logo
Whistle-blowers are not impimpis, they are defenders of democracy

Whistle-blowers are not impimpis, they are defenders of democracy

Daily Maverick2 days ago

We can, and must, become a country that not only protects whistle-blowers, but celebrates them. Whistle-blowers are the lifeline of the future of this country and we owe them more than silence.
' South Africa has the best Constitution in the world. Now, we need the best whistle-blower protection law in the world' – former Chief Justice Raymond Zondo
With corruption still rife in a country emergent from the grips of State Capture, the urgency to protect whistle-blowers has never been greater.
Despite having one of the most progressive whistle-blower protection laws on the continent, significant gaps in South Africa leave those who bravely speak truth to power vulnerable to retaliation, including legal harassment, financial ruin, reputational damage and, in severe instances, even death.
Whistle-blowing is an essential part of any anti-corruption toolkit. It saves public funds, protects the environment, promotes democratic values, curbs human rights abuses and saves lives. Protecting whistle-blowers is an absolute necessity.
Earlier this year, the Platform to Protect Whistleblowers in Africa and the National Anti-Corruption Advisory Council brought together a cross-section of legal experts, whistle-blowers, public officials and civil society actors in Cape Town to confront the harsh realities faced by those who risk everything to expose corruption.
The conference sought to reimagine South Africa's approach to whistle-blower protection and the outcome was clear: South Africa's whistle-blower law, the Protected Disclosures Act, is no longer fit for purpose. As the Department of Justice embarks on revising the law to protect whistle-blowers, as a collective, we need to consider what any amendment should look like.
Real protection demands imaginative, forward-thinking legislation.
A vision for reform
While the government prepares to table the new Whistleblower Protection Bill, there is an unprecedented opportunity to align South Africa's legislation with international frameworks and, most importantly, realities on the ground. But we've seen legislation passed with great acclaim, only to be toothless in execution. This time, we can't afford to fail.
To better protect whistle-blowers, several key changes are needed. First, an Independent Whistleblower Authority should be established. This body would offer legal advice, investigate retaliation, provide support services and coordinate with other agencies. It must be transparent, well-resourced and free from political influence.
The requirement to prove 'good faith' must be removed. Whistle-blower protection should be based on the public interest of the disclosure, not personal motives. Moreover, if a whistle-blower suffers harm after making a protected disclosure, it should be presumed to be retaliation and the accused bear the burden of proving otherwise.
Criminal penalties should also apply to those who breach confidentiality, and, crucially, retaliation against whistle-blowers needs severe penalties.
Protections must further extend to include not only employees but also citizens, journalists, civil society organisations and others who support whistle-blowers, such as investigators and family members.
Vitally, financial support should be meaningful. Whistle-blowers need to be rewarded and, at the very least, a publicly managed fund should cover legal fees, relocation costs and psychosocial support.
Reframing the narrative
Perhaps equally important is the need to change the way we talk about whistle-blowers. We can, and must, become a country that not only protects whistle-blowers, but celebrates them. Whistle-blowers are stepping in where institutions have failed. They're exposing rot in procurement processes, revealing collusion between business and politics and defending our democracy.
Whistle-blowers are the lifeline of the future of this country and we owe them more than silence.
Even the best law will fail if the culture remains one of stigma and fear. The word ' impimpi ' still echoes in our collective consciousness, but whistle-blowers are not informants – they are defenders of the public good. We must tell new stories in our classrooms, boardrooms and in our communities that celebrate courage and integrity. Honouring ethical behaviour, not punishing it, is paramount.
South Africa has already shown the world what constitutional courage looks like. In the post-apartheid era we built one of the most admired constitutions in history. Now, as corruption threatens to erode the moral foundation of our democracy, we must show that same courage again.
Constitutionalising whistle-blower protection?
One of our strongest calls at the conference was the urge to go a step further: to enshrine whistle-blower protection into the Constitution itself.
This is not a symbolic gesture. Constitutionalisation would send an unequivocal message: whistle-blowing is not just a personal risk, but a public service. It would elevate the act of speaking out to a constitutional right and duty, protected at the highest level of law.
Former Chief Justice Raymond Zondo echoed this sentiment, arguing that constitutional recognition would help end the stigma of whistle-blowers as snitches, build trust in institutions and make South Africa a global leader in anti-corruption reform.
What is clear is that South Africa needs more than a good law. We need a landmark law – one that closes legal gaps, provides real protection and reflects our democratic values. This isn't just about policy. It's about lives, and the type of country we aspire to be. If we want to stop corruption before it festers, if we want a democracy that works for everyone, we must protect those who shine a light in the darkness.
Whistle-blowers have done their part, it's time for legislators to do theirs. DM
William Bourdon is chair of the Platform to Protect Whistleblowers in Africa (PPLAAF) and a lawyer and member of the Paris bar. He is the advocate of whistle-blowers Edward Snowden, Hervé Falciani (Swissleaks) and Antoine Deltour (Luxleaks). He was secretary-general of the International Federation for Human Rights from 1995 to 2000.
Gemma-Maé Hartley is the regional project officer for PPLAAF Southern Africa. She has a master ' s degree in political and international studies from Rhodes University, specialising in human rights. She has been accompanying whistle-blowers across the continent for a number of years.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Whistle-blowers are not impimpis, they are defenders of democracy
Whistle-blowers are not impimpis, they are defenders of democracy

Daily Maverick

time2 days ago

  • Daily Maverick

Whistle-blowers are not impimpis, they are defenders of democracy

We can, and must, become a country that not only protects whistle-blowers, but celebrates them. Whistle-blowers are the lifeline of the future of this country and we owe them more than silence. ' South Africa has the best Constitution in the world. Now, we need the best whistle-blower protection law in the world' – former Chief Justice Raymond Zondo With corruption still rife in a country emergent from the grips of State Capture, the urgency to protect whistle-blowers has never been greater. Despite having one of the most progressive whistle-blower protection laws on the continent, significant gaps in South Africa leave those who bravely speak truth to power vulnerable to retaliation, including legal harassment, financial ruin, reputational damage and, in severe instances, even death. Whistle-blowing is an essential part of any anti-corruption toolkit. It saves public funds, protects the environment, promotes democratic values, curbs human rights abuses and saves lives. Protecting whistle-blowers is an absolute necessity. Earlier this year, the Platform to Protect Whistleblowers in Africa and the National Anti-Corruption Advisory Council brought together a cross-section of legal experts, whistle-blowers, public officials and civil society actors in Cape Town to confront the harsh realities faced by those who risk everything to expose corruption. The conference sought to reimagine South Africa's approach to whistle-blower protection and the outcome was clear: South Africa's whistle-blower law, the Protected Disclosures Act, is no longer fit for purpose. As the Department of Justice embarks on revising the law to protect whistle-blowers, as a collective, we need to consider what any amendment should look like. Real protection demands imaginative, forward-thinking legislation. A vision for reform While the government prepares to table the new Whistleblower Protection Bill, there is an unprecedented opportunity to align South Africa's legislation with international frameworks and, most importantly, realities on the ground. But we've seen legislation passed with great acclaim, only to be toothless in execution. This time, we can't afford to fail. To better protect whistle-blowers, several key changes are needed. First, an Independent Whistleblower Authority should be established. This body would offer legal advice, investigate retaliation, provide support services and coordinate with other agencies. It must be transparent, well-resourced and free from political influence. The requirement to prove 'good faith' must be removed. Whistle-blower protection should be based on the public interest of the disclosure, not personal motives. Moreover, if a whistle-blower suffers harm after making a protected disclosure, it should be presumed to be retaliation and the accused bear the burden of proving otherwise. Criminal penalties should also apply to those who breach confidentiality, and, crucially, retaliation against whistle-blowers needs severe penalties. Protections must further extend to include not only employees but also citizens, journalists, civil society organisations and others who support whistle-blowers, such as investigators and family members. Vitally, financial support should be meaningful. Whistle-blowers need to be rewarded and, at the very least, a publicly managed fund should cover legal fees, relocation costs and psychosocial support. Reframing the narrative Perhaps equally important is the need to change the way we talk about whistle-blowers. We can, and must, become a country that not only protects whistle-blowers, but celebrates them. Whistle-blowers are stepping in where institutions have failed. They're exposing rot in procurement processes, revealing collusion between business and politics and defending our democracy. Whistle-blowers are the lifeline of the future of this country and we owe them more than silence. Even the best law will fail if the culture remains one of stigma and fear. The word ' impimpi ' still echoes in our collective consciousness, but whistle-blowers are not informants – they are defenders of the public good. We must tell new stories in our classrooms, boardrooms and in our communities that celebrate courage and integrity. Honouring ethical behaviour, not punishing it, is paramount. South Africa has already shown the world what constitutional courage looks like. In the post-apartheid era we built one of the most admired constitutions in history. Now, as corruption threatens to erode the moral foundation of our democracy, we must show that same courage again. Constitutionalising whistle-blower protection? One of our strongest calls at the conference was the urge to go a step further: to enshrine whistle-blower protection into the Constitution itself. This is not a symbolic gesture. Constitutionalisation would send an unequivocal message: whistle-blowing is not just a personal risk, but a public service. It would elevate the act of speaking out to a constitutional right and duty, protected at the highest level of law. Former Chief Justice Raymond Zondo echoed this sentiment, arguing that constitutional recognition would help end the stigma of whistle-blowers as snitches, build trust in institutions and make South Africa a global leader in anti-corruption reform. What is clear is that South Africa needs more than a good law. We need a landmark law – one that closes legal gaps, provides real protection and reflects our democratic values. This isn't just about policy. It's about lives, and the type of country we aspire to be. If we want to stop corruption before it festers, if we want a democracy that works for everyone, we must protect those who shine a light in the darkness. Whistle-blowers have done their part, it's time for legislators to do theirs. DM William Bourdon is chair of the Platform to Protect Whistleblowers in Africa (PPLAAF) and a lawyer and member of the Paris bar. He is the advocate of whistle-blowers Edward Snowden, Hervé Falciani (Swissleaks) and Antoine Deltour (Luxleaks). He was secretary-general of the International Federation for Human Rights from 1995 to 2000. Gemma-Maé Hartley is the regional project officer for PPLAAF Southern Africa. She has a master ' s degree in political and international studies from Rhodes University, specialising in human rights. She has been accompanying whistle-blowers across the continent for a number of years.

Mandela's grandson calls for charges against Afrikaners who have taken up Trump's resettlement offer
Mandela's grandson calls for charges against Afrikaners who have taken up Trump's resettlement offer

IOL News

time3 days ago

  • IOL News

Mandela's grandson calls for charges against Afrikaners who have taken up Trump's resettlement offer

Mayibuye Mandela, great-grandson of the legendary Nelson Mandela, has called on the government to pursue legal action against 49 Afrikaners who claimed refugee status in the US. Image: Supplied Mayibuye Melisizwe Mandela, the great-grandson of Nelson Mandela, has called on the South African government take legal action against the more than 49 Afrikaners who have relocated to the US, saying they falsely claimed refugee status while fabricating a narrative of white genocide. In February, US President Donald Trump offered refugee status to Afrikaners, claiming they faced persecution in South Africa. The first batch of more than 49 arrived in the US in May, later followed by a smaller batch. During a meeting at the Oval Office in Washington in May, President Cyril Ramaphosa told Trump that there was no genocide in South Africa, adding that there was a crime and the majority of the victims were Black. Mayibuye Mandela said the claims of a genocide against Afrikaners was false and he called on the government, including the Department of Justice, Department of International Relations and Cooperation (Dirco), Home Affairs and the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) to pursue legal action against the group. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Next Stay Close ✕ Mayibuye Mandela claimed that their actions constitute offences under South Africa's Immigration Act, the Films and Publications Act, the Equality Act and the Protection of Constitutional Democracy Against Terrorist and Related Activities Act. 'This is not just a matter of misinformation. It is a coordinated effort to destabilise our country and incite international hostility,' he said. Dirco spokesperson, Chrispin Phiri, said Mandela should open a case, saying the appropriate course for citizens who believe the laws of the country have been contravened is to report concerns to the competent law enforcement authorities. 'These authorities possess the mandate to investigate such reports and ascertain their veracity,' he said. NPA's spokesperson Mthunzi Mhaga, said it was not fair to comment while there is no docket opened with the SAPS. Home Affairs spokesperson, Siya Qoza, also declined to comment as it was not clear which Immigration Act clauses have been breached, while Justice Department spokesperson, Terrence Manase, did not comment. Asked if he would open a case, Mayibuye Mandela said he had a discussion with his team and it has been concluded that a case should be opened. He said AfriForum and Solidarity must also be held accountable for their roles in 'orchestrating and promoting this false narrative'. He accused the two organisations of inciting racial division, defaming South Africa's constitutional democracy and 'betraying the principles that generations of South Africans have fought to uphold'. AfriForm said questions should be referred to chief officer, Kallie Kriel, who did not respond. Solidarity's head of public Liaison, Jaco Kleynhans, said the organisation views these allegations as 'completely unfounded and just another attempt to shift the focus away from South Africa's huge problems'. Kleynhans said Solidarity had never claimed that a genocide is taking place in South Africa but has long been providing evidence of serious cultural and economic oppression of minorities in the country. He said this amounts to a 'general cultural persecution that is beginning to take on dangerous levels and could lead to life-threatening threats in the future'. 'The US government has every right to grant refugee status to citizens of another country that it considers to be experiencing serious oppression or persecution." "Instead of attacking these people or the organisations they represent, we need to have a serious conversation in South Africa about the extent of absolute racial discrimination against minorities, the levels of violent crime that are occurring in our country, and what is needed to address these and other problems. He said Solidarity is in constant contact with the Trump administration. "We will not allow what is happening in South Africa to be swept under the rug or for defamatory allegations to be made about our position on important issues,' he said. Both AfriForum and Solidarity face a government investigation of treason, after allegations that they supplied false and damaging information to the US government regarding the treatment of white farmers. Minister in Presidency, Khumbudzo Ntshavehini, confirmed the investigation during a parliamentary session last month, warning that treasonous acts cannot be left unpunished. This follows calls from several political parties, including the EFF and MK Party, for the government to act against the two organisations following their visit to the US, where they engaged with Trump's administration.

These are Gauteng's hotspots for murder, rape, kidnapping, carjacking and house robbery
These are Gauteng's hotspots for murder, rape, kidnapping, carjacking and house robbery

The Citizen

time05-06-2025

  • The Citizen

These are Gauteng's hotspots for murder, rape, kidnapping, carjacking and house robbery

Arguments, misunderstandings, road rage and provocation remain the highest number of incidents. Between January 2025 and March 2025, Gauteng recorded an increase in kidnappings, said Gauteng police commissioner Lieutenant-General Tommy Mthombeni on Thursday. Through the National Anti–Kidnapping Unit, the province arrested 88 suspects linked to 62 cases of kidnapping and rescued 77 victims of kidnapping during the period under review. 'We are working together with our stakeholders to combat the kidnapping syndicates operating in this province. We are thankful to Business Against Crime South Africa for our partnership through the Eyes and Ears Initiative and are able to deploy their technological resources and utilise security officers as force multipliers when conducting take-down operations,' said Mthombeni. ALSO READ: Crime stats: SA records decrease in murders but increase in rapes However, the Gauteng top cop acknowledged that more still needed to be done. 'We acknowledge that there is still much work to be done, and as we move forward, we will continue to foster collaboration with our stakeholders in ensuring that we improve the safety and security of our communities.' Multiple murders are also a challenge for the province, with 75 dockets having been opened for 191 victims. The province recorded two incidents where seven victims were murdered on the same crime scene, said Mthombeni. The crime statistics he presented showed a decrease in murder, with 1 439 cases recorded compared to 1 614 cases recorded during the same period last year. ALSO READ: 110 women murdered in KwaZulu-Natal since October – Mchunu Arguments, misunderstandings, road rage and provocation remain the highest number of incidents, with 122 cases, followed by vigilantism and mob justice with 69 cases, and taxi-related murders with 45 cases. You're most likely to be murdered in a public place, where 706 cases were recorded — followed by private residences of either the victim or perpetrator, with 306 cases, and liquor outlets, where 50 murders occurred. Gauteng hotspots The crime statistics showed that there are no-go areas in Gauteng, where you're likely to experience murder, rape, carjacking, house robbery and kidnapping. The top 10 police stations for murder in Gauteng are Ivory Park (42 cases), Jeppe (38), Orange Farm (37), Lenasia (33), Hillbrow (32), Ennerdale (31), Eldorado Park (30), Kagiso (28), JHB Central (28), and Daveyton (26). The top 40 stations for rape include Roodepoort (60 cases), Orange Farm (54), Alexandra (45), Diepsloot (43), Ivory Park (38), Atteridgeville (36), Temba (34), Rietgat (34), Tembisa (34), Mamelodi East (34). ALSO READ: GBV, femicide receiving 'priority attention', says Gauteng police commissioner Here is where you're more likely to lose your car in Gauteng: Ivory Park (67 cases), Mamelodi East (65), Akasia (58), Jabulani (57), Moroka (51), Olievenhoutbosch (51), Sandringham -(45), Ennerdale (43), Vosloorus (42), Pretoria West (42). The top 10 police stations where cases of robbery at residential premises were recorded: Loate (64 cases), Mabopane (51), Tembisa (43), Roodepoort (43), Mamelodi East (39), Silverton (38), Moffatview (38), Mondeor (36), Putfontein (33), Lenasia (33), Ivory Park (33). These are the hotspots for kidnapping: JHB Central (63 cases), Vosloorus (63), Moroka (53), Ivory Park (51), Roodepoort (48), Jabulani (47), Midrand (47), Orange Farm (45), Tembisa (44), Sandringham (39). According to the crime statistics, Ivory Park appeared in the top 10 stations list for all the crimes mentioned, while Orange Farm is a hotspot for murder, rape and kidnapping. Roodepoort features in the top 10 police stations for rape, house robbery and kidnapping, while Tembisa featured for rape, house robbery and kidnapping. In Mamelodi East, rape, carjacking and house robbery were the most common crimes, while Jabulani, Moroka and Sandringham have a carjacking and kidnapping problem. READ NEXT: Justice department's poor record-keeping delays protection orders for GBV victims – AG

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store