controlled Congress, the bill's reintroduction will likely result in a similar fate. Women Rule spoke with Jacobs on the reintroduction of the bill, which comes on the heels of the three-year anniversary of the Dobbs decision. This interview has been edited for length and clarity. I first wanted to talk a little bit about the bill. I think especially in a post-Roe world, there's growing concern over government tracking on period apps and other apps and sites related to reproductive and sexual health. I first introduced this bill because right after the opposite decision came down when Roe v. Wade was overturned, I started getting all these messages from friends and peers wondering what they should do about their period tracking apps, and I also use a period tracking app, and we started looking into it and there's basically no protections for this kind of reproductive and sexual health data. It's not covered under HIPAA, and so we're already seeing people try to use this data to go after people who are getting abortions and those helping them in states that have criminalized abortion. We know that they want to go after this data, and so I think it's incredibly important that we as Congress do something to protect this very sensitive data. Actually, there was a poll two years ago that showed that 2 in 3 Americans, including 54 percent of Republicans, support Congress making it illegal for apps and search engines to sell their reproductive health data. Why is it important for this bill to pass now? Well, in 2017, even before the overturning of Roe v. Wade, Mississippi police used Google search history to go after someone and alleged that she had an abortion. In 2022, the police used Facebook messages in Nebraska as part of an investigation into an abortion illegal under state law. More recently, a data broker sold cell phone and geolocation data to an anti-abortion political group that then used that information to dispense misinformation about reproductive health to people who had visited 600 abortion clinics in 48 states. And more Americans are turning to online clinics for medication abortions. Young people increasingly use the internet, live online, we are googling questions about medicine, we are using Ubers to get places, right? And all of this data can be misused, and we know the lengths that police and prosecutors will go to to try and intimidate or prosecute people for having abortions. With a Republican controlled Congress, it seems unlikely that the bill will pass, but have you received any support from across the aisle? Unfortunately, while I work in a bipartisan way with a lot of Republicans on data privacy, when it comes to this kind of data, they have been unwilling to engage even though they claim to support data privacy. We're coming up on the three-year anniversary of Roe v. Wade being overturned, and you've mentioned a few examples. Could you talk about how the Dobbs decision has impacted those who use these reproductive and self sexual health tracking apps and sites? Look, especially in states that have criminalized abortion — something like 1 in 3 women live in a state that has criminalized abortion in some way — there is an incredible amount of fear that even if they have a natural miscarriage they could be prosecuted because they Googled something once or that this kind of information can be used against [them] and weaponized against people. I think as we're seeing more and more states and as we know that at the end of the day this Republican Party wants a federal abortion ban, it's more important than ever that we protect people's data. Is there anything in particular about the My Body My Data Act that you would like to highlight? This is the abortion fight of the 21st century, right? Because it's about access and it's about how they're enforcing these really horrible laws. Americans are now becoming more aware of how their data is being used and stored, in part because of DOGE and what Elon Musk is doing. And we know that women are often trying to find the apps and services that claim to safeguard their data, but each individual person shouldn't have to try and figure this out on their own, and it shouldn't be up to companies to do the right thing. This is the exact kind of thing you need the government for, to protect very sensitive health data. And young people intrinsically understand this issue from both sides of the aisle. But part of what's hard is that so many of my colleagues do not understand this. There's just a bit of a mismatch between Congress and the American people on this issue. POLITICO Special Report How Kamala Harris Is Processing the LA Unrest by Melanie Mason for POLITICO: 'Harris has been choosy about when to weigh in publicly on politics since leaving Washington. So her statement on social media this week denouncing President Donald Trump's activation of the National Guard as a 'dangerous escalation' instantly lent itself to frenzied tea leaves reading. … For Harris, it was a natural issue to speak up on for several reasons, according to one of the people familiar with her thinking and granted anonymity to speak freely. First, she's coming at this as a lifelong Californian who came up in law enforcement and has made the rule of law a driving theme of her career. She also empathizes with the protesters, after growing up steeped in the civil rights protests of her childhood and campus anti-apartheid movement of the 1980s.' Trump's DOJ Indicted a Democratic Congresswoman. The Case Could Fall Apart. by Ankush Khardori for POLITICO: 'The decision to proceed with an indictment following the initial charges against the New Jersey Democrat comes at a politically volatile moment — following President Donald Trump's decision to deploy the National Guard and the Marines in response to protests in Los Angeles, and in the midst of ongoing wrangling over the scope and legality of the administration's deportation effort. In recent weeks, that effort has generated heartrending images from courthouse arrests and more admissions of mistaken deportations from the Justice Department. Meanwhile, the administration is moving to deport hundreds of thousands of people who entered the country legally under the last administration.' Phil Murphy Skated to the NJ Governor's Mansion. Mikie Sherrill Might Not Have it So Easy. by Matt Friedman and Madison Fernandez for POLITICO: 'Rep. Mikie Sherrill was the vanguard of the anti-Trump backlash in 2018. Just months after the political unknown declared her Democratic candidacy for Congress and began raising money at a fast clip, the 24-year Republican incumbent bowed out rather than face the first competitive general election of his career. Sherrill easily won what had long been a safe Republican district in a blue wave election that flipped the House. Now, Sherrill stands as Democrats' bulwark against a red tide after winning the party nomination for New Jersey governor Tuesday night.' Number of the Week More on that here. MUST READS Doctors Report the First Pregnancy Using a New AI Procedure by Alice Park for Time Magazine: 'Doctors at Columbia University Fertility Center have reported what they are calling the first pregnancy using a new AI system, in a couple that had been trying to start a family for nearly two decades. The pregnancy was possible due to an advance developed by the Columbia team, led by Dr. Zev Williams, director of the center, to address azoospermia, or a lack of detectable sperm in the ejaculate. Male factors account for about 40 percent of infertility in the U.S., and azoospermia is responsible for about 10 percent of those cases. Until recently, there was little doctors could do to address the lack of sperm needed to fertilize an egg, other than using donor sperm.' Domestic Abusers Could Have Easier Path to Getting Gun Rights Back Under Trump Proposal by Jennifer Gerson for The 19th: 'The Trump administration is proposing a change to how people convicted of crimes can have their gun rights restored, raising concerns over what this means for victims of domestic violence. The Democratic Women's Caucus and the Gun Violence Prevention Task Force of the U.S. House of Representatives sent a letter to Attorney General Pam Bondi and Robert Hinchman, senior counsel at the Department of Justice (DOJ), criticizing an interim final rule that would move the responsibility for determining if someone gets their gun rights back from the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) to the Office of the Attorney General. While the ATF is part of the DOJ, the letter says the proposal would create 'an apparent lack of an objective, holistic process for making' these decisions.' Senate Democrats File Bill to Prevent Ban on Transgender Military Service by Luis Martinez for ABC News: 'The 'Fit to Serve Act' would prohibit the Defense Department from banning transgender service members from serving in the military. If passed, the law would prevent the DOD from denying access to healthcare on the basis of gender identity, and it would also prohibit the military from forcing service members to serve in their sex assigned at birth. It would also make it illegal for the military to discriminate against service members on the basis of gender identity.' QUOTE OF THE WEEK Read more here. on the move Fortune journalist Emma Hinchliffe was promoted to editor of the Most Powerful Women Daily newsletter at the publication, leading editorial for the 28-year-old franchise. Martina McLennan is now director of policy communications for economic and health policy at the Bipartisan Policy Center. She previously was communications director for Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.). (h/t POLITICO Influence) Cara Duckworth is now SVP of comms at USTelecom – The Broadband Association. She previously was chief corporate comms officer at the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (h/t POLITICO Playbook)

A Bagel Shop Bows Out of Manhattan After Over a Decade
A Bagel Shop Bows Out of Manhattan After Over a Decade

Eater

time3 hours ago

  • Eater

A Bagel Shop Bows Out of Manhattan After Over a Decade

Skip to main content Current eater city: New York After 11 years, Baz Bagel, located at 181 Grand Street, at Mulberry Street, in Little Italy, is bowing out. An announcement went up on Instagram this week: The last day is June 22. Owner Bari Musacchio confirmed the news to Eater, adding that she had previously lived above the restaurant, but after 20 years in the neighborhood, she had moved on and it felt like a 'natural time' to do the same with her business. She has passed the keys to an uptown bagel operator, to be announced soon. 'We knew bagels would continue to thrive on Grand Street, so finding the right operator was key — especially one that could keep our amazing staff on board,' she says. 'We're incredibly proud that our small neighborhood shop made its way into some of NYC's biggest moments — whether it was serving the Knicks, Liberty, Rangers, being part of WWHL, Fleet Week, or collaborating on so many iconic events over the years.' Williamsburg's Titi's Empanadas opens today, Friday, June 13, in the East Village at 130 E. Seventh Street, near Avenue A, EVGrieve reports. Owners Jesus Villalobos and Nate Ramm — related to the family behind the Venezuelan restaurants Cachapas y Mas — have expanded to a location that includes lunch, dinner, and weekend late night. Hours are from 11 a.m. to 11 p.m. Sunday through Thursday and until 4 a.m. Friday and Saturday. The menu lists empanadas as well as a $29 empanada flight; sandwiches like chopped cheese and cachapas; desserts, juices, and baked goods, as well as coffee drinks, beer, and wine. A soufflé shop, Fluffy Fluffy, has opened in the East Village at 153 First Avenue, at East 10th Street. The shop already has U.S. locations in New Jersey, Texas, Florida, and Georgia, where it offers drinks like matcha mango lattes, soufflés in flavors such as cookies and cream or crème brûlée, croissant-waffle mash-up sandwiches, and more.

Should You Buy Berkshire Hathaway While It's Below $500?
Should You Buy Berkshire Hathaway While It's Below $500?

Yahoo

time4 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Should You Buy Berkshire Hathaway While It's Below $500?

Berkshire Hathaway was one of the best-performing large cap stocks of 2025 until Warren Buffett announced his retirement. Since the announcement, Berkshire has lost about 11% of its value. Long-term investors who buy now could be getting a bargain. 10 stocks we like better than Berkshire Hathaway › Berkshire Hathaway (NYSE: BRK.A)(NYSE: BRK.B) has been one of the more interesting stock market stories of 2025. When the S&P 500 briefly plunged into bear market territory in April after the president's reciprocal tariff announcements, Berkshire held up quite well. In fact, Berkshire's stock reached a fresh all-time high a few weeks later and as of early May was one of the best-performing large cap stocks in the market. However, at Berkshire Hathaway's annual meeting, legendary investor and CEO Warren Buffett dropped a bombshell on investors and announced that he intends to step down at the end of the year. In just over a month since that time, Berkshire has lost more than 10% of its market value. Historically, a 10% correction in Berkshire Hathaway stock has been an excellent time to buy. However, this time looks a little different. For one thing, even after falling 10%, Berkshire is still beating the S&P 500 over the past year. Second, is Berkshire a good buy even without Warren Buffet? There are two things to unpack here: Can Berkshire still be a great investment in the post-Warren Buffett era? With a valuation of more than $1 trillion, even after a 10% decline, is Berkshire attractively valued as a business? To be sure, these are somewhat a matter of opinion. But let's try to answer both of these questions. First, it's important to acknowledge that there's a lot that won't change when Buffett steps down. Just to name a few key points: Each of Berkshire's subsidiary businesses has its own management team, and there's very little oversight from Berkshire's corporate office. After Buffett steps down, new CEO Greg Abel will still oversee the company's non-insurance operations, and Vice Chairman Ajit Jain will still preside over the insurance businesses. Investment managers Ted Weschler and Todd Combs will still help allocate money in the stock portfolio. Buffett is planning to remain in an executive chairman role, so he still has significant influence. Arguably, the biggest changes will be that Greg Abel, not Buffett, will have final say over what the company does with its nearly $350 billion cash stockpile, and Buffett won't be picking stocks in the portfolio. However, I'd push back on the fact that these will be major changes. Abel knows Buffett's capital deployment strategies better than anyone and will use the same general investment framework in place now. And with the stock portfolio, Weschler and Combs have established an excellent track record. In fact, one of them was initially responsible for Berkshire's Apple (NASDAQ: AAPL) investment -- its most successful of all time. There are three main parts of Berkshire Hathaway: its operating businesses, its stock portfolio, and its cash. The latter two are very straightforward to value. As of the latest information, Berkshire has about $348 billion in cash and short-term investments, and its stock portfolio has a market value of $279.4 billion. Subtracting these from its market cap of $1.049 trillion shows that the company's operating businesses are valued at $421.6 billion. Over the past four quarters, excluding investment income, Berkshire's operating profit has been about $33 billion. This means that Berkshire's businesses are trading for an exceptionally low valuation of less than 13 times earnings despite being a largely recession-resistant collection of companies with reliable cash flow. Of course, this valuation is a bit of an oversimplification. Berkshire's subsidiaries are a diverse collection of different industries, growth rates, and business dynamics, and looking at the price-to-earnings (P/E) multiple for any investment is just one piece of the valuation puzzle. But the point is that despite its trillion-dollar valuation, Berkshire isn't as expensive of a stock as you might assume. At a share price of about $488 as I'm writing this, Berkshire isn't as attractive as it was a year ago when its share price was 20% lower. But there are some good reasons for the strong performance, and the reality is that the business isn't going to change as much as you might think after Buffett steps down, and a 11% decline in the stock seems to be a bit of an overreaction. After all, Buffett turns 95 this year, so although the announcement was unexpected, the fact that he won't be at the helm much longer really shouldn't be a surprise. Berkshire Hathaway is one of my largest stock investments and one I've added to many times over the decade or so I've held it. I have absolutely no plans to sell a single share, and although I have no clue what Berkshire's stock price will do over the coming weeks or months, there's a solid case to be made that this is a buying opportunity for long-term investors. Before you buy stock in Berkshire Hathaway, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Berkshire Hathaway wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $657,871!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $875,479!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 998% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 174% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 9, 2025 Matt Frankel has positions in Berkshire Hathaway. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Apple and Berkshire Hathaway. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Should You Buy Berkshire Hathaway While It's Below $500? was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store