Calif. teacher's killing was a mystery for 47 years. Confession from family of a student solves it
On June 16, 1978, one day after Branham High School recessed for summer, a student found Diane Peterson lying on the floor of the hallway near her classroom with a single stab wound to her chest, according to the Santa Clara District Attorney's Office.
Peterson was said to be one of several teachers on campus cleaning out their classrooms for the summer break when she was killed, according to the news release.
For years, authorities had considered Harry "Nicky" Nickerson, at the time a 16-year-old student at the school, as a person of interest in the case, Santa Clara County prosecutors said in a media statement.
But the tips and leads they received led to dead-ends, and so the case remained unsolved for 47 years.
Until earlier this year, when police say a relative disclosed that Nickerson admitted to stabbing the teacher just minutes after it happened, prosecutors said.
'This marks the end of a terrible and tragic mystery," said Santa Clara Dist. Atty. Jeff Rosen in a statement. "Ms. Peterson would have been a senior citizen today if she had not crossed paths with this violent teenager. I wish she was."
Nickerson became a person of interest in the case just days after Peterson was killed, when he was arrested in an unrelated crime and detectives noticed his booking photo bore a striking resemblance to a police sketch of the teacher's killer.
The sketch came from a student witness who said they heard Peterson yell for help and saw the killer flee. The same student, however, later disclaimed his statement, according to authorities.
Read more: Man charged in cold case murder, sexual assaults could have more victims, police say
Police had also been told by a witness that they had seen Nickerson carrying a knife that had "Teacher Dear" written on the side. But under questioning, Nickerson denied having a knife at all, and authorities were unable to corroborate the claim.
Years later, prosecutors noted the retracted statement by the fellow student, as well as another person who said Nickerson confessed to killing Peterson when she confronted him for dealing drugs, but neither story was corroborated.
Over the years, authorities say Nickerson built up a rap sheet that included convictions for kidnapping, armed robbery and assault with a deadly weapon. He was shot and critically injured during an attempted drug robbery in 1984 and committed suicide in 1993.
"Nearly five decades have passed since a young teacher's life was tragically taken," San Jose Police Chief Paul Joseph said. "While the suspect will never stand trial or face the consequences for his actions, we hope this resolution brings a measure of peace to the victim's loved ones and to a community that has carried this loss for far too long."
Sign up for Essential California for news, features and recommendations from the L.A. Times and beyond in your inbox six days a week.
This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
San Francisco Chronicle
16 hours ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Video shows Richmond police confrontation with armed man they fatally shot
The Richmond Police Department on Monday released body-worn camera video that shows a man emerging from a home last week holding two knives moments before officers fatally shot him. The man, Angel Montano, 27, was a former U.S. Marine who suffered from mental health issues, attorney John Burris, who represents the family, told the Chronicle. The shooting occurred around 5 p.m. Aug. 4, after a 911 caller reported that his brother, identified as Montano, was armed with a knife in their home, threatening to kill him and his mother, police said. 'My brother became aggressive,' Montano's brother told a dispatcher, according to audio of the 911 call that the department released along with the video. 'He has mental issues.' The body-worn camera video shows officers staged outside the home on First Street. Police said the officers were waiting for backup and less-than-lethal tools. As officers staged outside, Montano's brother reported that Montano wanted to attack him and that Montano was standing in the home in front of the front door, with their mother between the two of them. Montano's brother was heard pleading with Montano to put down the knife. The situation escalated as Montano's brother reported that Montano had grabbed a second knife. He had a kitchen knife in his left hand and a utility knife in his right hand. 'Please hurry,' Montano's brother implored, according to the 911 audio. 'Send them in now.' The dispatcher informed Montano's brother that officers had to come up with a plan to keep them safe. 'We're not just going to rush,' the dispatcher said. Officers then walked up to the front door, which was slightly ajar, the video showed. Police said officers heard an altercation and feared someone inside the home was being harmed. An officer armed with what appeared to be a gun then pushed open the front door as he and other officers announced themselves. 'Come outside,' one of the officers shouted. The officer who pushed open the door then shouted: 'Hey, hey, hey, stop!' The footage ends as the man emerges. Police released photos from the video that showed he was armed with a knife in each hand. Two officers, identified as Nicholas Remick and Colton Stocking, shot Montano, who died at the scene, police said. The police department and the Contra Costa County District Attorney's Office are investigating the shooting. The two officers remained on administrative leave, in accordance with department policy, police said. The case marked Remick's second on-duty shooting in six months. The prior shooting occurred around 9 p.m. Feb. 4, after officers located a man wanted on a warrant for an alleged probation violation tied to a domestic violence case. The suspect, found near the railroad tracks just west of Carlson Boulevard, refused to cooperate with officers, prompting a standoff while he was armed with what looked like a knife, police said. Officers tried to de-escalate and peacefully resolve the situation for about 30 minutes, but the suspect ultimately charged at officers while raising the object in his hand in 'a threatening manner,' police said. That's when Remick and Officer Jessica Khalil shot the man. The object turned out to be a black knife sheath, police said. The California Department of Justice, which investigates police shootings of unarmed civilians, identified the man as Jose De Jesus Mendez Rios. The DOJ's investigation of the shooting was ongoing as of Monday. Remick was also named in a federal lawsuit in January after a man sued the city of Richmond, alleging Remick and a sergeant assaulted him as he recorded video of an arrest after a police chase came to an end outside a market on May 5, 2024. Kwesi Guss claimed that as Sgt. Alexander Caine ran toward the driver and passenger of the car officers had pursued, he yelled at Guss to get out of the way and pushed him. 'Shut yo' b— ass up,' Guss replied, according to the lawsuit. Caine responded: 'What was that?' Then he struck Guss' chest with his palms, the lawsuit alleged. The sergeant pushed Guss three more times before a witness stepped in. That's when Remick ran over. He and Caine grabbed Guss, handcuffed him and forced him to the ground, placing their knees on Guss' back and ribs, and pushing his face onto the ground, the lawsuit stated. Police detained him for about an hour, then released him. The lawsuit remains pending in San Francisco federal court, with a trial date set for next year. Burris, who filed the lawsuit on Guss' behalf and now represents the Montano family, said he plans to take a close look at the shooting of Montano to determine if officers violated any of Montano's constitutional or civil rights. He said the footage released Monday was only one part of the 'story.' He said he did not yet know the details about Montano's mental health condition. On the day of the shooting, Burris said, Montano's family told dispatchers about his history of mental illness. Montano lived with his mother, brother and sister. He also leaves behind a 2-year-old daughter, Burris said.
Yahoo
04-08-2025
- Yahoo
Tory Lanez Ordered to Pay Megan Thee Stallion's Legal Fees For ‘Disruptive' Deposition
Tory Lanez has been ordered to cover Megan Thee Stallion's legal fees after he was combative and feigned ignorance of basic facts during a videotaped deposition last April linked to the 'Savage' singer's defamation and cyberstalking lawsuit against YouTube blogger Milagro Gramz. A federal judge issued the sanctions ruling Friday, saying Lanez, born Daystar Peterson, must pay Megan's 'reasonable attorney's fees incurred in taking [his] deposition.' The judge further ruled that a court-ordered, follow-up attempt to take Peterson's deposition would be supervised by a magistrate judge. More from Rolling Stone Soulja Boy Arrested on Weapons Charge During Traffic Stop in Los Angeles Orlando Bloom Won't Have to Testify in Katy Perry's $15 Million Mansion War Gary Busey Pleads Guilty to Groping Woman's Behind At the April 9 deposition, with Peterson appearing by video from prison, the rapper repeatedly interrupted the attorney who was conducting the exam on behalf of the Grammy-winning rapper, born Megan Pete. Peterson accused the lawyer of planning to leak the video 'to fake some sort of narrative.' He also deflected questions by asking for the definitions of words including 'discuss' and 'approve.' Asked at one point if he agreed that Megan Thee Stallion and Megan Pete are the same person, Peterson was evasive. 'There's a lot of Ms. Petes in this world. Which Ms. Pete are you talking about?' he replied. At one point, he instructed his lawyer to 'Google how many Megan Petes there are in the world.' Shortly after the disastrous exam ran off the rails, Pete's lawyers asked that Lanez be held in contempt. In a filing, they said his demeanor was 'so disruptive, inflammatory, and inconsistent with the basic norms of civil litigation' that it 'made a mockery of the proceedings.' While granting the legal fees for the April exam, the judge's new ruling did not go as far as Pete wanted. Her lawyers had asked that Peterson be forced to pay for the follow-up exam as well. The April deposition marked the first time Peterson was forced to answer questions under oath since he accused of assaulting Pete with a semi-automatic firearm on a residential street in Los Angeles five years ago. Peterson is now serving a 10-year sentence after being found guilty of shooting Pete in both feet during the alcohol-fueled incident that followed a party at Kylie Jenner's house. Pete requested the deposition as she pursues her lawsuit against Gramz, whose legal name is Milagro Cooper. Pete claims Cooper spread 'vicious and hateful rumors' about her while acting as Peterson's 'paid surrogate.' Peterson, 33, declined to testify in his own defense at his December 2022 criminal trial that ended with his conviction on all three felony counts. He's now appealing the verdict. A source previously told Rolling Stone that Peterson regretted not testifying in his own defense. While Pete and her lawyers can subpoena any person they believe has information useful to their case, a spokesman for the non-profit organization whose lawyers now represent Peterson said the incarcerated rapper would not be a willing participant in a prison-based deposition. 'If you know Tory Lanez how I do, good luck trying to get him to 'testify' to anything, it's just not what he does,' Ceasar McDowell, CEO of Unite the People, said in a statement previously sent to Rolling Stone. 'He definitely did not 'agree' to testify now.' Cooper's lawyer, Michael Pancier, confirmed that his client did not oppose the deposition. Pete first sued Cooper in October, claiming the YouTuber was part of a 'coordinated campaign' to smear her reputation and harass her as retaliation for her testimony against Peterson at trial. Pete claims Cooper has repeatedly attacked her with claims she suffers from alcoholism and requires a guardian. Pete alleges Cooper also promoted a deepfake pornographic video of her. Cooper denies conspiring with Peterson and tried to get the lawsuit dismissed on the grounds that she was shielded as a journalist. The federal judge overseeing the lawsuit in Florida ruled against Cooper, allowing Pete's lawsuit to proceed. The judge said Pete had made a 'compelling case' that Cooper acted with a 'reckless disregard for the truth.' Cooper's alleged ties to Peterson were mentioned in Pete's recent petition for a restraining order against Peterson. Pete claimed that Peterson used Cooper as a 'puppet and mouthpiece,' pointing to social media posts from October in which Cooper highlighted Peterson's false claim that the gun used in the July 2020 assault had 'gone missing.' The gun remains in police custody. At a hearing in January, Pete gave emotional testimony that touched on her claims about Cooper without naming her directly. 'I haven't been at peace since I been shot, and I'm just trying to be un-harassed, not only by the person who shot me, but by the people he's been paying to continue to harass me,' Pete testified under oath. 'I probably won't ever have my own peace about the situation, but I just really want the harassment from the person who shot me to stop.' Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge Richard Bloom granted the request, giving Pete a five-year restraining order against Peterson. The judge cited 'several uncontroverted facts' in his ruling, including 'conduct that culminated in [Lanez] shooting approximately five rounds at petitioner that resulted in injuries to her.' The judge said Peterson must stay at least 100 yards away from Pete and refrain from harassing, intimidating, or threatening her in any way until at least January 9, 2030. Best of Rolling Stone Sly and the Family Stone: 20 Essential Songs The 50 Greatest Eminem Songs All 274 of Taylor Swift's Songs, Ranked Solve the daily Crossword
Boston Globe
01-08-2025
- Boston Globe
Afghan US army interpreter detained by ICE is accused of being a national security risk. His lawyer said ICE hasn't disclosed why.
'That circumvents all due process, all hearings, all opportunity to say 'Hey, this is a mistake,'' Keating said. Advertisement Zia's detainment is the latest case of an immigrant who was in the country legally being detained by ICE. In March, immigration agents surrounded Tufts PhD student Peterson filed a petition in the US District Court of Massachusetts to nullify the expedited removal order, as well as filed a claim for asylum on behalf of Zia. A judge ordered DHS on July 18 to notify the court at least 72 hours before Zia is transferred to a different facility or deported. Advertisement Peterson said the decision gives them 'breathing room' to work on his case. 'Although the government hasn't in all cases followed judicial orders in recent months, this is a much better and more secure position to be in than we were right after my client was apprehended,' she said. Zia worked as an interpreter for US troops from 2006 to 2007, according to court filings and a copy of his special immigrant visa application. He fled across the border into Pakistan when the Taliban In a letter of recommendation for Zia's visa application, a sergeant who directly supervised him said Zia was instrumental to the success of the unit's mission and 'presents no danger' to the US. 'I would invite him into my own home with my children and not be worried anything would happen,' the sergeant wrote. 'I trust in him completely.' Zia was on track for permanent residency when he was detained by ICE for unclear reasons. 'Everything is completely legal,' Peterson said. Keating considers the army interpreter's arrest an attempt by the federal government to 'This is about the Trump administration and ICE finding one more way to push the numbers to 3,000 [arrests] a day,' the congressman said. A senior Department of Homeland Security official said in an email to the Globe that Zia was 'paroled by the Biden administration.' Advertisement 'He is currently under investigation for a serious criminal allegation,' the official wrote. 'All of his claims will be heard by a judge. Any Afghan who fears persecution is able to request relief.' An attorney for ICE officials wrote in a response to Zia's petition that ICE terminated his parole after the FBI indicated he is 'a risk to the national security of the United States' and lacks 'valid entry documents.' But his attorney said she has received no formal communication from the Department of Homeland Security about an investigation. 'It was only after media reached out to ICE or to DHS that we heard anything about that at all,' Peterson said. 'As his attorney, I don't believe there's anything to this.' She noted that other Afghan clients of hers have been called for formal interviews with the Federal Bureau of Investigation or received knocks on their doors from agents, who ask them a few questions before leaving. Zia received no such request, she said. Peterson is now crossing her fingers for an interview with an immigration officer, where Zia can prove he has reason to fear persecution if he is deported. Shawn VanDiver, the founder and president of AfghanEvac, an advocacy organization for Afghans contracted by the US military, said Zia is one of his 'priority cases' among 'well over 100″ instances of Afghans arrested by ICE. 'He is yet another person who followed all of the rules,' said VanDiver, who served in Iraq in the US Navy. He added that he wants to show Afghan allies that veterans have their backs. He has signed up more than 110 people who will be trained in the next week on how to support Afghan immigrants at their court appointments, including wearing veteran gear to sit in the courtrooms. To VanDiver, it's the least Americans can do. Advertisement 'We told them they can be Americans,' he said. 'We're making it very hard for them.' Jade Lozada can be reached at
