Red Cross outraged over killing of eight medics in Gaza
The International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies (IFRC) has said it is "outraged" at the deaths of eight medics killed on duty in Rafah in southern Gaza.
The nine-person ambulance team came under heavy fire in al-Hashashin on 23 March, said the IFRC. Their bodies were retrieved on Sunday after access was denied for a week. One medic is still missing.
The Palestine Red Crescent Society (PRCS) said their staff's bodies were discovered along with those of six members of Gaza's Hamas-run civil defence agency and one UN employee.
They did not say who opened fire on the convoy - but Hamas blamed the Israel Defense Forces for the attack. The BBC has sought comment from the IDF.
In Sunday's statement, the IFRC said the eight bodies of PRCS workers were retrieved "after seven days of silence and having access denied to the area of Rafah where they were last seen".
The organisation identified those killed as ambulance officers Mostafa Khufaga, Saleh Muamer and Ezzedine Shaath, and first responder volunteers Mohammad Bahloul, Mohammed al-Heila, Ashraf Abu Labda, Raed al-Sharif and Rifatt Radwan.
It added that ambulance officer Assad Al-Nassasra was "still missing".
"I am heartbroken. These dedicated ambulance workers were responding to wounded people. They were humanitarians," IFRC Secretary General Jagan Chapagain said.
"They wore emblems that should have protected them; their ambulances were clearly marked.
"Even in the most complex conflict zones, there are rules. These rules of International Humanitarian Law could not be clearer – civilians must be protected; humanitarians must be protected. Health services must be protected."
The IDF has publicly not commented on the Red Cross and Red Crescent statement.
The AFP news agency reported that on Saturday the Israeli military admitted it had fired on ambulances in southern Gaza last Sunday after identifying them as "suspicious vehicles".
Israeli troops had "opened fire toward Hamas vehicles and eliminated several Hamas terrorists", the military said in a statement to AFP.
"A few minutes afterward, additional vehicles advanced suspiciously toward the troops... The troops responded by firing toward the suspicious vehicles, eliminating a number of Hamas and Islamic Jihad terrorists."
The military added that "after an initial inquiry, it was determined that some of the suspicious vehicles... were ambulances and fire trucks".
It also said there had been "repeated use" by "terrorist organisations in the Gaza Strip of ambulances for terrorist purposes".
Senior Hamas official Basem Naim condemned the attack.
"The targeted killing of rescue workers - who are protected under international humanitarian law - constitutes a flagrant violation of the Geneva Conventions and a war crime," he said.
Israel resumed its military offensive in Gaza on 18 March after the first phase of a ceasefire that began in January came to an end, and negotiations on a second phase of the deal stalled.
More than 900 people have since been killed by Israeli strikes in Gaza, the Hamas-run health ministry has said.
The war was triggered when Hamas attacked southern Israel on 7 October 2023, killing about 1,200 people and taking 251 back to Gaza as captives.
Israel responded with a massive military offensive, which has killed more than 50,000 Palestinians, Gaza's Hamas-run health ministry says.
Wounded Palestinians dying over lack of supplies, US surgeon who worked in Gaza says
Why has Israel bombed Gaza and what next for ceasefire deal?
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
an hour ago
Trump directs ICE to expand deportations in Democratic-run cities, undeterred by protests
WASHINGTON -- President Donald Trump on Sunday directed federal immigration officials to prioritize deportations from Democratic-run cities, a move that comes after large protests erupted in Los Angeles and other major cities against the Trump administration's immigration policies. Trump in a social media posting called on U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials 'to do all in their power to achieve the very important goal of delivering the single largest Mass Deportation Program in History.' He added that to reach the goal officials 'must expand efforts to detain and deport Illegal Aliens in America's largest Cities, such as Los Angeles, Chicago, and New York, where Millions upon Millions of Illegal Aliens reside.' Trump's declaration comes after weeks of increased enforcement, and after Stephen Miller, White House deputy chief of staff and main architect of Trump's immigration policies, said ICE officers would target at least 3,000 arrests a day, up from about 650 a day during the first five months of Trump's second term. At the same time, the Trump administration has directed immigration officers to pause arrests at farms, restaurants and hotels, after Trump expressed alarm about the impact aggressive enforcement is having on those industries, according to a U.S. official familiar with the matter who spoke only on condition of anonymity. Opponents of Trump's immigration policies took to the streets as part of the 'no kings' demonstrations Saturday that came as Trump held a massive parade in Washington for the 250th anniversary of the U.S. Army. Saturday's protests were mostly peaceful. But police in Los Angeles used tear gas and crowd-control munitions to clear out protesters after the event ended. Officers in Portland, Oregon, also fired tear gas and projectiles to disperse a crowd that protested in front of a U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement building well into the evening. Trump made the call for stepped up enforcement in Democratic-controlled cities on social media as he was making his way to the Group of Seven economic summit in Alberta, Canada. He suggested to reporters as he departed the White House for the G7 on Sunday evening that his decision to deploy National Guard troops to Los Angeles was the reason the protests in that city went peacefully. 'If we didn't have the National Guard on call and ready, they would rip Los Angeles apart,' Trump said. The shift also come as Trump is grappling with the impact his mass deportation effort is having on key industries that rely on workers in the country illegally. Trump posted on his Truth Social site Thursday that he heard from hotel, agriculture and leisure industries that his 'very aggressive policy on immigration is taking very good, long time workers away from them' and promised that changes would be made . That same day Tatum King, an official with ICE's Homeland Security Investigations unit, wrote to regional leaders telling them to halt investigations of the agriculture industry, including meatpackers, as well as of restaurants and hotels, according to the U.S. official.
Boston Globe
an hour ago
- Boston Globe
Why many Israelis support attacking Iran
To understand why, it is helpful to consider the timing of the Israeli attack. Since 1979, Iran has gradually positioned itself as Israel's main enemy. The revolutionary Islamic regime has viewed Israel as a foreign implant in the region and its leaders have openly called for Israel's destruction. (It is difficult to think of another instance in which one sovereign state calls for the destruction of another, highlighted by the fact that the two don't even share a border.) Israel, for its part, has responded with a series of sabotage operations and targeted killings against Iranian security and nuclear figures over the years. Advertisement Over the past decade, Iran has accelerated plans to encircle Israel with a 'ring of fire,' believing that arming paramilitary forces like Hamas, Hezbollah, and the Houthis with missiles, rockets, and drones would lead to Israel's annihilation. And though the leader of Hamas, Yahya Sinwar, launched his murderous plan on Oct. 7 without the full participation from Hezbollah and Iran that he had hoped for, most Israelis directly link Iran — which funded, armed, and trained Hamas — to the attack. That attack is what touched off the bloody conflict that has now lasted 20 months. Advertisement Iran's nuclear program, which has included attempts at developing military nuclear capabilities over the years, is seen by the Israeli public and its leaders as the epitome of these efforts to destroy Israel. and believed that Israel needed to be able to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons. In other words, almost no one in Israel believes that nuclear weapons in the hands of the current regime are anything other than a major danger. So why did Israel wait until now? Over the years, the possibility of attacking Iran's nuclear facilities has come up from time to time, Advertisement For its part, the United States did not demonstrate a willingness to join in, and even now, it seems happy to allow Israel to act on its own — at least as long as Iran doesn't directly target American interests. In addition, over the years, Iran has built deterrent capabilities against Israel, consisting mainly of its enormous missile arsenal and, even more so, the one it placed on Israel's northern border in the hands of Hezbollah. Various Israeli governments have repeatedly decided that the cost was not worth the benefit of independent action. So what changed? Four key factors have contributed to Israel's decision to attack last week. The first was the loss of Iran's deterrent power. Israel's surprisingly successful attacks against Hezbollah in October 2024 removed most of the missile threat from the north and, more importantly, broke the spirit of the group — which was built by Iran in large measure to deter Israel from attacking its nuclear program. This demoralization was illustrated by Second, the United States has changed. President Trump, who withdrew from the JCPOA in 2018 and ordered the Advertisement Third, Iran's nuclear program was getting closer to the nuclear threshold. When the nuclear deal was in full force, Iran was kept a year away from the ability to enrich uranium to military grade. But by the time of the Israeli attack, Finally, there is the change brought about by the war itself. Hamas's attack on Oct. 7 and the events that followed created enormous fear of one kind in Israeli leadership circles while breaking down the barrier of another kind of fear. The fear of taking comprehensive, reality-altering action that characterized pre-war Israel, has been replaced by fear of any enemy building up its strength under the cover of short-term quiet. Many in Israel, in both security and political circles, have become convinced that Israel must act with maximum aggression toward enemies that challenge its existence. This is partly why Israel continues to hold territory in Syria and Lebanon, and why many Israelis believed that now was a window of opportunity that had to be exploited to act against Iran. The direct confrontation between the two countries that began after Israel's Advertisement Although it is too early to know how this phase of the direct war between Iran and Israel will end, Netanyahu could well emerge with the upper hand. He almost certainly believes this will benefit him politically after two years in which he struggled to restore his status. And yet, despite the deep cynicism many Israelis feel toward their prime minister, it is difficult to find prominent voices expressing opposition to the current operation against Iran. But if they are looking for a way to distinguish themselves from the prime minister, Netanyahu's political rivals now have room to act. The key must be to ask how to exploit the achievement created by the June 13 attack. Unlike Netanyahu and his allies, they must make it clear that weakening Iran should be used to promote political accords in our war-torn region — arrangements that should include the Palestinians.
Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
US Embassy Damaged By Iranian Missile Strike In Tel Aviv
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The U.S. Embassy in Tel Aviv has sustained "minor damage" after an Iranian missile landed close to the building in the early hours of Monday, the U.S. ambassador to Israel said. Ambassador Mike Huckabee wrote on X, formerly Twitter, that no U.S. personnel were injured in the incident, but added that U.S. Embassy office and consulate would remain closed on Monday. The incident came as Israel and Iran exchanged strikes for a fourth day. Israeli authorities reported overnight that Iranian weapons had fallen close to the coastal area and around Tel Aviv, causing damage to property and infrastructure. Four people were killed in different parts of central Israel, the country's Magen David Adom emergency services said on Monday. Another 87 people were injured. The U.S. Embassy building in Tel Aviv in 2017. The U.S. Embassy building in Tel Aviv in 2017. JACK GUEZ/AFP via Getty Images This is a breaking story. More to follow.
