‘Shameful' move in Aussie salmon industry
The Tasmanian government on Sunday announced it will conduct an independent study of the industry.
The study is expected to ascertain whether environmental standards and legislation need to be strengthened or changed as well as international methods of fish-farming.
Disease and antibiotic use are also expected to be on the agenda as the state battles the bacteria Piscirickettsia salmonis, with more than 3 million salmon dying from the disease last summer, according to the Bob Brown Foundation.
The marine expansion of the industry will be paused while the study is carried out. Marine expansion of Tasmania's salmon industry will be paused for an independent review. NewsWire / Supplied Credit: NewsWire
Tasmanian Premier Jeremy Rockliff said the government was 'on the side of Tasmanians' and expected to see practical reforms and regulations to protect the environment and the industry.
'To support the salmon industry to meet its social license in line with contemporary environmental expectations, we will deliver an independent study of the industry,' Mr Rockliff said.
'I said clearly, after the mass mortality event of last summer, the industry is on notice.
'I do not resile from that. We must always seek to strike a balance between sustainable primary industries and our unique natural environments in which they operate.'
An independent off-island specialist will be brought in to conduct the study. Tasmania's salmon industry has struggled amid an outbreak of the bacteria Piscirickettsia salmonis. NewsWire/Scott Gelston Credit: News Corp Australia
Salmon Tasmania chief executive officer John Whittington accused state premier Jeremy Rockliff of 'strangling growth' and breaking commitments to appease the Greens and Independents.
'The Premier has gone back on his word and commitments and shamefully let down every salmon worker, their families, and communities across the state,' Mr Whittington said in a statement on Sunday.
'The Premier has let down the salmon aquaculture industry; strangling growth, guaranteeing a whole host of new red tape, and significantly undermining confidence and investment.'
Mr Whittington said Tasmanian industries, workers, and their families deserved better than being treated like a 'political plaything that is traded away for power'.
'This decision abandons regional Tasmania and sends a dangerous message to any business considering investing in our state,' he said. The review will be carried out by an independent, off-island specialist. NewsWire / Supplied Credit: NewsWire
However Mr Rockliff stood by his decision on Sunday morning, telling reporters the industry should 'embrace' the move.
'This is not something that the industry should fear, it's actually something that the industry should embrace, and embrace the fact that we are wanting to support the industry become better,' he said.
'Better when it comes to the environment … to supporting Tasmania and all the regional Tasmanians and all the jobs that they employ.'
The decision comes just days after Minister for Primary Industries and Water Gavin Pearce on Friday stated an antibiotic, Florfenicol, was being considered by the industry and experts among other options to combat Piscirickettsia salmonis.
However, Mr Pearce noted it hasn't been used in large amounts in Australia.
'A range of options are being considered by industry and experts to deal with Piscirickettsia salmonis, including vaccine development, adjusting production strategies and improving fish health surveillance,' Mr Pearce said.
'Industry has also advised of an alternative antibiotic, Florfenicol, that it wants to use … Our independent EPA and chief veterinary officer will play an important role in providing advice to government and to industry on its use.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Perth Now
an hour ago
- Perth Now
Australia's ‘critical' offering to the US
Australia is key to Donald Trump's goals of weaning the US off cheap Chinese critical minerals, Australia's envoy in Washington says. Critical minerals are just that – minerals, such as lithium, vital for manufacturing advanced technologies, from smartphones and cars to wind turbines and defence systems. Currently, China dominates the space, but Australia has emerged as a challenger, ruffling some feathers in Beijing. Because of their importance to modern tech, Western countries are increasingly viewing critical minerals as a matter of national security and scrambling to bolster sovereign stockpiles and production. In an interview overnight, Australian Ambassador to the US Kevin Rudd said that Xi Jinping's 'ideology' on China's long-term economic development was 'to ensure that the world is dependent on China while China is not dependent on the world'. 'And that in a nutshell is what we see across the whole breadth of industrial policy, from semiconductors through to critical minerals and rare earths,' the former prime minister told the Center for Strategic and International Studies. Australian Ambassador to the US Kevin Rudd says Australia is key to breaking China's grip on critical minerals. Martin Ollman / NewsWire Credit: News Corp Australia Boasting mineral reserves that 'more or less equals the periodic table' and an advanced mining sector, Mr Rudd said Australia was well-placed to help break the dependence on China. 'Geology has been kind to us,' he said, adding that Australia is 'an ancient continent'. 'We have the best mining companies in the world and the biggest mining companies in the world, some of whom have just been meeting with President Trump here in Washington, DC., as well as a whole depth of technical expertise represented in the research faculties of our major universities. 'So put together the geology … put together our processing capacity … and put together the depth and breadth of our mining expertise, I think we're well-placed to assist in diversifying the supply chains, creating resilient supply chains, and helping the United States, under President Trump's leadership, meet his requirements for a resilient America when it comes to critical minerals and rare earths.' Australia's emergence as a competitor in the sector has not gone down well in Beijing. Despite the Chinese President's warm words to Anthony Albanese in July about fair and open trade, his government's actions have made clear that extends to Australian lobsters rather than Australian minerals. Since 2022, Australia's leading producer Lynas Rare Earths has been subjected to a relentless Chinese disinformation campaign targeting its operations both within Australia and abroad. It has not deterred efforts to grow Australia's presence, driven in large part by the defence industry. Mr Rudd said critical minerals should be viewed as 'defence goods', pointing to the tons used in the nuclear-powered submarines Australia is set to get under AUKUS. He said the American-made Virginia-class 'contains within it something like 4.5 tons of critical minerals, rare earths, highly processed'. 'You go to an F-35, you're looking at a high proportion of the actual aircraft itself being derivative of advanced process to rare earth,' he continued. 'So whether we like it or not, the reality is the sharpest edges of what we do in the military hang off the availability of critical minerals in rare earths supply, as well as processed critical minerals in rare earths, as well as critical ... derivatives, such as magnets. 'So I think what President Trump is seeking to do … is trying to find how this now plays into a secure supply chain the United States. 'And as a US ally, we are ready and able to help, and we have the capacity to do so.'
ABC News
3 hours ago
- ABC News
Tasmanian Liberals face challenge implementing policies with new crossbench
Tasmanian Premier Jeremy Rockliff says his minority government remains "committed to working across the parliament", as it plans to make inroads on budget repair, a new state-owned insurance agency, and allowing pets in rentals early in the new term. The state's net debt, which is projected to reach $13 billion by 2027-28, was one of the key reasons the state went to the polls. The budget outlook was a key policy platform for Labor and most members of the crossbench. "It'll be a lot of work," Mr Rockliff said on Wednesday. Within the first week, the government intends to consult with Treasury and government agencies, ahead of the November budget. Mr Rockliff said using the original 2025 budget as a baseline, the party would "work across the political divide" to bring it into shape. Independent MP Peter George said the party needed to show transparency and accountability. "The big problem is going to be whether the Liberal government is prepared to share the information that's necessary for making decisions, and whether it's also prepared to take the responsibility for the state of the budget that we've got now," he said. "I don't have a lot of faith in this Liberal administration. "It takes a long, long time to build trust, confidence and faith, and it can be very easily destroyed. "We need to do this very slowly." Within the first 100 days, the government wants to introduce legislation to advance state-owned insurance agency, TasInsure, planning to have it set up in 2026. The plan was slammed by the opposition, prominent economist Saul Eslake, and the Insurance Council of Australia during the campaign, but heralded as game-changing by the Tasmanian Chamber of Commerce and Industry. Also a priority is amending the Residential Tenancy Act, to give tenants more secure right to keep pets in rentals — a promise the Liberals took to the 2024 election. Labor campaigned this time around with TassieDoc, pledging to deliver five fully bulk-billed clinics across the state. The Liberals quickly matched it, but did not follow on when Labor bumped the number up to 10. Now, the government plans to run an expression of interest for four new bulk-billed clinics within the first 100 days, "based on evidence of need". The Liberals have also promised to release updated costings on the leasing arrangement for Spirit of Tasmania IV, which was docked in Scotland from late 2024 and is due to reach Tasmanian waters this week. Without a majority in parliament, the Liberals have made a number of policy concessions to win over crossbenchers, including phasing out greyhound racing, abandoning a plan to release more native forest for logging and, most recently, a pause on salmon farming expansions while an independent review of the industry takes place. And the Liberals will need to continue appeasing the crossbench if they want to stay in power for a full four years. "There's no time for hubris. There's no need or want for hubris," Mr Rockliff said. But they remain at an impasse when it comes to Hobart's proposed Macquarie Point stadium. Independent MP Kristie Johnston said she did not expect the premier to abandon the project, but "the reality is we are in a power-sharing parliament now". The Project of State Significance (PoSS) process for assessing the project continued throughout the election campaign, and the premier said regardless of whether the PoSS or enabling legislation came before the parliament, everyone in the chamber would have their vote. Shooters, Fishers and Farmers member Carlo di Falco, one of the most conservative crossbenchers, told ABC Mornings he planned to push back on the concessions made that he did not agree with, such as the greyhound racing ban. He said he was "blindsided" by the move. "I'm not going to give Jeremy a free ride, and I've got a better chance of getting a better outcome for my constituents being inside the tent rather than outside, so every time Jeremy gets comfortable in his sleeping bag, I'm going to be kicking it," he said. On Wednesday, Minister for Business, Industry and Resources Felix Ellis announced a $20 million bridging loan to Liberty Bell Bay owner GFG Alliance to ensure the "bright future" of hundreds of Tasmanians. "It will provide a shipment of ore so that workers on site can get on with what they do best and produce manganese through the smelter," he said. Australian Workers Union president Robert Flanagan welcomed the support, but remained disappointed by the salmon review. "What we want to see is a government that supports job opportunities in Tasmania, and we think that [with] the crossbench the government has to work with [it] will be very difficult to achieve that outcome," he said.
Perth Now
4 hours ago
- Perth Now
Lehrmann returns to court to clear name
FOR 6AM Bruce Lehrmann will return to a Sydney court on Thursday as his lawyer attempts to argue that he was 'surprised' by the findings made against him in his damaging defamation suit loss to Network 10 and Lisa Wilkinson. Lehrmann has appealed to the Full Court of the Federal Court following his multimillion dollar loss to Ten and Ms Wilkinson last year. Justice Michael Lee found that Lehrmann – on the civil standard of the balance of probabilities – had raped his colleague Brittany Higgins inside Parliament House in 2019. Lehrmann sued over Ms Wilkinson's interview with Ms Higgins on The Project but Justice Lee made damning findings against him and he was subsequently ordered to pay $2m in Ten's legal costs. The former Liberal staffer has now appealed Justice Lee's decision and is being represented by solicitor Zali Burrows at a three-day hearing. Ten is being represented by Dr Matt Collins SC while barrister Sue Chrysanthou SC is appearing for Ms Wilkinson. Bruce Lehrmann leaves the Federal Court on Wednesday. NewsWire / Nikki Short. Credit: News Corp Australia 'Denial of natural justice' Ms Burrows told the court on Wednesday that Lehrmann was the victim of procedural unfairness because the findings of Justice Lee were different to the case put forward at trial. 'It's a really, serious unfair denial of natural justice if Mr Lehrmann goes through a trial where it's said 'you are accused of A, B, D, E to Ms Higgins, this is the way it happened. And the judge finds 'well I don't find any of those A, B, C, D, E',' Ms Burrows said. However Justice Michael Wigney replied: 'That's not what happened. He did a find … it was A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I … A number of the matters alleged and particularised were found.' Ms Burrows further argued that it was pleaded by Ten and Wilkinson as a 'violent rape' but Justice Lee found it was a 'non-violent rape'. Justice Craig Colvin replied: 'I'm not sure he found a non-violent rape and I'm not sure that's a concept that I understand.' Ms Burrows told the court that Lehrmann was 'taken by surprise' that Justice Lee made findings that differed from Ms Higgins' account and 'he came up with a different version, a softer version.' Bruce Lehrmann was branded Australia's most hated man by his solicitor. NewsWire / John Appleyard Credit: News Corp Australia 'Australia's most hated man' In his judgment, Justice Lee found that Lehrmann could have only been awarded $20,000 had he won the trial. However Ms Burrows said he should be awarded a substantial amount if he had the findings overturned on appeal. She has pointed to media coverage of the trial, 'social media insults he gets' and other 'harassment'. 'He's pretty much become the national joke,' Ms Burrows said. 'As I previously submitted to this court, he's probably Australia's most hated man.' Barrister Sue Chrysanthou and Lisa Wilkinson. NewsWire/Simon Bullard. Credit: News Corp Australia Ten attack's Lehrmann's 'astonishing' claim Dr Collins on Wednesday attacked Lehrmann's argument that he might have given different evidence had he known the findings that Justice Lee was going to make. At trial, Lehrmann told the court that he had no sexual contact with Ms Higgins at Parliament House. Ms Burrows told the court on Wednesday that he was the victim of procedural fairness and was surprised by Justice Lee's findings. But Dr Collins attacked that argument as 'astonishing' given that he has persistently claimed that he did not have sex with Ms Higgins. 'Our learned friend said today at the bar table that well the unfairness resides in the fact they might have called further evidence, although she backed away from that when questioned about that evidence might have been,' Dr Collins said. 'There were only two people in the room. 'But she said Mr Lehrmann's evidence might have been different. 'That's, with respect, an astonishing submission. 'It could only be that had the pleading alleged a sexual assault in which consent was in question, he would have conceded having sexual intercourse with her and argued that he had her consent or thought he had her consent.'
