
Egyptian Journalist: The October 7 Attack Is The Reason For Gaza's Destruction; Hamas Rejects All Offers, Sacrifices The People Of Gaza To Survive As A Military Force
Al-Wahhab's articles echo numerous voices in the Arab and Islamic world that have criticized Hamas' decision to attack Israel, claiming that this was an illegitimate and unjustified move in light of the heavy cost in lives and property. Some of these voices even urged Hamas to ceded power and disarm in order to save what can still be salvaged of Gaza.[1]
Armed Hamas fighters (Image: Shorouknews.com, March 20, 2025)
The following are translated excerpts from Al-Wahhab's recent articles:
Hamas Uses Gaza Civilians As Human Shields; What It Does Is Not Resistance
In an article published on June 17, 2025, Al-Wahab wrote: "Hamas' rule over the Gaza Strip clearly caused it to feel that it could take on the occupation, and indeed, it planned the October 7 attack, which was a turning point in the [history of] the entire Middle East. The movement members perpetrated an attack that dominated global discourse, caused severe embarrassment to the Netanyahu government and exposed the fragility of the 'Iron Dome' [system] that Israel [considered] an impenetrable deterrence.
"Hamas viewed the October 7 attack as a historic victory over the Israeli occupation without considering or preparing for the Israeli response… The blow Hamas dealt to Israel led the occupation government to shift from the notion of ruling over the Palestinian territories to an operation of systematic genocide… People are killed and wounded every day in the Israeli attacks [on Gaza] which directly affect civilians. [Yet,] faced with this torrent of Palestinian blood, Hamas has rejected all the mediators' ceasefire proposals and set conditions that are primarily intended to preserve its existence as a military [force] and to maintain its power in Gaza, regardless of the magnitude of the human price that has been paid since its barbaric October 7 attack…
"Amid Hamas' position that calls to continue the fighting, the civilians became human shields that Hamas sacrifices in its war against the occupation, [a situation] that has provoked public fury among the people of Gaza… What Hamas is doing in Gaza exceed the boundaries of resistance. Given the scope of the destruction, it is legally and morally responsible [for the situation]. [Yet] the movement does not heed the increasing calls from the opposition [in Gaza] to agree to a period of calm under any conditions. On the contrary, it employs means of repression against anyone who opposes it.
"Therefore, the responsibility for the harsh response of the occupation army to the October 7 attack lies with Hamas, which prefered its own interests and political achievements over the lives of the people. Today, if there remains even a sliver of hope to save Gaza, this movement must restore Gaza to the rule of the Palestinian Authority, so as to thwart the Israeli plan to eliminate the Palestinian cause through the Gaza gateway."[2]
The Gazans Pay The Price Of Hamas's Mistakes In The October 7 Attack
In an article published on June 8, 2025, Abd Al-Wahab wrote that Hamas' standing in the Arab world has taken a blow as a result of its insistence to continue the war with Israel at the expense of its people: "…There can be no doubt that [Hamas's] decision to carry out the October 7 [attack] is the main reason for the devastation of the Gaza Strip, and reflects Hamas' recklessness and its failure to anticipate the Israeli response Gaza was likely to face. This response arrived with brutal force, as though Israel was [just] waiting for Hamas to make a mistake so that it could carry out the largest invasion in history against an unarmed population, causing tremendous devastation in Gaza. The destructive Gaza war continues to claim victims and to immerse Gaza in further misery and hunger, but despite this Hamas, seemingly detached from reality. stubbornly clings to military options that have no impact on the occupation army, which enjoys the support of the U.S.
"Hamas's increasing isolation is no longer just a political impression. It is an obvious fact that grows clearer each day in light of the international positions, the mediators' refusal to consider [Hamas's] proposals, and especially the decline of the Arab stance that used to politically cover for [Hamas]… Even countries that traditionally supported Hamas have begun to distance themselves from extending political or even humanitarian support for it. There has been a significant decline in the official Arab discourse [in support of] the movement, and an increasing support for the diplomatic efforts put forward by the Palestinian Authority. This shows that Hamas is losing its strategic depth, after it chose military escalation as the only option despite the warnings and despite the tremendous destruction caused by its October 7 escapade.
"But gravest of all is the effect on the relationship between Hamas and the Gazans themselves. The civilians' daily suffering prevents any expressions of solidarity with the movement leadership. On the contrary, a deep rift has formed between what the people want – security, food, and an exit from the hell – and what Hamas insists on: militant slogans and positions that do not reflect any flexibility or any rethinking of its path. It appears that the movement's military and political leadership [lives] in a world of its own, publishing statements from underground while the people aboveground search for a crust of bread beneath the rubble to relieve the hunger of their children.
"The insistence on fighting amid such devastation and isolation does not seem heroic. This is stubbornness at the expense of the national interest. It is worrying that the [Hamas] leadership sticks to the option [of fighting] in the field when it lacks any means [to do so], other than causing more pain. This leadership does not recognize that its first obligation to the [Palestinian] people is to protect them and not to drag them into a long-term campaign whose duration no one can predict.
'A movement that loses the trust of the mediators, is accused by the Gazans of incompetence, and loses its regional allies cannot continue to present itself as the representative of the Palestinian people. Legitimacy derives from serving the people and not from launching missiles from among the ruins, which leads to doom and destruction. If Hamas doesn't reexamine its positions and stop underappreciating the suffering of the civilians, it will not remain isolated on the international level, but will suffer internal isolation that is likely to cost it its very existence in the future Palestinian arena."[3]
The Destruction In The Gaza Strip Stems From Hamas's Aspirations For Exclusive Control
In a May 17, 2025 article, Abd Al-Wahab wrote: "Almost a year and a half has passed since the October 7 attack, which is the main reason for the chaos and destruction in the Gaza Strip. Hamas obviously knew that Israel would respond to the attack on its citizens, but [nevertheless] wanted to score a victory for 'the resistance' while ignoring the magnitude of the consequences that were likely to ensue.
"Hamas knows well that the death of its senior officials in the war is the natural price of the resistance. But what is worse is that it applies the same logic to the people of Gaza, and, as a result, thousands of civilians have died in an unprecedented war that has been transformed Gaza into piles of rubble.
"Hamas's coup against the Palestinian Authority and its seizure of exclusive power in Gaza caused a deep rift on the path of the Palestinian cause. The total destruction of all aspects of life in the Gaza Strip results from Hamas's bid for exclusive control without any thought for a political path or a solution to the conflict with Israel.
"The political picture in Gaza has become more complicated, due to Netanyahu's desire to achieve a personal victory which he will use to deal with the tremendous pressure he is facing from the Israeli opposition and the families of the hostages held by Hamas. Hamas also understands that its fate is currently on the line, so it attempts to extricate itself from this crisis without risking its survival or its rule in Gaza…
"[Stuck] between Netanyahu's loathsome ambitions and Hamas's ambition to remain in power, the people of Gaza remain the victims of the destructive war. This has sparked great fury among the Gazans, who have begun to understand that Hamas uses them as human shields against the Israeli aggression. Furthermore, they see no clear horizon for the future of Gaza, which remains threatened and uncertain – especially since the war will not end as long as both sides of the conflict cling to their ambitions."[4]
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Memri
9 hours ago
- Memri
The Qatar Weekly Update (QWU) – Part Of The Qatar Monitor Project (QMP) – No. 30, August 1, 2025
Congressman Greg Landsman (D-OH) declined an invite from Qatar 1. Qatar Threatened To Cut EU LNG Supplies Over Sustainability Law, Letter Shows, Reuters, July 26, 2025. 2. Jewish Congressman Declines Qatar Invite, Calls Out Mishandling Of Gaza Hostage Crisis, Jerusalem Post, July 29, 2025. "Qatar's gross mishandling of the hostage crisis in Gaza and failure to sufficiently pressure Hamas into ending the war prevents me from allowing staff to visit your country," Landsman wrote. 3. Israel Suspects Qatar Behind Hamas 'Starvation' Propaganda Campaign, Israel National News, July 28, 2025. 4. President Barzani Praises Qatar's Stability Role, Shafaq News, July 30, 2025. 5. Former Senior Mossad Official Questioned In Qatargate Corruption Scandal, Haaretz, July 28, 2025. 6. The Go-Between: How Qatar Became The Global Capital Of Diplomacy, The Guardian, July 22, 2025. * Yigal Carmon is Founder and President of MEMRI.


Shafaq News
10 hours ago
- Shafaq News
Trump promises new plan to feed starving Gazans
Shafaq News – Washington US President Donald Trump on Friday pledged to launch a new initiative to address hunger in Gaza, saying he is 'working on a plan to get people fed,' amid growing concern over the humanitarian situation in the war-torn enclave. In a brief phone call with Axios, Trump described the crisis relief as something that 'should have happened a long time ago,' accusing Hamas of stealing and selling humanitarian aid entering the enclave. He declined to elaborate on the plan when pressed by Axios, and did not confirm whether it would involve expanded support for the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) or introduce new delivery mechanisms. The statement followed a visit by US presidential envoy Steve Witkoff and Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee to aid distribution centers run by the GHF. In a post on X, Witkoff revealed he and Huckabee spent five hours inside Gaza to get 'a clear understanding of the humanitarian situation and help craft a plan to deliver food and medical aid to the people of Gaza.' At @POTUS 's direction, @USAmbIsrael and I met yesterday with Israeli officials to discuss the humanitarian situation in Gaza. Today, we spent over five hours inside Gaza — level setting the facts on the ground, assessing conditions, and meeting with @GHFUpdates and other… — Special Envoy Steve Witkoff (@SEPeaceMissions) August 1, 2025 Washington has faced mounting pressure to increase aid flows into the enclave, where starvation and malnutrition are rapidly worsening. The US-backed GHF has been criticized by international rights groups for operating only in select areas, forcing displaced Palestinians to travel long distances—often through active conflict zones—to access food. Axios further pointed out that an Israeli official briefed reporters on Thursday about Witkoff's separate meeting with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. The two discussed the current deadlock in ceasefire and hostage negotiations, and the possibility of moving toward a more comprehensive agreement with Hamas. Trump declined to comment on the outcome of that meeting, saying only, 'You will see soon.'


Shafaq News
10 hours ago
- Shafaq News
War is possible again: Lebanon's ongoing negotiations on Hezbollah's arsenal
Shafaq News After months of political back-and-forth, the issue of Hezbollah's weapons has become increasingly central in both domestic Lebanese discourse and international positioning. With time running short and diplomatic options narrowing, the debate is intensifying, signaling the potential for renewed escalation. Limited Diplomatic Window Many observers note that the possibility of removing the Lebanon file from US Syria envoy Tom Barrack is unlikely to alter Washington's or Tel Aviv's longstanding demands regarding Hezbollah's disarmament. Speculation surrounding the possible reappointment of former envoy Morgan Ortagus—known for her vocal support of Israel—has further fueled concerns about a diminishing diplomatic posture by the US in handling Lebanon's complex political and security landscape. Meanwhile, Hezbollah remains adamant about retaining its arsenal for the foreseeable future. In contrast, key international actors, led by the United States, continue to demand concrete steps toward consolidating state control over all weapons. This outlook is reinforced by a series of high-profile public statements that suggest the window for political resolution is rapidly closing. Diverging Rhetoric: Aoun's Appeal Versus Hezbollah's Defiance The Lebanese President Joseph Aoun issued a direct appeal to Hezbollah, calling for the group to hand over its weapons 'today rather than tomorrow,' framing the issue in existential terms, 'to liberate occupied territories, rebuild the state, restore international trust in Lebanon, and prevent further national collapse.' Aoun emphasized that the sacrifices of Lebanon's martyrs must not be in vain. Hezbollah's leadership, however, is far from the President's appeal. The Secretary-General Naim Qassem reiterated that disarmament is not on the table. He warned against reducing Lebanon to 'an Israeli annex,' regardless of the cost, and instead emphasized other priorities—including reconstruction efforts following the Israeli war and halting Israeli attacks. 'End the aggression and free the prisoners; only then can we have a serious discussion,' Qassem declared, dismissing any calls—domestic or foreign—for disarmament as serving 'the Israeli project,' and argued that Israel's ambitions extended beyond disputed border points, warning that disarming the resistance would pave the way for Israeli expansionism inside Lebanon. Despite the apparent contradiction between Aoun and Hezbollah, political sources suggest that a quiet but constructive dialogue is ongoing between the two sides. This conversation is expected to culminate in a government session that will formally address the state's monopoly over arms. Negotiations, Not Disarmament—For Now Lebanese political analyst Qassem Qassir told Shafaq News that disarmament is not currently on the agenda. He confirmed that negotiations between Hezbollah and the presidency continue, but stressed that any meaningful discussion about Hezbollah's weapons hinges on several non-negotiable conditions: ending Israeli aggression, withdrawing from Lebanese territory, releasing prisoners, and initiating reconstruction. 'These are firm and clear positions,' Qassir said. 'Any consideration of limiting arms to the state can only follow the fulfillment of these demands.' Qassir also emphasized that Hezbollah's heavy missiles and drones constitute 'a point of strength for Lebanon,' forming a strategic deterrent against Israel. 'These capabilities cannot be relinquished without assurances for their protection.' He further warned that the US and Israel do not merely seek Hezbollah's disarmament, but rather its destruction—whether those weapons are held by the party or the Lebanese Army. 'Israel may use the pretext of disarmament to justify a new war on Lebanon,' he cautioned. While internal discussions have floated the idea of placing Hezbollah's arms under unofficial state authority, Qassir concluded that no concrete steps have been taken by the Lebanese state toward actual disarmament. What is unfolding, he said, remains confined to preliminary consultations and general understandings. Israel Rejects Lebanese Initiative, Heightening Risks of Escalation With diplomacy faltering, many in Lebanon fear that an escalation is inevitable—possibly resembling the recent conflict that ended with a ceasefire agreement on November 27. Two developments in particular are fueling these fears. First is the continued pattern of Israeli airstrikes and targeted assassinations, concentrated in southern Lebanon and the Bekaa Valley. Second is a report by Reuters, citing five diplomatic sources, stating that Israel rejected a proposal from Lebanese Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri. The proposal had sought a halt to Israeli airstrikes as a first step toward fully implementing the ceasefire agreement. Israel has issued neither confirmation nor denial of the report. Potential Political Fallout? Beyond the battlefield risks, internal political repercussions also loom. Despite Hezbollah's entrenched role in the Lebanese government, ongoing external pressure and internal divisions over its weapons could reshape the very structure of governance. This unresolved contradiction—between Hezbollah's strategic doctrine and growing international insistence on state sovereignty—has yet to reach a breaking point. But the signals from all sides suggest that the margin for ambiguity is rapidly narrowing.