Royal bride Lady Frederick Windsor says her wedding hair was 'disgusting' and dress picked out by her mother-in-law made her look 'barking' in candid new tell-all
Sophie Winkleman has shared an unfiltered take on her royal wedding, admitting her hairstyle was "so disgusting" it still upsets her husband, Lord Frederick Windsor, all these years later.
The British actress, 44, married into the royal family in 2009 when she wed Lord Frederick Windsor, 46, the only son of Prince and Princess Michael of Kent.
The pair met on New Year's Eve in 2006 after sharing a taxi from a party in Soho, where Frederick recognised her from her breakout role as Big Suze in the hit series Peep Show.
Their wedding took place at Hampton Court Palace in front of around 400 guests, including Princess Eugenie, the Duke and Duchess of Kent, Lady Annabel Goldsmith, actress Jane Asher, Lady Helen Taylor, and musician Bryan Adams.
But despite the grandeur, Winkleman admits she doesn't look back on the day with much fondness- largely due to her hair and the gown, which was selected by her mother-in-law, Princess Michael of Kent.
"My hair was so disgusting and Freddy still gets upset about it," she told The Telegraph.
"It was just disgusting. And my mother-in-law chose my dress, which was very sweet and puffy, but I looked barking."
The gown, a silk design with lace sleeves and a three-metre train, was made by Anna Bystrova of Roza Couture, a designer favoured by Princess Michael, who reportedly took the reins on many aspects of the ceremony.
"She sort of took it all over and I actually didn't mind at all," Winkleman added.
"I thought, 'Great, do everything'. I was concentrating on this acting job and saying goodbye to my darling granny who wasn't very well and just doing other stuff. But now I look back on it and think I should have worn a simpler dress and I should have got my hair blow dried by someone who'd done it before."
Adding to the whirlwind, Sophie and Freddie packed up and moved to Los Angeles the very next day to pursue work opportunities.
"We got married on Saturday and moved everything, our whole lives out to America the day after," she recalled.
Frederick transferred with JP Morgan, while Winkleman went on to star in Two and a Half Men opposite Ashton Kutcher, and wrote screenplays for stars like Salma Hayek and Penélope Cruz.
"We thought we shouldn't just huddle in England but be brave, do something different, so we did," she told HELLO! last year, calling the experience "very interesting and freeing".
The couple eventually returned to the UK after welcoming their eldest daughter, Maud.
They now live in South London with their two daughters, Maud, 11, and Isabella, nine, while Frederick works as an executive director at JP Morgan.
Winkleman says she's remained close with her royal in-laws.
"Family isn't always brilliant but this lot are very sweet. I love all of them," she told The Telegraph.
Back in 2020, she also told The Times that she hadn't had "a single negative experience" with the royals.
"I was incredibly welcomed with open arms," she said at the time.
"The Queen's been wonderful, Prince Charles (now King Charles) has been wonderful, Prince William's been heaven.
"They'd never tell me off at all if I wanted to play some role. Everyone's looked after me. Oh God, please don't make me sound too gushing."
Her comments contrast sharply with those of fellow actress-turned-royal Meghan Markle, 43, who, along with Prince Harry, 40, stepped back from official royal duties in 2020 and moved to California.
Unfortunately, Meghan and Harry remain estranged from the royal family.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Perth Now
2 hours ago
- Perth Now
Sherrie Hewson refuses to go out without makeup on: 'I'd rather bury myself in the back garden...'
Sherrie Hewson refuses to go out without wearing makeup. The 74-year-old actress has been a mainstay on British television for decades but insisted that she would rather "bury [herself] in the back garden" than go out with a bare face. She told MyWeekly: "I would rather bury myself in my back garden than go outside without make-up on. I love to go full face glam and describe my style as a bit of everything." The former 'Benidorm' star added that one of her "pet hates" in life is being called old, and tries to take inspiration from her late mother when it comes to ageing. She said: "Being called a pensioner or senior citizen is one of my pet hates. It infers you're past it and that's rubbish. I don't want to be treated in a certain way because of my age. "My mum was 89 when she died. But up until near the end, she went out dancing every night, she sailed, she went on skiing holidays. She never thought, 'Oh, I'm a certain age so I mustn't do that any more!'" The former 'Coronation Street' actress thinks that it is "important" that others do the same, and insisted she will never let anything like age get in the way of what she really wants to do. She added: "I think it's important that we all stand up and say and do the same. We must stop being so timid and downtrodden. Get out there, do what you want! Go bungee-jumping if it's what you've always dreamed of! Don't ever let anyone stop you from being who you are."
Sydney Morning Herald
6 hours ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
I've spent time with tech oligarchs – you have no idea just how weird they are
Last week, Jesse Armstrong, the British director behind Succession, released his first feature-length film – a thinly veiled satire about the tech oligarchs who dominate our lives and, increasingly, have a say over what constitutes free speech. Though it would be easy to write Mountainhead off as pure fiction, to anyone who has spent time around these people, as I have, it was eerily accurate. The four fictional billionaires are flush with obscene wealth accumulated in the technological miracle of the past two decades. Having all flown in on their respective private jets, they decamp to a remote mansion for a weekend of poker and bounce between 'friendly' shit talking, writing their net worth on their chests, planning a coup, and watching mass violence unfold around the world thanks to one of the character's apps (likely a nod to Facebook's amplification of content that ultimately contributed to genocide in Myanmar). In writing the script, Armstrong borrowed from real life, using Elon Musk, Peter Thiel, Mark Andreesen and Sam Bankman-Fried as inspiration. Some of the most important and influential people of Silicon Valley, these men all share a belief in the saving grace of their own genius, even as one of them serves a 25-year sentence for duping people out of billions. Loading Though the world mostly thinks of Silicon Valley as some kind of liberal bastion, at its core, it is libertarian (even the film's title is a nod to 'the godmother of American libertarianism', Ayn Rand). When I lived in San Francisco, where I was working for the Biden-Harris administration and the Democratic National Convention, I quickly realised that the prevailing attitude is that governments and regulations are pesky and burdensome – that they only serve to obstruct technological progress they're too small-minded to understand. Working among and moving in the same social circles as senior tech executives and some of today's best known billionaires, you'd see just how weird they were. They would brag about sleeping in the office or demanding staff miss important family events. I once watched the son of a tech billionaire demand that a senior US government official record a video to ask a girl out for him. In 2022, when autonomous-driving taxis started appearing on the streets of San Francisco, this confrontation between big-tech cockiness and government process showed up loud and clear. The businesses making the taxis failed to notify local officials before rolling out the vehicles, and only partially released their data to regulators. When one tech company's fleet was taken off the roads due to safety concerns, other tech companies lobbied to get rid of human taxi drivers entirely. Sure, there's a lot less awkward chat in driverless taxis, but for technology with such a profound impact as vehicles driving around a city with no human behind the wheel, transparent oversight should be non-negotiable.
The Age
6 hours ago
- The Age
I've spent time with tech oligarchs – you have no idea just how weird they are
Last week, Jesse Armstrong, the British director behind Succession, released his first feature-length film – a thinly veiled satire about the tech oligarchs who dominate our lives and, increasingly, have a say over what constitutes free speech. Though it would be easy to write Mountainhead off as pure fiction, to anyone who has spent time around these people, as I have, it was eerily accurate. The four fictional billionaires are flush with obscene wealth accumulated in the technological miracle of the past two decades. Having all flown in on their respective private jets, they decamp to a remote mansion for a weekend of poker and bounce between 'friendly' shit talking, writing their net worth on their chests, planning a coup, and watching mass violence unfold around the world thanks to one of the character's apps (likely a nod to Facebook's amplification of content that ultimately contributed to genocide in Myanmar). In writing the script, Armstrong borrowed from real life, using Elon Musk, Peter Thiel, Mark Andreesen and Sam Bankman-Fried as inspiration. Some of the most important and influential people of Silicon Valley, these men all share a belief in the saving grace of their own genius, even as one of them serves a 25-year sentence for duping people out of billions. Loading Though the world mostly thinks of Silicon Valley as some kind of liberal bastion, at its core, it is libertarian (even the film's title is a nod to 'the godmother of American libertarianism', Ayn Rand). When I lived in San Francisco, where I was working for the Biden-Harris administration and the Democratic National Convention, I quickly realised that the prevailing attitude is that governments and regulations are pesky and burdensome – that they only serve to obstruct technological progress they're too small-minded to understand. Working among and moving in the same social circles as senior tech executives and some of today's best known billionaires, you'd see just how weird they were. They would brag about sleeping in the office or demanding staff miss important family events. I once watched the son of a tech billionaire demand that a senior US government official record a video to ask a girl out for him. In 2022, when autonomous-driving taxis started appearing on the streets of San Francisco, this confrontation between big-tech cockiness and government process showed up loud and clear. The businesses making the taxis failed to notify local officials before rolling out the vehicles, and only partially released their data to regulators. When one tech company's fleet was taken off the roads due to safety concerns, other tech companies lobbied to get rid of human taxi drivers entirely. Sure, there's a lot less awkward chat in driverless taxis, but for technology with such a profound impact as vehicles driving around a city with no human behind the wheel, transparent oversight should be non-negotiable.
