
Unplugged & Learning
By the time Jada, an eighth grader at Detroit Achievement Academy, settles into her morning routine with her class, she already knows she won't be pulled into a group chat or sneak a glance at TikTok between classes. Her phone is zipped away in her bookbag, self-secured and self-managed by her, as it is for every student in the building.
And she likes it that way.
'I thought I'd hate it at first,' Jada admits. 'But honestly, it's way better. My classmates and I actually talk to each other at school. And I'm not stressing about what's happening on my phone.'
Across the country, more schools are coming to the same conclusion: cellphones, for all their utility, are making it harder for kids to learn, focus, and just be kids. At Detroit Achievement, the no-cellphone policy is more than just about reducing screen time. It's about protecting time, and space, for students to grow as people.
For Kirstin Stoeckle, Director of Upper School at Detroit Achievement Academy, the decision to ban cellphones wasn't about punishment. It was about presence.
'When people outside our school community meet our middle schoolers, they almost always comment on how engaged they are, with each other and at school, and how they still seem like joyful, happy kids.'
That sense of childhood - of the good kind of boredom, the kind that leads to creativity instead of doomscrolling - is something Stoeckle and her team are determined to protect. In her view, phones aren't just distractions; they're accelerants. They speed kids toward social pressures they may not be ready for and pull them away from the small, formative moments that make up a school day.
'We didn't ban phones so that our kids would stay kids for longer,' she explains, 'but that did certainly happen, and it has been beautiful for everyone involved. They laugh a lot at lunch. They play outside more, often silly games that they created themselves. We're seeing relationships deepen - in person, in real time.'
A growing body of research supports what schools like Detroit Achievement already see every day. In a study spanning four English cities, researchers at the London School of Economics found that banning phones led to a 6.4% increase in test scores - equivalent to an extra hour of instructional time per week. The gains were even more pronounced for low-achieving students, effectively narrowing the achievement gap without a single change to curriculum or staffing.
Further emphasizing the impact on economically disadvantaged students, the study noted that the lowest-achieving students benefited the most, with their test scores increasing by 14.23% of a standard deviation.
In Norway, a similar experiment with middle schools showed students not only performed better academically but were also more likely to go on to advanced secondary programs. The policy didn't just help kids learn more, it helped them believe in what they could do next.
Here in the U.S., schools are catching on. The Bentonville School District in Arkansas banned phones and in just one year recorded a 57% reduction in verbal or physical aggression offenses and a 51% reduction in drug-related offenses, she said. Arkansas Governor Sarah Huckabee Sanders recently announced a bill to make every school in Arkansas phone-free, an effort to re-invest in the mental wellbeing of the state's kids.
In Michigan, new legislation is pushing public schools to adopt similar restrictions, while New York and Florida have already announced bell-to-bell bans in the coming school year.
It's tempting to frame phone bans as a nostalgic return to 'how things used to be,' but the implications are much bigger. Constant access to devices doesn't just fragment attention; it rewires expectations. Students come to see every lull as a void to be filled by content, not conversation. Every moment of discomfort - social, intellectual, emotional - gets outsourced to a screen.
In that environment, deeper learning suffers. So does resilience. Teachers talk about the difference: students who once rushed to Google an answer now pause to wrestle with a hard question. Others who used to eat lunch in silence, eyes locked on their phones, are laughing in circles of friends. It's not magic—it's policy. But the result feels magical.
What makes cellphone bans so compelling is their simplicity. There's no need for massive budget increases or sweeping reform. Just a bookbag or a locked pouch and a clear expectation.
Is it a silver bullet? No. But it might be the cleanest, fastest way to reclaim time, attention, and connection in American schools.
As for Jada, she's already convinced.
'When we went to visit high schools, kids were just by themselves on their phones, like they were in a different place.' she says. 'But, I'm actually here, like, in reality. Does that make sense?'
Yeah. It does make sense, Jada.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Washington Post
29 minutes ago
- Washington Post
In L.A., crowds continue to grow in anti-ICE protests
We and our third-party partners process personal data including through the use of cookies, pixels, and other tracking technologies to provide, analyze, and improve our services; personalize your experience (including content); and personalize ads on and off the services. Learn more and manage your preferences at our Privacy Policy
Yahoo
35 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Wife Gives Husband 3 Rules Before Going Into Labor. He Breaks Them All
A woman says her husband named their new baby without her, while she was recovering from surgery In a post on Reddit, the woman writes that she and her husband agreed to a few ground rules before she underwent a cesarean section — but he went against every one Now, she's considering leaving him and changing the baby's nameA new mom says she wants to rename her 7-month-old baby after her husband named the child while she underwent a cesarean section. In a since-deleted Reddit post, the 33-year-old woman writes that she laid a few ground rules prior to undergoing the procedure so that she could be "clear about my needs." The three rules were as follows: "1. I did not want to wake up from my c-section to people in the room - his family. Not because they're bad people or anything, but I did not want people to see me like that. I knew it was going to be a vulnerable time and didn't want people there." "2. Nobody besides the doctors, nurses, and my husband were allowed to hold my baby before I was. 3. We had a list of names - that I liked and he was okay with some. He was free to pick from the list or we'd talk about it when I woke up. Specifically, I didn't want him to name our baby after his dad, which is what he'd wanted to do." While her husband agreed to the rules initially, he ended up breaking all three. "I was not prepared for when I was going to be put under…. They didn't walk me through anything that was going to happen or give me any warning," she writes in the post. "I got wheeled into a room, they asked me questions about myself, and next thing I know I was out like a light." "I wake up and the first thing I see is his mom holding my baby," she continues. "Mind you when I woke up I had no idea what was going on, forgot why I was there, that I had been pregnant, had a baby… all of it was gone from my mind." Once others had left the room, the woman asked her husband what they should name the baby and he immediately "got a bit awkward and said he named him after his dad." Never miss a story — sign up for to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories. "I asked why and he said because the nurses had been harassing him about a name," she explains. Now, seven months later, the woman says she is considering ending the marriage and moving back to her home country, where she would file to get the baby's name changed to one on the original list. Fellow Reddit users are offering their takes on the situation, with many encouraging her to "take your baby and run." "There's nothing to salvage here," one user wrote. "He doesn't care about you or what you want to even help provide for him, 'his family.' " "Go home. What you've experienced so far is what your entire life will be with him," another agreed. "He'll agree to what you want and then do as he pleases because there are now consequences to breaking promises for him. Not to mention he'll never try to support his family because he already isn't. Run while you can." Read the original article on People


Fox News
an hour ago
- Fox News
Compact machine turns air into ready-to-use gasoline
All times eastern Fox Report with Jon Scott FOX News Radio Live Channel Coverage WATCH LIVE: 250th Army Birthday Festival official ceremony underway