Sebi proposes to ease IPO norms for large companies
Sebi
) is proposing to ease norms for large companies looking to sell shares through an
Initial Public Offering
(IPO). The regulator has recommended to reduce the minimum proportion of shares (MPS) that such companies must offer to the public in the issue.
The proposal would allow entities such as the National Stock Exchange (NSE) and Reliance Jio Infocomm, which command multi-billion dollar valuations, to go public with a smaller float.
"For such large issuers, diluting substantial stake through an IPO can pose challenges, as the market may not be able to absorb such a large supply of shares, which in turn may discourage such issuers from pursuing listings in India," Sebi said in a discussion paper on Monday.
The regulator said for companies with a post IPO market cap above ₹50,000 crore, the minimum share sale would have to be at least 8% from the current 10%. For companies, with a post issue market cap of over ₹1 lakh crore and ₹5 lakh crore, they would have to dilute at least 2.75% and 2.5%, respectively. Now, companies with a post-issue market cap above ₹1 lakh crore had to dilute at least 5% of equity.
ET in its edition dated August 1, 2025, had reported that Sebi is considering a proposal to allow large companies with valuations exceeding ₹1 lakh crore to dilute only 2.5% of their equity base.
Live Events
Agencies
Minimum Public Shareholding
The regulator has also proposed relaxations in the timeline to meet the minimum public holding norms.
For issuers with a post issue market capitalisation above ₹50,000 crore, the timeline for compliance with the minimum public shareholding requirement of 25% would be extended to five years from the existing three years from date of listing.While for issuers with a post issue market cap above ₹1,00,000 crore, if the public shareholding is less than 15% as on the date of listing, then minimum public holding of 15% can be achieved within five years and 25% within 10 years from date of listing.
"Mandating substantial equity dilution for meeting the MPS requirements, immediately after the IPO can lead to an oversupply of shares in the market. This anticipation of further dilution may impact the share prices, despite strong company fundamentals, and may adversely impact existing public shareholders," it said.
The regulator said it would make recommendations to the finance ministry to amend the Securities Contracts (Regulation) Rule to provide flexibility to large issuers.
Sebi said, this would allow large issuers to undertake fund raising in a phased manner and facilitate issuers to plan and execute fund-raising activities.
In 2021, the minimum public shareholding rules were introduced. Under these provisions, issuers with a post issue market cap above ₹1 lakh crore are required to dilute at least 5% at the time of the IPO and are mandated to increase their public shareholding to 10% within 2 years and further to 25% within 5 years from date of listing.
"For very large market cap companies...this will reduce requirements to seek ad hoc or one time Sebi relaxations. This move will further ease the pressure on secondary capital markets, where only issuers with genuine capital requirements will tap into for a fund raise," said Arka Mookerjee, partner, JSA Advocates & Solicitors.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
33 minutes ago
- Time of India
Sebi looks to promote long-tenure derivatives
Sebi Sebi Sebi 1 2 Mumbai: Market regulator Sebi is working on ways to extend the tenure of derivative (futures & options or F&O) contracts, a trouble area for the market regulator, as data show nine out of 10 retail participants lose money in this segment. Currently, retail participants trade more in weekly options contracts than in the relatively long-tenure ones of one-, two- and three-month maturities. Sebi chief Tuhin Kanta Pandey on Thursday hinted that the regulator would look to promote hedging and long-term investing in the market. In contrast, a large number of market experts believe the F&O space in India is used primarily for speculative activities. "We will consult with stakeholders on ways to improve in a calibrated manner and on the maturity profile of derivative products so that they better serve hedging and long-term investing," Pandey said. He was speaking at FICCI's annual Capital Market Conference. Market players expect Sebi to now completely ban weekly options contracts, one of the most traded contracts on both NSE and BSE, which also bring in big revenues for these bourses. Post Sebi chief's comments, the stock prices of BSE crashed over 7.5%. Among the listed brokers with many clients trading in the F&O segment, Angel One was the most affected, with the stock crashing 6.7%. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Your Finger Shape Says a Lot About Your Personality, Read Now Tips and Tricks Undo Market players welcome Sebi's plan for longer tenure F&O contracts. "As the world's fifth-largest equity market , India needs markets that front-end growth," said Venkatachalam Shunmugham, Founding Partner, MCQube, a securities market thinktank. "A move to one-monthly expiry helps shift focus back to resilient cash markets and vibrant fundraising," he said. Stay informed with the latest business news, updates on bank holidays , public holidays , current gold rate and silver price .
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
an hour ago
- Business Standard
Best of BS Opinion: Land reforms, nuclear energy can power Indian economy
Hello and welcome to the Best of BS Opinion, our daily wrap of Business Standard 's opinion page. Indian manufacturing has long battled the bogey of land acquisition, which can be slow, costly, and riddled with red tape across jurisdictions. Multiple chokepoints mean higher costs, financing hurdles, and sometimes even render entire projects unviable, notes our first editorial, and also commends the Confederation of Indian Industry's (CII) call for a comprehensive overhaul of land acquisition for manufacturing. The NDA government had early on in its first term attempted land reforms but was forced to beat a retreat in the face of political and farmer resistance. Indeed, the landscape for land reforms is fraught with political sensitivities but the economic compulsion for it means the government must bite the bullet, using political consensus and transparent safeguards for sellers. Given the churn in global supply chain, India needs to bump up manufacturing's share in GDP, but unresolved issues in factor markets could cost it a golden opportunity. The central government earlier this month opened up multiple elements of the nuclear energy ecosystem to the private sector, including uranium mining, imports, and processing, besides nuclear power generation. This, our second editorial notes, is a big push towards the country's ambitions of a 100 GW of nuclear power by 2047, and a nod to its role in climate imperatives, energy mix, and reducing dependence on fossil fuels. Given India's low uranium reserves, the relaxation on imports will be key. However, all of this will entail significant changes to existing laws, especially the Civil Liability for Nuclear Damage Act that has so far deterred foreign firms. Meanwhile, private players must adopt innovative financing structures suited to the long-term nature of nuclear assets. The government also must engage with local communities to allay public fear and ensure environmental care and fair compensation. All headline-grabbing corporate frauds - from Enron to WorldCom to our own Satyam - have thrown up a common question: What were the independent directors doing? Amit Tandon takes on this nettlesome issue in his column, pointing out that the role of an independent director must go beyond passing an exam. It is not enough to being familiar with the letter of the law; independent directors must follow its spirit. For too long, boardrooms had become a family-and-friends cocoon until Sebi brought in strict regulation to diversify them. But then, diversity in corporate governance should not remain a box-ticking exercise, and mere compliance should not be confused with culture. Independent directors, he reminds us, must be true to their designation: willingn to challenge, question, and dissent when needed. The question of what to do with slothful public sector enterprises (PSEs) has vexed many a government. In 2021, Prime Minister Narendra Modi loftily announced at a divestment webinar that 'The government has no business to be in business.' Earlier that year, the Union Budget had announced the government's policy on 'disinvestment in all non-strategic and strategic sectors". But, as our columnist Amit Tyagi points out using data, that policy has now made a 180-degree turn, with divestment activity now lower than before FY21. Tyagi notes that this poor show in divestment is likely due to the reluctance of the ministries to part with their fiefdom and patronage; and bureaucratic fear of getting into trouble with investigative agencies over potential allegations of underselling PSEs. Even more worrying is the recent trend of the government infusing substantial funds into PSEs through equity and easy loans, a case of throwing good money after bad. The Centre, he argues, must return to its 2021 divestment policy and implement it with rigour in a time-bound manner, backed by proper planning, as only privatisation can transform the working culture of PSEs. The King of Fruits: That is how the mango is known across the Indian subcontinent, where it is said to have its origins. A new book 'Mango: A Global History' follows the fruit on its globetrotting journey through empire and slavery, revolution and recipes. The authors, writes Sneha Pathak, recount how world leaders and slaves alike took to the fruit - the former for flavour, the latter for survival - while the messy eating of its fleshiness meant that memsahibs of the British empire took to devouring it in the bathroom, earning it the moniker 'bathroom fruit'. In fact, the authors Constance L Kirker and Mary Newman tell the reader in the introduction itself that eating a mango is a 'full body experience' and that to savour it one must get out of one's 'comfort zones and get messy'.
Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
Court papers, Sebi letters lay bare Kapur siblings' long fight over Sona Comstar
Fresh questions by the late Sunjay Kapur's sister Mandhira Kapur over the transfer of ownership of the RK Family Trust, which controls the promoter entity of listed auto components major Sona Comstar, are not the first time that a dispute has emerged within the Kapur family over the division of the estate built by the late Surinder Kapur, according to documents seen by Mint. In the last one week, Mandhira has questioned the role of RK Family Trust in taking away the control on the shareholding of Aureus Investment Private Ltd—a key promoter entity of Sona Comstar—from Rani Kapur. But this is not the first time such a concern has been raised by Mandhira. Read more: Sona Comstar case: Why family firms need a governance triad The dispute over the division of the family assets between siblings Mandhira and Sunjay Kapur, the children of Surinder Kapur, had earlier boiled over into courts of law and before the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi), according to documents reviewed by Mint. In a letter to the then Sebi chairman Ajay Tyagi in May 2021, just ahead of the public markets listing of Sona Comstar, Mandhira highlighted that her father had drafted a will that transferred the entire estate to her mother Rani Kapur, with a wish that Mandhira eventually receive her fair share. "As per the DRHP (draft red herring prospectus), it seems that my brother is trying to usurp my father's entire estate to himself for which he has created RK Family Trust. The details of the trust are shrouded in mystery," she alleged. RK Family Trust controls more than two-thirds of Aureus Investment Private Ltd, the promoter entity of Sona Comstar, holding a 28% stake in the company. In another letter to the Sebi chief in June 2021, Mandhira questioned Sunjay's attempts to dismiss the bearing of the matters involving the trust on the listing of the company. She asked for an investigation into the trust. "Hence, I once again, request you to not allow Sona BLW Precision Forgings Limited to launch its initial public offer (IPO) until this significant issue of my rights and considerations are resolved," Mandhira pleaded to the Sebi chief. However, the listing successfully went ahead in June 2021. The IPO's issue price was ₹291 a share. On Thursday, shares of Sonal BLW Precision settled 1.6% lower at ₹442.85 apiece on the BSE. Previous disputes While the battle over the trust raged, the siblings also took on each other in courts of law over the trademark rights of the name 'Sona'. In June 2020, the Mandhira Kapur-controlled Mandhira Marketing Private Ltd changed its name to Sona Mandhira Private Ltd. Sona BLW Precision Forgings challenged this in the Delhi High Court. The court granted an interim injunction in 2023, restraining the Mandhira Kapur-controlled company from using the Sona trademark. The difference between the siblings stayed till the demise of Sunjay in June this year. Mandhira admitted in her interviews with the media that the two hadn't spoken in four years. However, with the control of the RK Family Trust now going to Sunjay's wife Priya Sachdev and their son Azarias, and Sunjay's two children from an earlier marriage to Karishma Kapoor also touted to receive control, Mandhira and her mother Rani Kapur find themselves at loggerheads with the new owners. Joining her mother in questioning the transfer of power to Priya Sachdev Kapur, Mandhira in multiple media interviews questioned how she and her mother have been kept out of the family's ownership of Sona Comstar. "We didn't know. We had to look into this stuff. We have learned that everything was put into this so-called trust, which I don't know how. We don't know anything. We're still finding out stuff. My father left everything to my mother. My father and mother founded Sona. So to tell my mother at 80, you have nothing to do with the company she built, I think is a little absurd," Mandhira said in an interview to NDTV. Queries sent to Sona Comstar, Rani Kapur, and Mandhira Kapur remained unanswered. Mint previously reported that Rani Kapur received a 42% stake in Sona Comstar's promoter entity Aureus Investment (then known as Sona Autocomp Holding Pvt. Ltd) in 2015 following her husband's passing away. The stake was subsequently transferred to the RK Family Trust in October 2017 through a trust deed. Aureus said in response to Mint's earlier queries that the transfer was done by Rani Kapur on her own volition. Rani Kapur remained the beneficiary of the trust for two more years. In 2019, the trust informed Sona Comstar, which was a privately-held company at the time, that its sole beneficiary was now Sunjay Kapur, as per a press release issued last month by Sona Comstar. Mint could not ascertain the reasons behind the transfer of Aureus shares from Rani Kapur to RK Family Trust and the subsequent beneficial control transfer of the trust from her to Sunjay. However, Rani Kapur has in a recent statement claimed that the transfers were against her will and she was made to sign documents the contents of which she was not aware of. While the facts of the matter continue to be debated in the press, Mandhira and Rani have few legal options. Read more: Sona Comstar row shows why Indian firms must let professionals lead 'Mandhira Kapur and Rani Kapur's potential remedies would depend upon whether they can establish that the beneficial ownership transfers of the RK Family Trust and Raghuvanshi Investment in favour of Sunjay Kapur were either legally invalid or obtained through misrepresentation, undue influence, fraud, or lack of informed consent," said Deepika Kumari, partner, King Stubb & Kasiva, Advocates and Attorneys. Rani Kapur's claim that she was made to sign documents without knowledge of their content—particularly after Sunjay's demise—introduces an element of potential fraud, misrepresentation, or lack of informed consent, Kumari said. If she can establish that her signature was obtained without full disclosure, this could substantiate a plea that the transfers or subsequent trust arrangements were voidable and should not bind her legally. Sucharita Basu, founder and managing partner, Aquilaw, said that any such claims of documents being signed forcibly would have to be proved. However, from the disclosures made by Sona Comstar, no documents have been signed or obtained from Rani Kapur by the company following the passing of Sunjay Kapur, she said. 'In case any documents were forcibly signed, then a police complaint may be filed for the same," she said. Read more: Sona Comstar not informed who controls promoter family trust after Sunjay Kapur, CEO says
