Gulf stocks mixed as new tariffs take effect, oil prices retreat
June 4 (Reuters) - Stock markets in the Gulf were mixed early on Wednesday, with U.S. President Donald Trump's duties on steel and aluminium going into effect, marking the latest chapter in a trade war that has rattled global markets.
Investor focus continues to be on the pace of trade negotiations, with a possible call this week between President Trump and Chinese leader Xi Jinping in the spotlight. This comes after Trump accused China on Friday for violating a bilateral deal to roll back tariffs and trade restrictions.
Oil prices dipped, with Brent crude futures down 0.3% to $65.46 a barrel by 0644 GMT . Prices were weighed down by increasing OPEC+ output and continued concerns over the global economic outlook due to trade tensions.
Saudi Arabia's benchmark stock index (.TASI), opens new tab was up 0.49%. Arabian Pipes Company (2200.SE), opens new tab gained 3.63% in early trade. JP Morgan also said on Tuesday that the kingdom was set to issue $12.6 billion in bonds for the rest of the year.
Markets in the UAE were trading higher, with Dubai's main share index (.DFMGI), opens new tab up 0.14% and Abu Dhabi's benchmark index (.FTFADGI), opens new tab up 0.15% in early trade.
In Dubai, Commercial Bank of Dubai (CBD.DU), opens new tab was the top gainer on the index, up 3.04%.The index is set for a third consecutive session of gains.
Qatar's benchmark stock index (.QSI), opens new tab was down 0.36%, with maritime and logistics services provider Qatar Navigation (QNNC.QA), opens new tab down 1.09%, the top loser on the index.
Qatar recorded a budget deficit of 0.5 billion riyals ($133.31 million) in the first quarter of 2025, according to data from the finance ministry. Total revenue stood at 49.9 billion riyals, down 7.5% from the same quarter last year.
Wednesday is the deadline for countries to submit their best proposals for trade deals with the U.S. and a chance to avoid Trump's hefty tariffs.
Markets are also expecting the wildfires that have swept Canada since last month to impact oil supply, despite a temporary relief from wet weather. Wildfires in Alberta have affected more than 7% of the country's crude oil output, according to Reuters calculations.
($1 = 3.7506 riyals)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Al-Hilal turn attention to Bruno Fernandes' Portugal team-mate after failing in their pursuit of Manchester United captain
Al-Hilal have set their sights on another Premier League midfielder after their failed pursuit of Manchester United 's Bruno Fernandes. Fernandes turned down a stunning £200m proposal from Saudi giants Al-Hilal, according to reports. The Saudi side made the Red Devils skipper their priority signing ahead of the upcoming Club World Cup and were prepared to offer the Portuguese a tax-free contract in the region of £700,000-a-week plus bonuses, treble his weekly earnings in England. Mail Sport revealed that Fernandes' agent, Miguel Pinho, spent three days at the Four Seasons hotel in Riyadh last week, where he held face-to-face talks with club officials. However, news broke on Tuesday morning claim that Fernandes came to a decision over his future and rejected the proposal from the Saudi giants. And now they have turned their attention to a midfielder from United's rivals Manchester City. Foot Mercato report that midfielder Bernardo Silva is high on the club's shortlist after the club appointed former Inter Milan boss Simone Inzaghi. The outlet adds that Al-Hilal have already submitted a contractual offer to Silva, who is currently in Germany ahead of Sunday's Nations League final in Munich. Silva, 30, is entering the final year of his current contract at the Etihad after eight years at the club. He has contributed 71 goals and 72 assists in 404 appearances for the Citizens, helping them win six Premier League titles and the Champions League.
The Guardian
7 hours ago
- The Guardian
Bruno Fernandes staying means Manchester United face all kinds of trade-offs
In publicly rejecting the overtures of the Saudi Pro League, Bruno Fernandes has made it clear he wants to continue playing football at the highest level. That he wants to challenge for trophies. That he has no interest in wasting what remains of his peak years jogging around aimlessly in the service of a vast public relations project, providing lucrative content for a cruel and heartless regime. Despite all this, he's more than happy to remain at Manchester United for now. There were other angles to this decision. In a sense, Al-Hilal's courtship of Fernandes represented a kind of catch-22 for United, desperate to reinforce their underperforming squad while remaining compliant with profitability and sustainability rules. Only a player who truly loved United could contemplate leaving in order to help balance the books. But in signalling his willingness to leave, Fernandes merely demonstrated why United could not possibly let him go. Here, after all, is a player who has firmly established himself as one of the best midfielders in the world while playing for a team that has just finished 15th in the league, who so clearly adores this club and its people more than its parasitic owners ever will. But in this market everything has its price and for Al-Hilal – under the new management of Simone Inzaghi – that price was reported to be £100m in fees and around £50m a year in wages. Selling Fernandes would have been the easy way out for United: a huge fee for a 30-year-old on massive wages, which could then be reinvested in the rest of the squad. As it is, Fernandes will probably have to be accommodated – tactically and financially – alongside United's two forward signings: Matheus Cunha from Wolves and Bryan Mbeumo, who is in the process of being acquired from Brentford. How might Ruben Amorim blend these three richly gifted talents? And what trade-offs will need to be made in the process? The first statistic that jumps out is that Cunha and Mbeumo were first and third for xG overperformance in the 2024-25 Premier League season. To put it in lay terms: they scored 35 goals between them, whereas the average player presented with exactly the same chances would be expected to score 20.9 goals. So are these elite finishers? Well, neither player has remotely outperformed their xG to a similar extent before, which suggests their goal haul is more the result of temporary luck than sustainable class. In short: if United are signing Cunha or Mbeumo in expectation of a reliable 20-goal striker, they are likely to be disappointed. Mbeumo's strength, historically, has been as a creative attacker rather than a pure target man: a link between midfield and attack, quick feet in the penalty area, a dainty dink to the back post. Interestingly, while he has outperformed his expected goals he has underperformed his expected assists for the first time. Mbeumo makes perfect sense as a foil for a deadlier finisher such as Yoane Wissa or Ivan Toney or Vincent Aboubakar with Cameroon. But he is not necessarily that deadly finisher himself. Cunha, for all his undoubted technical gifts and spectacular interventions for Wolves, fits the profile of an attacking midfielder more than a pure striker. He is at his most comfortable picking the ball up 40 yards out, combining with others, playing the killer through ball or shooting early from long range. Of all the players who have scored more than six goals in the Premier League season, only two – on average – took their shots from further out. One was Eberechi Eze. The other was Fernandes. What, then, is the wider strategy? Is it to convert the 5ft 7in Mbeumo into a No 9? Is it to provide the perfect platform for Rasmus Højlund? Is it to build a more fluid attacking model in which the front three in Amorim's 3-4-3 can freely interchange and shift the point of attack, a system that somehow harnesses Mbeumo's physicality and Cunha's link play and both men's ability to progress the ball in the opposition half? And if so, how does it respond against teams that do not allow United the space to transition and run from deep against them? Sign up to Football Daily Kick off your evenings with the Guardian's take on the world of football after newsletter promotion Perhaps we will not know for sure until United line up in pre-season. Perhaps further signings will clarify the strategy. Perhaps in time United will come to resemble their 2020-21 iteration under Ole Gunnar Solskjær; a side largely set up on the transition, built around the pace of Marcus Rashford, Mason Greenwood and Anthony Martial, when Fernandes enjoyed the most singularly destructive season of his career. But all of this requires a certain leap of faith. Faith in the ability of Mbeumo and Cunha to continue their upward trajectory, to thrive in new more claustrophobic environments. Faith in the ability of Fernandes to adapt to what is likely to be a deeper and more disciplined role, with less scope for roaming all over the pitch. Faith in the United hierarchy to balance the books, to make the necessary sales in a market where everyone knows United have to sell. Above all it requires a faith in Amorim. To find the solutions that have been so scarce thus far. To be the coach United hired rather than the guy every United coach seems to become in the end: tired, jaded, fearful, resentful, a punchline pursued by viral Gary Neville clips. United's age of dominance has gone. Their financial impregnability has gone. Their cash reserves have gone. Their swagger, their dignity, their proud sense of exceptionalism: all gone. In a way, blind faith may be all the modern United has left.
Daily Mail
17 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Trump's tariffs will cost UK steel industry £150m
US trade tariffs have dealt a £150 million blow to the UK steel industry as a wave of cheap products driven from American shores are being dumped in Britain, senior industry figures warn. The UK risks being hit harder than other countries in the tariff chaos despite having negotiated a deal with Donald Trump on exports of steel to the US. This, steel bosses say, is because the UK does not have 'the right defences' to prevent countries such as China from flooding our market with cheap steel that would have been sold to the US. That will drive down prices and crowd out domestic British steelmakers. By contrast, EU countries have erected barriers to protect their steel industries. Trade body UK Steel said imports were 'flooding on to the UK market depressing prices' as a result of the US tariffs, which last week rose to 50 per cent for steel and aluminium from a previous rate of 25 per cent. The UK managed to avoid the higher levy after securing a last-minute exemption. But Russell Codling, commercial director at Tata Steel, told MPs urgent measures were needed to protect UK industry. He said steel prices in the UK were tanking below those in Europe following the US tariffs – a price difference 'leading to something like a £100 million- £150 million-a-year loss in the UK compared with Europe.' The UK industry is already struggling to remain profitable due to high energy costs and environmental taxes, which are heavier than those on EU manufacturers. Codling added that the UK market for foreign steel imports was 'far more free-flowing than into mainland Europe'. The latest crisis comes hard on the heels of Government intervention to prevent the country's last blast furnaces at the British Steel plant in Scunthorpe, North Lincolnshire, from being closed by Chinese owners Jingye in April. Codling, whose firm employs 8,000 people, said the UK needed to bring in measures to shield producers against cheap imports that 'are as least as good as our trading partners around the world.' A 25 per cent levy will still apply until the Government finalises a proposed trade deal with the US which should see tariffs cut to zero. Steel exports from Britain to the US are worth £400 million a year, making it the sector's second-biggest market. But UK bosses fear the Trump administration could alter the terms of any deal before it is signed. Gareth Stace, director general of UK Steel, said the Government needed to take 'decisive action' to protect producers. He added: 'The EU has stepped up its trade defences, and now we must do the same.' Respected industrialist Andrew Cook warned that the dumping of cheap steel would cause 'great damage'. He said: 'China built 600 million tons of surplus steel-making capacity to dump on foreign markets. This is the main reason why Britain's steel industry has suffered so badly.' Currently, the UK sets a quota for steel imports allowed into the country tariff-free. Imports above that level incur a 25 per cent levy. But UK Steel says the quotas do not offer 'adequate protection'. The UK's Trade Remedies Authority (TRA), which monitors unfair practices, is reviewing whether the measures, which are based on EU controls from 2018, suffice. Industry minister Sarah Jones insisted the Government – which is set to unveil its £2.5 billion steel strategy later this year – is backing the industry 'to the hilt'. She said: 'The TRA has been working at pace to identify stronger measures to defend the industry.' Rajesh Nair, head of Tata Steel UK, urged Ministers to ensure the US doesn't require British exports to have been 'melted and poured' in the UK to be tariff-exempt. This process now only happens at British Steel's Scunthorpe blast furnaces. Tata, which closed its UK blast furnace last year, is having to import steel until electric arc furnace steelmaking starts in Port Talbot in late 2027, Nair said.
