&w=3840&q=100)
Quiet storm in Pakistan: Asim Munir's unusual meetings with Zardari, Sharif stir coup speculation, again
Pakistan's Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, along with Chief of the Army Staff (COAS) of Pakistan Asim Munir. Some suggest that the Sharif family may be involved in the possible coup. File image/Reuters
While earlier speculations on a military coup in Pakistan have not died down yet, Chief of Army Staff Asim Munir met Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif on Tuesday shortly after Sharif held a meeting with President Asif Ali Zardari at the latter's residence.
The back-to-back meetings have, once again, stirred coup rumours in Pakistan's political circles as Munir engages with the top leadership to replace the president. According to a report by The Express Tribune, word of the town is that Islamabad is likely to invoke the 27th Amendment, followed by a resignation of President Zardari.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
'Army has no interest in politics'
The theory that military may take over the reins of the Pakistani government has been dismissed by Defence Minister Khawaja Asif, who has rejected media reports as lacking 'credibility'.
Talking to the Express Tribune, Asif confirmed that while the possibility of President Zardari's resignation and a subsequent military takeover came up during the discussions between Munir and Sharif, he dismissed rumours and found claims made by Pakistani media 'unfounded.'
He said that Zardari was well aware of the meeting between Sharif and Munir. 'Mr President was fully aware of the issue and expressed his full confidence in the government. It's all kite flying,' Asif asserted.
'Army chief has no interest in politics. He [Munir] doesn't need anything,' he added.
Sharif denies claims, too
Last week, PM Sharif said, 'Field Marshal Asim Munir has never expressed any desire to become the president, nor is there any such plan in the offing.'
Interior Minister Mohsin Naqvi also criticised what he called a 'malicious campaign' targeting Pakistan's civilian and military leaders.
In a post on X, Naqvi suggested that foreign groups were behind the dissemination of these rumours and said the government knows who is responsible for pushing this narrative.
With inputs from agencies
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
2 minutes ago
- Mint
Russia-Ukraine war to end soon? In a first, Moscow backs Zelensky's call to step up peace talks
In a first and a major breakthrough in the ongoing Russia-Ukraine war, Kremlin on Friday agreed with Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelensky that negotiations between Moscow and Kyiv should be stepped up. According to a Reuters report, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov also said that it does not think that US President Donald Trump's stance on Ukraine means end of talks between Washington and Moscow. He was referring to recent warnings by the US regarding possible secondary sanctions on buyers of Russian exports. Two rounds of talks between Ukraine and Russia in Turkey this year yielded an agreement to exchange prisoners and soldiers' remains. But no date has yet been set for a new round of talks and both sides remain far apart on the terms of any ceasefire. (This is a developing story. Please check back for updates)
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
2 minutes ago
- First Post
Pahalgam: US terror-tags Pakistan's proxy TRF, will China follow suit now or continue shielding it at UN?
After the United States designated The Resistance Front (TRF), which claimed responsibility for the Pahalgam attack, as a terrorist organisation, all eyes are on China whether it will follow suit. China has blocked the listing of Pakistan-based groups and leaders at the United Nations (UN) for years. read more The US Department of State added The Resistance Front (TRF) as a designated Foreign Terrorist Organization (FTO) and Specially Designated Global Terrorist (SDGT) on July 17, 2025. Representational Image After the United States designated Pakistan-based The Resistance Front (TRF) as a terrorist organisation, all eyes are on China whether it will follow suit. The TRF had claimed responsibility for the Pahalgam attack in which terrorists killed 26 people. It is considered to be a proxy of Pakistan-based Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT), which has been plotting and carrying out terrorist acts against India for years. The LeT was behind the 26/11 Mumbai attacks. For years, China has blocked the designation of Pakistan-based jihadist groups and leaders as terrorists at the United Nations (UN). In its own reports as well, China has refused to mention or has downplayed Pakistani jihadists that attack India. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The US Department of State on Friday designated the TRF as a Foreign Terrorist Organization (FTO) and Specially Designated Global Terrorist (SDGT). 'TRF, a Lashkar-e-Tayyiba (LeT) front and proxy, claimed responsibility for the April 22, 2025, Pahalgam attack which killed 26 civilians. This was the deadliest attack on civilians in India since the 2008 Mumbai attacks conducted by LeT. TRF has also claimed responsibility for several attacks against Indian security forces, including most recently in 2024,' the Department of State said in a statement. All eyes on China In the past, India has reacted sharply to China blocking moves to list Pakistan-based jihadists as terrorists at the UN. China has blocked terrorist listings without providing reasons and has often resorted to procedural delays instead of a veto. 'This is a disguised veto, but an even more impervious one that indeed merits a discussion amongst the wider membership. For genuine evidence-based listing proposals for globally sanctioned terrorists to be blocked without giving any due justification is uncalled for and smacks of doublespeak when it comes to the council's commitment in tackling the challenge of terrorism,' Ruchira Kamboj, India's then-UN envoy, said last year. Earlier this year, India in May submitted a detailed dossier to the UN Security Counci to seek TRF's designation as a global terror group. Even as the dossier included intelligence findings on the TRF's funding, handlers, and leadership ties to LeT, China blocked the move by putting a 'technical hold', which is a procedural delay used by permanent UNSC members to avoid open vetoes. China is a UNSC permanent member along with the United States, United Kingdom, France, and Russia. Previously, China has also blocked the designation of individual terrorists like Masood Azhar (2009-19), Abdul Rauf Azhar (2022-23), Sajid Mir (2022-23), and Shahid Mahmood (2022-23). In its own report, China excluded TRF from the list of active terrorist groups, but included the Baloch Liberation Army (BLA) and Majeed Brigade of the BLA. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
2 minutes ago
- First Post
Is RIC set to return? Can the Russia-India-China troika work again?
With Moscow and Beijing pushing to revive the long-inactive Russia-India-China (RIC) trilateral dialogue, attention has turned to New Delhi's cautious stance. As calls grow to reboot this strategic platform — frozen since the Galwan Valley clash — can RIC regain relevance in today's polarised global order? read more Chinese President Xi Jinping, Russian President Vladimir Putin and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi enter a hall for a family photo before a plenary session of the BRICS 2024 Summit in Kazan, Russia, October 23, 2024. File Image/Reuters Efforts are underway to reactivate the long-dormant Russia-India-China (RIC) trilateral dialogue, with both Moscow and Beijing openly supporting the resumption of the format. India has responded with a measured stance, acknowledging the importance of RIC but indicating that any decision to reconvene would depend on agreement among all three nations at a mutually suitable time. The renewed interest in RIC follows years of inactivity brought on by both the global Covid-19 pandemic and the India-China military tensions in eastern Ladakh that escalated in 2020. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD How and why RIC came about The Russia-India-China trilateral format traces its origins to the late 1990s, originating from an initiative led by former Russian Prime Minister Yevgeny Primakov. It was designed as a strategic alignment to offset Western dominance, especially US unilateralism, and to promote a multipolar global system based on sovereign equality and regional cooperation. Primakov's idea found early momentum in the following decade. Between 2002 and 2020, RIC hosted more than 20 ministerial-level meetings, bringing together foreign ministers and officials from sectors such as trade, energy, and disaster management. A significant milestone was the 2007 Delhi Security Summit, where the foreign ministers of the three countries — Li Zhaoxing (China), Pranab Mukherjee (India) and Sergey Lavrov (Russia) — deliberated on cross-border security concerns, global governance reforms, and regional challenges. The trilateral engagement broadened between 2008 and 2010 through thematic working groups. These expert-level meetings explored cooperation in sectors such as agriculture, public health, innovation, and emergency response. Sessions were held across various cities, including Bengaluru, Moscow, Samara, and different Chinese locations. Despite its promising start, the format lost momentum in the wake of multiple geopolitical setbacks. What stalled the future of RIC RIC activities came to a halt in 2020. The outbreak of the Covid-19 pandemic globally disrupted diplomatic schedules and international gatherings. This was quickly followed by the India-China military standoff in eastern Ladakh, culminating in the Galwan Valley clash, which marked the most serious border conflict between the two nations in decades. Since the incident, bilateral relations between India and China have remained strained, with India insisting that peace and stability along the Line of Actual Control (LAC) are prerequisites for full diplomatic normalisation. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The deep freeze in ties also extended to multilateral forums where both nations participated, including RIC. How Russia & China are trying to renew RIC The most recent wave of interest in reviving the RIC has been led by Moscow and Beijing. Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Andrei Rudenko was quoted by Izvestia as saying that Russia is in active dialogue with both New Delhi and Beijing on the matter. 'This topic appears in our negotiations with both of them. We are interested in making this format work, because these three countries are important partners, besides being the founders of BRICS,' Rudenko said. He added, 'Therefore, the absence of this format, in my opinion, looks inappropriate. In this regard, we expect that the countries will agree to resume work within the framework of the RIC — of course, when relations between these states reach a level that allows them to work in a trilateral format.' China has echoed Russia's position. At a regular media briefing, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Lin Jian said, 'China-Russia-India cooperation not only serves the respective interests of the three countries but also helps uphold peace, security, stability and progress in the region and the world.' He added, 'China stands ready to maintain communication with Russia and India on advancing the trilateral cooperation.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD This diplomatic overture follows the visit of Indian External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar to China for the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) foreign ministers' meeting, where he also met with Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi and Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov. 'I would like to confirm our genuine interest in earliest resumption of the work within the format of troika – Russia, India, China – which was established many years ago on the initiative of Yevgeny Primakov (former Russian PM), and which has organised meetings over 20 times at the ministerial level since then, not only at level of foreign policy chiefs, but also heads of other economic, trade and financial agencies of three countries," Lavorv had also said in June. What India's stance is vis-à-vis RIC While Moscow and Beijing have made their intentions clear, New Delhi remains non-committal about any immediate revival of the trilateral grouping. During a press briefing, Indian Ministry of External Affairs spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal reaffirmed India's position. 'This consultative format is a mechanism where the three countries come and discuss global issues and regional issues of interest to them,' Jaiswal said. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'As to when this particular RIC format meeting is going to be held, it is something that will be worked out among the three countries in a mutually convenient manner.' He clarified that no meeting has been agreed upon, and there are currently no ongoing talks regarding scheduling a new RIC session. Sources also confirmed to PTI that any such planning would require alignment on broader diplomatic concerns. At the heart of India's cautious approach lies its uneasy relationship with China. Although bilateral ties have shown tentative signs of improvement since Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Chinese President Xi Jinping met on the sidelines of the BRICS Summit in Kazan last year, key issues remain unresolved. Subsequent visits to China by National Security Advisor Ajit Doval and Defence Minister Rajnath Singh contributed to a series of diplomatic exchanges aimed at stabilising relations. However, India has consistently maintained that a full normalisation of bilateral engagement with China cannot occur unless the border situation improves. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD How important RIC is in today's global order The RIC format is not just a diplomatic exercise — it has also functioned as a critical component of larger multilateral structures such as Brics and the SCO. These platforms are seen as vehicles for fostering a multipolar global system, one not dominated by any single superpower. The RIC countries — Russia, India, and China — are all large developing economies with significant regional and global influence. Their shared interests include restructuring global governance institutions, enhancing South-South cooperation, and promoting development-focused multilateralism. The expansion of Brics to include new members such as Egypt, Iran, Indonesia, Ethiopia, and the UAE shows the evolving role of the bloc. Since Brics was originally launched by Brazil, Russia, India, and China in 2006 (with South Africa joining later), its foundation was effectively built upon the collaborative dynamics that RIC had envisioned. Despite this shared platform, internal tensions — especially between India and China — have frequently diluted the RIC's effectiveness. China's continued support to Pakistan in forums that target Indian interests, and strategic friction along the LAC, have significantly contributed to a trust deficit. Additionally, India's active participation in the Quad — alongside the United States, Japan, and Australia — has not been welcome, especially from Beijing's viewpoint, which sees the grouping as a containment strategy against its rise. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Russia, for its part, finds itself in a balancing act. While facing diplomatic isolation from the West due to the ongoing war in Ukraine, Moscow has sought to strengthen ties with both India and China. Russian analysts suggest that the Kremlin views RIC as a way to offset India's growing proximity to the US and the European Union. As things stand, the revival of the RIC remains under consideration but not yet in motion. With inputs from agencies
