Ex-ICICI Bank CEO Chanda Kochhar held guilty in Rs 640000000 bribery for approving Rs 300 Crore loan
This order overturns the earlier clean chit she received from the PMLA Adjudicating Authority and supports the Enforcement Directorate's (ED) provisional attachment of her assets, framing the transaction as a prima facie case of money laundering. Conflict Of Interest In Kochhar's Approval To Videocon
The Tribunal showed a clear conflict of interest in Kochhar's approval of the loan. Shortly after disbursing the funds to a Videocon entity, Rs 64 crore was traced to NuPower Renewables Pvt. Ltd. (NRPL), a company promoted by her husband Deepak Kochhar. This sum was funneled via Supreme Energy Pvt. Ltd. (SEPL), which is reportedly linked to Videocon's promoter Venugopal Dhoot. While the Tribunal acknowledged that a final determination rests with the Trial Court, it concluded there was sufficient preliminary evidence to justify the attachment order under money laundering charges.
The bench of the Appellate Tribunal, while delivering its findings, stated that it could not accept the justification offered by Chanda Kochhar for presiding over the committee meeting that sanctioned a Rs 300 crore loan to the Videocon Group, an entity she was familiar with. The tribunal observed that Kochhar could not claim ignorance of the relationship and, therefore, her participation in the loan sanctioning process was in clear violation of ICICI Bank's internal rules and policies. Rs 64 Crore Fund Diversion To NRPL
The tribunal further noted that immediately after the disbursement of the Rs 300 crore loan, a sum of Rs 64 crore was diverted to NuPower Renewables Pvt. Ltd. (NRPL), where Deepak Kochhar, the respondent and husband of Chanda Kochhar, was managing the company. He held 95% stakes in Supreme Energy Pvt. Ltd. (SEPL), which in turn controlled NRPL. Notably, V.N. Dhoot resigned from SEPL on January 15, 2009, transferring control of the company to Deepak Kochhar.
In its order, the tribunal criticized the Adjudicating Authority for ignoring evidence and instead relying on irrelevant considerations. It stated that the Authority had disproportionately focused on the shareholding structure of NRPL while overlooking the fact that Deepak Kochhar was the Managing Director and in full control of the company's operations. This was further supported by the statement of V.N. Dhoot recorded under Section 50 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), 2002, wherein he categorically affirmed that Deepak Kochhar was running the affairs of the company.
(With Inputs From ANI)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
27 minutes ago
- Time of India
IIT-G: Fee revised after 7 years to support students' welfare
Guwahati: IIT Guwahati authorities on Wednesday said a fee hike was imminent to support the cause of the students, even as PhD students at the institute continued their second day of protests on Wednesday against substantial fee increase across various heads. The students conducted a protest march on the campus on Tuesday night, while the IIT Guwahati administration maintained that the hike in fee has been made 'to support enhanced student welfare and activities'. 'IIT Guwahati revised the fee after seven years, and the increase for continuing students is Rs 8,900 per semester. This was made to support enhanced student welfare and activities, including increased allocations for hostel-level events, cultural and sports festivals, and Gymkhana-led initiatives beyond just Inter-IIT participation,' IIT Guwahati authority said in a statement on Wednesday. Following the fee increase announcement last month, PG and PhD students requested an open discussion to understand the fee component increases. The administration stated they held a four-hour discussion on July 17, explaining the fee increase details. "The students were also informed that the institute made provisions for loans through the Students' Welfare Fund to support the needy ones. At the conclusion of the meeting, with the clarifications in hand, the student body was asked to submit their representation if they had any further concerns. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Discover the upgrades that set the New Koda 2 Pro apart Ooni Pizza Ovens Learn More Undo No submission has been received so far," the IIT Guwahati authority claimed on Wednesday. The administration noted that the protest outside the administrative building that started on Tuesday was unexpected, occurring without prior notice or formal representation of concerns. "While a small group of students is protesting, the majority of the 8,400-strong student body is not participating in the protest," the administration claimed, although protesting PhD students asserted support from others unable to join. "This small group of protesting students bypassed the elected student body," the administration added, noting the elected student body statement: "Despite the ongoing dialogue within the elected student body to put up a proposal for consideration of fee revision, this small group of protesting students disobeyed the student representatives, jeopardising their efforts at reconciliation. The elected student body is not part of this protest and is also working through the proper channel for an amicable solution to the increased components of the fee. " The protesters highlight that PhD students' fee increased by Rs 10,900 for the July-Nov semester 2025, rising from Rs 34,800 in Jan-May 2025 to Rs 45,700.
Time of India
27 minutes ago
- Time of India
RERA slaps 4.5L fine on infra firm for fraud in plot sale
Cleared: dk Hyderabad: Telangana Real Estate Regulatory Authority (TGRERA) has imposed a penalty of 4.5 lakh on Roy All Diamond Infra Developers for misrepresentation and unauthorised marketing of a residential plot. The authority found that the firm collected 9 lakh from complainant Madikonda Mallesh without any legal ownership or authorisation over the property in question. Mallesh, a 40-year-old govt employee from Mallapur, filed the complaint after discovering that the plot he agreed to purchase in the venture 'Kaasvi E-City' did not belong to the respondent. According to the complaint, Nayak introduced himself as a partner in Roy All Diamond Infra Developers and claimed to be the absolute owner of Plot No. 43, measuring 150 square yards in Ferozguda village, Ibrahimpatnam mandal. He demanded a sale consideration of 36 lakh and received 9 lakh as advance through multiple payments in March 2024. You Can Also Check: Hyderabad AQI | Weather in Hyderabad | Bank Holidays in Hyderabad | Public Holidays in Hyderabad Nayak executed a sale agreement on June 7, 2024, with a clause requiring the balance payment of 27 lakh within 40 days. However, the respondent became untraceable after signing the agreement. Upon verifying the property's Encumbrance Certificate, the complainant discovered that the land actually belonged to another real estate developer. Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Hidden Cause Found: Dementia And Memory Loss Linked To This Habit Memory and Health Click Here Undo by Taboola by Taboola Furthermore, RERA registration number cited in the respondent's brochure was found to be false. TGRERA Orders Refund with Interest and Seeks Probe into Project Promoters TGRERA, in its findings, observed that the respondent had no legal title or authority over the land and that his conduct constituted a violation of Sections 11(4)(a) and 12 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016. In addition to the penalty under Section 61, the authority directed the respondent to refund the 9 lakh received from the complainant with 11% annual interest, calculated from the date of each payment until the amount is realised. The refund has to be completed within 30 days from the date of the order. Noting "unauthorised and deceptive conduct," the authority also instructed Telangana RERA secretary to initiate an inquiry and issue a show cause notice to the registered promoters of Kaasvi E-City. The notice seeks a written explanation on whether Nayak was ever authorised to market or collect payments for the project, and requires submission of all related agreements and correspondence. The order was issued under Sections 37 and 38 of the RERA Act, empowering the authority to take such enforcement actions. The authority has made it clear that any further non-compliance with the refund or penalty payment timelines would invite additional consequences under the Act.
Time of India
27 minutes ago
- Time of India
Rights panel slams Haryana cops for stripping disabled CA, orders ₹50k relief
Chandigarh: The Haryana Human Rights Commission (HHRC) has indicted a police assistant sub-inspector (ASI) and a constable of forcibly making an arrested chartered accountant (CA), who has a physical disability, to strip to his underwear, allow a relative of his estranged wife to make a video of him in the embarrassing position, and then distribute it. The commission on Wednesday asked the Haryana home department to pay a compensation of Rs 50,000 to the victim, a resident of Faridabad who was arrested in a molestation case registered on a complaint by his wife at Saran police station. The order came from a full quorum bench comprising commission chairman Justice Lalit Batra, judicial member Kuldeep Jain, and member Deep Bhatia, while announcing partial relief in a case pending for three years. The incident dates to May 2021, when the ASI and constable had gone to arrest the victim. The victim alleged that after his arrest, the cops instructed him to remove his clothes in public view. Though he resisted, they coerced him into disrobing himself to his underwear, he alleged. Thereafter, he claimed, the cops facilitated a relative of his estranged wife to click his photo and shoot a video while in a semi-nude condition, and the same was circulated. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Enhance Online Presence and Get Customers [Try Now] Undo "This was not just a grave violation of human rights of the person by cops but resulted in traumatic stigma on the complainant as the video and pictures shot by private persons were circulated in private circles. Now, we have directed the home department to compensate the victim, and the department is at liberty to recover the fine from the errant cops identified as ASI Jagmati and constable Rakesh," said the commissioner in the order. The complainant also claimed that his request to the office of the Faridabad commissioner of police (CP) did not bear fruit. Even before HHRC, the police force was not cooperative and favoured the errant cops by not sharing the video footage of the lock-up. On reinvestigation, a DCP-level officer admitted to the victim being semi-nude but claimed that the victim volunteered to remove his clothes due to the summer heat. The commission did not buy this theory and assigned the investigation to its own investigating team headed by an SP-level officer. During investigation, the allegations were found to be true, and the complainant also brought on record a clip and photographs circulated by the relative of his estranged wife. "Since the availability of the video clip was an admitted fact supported by circumstantial evidence, this was enough to indict the errant cops to announce this order," said Bhatia, HHRC member.
