logo
Forget smartphones and wokery. There's an even greater threat to our children's education

Forget smartphones and wokery. There's an even greater threat to our children's education

Yahoo2 days ago

Given that today's children appear to spend much of their time in school being taught that the Vikings were champions of diversity and that human beings should be encouraged to choose between one or more of 72 different genders, you may fear that educational standards in this country are slipping somewhat. But perhaps we should be grateful. Because, believe it or not, things could actually be worse.
Say, for example, we were to follow a radical proposal made the other day by Daniel Susskind. Dr Susskind is an eminent economist, as well as the author of a book entitled A World Without Work: Technology, Automation and How We Should Respond. And, speaking at the Hay festival, he argued that the traditional school timetable should be ripped up, so that children can instead focus on learning to use artificial intelligence.
'We should be spending a third of the time that we have with students teaching them how to use these technologies,' he declared. 'How to write effective prompts and use these systems, get them to do what we want them to do…'
I appreciate that Dr Susskind is an exceptionally learned and intelligent man. None the less, I for one think his proposal sounds horrifying. We often talk about the need to ban smartphones in schools. Which is fair enough. But my priority would be to ban AI.
The fundamental purpose of education, after all, is to teach children how to think. AI, however, does the opposite. It teaches them that they don't need to think. Because it will do their thinking for them.
For proof, look at what's already happening in universities. In April, The Chronicle of Higher Education – an American journal – reported that ever-growing numbers of students were essentially outsourcing their studies to AI. When a professor at New York University tried to prevent his students from using AI to complete their assignments, he was met with consternation. Some students protested that he was interfering with their 'learning styles'. Another complained: '[If] you're asking me to go from point A to point B, why wouldn't I use a car to get there?' Meanwhile, one student asked for an extension to a deadline, 'on the grounds that ChatGPT was down the day the assignment was due'.
Still, I suppose we'd better get used to this sort of thing. It seems that a new educational era is upon us. One in which teachers get AI to set homework, pupils get AI to complete it, and then teachers get AI to mark it. Soon enough, there will be no need for human involvement at any stage of the process.
So, as schools will effectively be superfluous, the Government might as well just shut them all down. In fact, I urge it to do so as quickly as possible. Such a move would immediately free up tens of billions of pounds a year. And since, in due course, AI will be taking all the jobs that today's children could have grown up to do, we'll need the money to pay their benefits.
Heartfelt thanks to Ash Regan, the Scottish nationalist and one-time candidate to succeed Nicola Sturgeon as First Minister. Because on Sunday, she provided us with the one of the most memorable political quotes of the year. Even if not necessarily on purpose.
Ms Regan was being interviewed by The Herald newspaper about her plans to clamp down on prostitution in Scotland, by criminalising the buying of sex. Wasn't there a risk, asked The Herald's reporter, that these plans might inadvertently drive prostitution underground?
Ms Regan scoffed. Plainly she'd never heard anything so absurd.
'If you even think for one second, you cannot possibly drive prostitution underground,' she snorted. 'If you had a lot of women in underground cellars with a locked door, how would the punters get to them?'
Having digested these extraordinary words, we can, I believe, draw only one conclusion. Ms Regan is 51 years old. And yet, during over a half a century on this planet, she has never heard – or at least, never understood – the phrase 'driven underground'. And so she'd taken it literally.
After the interview, we must hope, a kindly aide will have taken her to one side, and gently explained that the expression is purely figurative. Otherwise, I fear that, despite Ms Regan's initial scoffing, she'll begin to worry that the reporter had a point – and that Scottish pimps really will take to opening brothels deep beneath the Earth's surface.
If so, we must wait to see what revisions Ms Regan might make to her plans. Perhaps she will recommend that the Scottish NHS supply all prostitutes with free vitamin D tablets, to make up for the lack of sunlight they'll be getting.
'Way of the World' is a twice-weekly satirical look at the headlines while aiming to mock the absurdities of the modern world. It is published at 6am every Tuesday and Saturday
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Pressure mounts on Carney to match Trump's tariffs on steel and aluminum
Pressure mounts on Carney to match Trump's tariffs on steel and aluminum

Yahoo

time38 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Pressure mounts on Carney to match Trump's tariffs on steel and aluminum

OTTAWA — Canada's steel industry is calling on the federal government to quickly match U.S. President Donald Trump's 50 per cent tariffs on steel and aluminum — part of a growing chorus demanding swift retaliation. Canadian Steel Producers Association CEO Catherine Cobden said Trump's tariffs are delivering a crushing blow to the Canadian steel industry. 'At a 25 per cent tariff rate, we saw significant layoffs, curtailed investments and a significant drop of shipments to the United States," she said in a statement sent to media. "At a 50 per cent tariff rate, the U.S. market is effectively closed to Canadian steel, leaving billions of dollars of Canadian steel without a market. "We need urgent action to protect our industry by fully re-instating our retaliatory tariffs on U.S. steel (to) match this latest American escalation." Prime Minister Mark Carney said Wednesday that his government will take "some time" to craft its response to the increased U.S. tariffs. Trump signed an executive order Tuesday to double the levies on steel and aluminum to 50 per cent. He claimed it was necessary to protect national security and industries in the United States. Carney said Canada is in "intensive" trade discussions with the U.S. about the "unlawful and unjustified" tariffs. "We will take some time — not much, some time — because we are in intensive discussions right now with the Americans on our trading relationship," Carney said when asked about his government's response. "Those discussions are progressing. I would note that the American action is global action. It's not one targeted at Canada. So we'll take some time, but not more." Ontario Premier Doug Ford said he told Carney that Ottawa should add another 25 per cent to Canada's retaliatory tariffs on steel to match Trump's levies. "We can't sit back and let President Trump steamroll us," Ford said at the Ontario legislature on Wednesday. "We need to act immediately. We can't just sit back because every single day that goes by, it gives uncertainty to the sectors, it adds additional costs on the steel." Ontario is home to six of Canada's 13 steel plants. Industry Minister Mélanie Joly said she's spoken with at least ten steel and aluminum sector CEOs and knows that many communities are anxious. She said the government will take a moment before it proceeds with any kind of counter-punch. "We are looking at different scenarios right now and we will take a decision, but we need a bit more time right now. Not too long," she said. Interim NDP Leader Don Davies said Carney should act soon because "industry and jobs are at stake." "I'm a little bit surprised that Prime Minister Carney needs time. These tariffs have been foreshadowed for some time," he said. "We need action." Canadian Labour Congress president Bea Bruske said the government should meet "force with force" by imposing surtaxes and blocking U.S. steel and aluminum. She called for emergency reforms to employment insurance for laid-off workers. Canada is a major supplier of steel and aluminum to the United States and economists have warned the tariffs could lead to cost increases for Americans. Both metals are used in a wide range of industries, from construction and the auto sector to the manufacture of products like soup cans and paper clips. Liberal MPs from steel towns in Ontario were visibly shaken when they entered caucus Wednesday. MP Lisa Hepfner of Hamilton, a major steel hub, did not mince words when asked about the impact of 50 per cent tariffs. "Thousands of jobs lost," she said. "The end of the industry." MP Terry Sheehan represents Sault Ste. Marie, where Algoma Steel is located. He said the industry was already struggling under 25 per cent tariffs. "If industry goes down in northern Ontario, you don't just lose your job, which is a terrible thing. You lose the equity in your home when those industries shutter," Sheehan said, although he quickly added that "we're not there" yet. Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre posted on social media that Trump's move to double tariffs was "wrong and unjustified" and that Canada must "take a strong stance in response to these tariffs that gets a deal as soon as possible." Conservative deputy leader Melissa Lantsman called for an emergency debate in Parliament on tariffs. "For steelworkers who say they are on the verge of collapse, for families who are worried about keeping food on the table or keeping a roof over their head, for businesses that need certainty, Liberal ministers need to answer to this House," Lantsman said on the Commons floor shortly after question period on Wednesday. House Speaker Francis Scarpaleggia denied the request, saying he didn't believe it met the criteria for an emergency debate under the House rules. — With files from Kelly Geraldine Malone in Washington, Allison Jones in Toronto and The Associated Press This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 4, 2025. David Baxter and Kyle Duggan, The Canadian Press Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

This Woman Is Showing The Effects Of The Tariff War In China, And Hooooo Boy You Are Not Ready For This
This Woman Is Showing The Effects Of The Tariff War In China, And Hooooo Boy You Are Not Ready For This

Yahoo

time43 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

This Woman Is Showing The Effects Of The Tariff War In China, And Hooooo Boy You Are Not Ready For This

Here in the US, we're experiencing the effects of President Trump's tariff wars every single day as prices continue going up. If you're wondering how the tariffs are affecting people in other countries, Emily ( a Canadian living in China, recently shared a video explaining exactly how things have changed for her in the grocery store over there. Emily's video starts out, "Hello from China. So, I'm in a grocery store right now, and I wanted to show you how the American tariffs are affecting Chinese customers." @ / Via "So, I was gonna get some beef for dinner tonight, and I saw this," she says, holding up a package of beef. "What used to be here is American beef. But now, as you can see, it says Australian beef." @ / Via "And I did look around," she added. "I couldn't find one single pack of beef from America. So I guess China just stopped buying beef from America, and it went straight to Australia." @ / Via "The whole idea that China is hurting because of the American tariffs? Well, they're not, because they are not as dependent on the US. In fact, only 18% of Chinese imports come from America. And for stuff like beef and soy, they can just go somewhere else easily." @ / Via Trading Economics says that the number is even lower than Emily suggested, putting the percentage of China's imports that come from the US at around 7% in 2023. According to the USDA, the US exported $1.58 billion worth of beef to China in 2024. Reuters also notes that in 2022, "soybeans were the No. 1 U.S. product imported by China," but that "the U.S. has lost competitive advantage to Brazil." "So I guess I'm having Australian beef for dinner tonight instead of American beef," Emily continued. "And honestly, because of the food quality, I probably trust Australian beef better." "And this box of beef right here is 50 RMB, which is about $7 USD." "So to answer the question, China ain't hurting. And if anything, I think we're probably doing even better because now [we have] better beef that tastes better and at a better price." @ / Via "So, thank you, Trump, for that," she concluded. Unsurprisingly, commenters had a lot to say on the topic. "USA put sanctions on themselves," one said. "No country is hurting apart from the US," said another. "I don't see China going back to the USA for those products in the next 4 years. Sadly a lot of American farmers are big fans of Trump." The video even made its way over to Twitter (now known as X), where even more people shared their opinions. "So Trump trying to beef up American exports, actually lead to losing customers to export to," said one. "Our tariff tiff countries have other options. America isn't the only trade partner in the world. We're even less desirable now because we aren't trusted." "There's nothing the United States can offer that the rest of the world doesn't already have. Except for serial killers and deep-fried hot dogs." You can watch Emily's full video below, and follow her over on TikTok. What do you think? Were you surprised to learn how the tariffs are affecting people in other countries? Let us know in the comments.

US vetoes UN Security Council resolution demanding Gaza ceasefire
US vetoes UN Security Council resolution demanding Gaza ceasefire

CNN

time43 minutes ago

  • CNN

US vetoes UN Security Council resolution demanding Gaza ceasefire

The United States on Wednesday vetoed a UN Security Council resolution calling for an 'immediate, unconditional and permanent' ceasefire between Israel and the militant group Hamas in Gaza. The US was the only nation to oppose the resolution. Fourteen others, including the United Kingdom, voted in favor. There were no abstentions. Dorothy Camille Shea, the United States ambassador to the UN, said the US opposed the resolution because it did not call for Hamas to disarm and leave Gaza. '(The resolution) is unacceptable for what it does say, it is unacceptable for what it does not say, and it is unacceptable for the manner in which it has been advanced,' she said in comments before the vote took place. The US 'has taken the very clear position since this conflict began that Israel has a right to defend itself, which includes defeating Hamas and ensuring they are never again in a position to threaten Israel. In this regard, any product that undermines our close ally Israel's security is a nonstarter,' she added. This is not the first time the US has vetoed a UN Security Council draft resolution on Gaza. In November 2024, it vetoed one calling for an immediate, unconditional and permanent ceasefire, on the grounds it would not have secured the release of hostages. The United Kingdom said it 'regrets' that the latest resolution 'was unable to reach a consensus.' 'The United Kingdom voted in favor of this resolution today because of the intolerable situation in Gaza,' the UK's Permanent Representative to the United Nations in New York Barbara Woodward said following the vote. 'We are determined to see an end to this war, secure the release of the hostages held by Hamas and alleviate the catastrophic humanitarian situation for Palestinians in Gaza,' she added. Woodward described Israel's expansion of its military operations in Gaza and its severe restrictions on aid as 'unjustifiable, disproportionate, and counterproductive.' Israel in mid May launched a major new offensive in Gaza it says is aimed at destroying Hamas and freeing hostages, sparking condemnation from the United Nations and aid organizations who warn civilians are bearing the brunt of the expanded assault. The ambassador also said the UK condemned Hamas' October 7, 2023, attack on Israel and demanded the militant group release all the hostages 'immediately and unconditionally,' saying 'Hamas can have no role in the future governance of Gaza.' The ambassador also restated the UK's position that 'a two-state solution is the only way to bring the long-lasting peace, stability and security that both Israelis and Palestinians deserve.' Meanwhile, Israel's Foreign Minister Gideon Sa'ar thanked US President Donald Trump and the US administration 'for standing shoulder to shoulder with Israel and vetoing this one-sided resolution in the UN Security Council.' 'The proposed resolution only strengthens Hamas and undermines American efforts to achieve a hostage deal,' he added in a post on X shortly after the voting. The draft text had demanded 'an immediate, unconditional and permanent ceasefire in Gaza respected by all parties' and the 'immediate and unconditional lifting of all restrictions on the entry of humanitarian aid into Gaza and its safe and unhindered distribution at scale.' It also demanded 'the immediate and unconditional release of all hostages held by Hamas and other groups.' Israel launched the war in Gaza after Hamas and other Palestinian armed groups carried out a surprise attack on southern Israel on October 7, 2023, killing 1,200 people, mostly civilians, and taking 251 hostages. It was the deadliest terror attack in Israel's history. The Palestinian Ministry of Health in Gaza said the number of people killed by Israel's offensive in Gaza in the wake of the October 7 attacks now exceeds 54,000, most of whom are women and children.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store