Analysts ‘Cautious About Near-Term Volatility' In AI Demand on Lackluster Nvidia Upgrade
Daiwa analysts have warned that they are 'cautious about near-term volatility' for artificial intelligence (AI) hardware demand following Computex 2025. The tech expo took place last week and ended on Friday. Daiwa analysts said it was largely a non-event and highlighted how this could impact hardware demand in the AI sector.
Confident Investing Starts Here:
According to the firm's analysts, there wasn't much at Computex that suggested AI hardware demand will be strong in 2025. The analysts also pointed to the limited differences between Nvidia's (NVDA) GB200 server and its new GB300 server as a potential downside for 2025 demand.
What About Long-Term AI Demand?
Daiwa analysts still have high hopes for AI demand in the long-term. They stated 'we have a positive long-term view on AI computing demand, driven by the ongoing shift to agentic and physical AI.' This has them more concerned with how AI hardware demand will be in 2026, than in 2025.
While the warning comes alongside Nvidia's modest server upgrade, limited AI hardware demand could affect other companies in the sector. Advanced Micro Devices (AMD), IBM (IBM), Super Micro Computer (SMCI), Dell Technologies (DELL), and Lenovo (LNVGF) are all companies that could suffer if AI demand remains low in the near-term.
Which AI Stocks Are Worth Investing In?
Turning to the TipRanks stock comparison tool, traders can see which AI stocks have the best analyst ratings and price targets. NVDA, DELL, and LNVGF stand out as AI server stocks with consensus Strong Buy ratings. Of them, Nvidia and Lenovo offer the best upside potential at 25.3% and 27.91%, respectively. However, NVDA's stock price target is significantly higher than LNVGF's at 164.51, compared to $1.65. Nvidia is also a leader in the AI space, making it a potentially safer investment compared to others on this list.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
30 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Nvidia Stock (NVDA) Preserves Pack Leader Status Following Q1
Nvidia (NVDA) once again proved to the markets, after reporting its Q1 earnings, that it remains the undisputed leader powering the global AI revolution, driven by relentless demand for its chips, even amid ongoing geopolitical and trade headwinds. Easily unpack a company's performance with TipRanks' new KPI Data for smart investment decisions Receive undervalued, market resilient stocks right to your inbox with TipRanks' Smart Value Newsletter Beyond beating all key metrics (excluding one-off events) and offering guidance that resonated well with investors, Nvidia stock experienced a strong post-earnings surge, even if the momentum cooled slightly in the days that followed. That said, there's arguably still a missing spark needed to fully reignite the stock's momentum heading into 2025. However, considering the broader growth story, Nvidia continues to trade at a very attractive valuation—one that could deliver meaningful alpha over the long term. Short- to mid-term bumps, especially tied to macro risks in China, are worth monitoring but don't alter the core thesis. Given the company's strong execution and still-intact fundamentals, I continue to rate NVDA as a Buy. As I pointed out in a previous article, for Nvidia stock to perform well after its Q1 Fiscal 2026 results, it wouldn't be enough to simply beat estimates—it needed to crush them and deliver guidance that topped market expectations. And that's precisely what Nvidia did. The company reported revenue of $44 billion (as shown in the chart below), beating its own guidance of $43 billion—a massive 69% increase year-over-year. Gross margins, which had been a point of concern during the early stages of Blackwell's rollout, came in at 71.3% (excluding the H20 charge, a financial write-off tied to its China-specific H20 GPUs). That's also above the guided range of 70.6% to 71%. Even more impressive was the Q2 guidance. Nvidia is projecting $45 billion in revenue, with a margin of plus or minus 2%. At the high end, that's $45.9 billion—above the ~$45.5 billion consensus estimate leading into earnings day. Margins are expected to rise again, landing between 71.8% and 72.0%, with a margin of error of approximately 50 basis points. At the top of that range, it suggests another round of margin expansion, which is exactly what investors wanted to hear. The company continues to state that once Blackwell production is fully ramped, margins could move into the 70–80% range over the next few quarters. This stronger-than-expected performance, along with the recovery in margins, led to long-term EPS estimates getting bumped up by around 9% starting in FY2029. Revenue projections for those years were also revised higher by roughly 8%. Not surprisingly, Nvidia shares jumped more than 5% in after-hours trading following the earnings release, although the stock mostly leveled off in the sessions since. In my view, the muted post-earnings reaction is actually a positive sign—it shows the market didn't see enough red flags to justify a selloff in Nvidia stock. However, bears argue that even with revenue jumping nearly 70% year-over-year, signs of fatigue in the growth story are evident, with sequential growth of just 12% potentially indicating that Nvidia's explosive momentum is entering a more seasonal or plateauing phase. For a company priced for hypergrowth, this kind of quarter-over-quarter slowdown can be an early warning signal. And it's not just about the numbers—geopolitical and regulatory pressures are starting to have real consequences. The U.S. export restrictions on AI chips like the H20 led to a $4.5 billion write-down and forced Nvidia to walk away from an estimated $15 billion in potential sales to China. That's not just a short-term financial hit—it also opens the door for competitors like Huawei to gain ground, especially as they accelerate domestic chip development. Although analysts have raised long-term estimates following Q1, there remains a genuine possibility that Nvidia's global dominance could face challenges over time, particularly if policy pressures persist. When factoring in the impact of the H20 write-off, Q1 would have been the first quarter since the AI boom began in which Nvidia did not achieve sequential growth. And for a stock valued for perfection, even a modest slowdown can pose a valuation risk. To me, the bigger issue here is that this goes beyond Nvidia—it's about the strategic direction of U.S. tech leadership. As CEO, Jensen Huang has warned that if the U.S. continues down this restrictive path without a more balanced strategy, it may ultimately strengthen Huawei and erode America's edge in AI. That's the kind of long-term headwind that bears are likely to latch onto as the growth narrative gets more complicated. But setting the macro risks aside, Nvidia's bull case remains intact after Q1, especially when considering its growth. The company continues to stand out as a GARP (growth at a reasonable price) opportunity. Currently, Nvidia trades at 31.6x forward earnings, with a consensus growth rate of 29% CAGR over the next three to five years. This results in a PEG ratio of just 1x—virtually identical to Advanced Micro Devices (AMD), despite AMD's significantly slower growth outlook, and significantly lower than most of the other Magnificent 7 names. Of course, for that valuation to hold up, Nvidia's growth trajectory needs to remain clean and strong. But honestly, it's hard to think of another company with Nvidia's size and scale, this level of fundamental quality, and such massive exposure to secular tailwinds like AI, trading at such an attractive growth-adjusted valuation. Among the 40 analysts who've covered NVDA in the past three months, there's hardly any room for doubt: 35 rate the stock as a Buy, while only four suggest Hold. Not a single analyst rates NVDA stock as a Sell. Currently, NVDA's average stock price target is $173.57, implying a potential upside of 22% from the current share price. Setting aside one-off events, Nvidia left the bears with almost nothing to complain about—crushing its own guidance and delivering a Q2 forecast that dispels doubts about how quickly gross margins are recovering. While risks like evolving U.S. sanctions on China, Nvidia's ability to maintain its presence in that market, and rising local competition are worth keeping an eye on, they don't outweigh the current risk-reward of going long, especially given the company's strong growth trajectory. Disclaimer & DisclosureReport an Issue Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Digital Trends
an hour ago
- Digital Trends
HP OMEN Max 16 review: a great laptop for gamers and creators
HP OMEN Max 16 MSRP $3,250.00 Score Details 'The HP OMEN Max 16 is fast enough and laid back enough for both gamers and creators.' Pros Conservative gamer aesthetic Strong productivity performance Excellent gaming performance Spectacular OLED display Good keyboard Solid connectivity Attractive pricing Cons Thick and heavy The HP OMEN Max 16 clearly aims to appeal to a wider range of buyers than the typical gaming laptop. Yes, it has excellent RBG lighting that gives it that gamer aesthetic, but it doesn't scream 'gamer' in a way that turns off creators. And that's a good thing, because it offers up performance that appeals to both. It's like the heart of a sports car is hidden inside a sedan's more sedate body. Recommended Videos Generally, today is a great time to buy a gaming laptop, with the introduction of Intel's Arrow Lake-HX and Nvidia's Blackwell GPU architecture bringing meaningful increases in performance and visual quality. I've reviewed a couple of them and they've been impressive. The OMEN Max 16 is the most impressive so far. Specs and configuration HP OMEN Max 16 Dimensions 14.04 x 10.59 x 0.90 – 0.98 inches Weight 6.1 pounds Processor Intel Core Ultra 9 255HX Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX Graphics Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Nvidia GeForce RTX 4080 Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 RAM 16GB DDR5-5600MHz 32GB DDR5-5600MHz 64GB DDR5-5600MHz Display 16.0-inch 16:10 FHD+ (1920 x 1200) IPS, 60-165Hz 16.0-inch 16:10 QHD+ (2560 x 1600) IPS, 60Hz 16.0-inch 16:10 QHD+ (2560 x 1600) OLED, 240Hz Storage 512GB SSD 1TB SSD 2TB SSD Touch No Ports 2 x USB-C with Thunderbolt 4 2 x USB-A 3.2 Gen 2 1 x HDMI 2.1 1 x 2.5Gb Ethernet RJ-45 1 x 3.5mm audio jack Wireless Wi-Fi 7 and Bluetooth 5.4 Webcam 1080 FHD+ with IR camera for Windows 11 Hello Operating system Windows 11 Battery 83 watt-hour Price The HP OMEN Max 16 comes in various configurations, starting at a list price of $2,100 ($1,700 on sale) for an Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX chipset, 16GB of RAM, a 512GB SSD, an Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti, and a 16.0-inch QHD+ IPS display. Interestingly, that's less expensive than a similarly equipped Asus ROG Strix G16 that's equipped with the same GPU but a faster AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX chipset for $2,500. It won't be as fast, but it's also $300 less expensive (or $700 less if you catch the sale price). You can also mix and match chipsets, RAM, and storage, up to 64GB of memory and a 2TB SSD, and select a QHD+ OLED display. The highest-end configuration with a Core Ultra 9 275HX, 64GB of RAM, a 2TB SSD, an RTX 5090, and the OLED panel costs $4,070 ($3,670 on sale). I reviewed the laptop with the Core Ultra 9 275HX, 32GB of RAM, a 1TB SSD, an RTX 5080, and the OLED display, which is priced at $3,250 ($2,850 on sale). Particularly at the sale prices, the OMEN Max 16 is an attractively priced gaming laptop that not only runs at high framerates with awesome display quality, but it's also a very powerful laptop for creators. Design Compared to the most recent gaming machines I've reviewed, the HP OMEN Max 16 is a reasonably conservative design. It's not the same kind of ultraconservative MacBook-like aesthetic of the Razer Blade 16, but it doesn't have the same kind of jet fighter exhaust vents as the Lenovo Legion Pro 7i, either. HP walked a line between those two, making the OMEN Max 16 a laptop that you can use for more than just gaming without sticking out. The main nod to a gamer aesthetic is the per-key RGB lighting and the row of LEDs along the front that project onto the surface below. The keyboard lighting is better than most in that each key is surrounded by lights that work with the LEDs in the lettering to give it a more cohesive feel. I like it better than most such keyboards, where the light spills out the sides and seems more haphazard by comparison. In terms of the front row lighting, that's very similar to the Asus ROG Strix G16. The rest of the design is fairly simplistic, in the sense that there's not a lot of gamer-like adornment. You won't find anything like Asus's AniMe Vision LEDs on the lid, like on the ROG Strix SCAR 18. The OMEN logo on the lid is subdued, and there's just a bit of text on the rear chassis describing the laptop. The lines are relatively streamlined, and it's mainly the venting that identifies this as a high-performance laptop. As with most gaming laptops, the OMEN Max 16 doesn't try to be a thin and light machine. Its thickness ranges from 0.90 inches to 0.98 inches, which is around the same thickness as the Asus and Lenovo gaming laptops I've recently reviewed. It weighs 6.1 pounds, which is half a pound heavier than the ROG Strix G16. And the display bezels aren't particularly small, including the bottom hinges that's quite large. That makes it a very large laptop in width and depth, including the small portion that juts out the back. But of course, portability isn't the objective. These laptops are meant to be carried from one place to another, but unlike a thin and light productivity laptop, you shouldn't expect it to be something you regularly carry around with you. Consider the massive power brick alone, which is absolutely necessary for gaming. In terms of its construction, the OMEN Max 16 is more than good enough. It has aluminum in the bottom chassis and lid, while the palm rest is plastic. That cuts down on waste, and because plastic isn't heat conductive like aluminum, your hands won't get as toasty. The lid is a little flexible, but it's not egregious, while the rest of the laptop is solid enough. Again, it's not MacBook-like in its construction, but there's nothing to complain about. Keyboard and touchpad I mentioned the per-key RGB lighting above, and I'll double down on how good it looks. You get full control over the lighting with the HP OMEN Gaming Hub utility, once you download and install the Light Studio add-in. This allows you to control the color scheme, effects, and more, which also applies to the RGB lighting along the front. Of course, we're also worried about how the keyboard feels, and I found it a bit of a mixed bag. The switches seem very snappy, although they don't provide the same kind of tactile feedback as mechanicals switches, and they aren't as deep. So that makes them just okay for gaming, but at the same time it's a comfortable keyboard for general typing. The layout includes a numeric keypad, which is great for binding macros, but the up and down arrow keys are small and recessed. I think gamers will be a bit torn on whether or not this is a great keyboard. The touchpad is a bit small, with a lot of room left on the palm rest. It's a mechanical version with buttons that seemed just a tad loose to me. I know that most gamers will use a gaming mouse, so it won't matter as much. But using this as a productivity laptop wasn't all that exciting. I'll note that it's more off-center from the keyboard than usual, and shifted way to the right. That took some getting used to. Connectivity and webcam I can't complain about the OMEN Max 16's connectivity. There are plenty of ports, including a mix of modern USB-C with Thunderbolt 4 and legacy ports, and there's a 2.5Gb Ethernet port for anyone who wants to avoid wireless latency during gaming. And, some of the ports, including the power connection, are along the back where they're out of the way. That's all to the good. Wireless connectivity is fully up to date as well. The webcam is a 1080p version, which has become the new baseline. I haven't seen a gaming laptop yet that has a higher resolution webcam, and HP did include an infrared camera for Windows 11 Hello facial recognition. So, that's a plus. Note that the Intel Arrow Lake-HX chipset that this laptop is built around has a rather anaemic Neural Processing Unit (NPU), coming in at 13 tera operations per second (TOPS) that's well below the 40 TOPS necessary to meet Microsoft's Copilot+ PC AI initiative requirements. Of course, the Nvidia GPU is incredibly fast at processing AI, so what you're really giving up is an NPU's greater efficiency. And, of course, you don't get Copilot+ features, if that matters to you. Performance Most of the gaming laptops I've reviewed in the last couple of months have been built around Intel's Arrow Lake-HX platform, specifically using the Core Ultra 9 275HX chipset. That's a 24 core (eight Performance and 16 Efficient) single-threaded chipset running at 5.4 GHz and consuming 55 watts of base power. It can boost up to 160 watts, and the OMEN Max 16 can make use of all of it. It's a very fast chipset that exceeds its predecessor and offers up some excellent gaming performance. I'll note that I also reviewed the Asus ROG Strix G16 with the AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D that has some advantages with its 3D V-Cache that makes it slightly faster for gaming. In addition, all of the recent gaming laptops I've reviewed have been based on Nvidia's latest Blackwell architecture, the 5000-series GPUs. All but one have used the GeForce RTX 5080, which is the second-fastest in Nvidia's lineup. It uses the latest CUDA cores, streaming multiprocessors, and RT and tensor cores, and it uses Nvidia's latest DLSS 4 with on-device AI processing that offers up much faster scaling and frame generation. The thing is, it's not a huge jump in performance in terms of framerates, but rather all that AI processing power is aimed at making things look great. The RTX 5080 can use up to 175 watts, and again, the OMEN Max 16 can use all of it. HP built an impressive thermal system, which obviously contributes to the laptops thickness and weight. It's fully of buzzwords, but as far as I can tell, they're all legit. There's HP's first ever Cryo Compound, which differs from liquid metal in that it offers the same kind of conductivity and coverage but avoids leakage that can cause short circuits or corrosion of nearby components. There's a vapor chamber that covers 60.8% of the motherboard, including all heat generating components. That's mated to two fans that have a larger gap (2.8mm) and are more separated from the motherboard and keyboard. That helps them produce more air circulation while being quieter than the previous generation. Overall, the thermal design allows up to 250 watts of power, when split as 75 watts to the CPU and 175 watts to the GPU. Clearly, that offers up advantages for GPU-bound gaming. And interestingly, HP develop a fan cleaning system that basically runs the fans in reverse to spit out any accumulated dust. That process can run automatically or can be manually kicked off. That means that the OMEN Max 16 is considerably more likely to maintain its thermal performance over time compared to systems without a similar feature. The OMEN Gaming Hub utility that I referred to above gives the user plenty of control over performance. HP uses AI to manage things, by default, although that can be turned off and things like fan speed can be manually controlled. There are a number of presets, of which I used Balanced, Performance, and Unleashed in my testing. If you choose Unleashed, then you can fully control the power provided to each component. I tested those settings put at their maximum and didn't find a meaningful increase in performance. In fact, the biggest jump is from Balanced to Performance, which was significant in some cases. The Unleashed was just a little faster in most cases, and actually slower in some others. Fan noise was a lot louder as you step up each time, and I found that Performance provided the best balance between noise and performance. The OMEN Max 16 was a strong performer in our productivity benchmarks, where the Lenovo Legion 7i was the fastest and the other two similarly equipped machines coming in close to equal in performance. For general computing tasks, these machines are all overkill. But all that power comes in handy if you're running more demanding tasks like creative workflows. In the Pugetbench Photoshop bunchmark, which runs in a live version of Adobe's Photoshop application, the OMEN Max 16 was a bit slower than the other Intel Arrow Lake-HX machines. Photoshop benefits from single-core performance in particular, which is why Apple's MacBook Pro 16 M4 Max is much faster thanks to the fastest CPU cores around. Then in the Pugetbench Premiere Pro benchmark, which runs in a live version of Adobe's Premier Pro, the OMEN Max 16 was again a little slower. But, Premiere Pro can use the GPU to speed up tasks like encoding video, so these Windows machines are slightly faster in this benchmark than the MacBook Pro. The bottom line is that the OMEN Max 16, while not the fastest for non-gaming tasks among its peers, is nevertheless fast enough that demanding non-gaming users should consider it. That matches up with the more conservative design, where someone might want a very fast creative workstation, for example, but they don't want to carry around a laptop that screams 'gamer.' Turn off the RGB lighting and this becomes a laptop that won't unnecessarily stand out. Geekbench 6 (single/multi) Handbrake (seconds) Cinebench R24 (single/multi/GPU) PCMark 10 Complete PugetBench Premiere Pro Pugetbench Photoshop HP OMEN Max 16 (Core Ultra 9 275HD /RTX 5080) 3,104 / 19,118 37 136 / 1,934 / N/A 9,787 8,629 Asus ROG Strix G16 (Ryzen 9 9955HX3D / RTX 5070 Ti) 3,021 / 15,946 38 128 / 1,575 / N/A 8,758 6,650 9,843 Asus ROG Strix SCAR 18 (2025) (Core Ultra 9 275HD /RTX 5080) 3,050 / 18,876 35 133 / 1,998 / N/A 8,758 9,867 8,486 Lenovo Legion Pro 7i (2025) (Core Ultra 9 275HX / RTX 5080) 3,136 / 20,228 33 135 / 2,054 / N/A 9,361 10,377 9,087 Lenovo Legion 9i Gen 9 (Core i9-14900H / RTX 4090) 1,873 / 13,175 71 117 / 916 / 8,873 9,122 N/A 6,622 Asus ROG Strix 18 (Core i9-14900HX / RTX 4090) 2,946 / 17,622 N/A 124 / 1,533 / 22,067 N/A 7,430 N/A Asus ROG Flow Z13 (Ryzen AI MAX+ 395 / Radeon 8060S) 2,993 / 20,659 36 121 / 1,568 / NA N/A 7,250 7,250 Alienware m16 R2 (Core Ultra 7 155H / RTX 4070) 2,366 / 12,707 N/A 103 / 1,040 / 10,884 7,028 5,590 N/A Apple MacBook Pro 16 (M4 Max 16/40) 3,626 / 25,332 48 179 /2,072 / 16,463 N/A 9,347 13,856 Gaming Of course, gaming performance is the most important metric here, and the OMEN Max 16 was in a dead heat with the Legion Pro 7i in most of our benchmarks. The other two RTX 5080 systems were generally a little slower. As mentioned, Nvidia's Blackwell 5000-series GPUs are aimed more at incredible image quality than sheer performance increases, and we see that reflected here. The RTX 5080 is faster than the previous generation in most tests, but not by a huge margin. But you'll get much better visuals, especially in titles that our optimized for DLSS 4. In the synthetic 3DMark Time Spy benchmark, the OMEN Max 16 is the second-fastest laptop in our comparison group, lagging behind only the Legion Pro 7i. And again, that's faster than previous generation laptops, including those running the RTX 4090, but not by a lot. In Civilization VI, which is both CPU- and GPU-intensive, the OMEN Max 16 is the fastest laptop we've tested. Only the Legion Pro 7i comes close. The Omen Max 16 was faster in Cyberpunk 2077 when running at 1600p and with Ultra RT (ray tracing) settings, significantly faster than the other RTX 5080 laptops. Only the Lenovo Legion 9i Gen 9 running the RTX 4090 has come close in our database. Then in Red Dead Redemption and Assassin's Creed Valhalla, the OMEN Max 16 was in the top three or four. The bottom line is that, as with the other recent gaming laptops with the same high-end components, the OMEN Max 16 is more than fast enough to run modern titles at 1600p and with graphics settings turned way up. 3DMark Time Spy Civ VI 1600p Ultra (fps) CyberPunk 2077 1600p Ultra RT (fps) Red Dead Redemption 1600p Ultra (fps) Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1600p Ultra High HP OMEN Max 16 (Core Ultra 9 275HD /RTX 5080) 21,330 303 92 89 121 Asus ROG Strix G16 (Ryzen 9 9955HX3D / RTX 5070 Ti) 15,925 239 66 78 101 Asus ROG Strix SCAR 18 (2025) (Core Ultra 9 275HD /RTX 5080) 19,823 273 70 87 122 Lenovo Legion Pro 7i (2025) (Core Ultra 9 275HX / RTX 5080) 21,486 296 77 94 127 MSI Creator Z17 HX Studio (Core i9-13950HX / RTX 4070) 11,630 157 N/A N/A 73 Lenovo Legion Pro 7i (2023) (Core i9-13900HX / RTX 4080) 18,382 223 45 99 126 Lenovo Legion 9i Gen 9 (Core i9-14900H / RTX 4090) 20,293 N/A 88 N/A N/A Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 (Core i9-13900H / RTX 4090) 18,372 191 N/A 99 N/A Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 6 (Core i7-13800H / RTX 4080) 13,615 170 57 N/A N/A Asus ROG Flow Z13 (Ryzen AI MAX+ 395 / Radeon 8060S) 10,532 6 N/A 1 67 Battery life These gaming laptops aren't meant to be portable. If you're looking for a laptop to take to the coffee shop for productivity work, then a laptop like the OMEN Max 16 just isn't a great choice. Who wants to carry a 6.1-pound laptop around with them? And that's made even worse if you have to carry the very large power adapter, too. The OMEN Max 16 has an 83 watt-hour battery, which isn't as much as most 16-inch gaming laptops that are usually at the maximum of 100 watts that you can carry on an airplane. It also has a high-res OLED display and other power-hungry components. So, I wasn't surprised that it couldn't quite make it to four hours in our web browsing and video looping battery tests, or about an hour in our more demanding Cinebench R24 benchmark. Display and audio There are a few display options with the OMEN Max 16, all of them based around a 16.0-inch screen size with a 16:10 aspect ratio. There are two IPS options, one FHD+ (1920 x 1200) running at between 60Hz and 165Hz and a QHD+ (2560 x 1600) running at 60Hz. Then, the high-end display is a QHD+ OLED panel running at 240Hz. That's the model I reviewed, and it provides the usual bright, dynamic colors and inky blacks as all OLED displays. It's quite spectacular. The Datacolor SpyderPro colorimeter I used to test the display agreed. It's reasonably bright at 409 nits, which is well above our threshold of 300 nits but behind the Strix SCAR 18's mini-LED display that generates a searing 1,084 nits. Colors are very wide at 100% sRGB, 97% AdobeRGB, and 100% DCI-P3, which excellent accuracy at a DeltaE of 0.82 (indistinguishable to the human eye). And blacks are perfect, with incredibly high contrast. The bottom line is that you'll love this display for everything you might want to do with the OMEN Max 16. That includes productivity work, creative tasks, and, of course, gaming. High dynamic range (HDR) support is excellent, which is great for games that run HDR as well as streaming media. There are two downward-firing speakers, which is a departure from some other gaming machines that have quad-speaker setups. The audio is okay, with clear mids and highs and some bass, but it doesn't pump out a lot of sound. You'll want to use headphones while gaming, because the fans get loud enough to drown out the audio. I had the opportunity to try out the HyperX Cloud III S wireless gaming headphones, and while I won't be providing a review of those, I can attest that they're awesome. They support DTS X Spatial Audio, which makes them great for games that support that technology, and overall they're great for gaming, music, and media consumption. By nature, they pump out a lot of bass, which supports TV shows, movies, and games a lot better than pure musical listening, but even so, I liked them quite a bit. They work very nicely with the OMEN Max 16 by supporting the Instant Pair feature that works a lot like Apple's headphones with Apple devices. Just turn the headphones on and they automagically pair. It works quite well. They cost $180, but they're well worth it for serious gamers. Another awesome Arrow Lake-HX and Blackwell option The OMEN Max 16 is just as fast as the competitors I've reviewed so far, and in some cases it's capable of the highest framerates. It's also a very speedy laptop for creators, capable of churning through photo and video editing tasks. It features a solid build and attractive RGB lighting. It's also a more conservative design, meaning it doesn't scream 'gamer' quite as loudly. Combine that with a relatively attractive price, especially on sale, and you have a laptop that can serve the needs of both gamers and creators. If that's you, then the OMEN Max 16 should certainly be on your shortlist.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Down Nearly 60%, Should You Buy the Dip on SoundHound AI?
SoundHound AI is growing rapidly, but it's racking up steep losses. Its growing dependence on acquisitions raises a few red flags. A lot of growth has already been baked into its valuations. 10 stocks we like better than SoundHound AI › SoundHound AI (NASDAQ: SOUN), a developer of artificial intelligence (AI)-powered audio recognition tools, saw its stock close at a record high of $24.23 on Dec. 26, 2024. But since then, its stock has declined nearly 60%. Let's see why this hot stock fizzled out -- and if its pullback represents a buying opportunity for long-term investors. SoundHound AI's namesake app identifies songs by listening to several seconds of recorded audio or a few hummed bars. However, most of its growth is fueled by Houndify, its developer platform, which allows businesses to create their own custom voice recognition tools. Houndify powers voice recognition features in restaurant ordering platforms, smart TVs, connected cars, and other devices. It's an appealing option for companies that don't want to send data to Microsoft, Alphabet's Google, or other tech giants that provide their own data-gathering voice recognition services. SoundHound AI initially attracted a lot of attention for three reasons. First, its revenue surged 47% in 2022, rose another 47% in 2023, and jumped 85% in 2024. Second, the booming AI market drove a stampede of bulls to its AI-driven stock. Lastly, the AI chipmaking bellwether Nvidia (NASDAQ: NVDA) boosted its stake in SoundHound and integrated its voice recognition tools into its Drive platform for connected vehicles. Yet Soundify's stock stumbled for three reasons. First, most of its growth in 2023 and 2024 was driven by acquisitions -- including the restaurant AI company SYNQ3, the online food ordering platform Allset, and the conversational AI company Amelia. That strategy strengthened its position in the restaurant industry, but it also indicated it was running out of room to grow. Second, those acquisitions made it even tougher to break even. Its adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) margins came in at negative 73% last year -- which broadly missed its original target of achieving a positive adjusted EBITDA margin by 2024. Lastly, Nvidia liquidated its entire position in SoundHound AI earlier this year. SoundHound ended 2024 with a backlog of $1.2 billion, and it already serves big automakers like Stellantis, quick-serve restaurants like Chipotle, healthcare institutions like MUSC Health, and tech giants like Tencent. Automakers are adding more voice-activated features to their vehicles, restaurants are using more of its AI tools to process their drive-thru and phone orders, and healthcare institutions are processing more patient requests with Amelia's AI chatbots. SoundHound could still have plenty of room to expand. From 2025 to 2035, the global voice agents market could grow at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 34.8%, according to market research firm as more companies replace their human workers with AI-powered voice agents. For 2025, SoundHound expects its revenue to surge 97%. From 2024 to 2027, analysts expect its revenue to rise at a CAGR of 48%, from $85 million to $277 million. They also expect it to finally squeeze out a positive adjusted EBITDA of $5 million in 2027. That outlook seems promising, but a lot of its future growth has already been baked into its valuations. With a market cap of $4.1 billion, it already trades at 25.5 times this year's sales. It's also more than doubled its number of shares since it went public by merging with a special purpose acquisition company (SPAC) just over three years ago, and that dilution will likely continue as it relies on its secondary offerings to raise fresh cash and its stock-based compensation to subsidize its salaries and acquisitions. So while SoundHound AI is still growing rapidly, it hasn't proven that it deserves its premium valuation or that its business model is sustainable. I might nibble on the stock after its recent pullback -- since its core market is still expanding -- but I wouldn't go all in until it meaningfully narrows its losses. Before you buy stock in SoundHound AI, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and SoundHound AI wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $656,825!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $865,550!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 994% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 172% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 2, 2025 Suzanne Frey, an executive at Alphabet, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. Leo Sun has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Alphabet, Chipotle Mexican Grill, Microsoft, Nvidia, and Tencent. The Motley Fool recommends Stellantis and recommends the following options: long January 2026 $395 calls on Microsoft, short January 2026 $405 calls on Microsoft, and short June 2025 $55 calls on Chipotle Mexican Grill. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Down Nearly 60%, Should You Buy the Dip on SoundHound AI? was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
