Eight EU countries still missing cyber rules for critical sectors
The Network and Information Security Directive 2 (NIS2), which was approved back in 2022 aims to protect critical entities, such as energy, transport, banking, water and digital infrastructures, against major cyber incidents.
Countries had to transpose the rules into national legislation by 17 October last year.
The EU executive began an infringement procedure in May against 19 member states for failing to adopt the rules. The countries had two months to take the necessary measures, or else face referral to the EU Court of Justice.
Eleven member states have now done the work, but the remaining eight face potential further Commission action.
A spokesperson for the institution told Euronews that the Commission is 'monitoring member states' replies" and 'once assessed, will propose either closure or in the absence of a satisfactory response [...] next steps of the infringement procedure.'
Under NIS2, companies need to issue a warning within 24 hours and deliver an incident report within 72 hours in case of incidents that cause serious operational disruptions. In case of non-compliance, companies face fines up to €10 million, or 2% of worldwide revenue, whichever is higher.
In December, the Commission will present an 'omnibus' simplification package in a bid to identify reporting obligations in existing digital legislation that can be cut to ease pressure on enterprises, particularly SMEs. Cyber rules are expected to be part of that.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Euronews
8 hours ago
- Euronews
EU Commission reacts to Poland's alleged misuse of recovery funds
On Friday, the news website reported that a map appeared on the National Recovery Plan (NRP) website, showing companies that had received subsidies from the European Union. What began as a simple publication online quickly sparked a dispute online, particularly on X, as users began to point out examples of alleged misallocations of EU funds. Politicians and the media subsequently commented on the matter, calling for answers. The expenditures of companies that received EU grants allegedly included company yachts, solariums, furniture, and coffee machines. Poland qualified for almost €60 billion in funding from the EU's Reconstruction and Resilience Fund. Such allocations were aimed at rebuilding member states' economies after the COVID-19 pandemic. In order to receive the funding, each EU country had to submit a National Recovery Plan (NERP) detailing how the funds would be spent to support post-pandemic economies. Under the former Law and Justice (PiS) government, Poland's access to funding was blocked by the EU due to a rule-of-law dispute between the bloc and its member state. Unblocking reconstruction funds was a key election promise made by Donald Tusk and his Civic Platform party ahead of the 2023 parliamentary elections. Some €280 million was earmarked for the hospitality sector, which suffered heavy losses due to successive pandemic-related lockdowns. A dedicated website presented requests from businesses in the sector, but this service has since become unavailable. Nevertheless, media reports have emerged detailing how some of the money was spent, including on yachts, saunas, solariums, and furniture. The issue of KPO aid to the hotel and catering industry was addressed by Prime Minister Donald Tusk during a speech given on Friday. "I will not accept any waste of KPO funds" - said the Prime Minister. Polish president's reaction Numerous politicians, from both the left and the right, quickly reacted to accusations of misallocation of funds, a number of politicians. Among them was the recently-inaugurated president of Poland, Karol Nawrocki. "I am often asked by journalists where we should get the money for [my proposed programs]. Today is a very important day [regarding this matter]. We have found out how the NRP funds have been distributed in Poland. I do not want funds on behalf of 10.5 million Poles spent on saunas, solariums and coffee machines. I want funding for Polish families," Nawrocki said during a speech on Friday. The Regional Public Prosecutor's Office in Warsaw has begun preliminary investigations into media reports of irregularities in the awarding of grants from the NRP. The President of the Polish Agency for Enterprise Development, Katarzyna Duber-Stachurska, was dismissed after doubts emerged about how EU funds were spent. European Commission intervention European Commission spokesman Maciej Berestecki stressed in an interview with Polish radio station RMF FM that "Poland is obliged to take clarifying action" on the awarding of KPO grants". Poland will now have to submit a payment request in November so that the European Commission can assess the projects' compliance with the NRP criteria. According to the Commission's press service, "It is the duty of Member States to take all appropriate measures to protect the financial interests of the Union." The Commission has the possibility to intervene if the Polish authorities do not react appropriately, above all in situations of fraud. "If we see that this does not work, the European Public Prosecutor's Office and OLAF [the Commission's anti-fraud office] will step in," they explained.
Euronews
17 hours ago
- Euronews
Brexit sends Brits to Europe for Louboutins in a blow to UK luxury
Brits are swapping London's glittering storefronts for Paris' grands magasins and Milan's Quadrilatero della moda — and the numbers behind the luxury exodus are startling. Since tax-free shopping became possible for UK visitors in the EU after Brexit in January 2021, British consumers have increasingly directed their high-end spending towards brands and stores across the Channel. According to a recent report published by the Association of International Retail (AIR), Britons shelled out €854 million (£730mn) on VAT-free shopping in the EU in 2024, a five-fold leap from €169mn in 2021. "This is not the same people spending a bit more — it's a whole new shopping-led tourism market spending additionally on hotels, travel, restaurants, etc.," the AIR report stated. When the UK left the European Union, its shoppers became non-EU visitors or third-country travellers and instantly became entitled to VAT-free shopping. According to the EU's VAT directive, retailers in the bloc must provide shoppers with the option of reclaiming no less than 15%, with most countries applying an average rate of 20%, of the cost of the item. This can be particularly appealing when it comes to high-end or luxury items. Say you decide to buy the TikTok-viral Loewe Puzzle Bag during a trip to Paris or Spain. The small one retails at around €3,600 and the large one is currently priced at around €4,200, according to prices listed on Loewe's official website. With the VAT returns, you would get €700 back for the small bag and €840 for the big one. Suddenly, a weekend trip to the continent might seem more appealing. "So, they are spending hundreds of millions of additional euros on hotels, restaurants, transport, fun... at Britain's expense," the AIR report added, highlighting the blow to UK tourism. According to the Paris Tourism Office, there was a 44% spike in visitors from the UK visiting the French capital in 2023, the highest increase among European tourists in the ranking. No VAT-free benefits in the UK When the UK left the EU in January 2021, it proceeded to abolish its previous VAT scheme, citing cost and complexity. This made the UK the only major global shopping destination not offering VAT-free shopping to any international tourists. The only way you can currently buy VAT-free goods in the UK is if they are bought online and shipped directly to an address outside the UK. Northern Ireland has retained a VAT-free scheme, meaning that if you purchase goods there as an EU citizen and fly out within three months, you will get your VAT tax returned to you upon leaving. Even big-ticket items people buy at the airport — such as in the stores in the duty-free area — were stripped of the VAT-free status. So for UK travellers who would usually purchase laptops, smartphones or designer cosmetics at the airport, largely the same prices apply as the ones they pay in stores at home. Alcohol and tobacco purchases are exceptions, as these can be bought duty-free. Luxury retailers are furious Britain's luxury lobby is unhappy about the tax changes. Walpole — the official body representing Britain's luxury sector including Rolls-Royce, Burberry, and Harrods — published a study in May, claiming that luxury exports to the EU were "up to 43% lower than they may have been without Brexit". In the fashion and accessories sector alone, Brexit incurred a 64% loss. "This points to a substantial 'Brexit effect' on this industry which supports over 450,000 jobs and contributes £14.6 billion (€16.8bn) to the Exchequer" the report continues. Crucially, British luxury brands are not just losing sales to European rivals, they are also watching demand for UK-made goods slump across the EU and global markets. The luxury industry is uniquely dominant in Europe's history, having emerged from centuries of craftsmanship and artisanal work matched with the latest developments in artistry and design. 'Luxury is a global phenomenon, but it calls the UK and Europe its home,' Walpole CEO Helen Brocklebank said in a statement. The EU currently produces 74% of global luxury goods, and 62% of those goods are exported outside the EU, according to the European Commission — a profit opportunity the UK luxury industry is missing out on. "The British luxury sector has incredible growth potential, with a projection to reach £125bn (€144bn) by 2028," Brocklebank continued. "However, to achieve this ambition, we cannot afford to have one arm tied behind our back. Strong links and favourable trading with Europe remain essential to reaching this forecast, alongside our success in other global markets and key to supporting craft-led and high value manufacturing in the UK." Brands report that delays, surprise courier fees and inconsistent border checks have pushed EU customers to rival European labels and left a trail of negative reviews for UK brands, leading to a confidence shock on the continent that brands are not able to quell on their own without policy changes. They claim that the EU market is not replaceable, namely that they cannot just pivot to another market that would match the demand. Continental Europe is both their biggest customer base and the linchpin of their supply chains, with brands sourcing many leathers in Tuscan tanneries and continental brands buying from Scottish cashmere mills for their own products. 'At a time of global uncertainty and trade challenges, the Government must seize the opportunity to smooth the trade barriers with our closest and largest trading partner," Brocklebank continued. Apart from the UK-EU relations, luxury sales have faced additional challenges from rising US tariffs and reduced consumer demand in China. Brits love their luxury A YouGov poll shows there is an appetite to spend more on luxury. According to a 2024 study, a quarter of Britons bought a luxury product in the previous year and 45% of those shoppers say they are happy to pay extra for premium brands. More than half spent up to £500, while 9% blew through £5,000. More than a third or 34% of luxury shoppers say they are likely to spend the same amount on luxury goods this year, compared to the previous year. So until Westminster considers relaunching some form of VAT-free equivalent benefits, every swipe of a British card in the EU may ring up another missed sale at home.
Euronews
a day ago
- Euronews
Orbán says Europe risks being 'sidelined' if Trump-Putin talks happen
Hungary's Prime Minister Viktor Orbán said on Friday that Europe risks being "sidelined" if a summit between US President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin to discuss ending the war in Ukraine takes place. Speaking to Hungary's state broadcaster, Orbán said "if the Russian-American summit comes, that's good, because there can finally be peace. But the Europeans will be left out of this, we will be sidelined in managing the security issues of our own continent." Orbán added that "as soon as possible", whether that be before or after the potential Russia-US meeting, there should be a Russian-European summit on the war. Orbán, a harsh critic of the European Union, suggested that such a meeting should not be led by leaders of European institutions. "Their knowledge would be scarce in Moscow," he said. Instead, Orbán said French President Emmanuel Macron and German Chancellor Friedrich Merz should "negotiate on behalf of Europe." Orbán is widely considered to be Putin's closest partner in the EU and has maintained friendly relations with the Kremlin even after Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022. "In my opinion, if Europe wants to take the decisions about its future into its own hands, it cannot sit at home like an upset toddler, talking bad about the Russian president," Orbán said. While most EU countries have offered political, financial, and military support to Kyiv, Hungary has charted a starkly different course, refusing to supply Ukraine with weapons or to allow their transit through Hungarian territory, demanding sanctions relief and rapprochement with Russia. Brussels has long been at odds with Budapest over perceived democratic backsliding. The EU is currently withholding approximately €9.5 billion in COVID-19 recovery funding and €8.4 billion in cohesion funds over those concerns. Brussels and Budapest over the years have been at loggerheads on a range of issues, most recently that of Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine, but the situation has been made worse by the financial issue. In March, Orbán vowed to rid his country of those he claims work for the interests of foreign powers, saying his right-wing government will eliminate a global "shadow army" serving the European Union and a "liberal American empire." The Hungarian leader, in power since 2010, has accelerated his longstanding efforts to crack down on critics such as media outlets, civil rights and anti-corruption groups, which he says have undermined Hungary's sovereignty by receiving financial assistance from international donors. Orbán, an ally of Trump, has applauded the US administration's actions to dismantle the US Agency for International Development, claiming, with no evidence, that it was used to fund liberal causes in Hungary aimed at toppling his government.
