How to protect your assets from nursing home costs
As you or your parents get older, it's natural to start thinking about the future and the financial impact of long-term care. Many people worry that nursing home costs and medical expenses could affect their life savings and the legacy they want to leave for their families. But by familiarizing yourself with the law, you can learn how to protect assets from a nursing home and create a stable future for yourself and your loved ones, LegalZoom says.
Protecting assets from nursing home costs isn't about avoiding the costs of care—rather, it's about legally preserving your assets according to your wishes. According to the National Council on Aging, the average cost of a private nursing home room in the U.S. is just over $9,700 per month—or more than $100,000 per year—and it's only expected to rise.
Many people rely on Medicaid benefits for long-term care, but Medicaid has strict asset eligibility limits, and you may have to 'spend down' your assets to qualify. The Medicaid system also has a five-year "look-back" period that's designed to keep applicants from giving assets away or selling them at less than fair market value in order to qualify. That's why many of these strategies for protecting assets from nursing home costs require advance planning—as in, at least five years before you'll need nursing home care.
There are several strategies you can use to protect assets from nursing home costs. Here are some of the most effective ways to afford the end-of-life care you or your loved ones need.
1. Purchase long-term care insurance
Long-term care (LTC) insurance covers the cost of a nursing home, assisted living facility, adult day care, or home health care for people who are unable to take care of themselves. With an LTC plan in place, you'll have a way to pay nursing home care costs without emptying out your savings account.
There's a price for that coverage, though. "The cost of long-term care insurance has gone up dramatically and many people hesitate to purchase a product which is available if they need it, but much like term life insurance, has no cash value if they do not need to go into a nursing home," says elder law attorney Steven Weisman.
When purchasing this protection, keep in mind that the Department of Health and Human Services says 22 percent of adults will need care for more than five years. Only 12% will need care for less than a year. Long-term care needs can add up, making LTC insurance worth it in the eyes of many.
2. Purchase a Medicaid-compliant annuity
A Medicaid-compliant annuity is a special type of annuity that helps protect assets by turning them into regular monthly income payments that Medicaid can't count against you. Both individuals and married couples can purchase these annuities, but they're especially relevant for married couples when there's a healthy spouse who isn't in a care facility.
If a couple has assets that would disqualify the applicant spouse from Medicaid, they can invest those funds into a Medicaid-compliant annuity to create a monthly income stream for the healthy spouse. When properly structured, it's a way to 'spend down' and reduce the income Medicaid considers when deciding if you qualify for that assistance.
"Annuity purchasers are effectively giving a lump sum of money to an annuity company in exchange for equal amounts of monthly payments to a healthy spouse while the other unhealthy spouse is receiving medical assistance subsidized by Medicaid," explains Shawn Plummer, CEO of The Annuity Expert.
People tend to make this purchase when they're in a last-minute or crisis planning situation, notes Plummer. However, not all annuities are Medicaid-compliant, and those that are have specific requirements, such as being non-transferable, irrevocable, and set to pay out over your life expectancy. It's important not to rush into an annuity, and consult with an elder law attorney who understands Medicaid rules.
3. Form a life estate
Wondering how to avoid a nursing home taking your house? A life estate is a legal arrangement that allows a homeowner to transfer ownership of their primary residence to another person (usually a family member) while also remaining an owner until they die, even if death occurs in a nursing home. It protects the home from being counted as an asset for Medicaid purposes, so you get more coverage for nursing home costs.
With a life estate, 'The home passes to the 'remainderman,' who is the person listed on the deed as the person to inherit the property upon the death of the 'life tenant,'" says Weisman. He adds that it differs from a joint tenancy in that until the homeowner dies, the 'remainderman' has no interest in the property.
4. Put your assets in an irrevocable trust
An irrevocable trust is a legal entity that holds and protects assets for designated beneficiaries. When you place assets in an irrevocable trust, you no longer maintain control over them directly. Instead, the assets are managed by a trustee, who can make distributions according to the trust's terms. You can put your home, business, investments, and other assets into the trust. You can even put your life insurance death benefit into an irrevocable life insurance trust (ILIT).
Because the trust owns the assets, not you, the assets aren't counted as a resource toward Medicaid eligibility. They also offer better asset protection from creditors, minimizing the chance they'll be used for nursing home costs—that's why an irrevocable trust is also sometimes called an asset protection trust.
The downside of an irrevocable trust is that, unlike a revocable trust, it doesn't allow you to make changes or cancel the trust except under certain circumstances. "Assets placed in the trust are legally no longer yours, and you must name an independent trustee," says Certified Estate Planner Chuck Czajka, founder of Macro Money Concepts. Also keep in mind that the five-year Medicaid lookback period applies, so you'll need to plan well before you or your loved ones need to enter a nursing home.
With an asset protection trust, you're revoking your rights to the assets, so consider this option carefully. Trusts can be complicated legal documents, so it's best to work with an elder law attorney, estate planning attorney, or professional trust service to be sure it's set up correctly.
5. Consider financial gifts to family members
Making financial gifts to family members is a popular asset protection plan. The IRS allows you to gift $18,000 per person each year without having to pay the federal gift tax.
By gradually transferring wealth through gifts, you can reduce the size of your estate, which may help with Medicaid eligibility down the line. The more Medicaid benefits you receive, the more nursing home costs will be covered when you need care, and the better asset protection you'll have.
Keep in mind that Medicaid's five-year look-back period applies to gifts, so any gifts made within five years of applying for Medicaid could result in penalties. If you're considering this asset protection strategy, start planning as early as possible, and keep detailed records of any gifts.
6. Start saving statements and get expert advice
If you want to protect assets from nursing home costs, don't wait to take action. The documentation required for spending during the five-year lookback period means you will need to keep bank records and receipts for large expenses, including financial gifts.
Keep a clear record of your financial history to make the Medicaid application process smoother. Also, keep a thorough list of all your assets—including your life insurance policies, investments, and titles to homes and vehicles—in case you want to create a trust.
Finally, be certain to consult an elder law attorney or estate planning attorney. They will help you understand the best options and strategies for your life stage and assets, whether you want to learn how to protect parents' assets from a nursing home or your own. They'll also help you navigate complex Medicaid rules, set up trusts, and make sure all your documents are in order.
Taking a proactive approach to protecting assets from nursing home costs makes a big difference in your success—and your peace of mind.
Does a trust protect assets from a nursing home?
Yes, certain types of trusts, like irrevocable trusts, can protect assets from nursing home costs. By placing your assets in an irrevocable trust, you remove them from your direct ownership, so it's more difficult for creditors to claim them. It can also help reduce the size of your estate for Medicaid purposes.
What is the Medicaid look-back period?
The Medicaid look-back period is a five-year timeframe during which Medicaid reviews your financial history for any large transfers or gifts. If you've given away money or assets within this period, Medicaid may delay your eligibility for benefits. The penalty period is based on the value of the transferred assets, so you'll want to plan ahead to avoid major transfers within five years of applying.
What types of assets are exempt from Medicaid eligibility calculations?
Medicaid exempts certain assets when it calculates the size of your estate to determine your eligibility for benefits. Typically, your primary residence, one vehicle, household goods, personal belongings like clothing or jewelry, certain life insurance policies, and some burial funds are not counted. Retirement accounts may also be exempt, depending on the state and whether you're drawing income from them. Asset exemption rules vary by state, so you should consult an estate planning or elder law attorney.
How do you avoid a nursing home taking your house?
To protect your house from nursing home care costs, consider transferring it to an irrevocable trust or creating a life estate. An irrevocable trust removes your ownership, and a life estate allows you to transfer the house to a family member while keeping the right to live there. Both strategies require advance planning due to Medicaid's five-year look-back period. Consulting an elder law or estate planning attorney can help you decide the best option for your situation.
How do spousal protection rules help preserve assets for a healthy spouse?
Medicaid has rules in place to protect the healthy spouse—known as the 'community spouse'—when the other spouse requires nursing home care. These rules allow the community spouse to keep certain assets, including a portion of the couple's combined assets, the primary home, and some income. This helps ensure the healthy spouse isn't left without resources while the other spouse receives care. Spousal asset protection rules vary by state, so working with a professional can help you understand what's allowed in your situation.
Sandra Beckwith contributed to this article.
This story was produced by LegalZoom and reviewed and distributed by Stacker.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
The Post seeks your questions about aging, healthcare and ways to finance it
The explosion is coming: The number of people 85 and older will nearly double in the next 10 years, according to the U.S. Census and, unless there's a miracle that halts aging, it's likely to increase the demand for healthcare like never before. Early signs foretell that the cost of medical care and living into advanced age with the right support is going to be an expensive proposition, fraught with complex and costly decisions. Medical service inflation is increasing faster than the general inflation rate: by 3.1% compared with the general inflation rate of 2.3%, according to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. The golden years might start looking a little less shiny, even for people who have saved their entire lives to enjoy this tropical paradise. The costs of long-term care, should one need it, can destroy generational wealth. A recent survey from CareScout, an information network of long-term care providers, found that the cost of a private room in a Miami-area nursing home averages about $12,714 a month. It's an expense most haven't saved for and don't have any idea how much it's going to cost, according to KFF, a national health policy research group. Looming in the background: Pressure to change Medicaid, which provides healthcare for the poorest residents and funds about 62% of Florida's nursing home residents and a labor shortage of people willing to do the lowest-level medical support jobs that involve bedpans, laundry and home help. Trying to navigate a complex and costly healthcare system in a world that's speeding up can be frustrating. These issues and others are why The Palm Beach Post is starting a new series of health columns focused on navigating the financial and physical challenges likely to emerge as more and more people reach advanced age and their children confront a reality there's no preparing for. We want to hear what questions you have as you and your loved ones enter new territory. Post insurance reporter Anne Geggis will take your questions about the ways to plan for living the best life even into advanced years. Geggis has more than 10 years' experience covering health and health governance, first at the Daytona Beach News-Journal, where she won the national Society of Professional Journalist's Sunshine Award, and then the Gainesville Sun, where she covered cutting-edge research at the state's chief academic medical center. She'll take your questions about health care and preparing for the future with advice from a wide range of experts. This column starts with you and your concerns, email them to her at ageggis@ or fill out the form below to submit your questions on healthcare and aging. Look for her first column in June. This article originally appeared on Palm Beach Post: Send us your questions about aging, healthcare and ways to finance it
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Republican cuts to food and health benefits ‘will kill', advocacy groups warn
Advocacy groups associated with the left are urging some Republicans not to go along with a plan to cut health and food benefits to the poor. The lobbying campaign comes as Democrats are nearly powerless to stop the 'One Big Beautiful Bill' act – a 1,100-page package of Donald Trump's legislative priorities, from deporting migrants to building a border wall. Republicans hold majorities in both the House and Senate. Related: Trump's 'big, beautiful' spending bill, from tax cuts to mass deportations 'Pediatricians are losing sleep at night over this program,' said Dr Sue Kressly, the president of American Academy of Pediatrics, in a press call on Tuesday. 'There are going to be short-term impacts where we really see hungry kids and the impact on their growth trajectory,' she continued, 'and then medium-term impacts, in which you stress the entire family and the family has to make decisions about – 'Do I pay for food? Do I pay for safe housing? Do I pay for visits to the doctors?'' Some of the most controversial provisions in the bill, and which have drawn scrutiny even from Republicans, include cutting billions of dollars in food and health benefits to the poor to offset the new Trump programs and an extension of tax cuts to well-off Americans. Although the 'beautiful bill' left the most controversial cuts on the table, it would still make major changes to federal health and food assistance programs called Medicaid and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (Snap), known colloquially as 'food stamps'. Medicaid is a public health insurance program for the low-income, disabled and elderly that insures roughly 71 million Americans. In just one example of its impact, the program pays for nearly half of all births in the US. Snap or 'food stamps' provides extra cash for groceries to 42 million low-income Americans, and is a lifeline for many to purchase nutritious foods, which tend to be more expensive. On Tuesday, the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO) released its latest 'score' of the bill, finding that it would cut $698bn from Medicaid and $267bn from food assistance. At the same time, tax cuts would add $3.8tn to the national debt. The CBO also found that the changes would reduce resources to the poorest 10% of Americans by 4%, and increase household resources to the richest 10% of Americans by a roughly equivalent amount, though the changes would differ slightly in timing because cuts take full effect in 2033. An analysis from the non-partisan group the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget found similar results, and described the Republican bill as moving 'in the wrong fiscal direction' in a statement. For Medicaid, cuts would be made by adding work requirements to the program, including a requirement that some beneficiaries prove they are working at the time they apply – a hurdle many groups argue would be difficult for sick Americans. Multiple studies have shown that adding work requirements to Medicaid forces beneficiaries off the program, while doing little to push people into the workforce, the provision's stated goal. On Snap, Republicans would cut the program by requiring states to pay between 5% and 25% of the benefits of the program. Such a change would represent the biggest cut in the program's six-decade history. Although states split the cost of administering the program with the federal government, the feds have always paid for the entire cost of benefits. With Republicans holding both chambers, left-leaning groups are now seeking to exploit cracks in Republican unity, particularly targeting those in moderate districts. On Wednesday, Reproductive Freedom for All announced it would buy ads attacking Republicans in Arizona, Colorado, New York and Virginia for their support of the bill. 'As a nurse living in rural south-eastern Ohio, I see friends, neighbors and family members who rely on Medicaid for everything from cancer treatment to lifesaving medications,' said Rick Lucas, president and executive director of the Ohio Nurses Association, in a statement. 'These cuts won't just hurt – they will kill.' Although unrelated to the bill in timing, the proposed cuts have come at the same time as a large new study, which found that Obama-era expansions of Medicaid have probably saved 27,000 lives since 2010. Republicans are aiming to pass the bill out of the chamber by Memorial Day – the upcoming Monday holiday. Members have pushed to do so, scheduling a rule committee meeting at 1am on Wednesday, a move Democrats criticized as hearing the bill under cover of darkness. 'When I was a teen, my late mother would often say nothing good happens after midnight,' the ranking rules committee Democrat, Brendan Boyle of Pennsylvania, said. 'Now I know what she meant.' However, the rift within the party cuts both ways. Some Republican deficit hawks are arguing cuts to social programs don't go far or fast enough. The divisions led Trump to visit Capitol Hill on Tuesday to urge Republican House members to 'land the plane', in the words of House Republican Dusty Johnson, of South Dakota. Trump administration officials also continue to zealously defend the bill. The health secretary, Robert F Kennedy Jr, argued on Tuesday that: 'There's only 8.5 million people affected by this … The remaining are able-bodied male workers who refuse to get a job, who refuse to even meet the minimal thresholds.' The secretary has repeatedly stated the cuts are to stop 'waste, fraud and abuse'. The CBO that found more than 13 million people would probably lose insurance in coming years because of the changes, including coverage losses from Obamacare. Sharon Parrot, president of the left-leaning Center on Budget and Policy Priorities said in a press call that Republicans had 'done all they can to portray the people hurt as anything but what they are – people in our communities'.

USA Today
an hour ago
- USA Today
Trump's big tax bill moves ahead to potential changes in the Senate
Trump's big tax bill moves ahead to potential changes in the Senate President Trump wants the Senate to slash taxes even more than the House-passed bill - and get the whole thing to his desk for signature by July 4 Show Caption Hide Caption Court blocks Trump's tariffs, saying they exceed legal authority A trade court blocked President Donald Trump's tariffs, saying they exceed his legal authority. WASHINGTON – House Republicans have done their job, narrowly passing President Donald Trump's sweeping tax and policy bill. Next up: the Senate. When members of Congress return to Washington on June 2 after a weeklong break, the upper chamber will dig into the more than 1,000-page bill that would extend income tax cuts, implement new tax breaks for tipped wages and overtime, overhaul Medicaid and food stamps, and put more money toward Trump's deportation plan. House Speaker Mike Johnson has urged his Senate counterparts to "make as few modifications to this package as possible," but senators have other plans. At least a dozen senators have indicated they would like to tweak the package before they sign off on it. More: Who are the GOP senators balking at Trump's tax bill? Trump ally Elon Musk said he's "disappointed" in the House-passed package, which would increase the deficit and "undermines the work that the DOGE team is doing." Speaking at the White House on May 30, Trump said he hopes the Senate will slash taxes even more than the reductions included in the House-passed bill. 'I'd like to see a bigger cut in taxes,' Trump told reporters. "It's going to be jiggered around a little bit." Some House Republicans have already faced jeers and heckling at town halls as attendees grilled lawmakers over the tax policy bill. GOP leaders are urging members to "go on offense" on the new bill and tout the party's efforts to keep undocumented people off of benefit programs, cut taxes, and secure the southern what to know as the Senate begins work on it's part of the major legislative package. Will there be public hearings on the Senate bill? It's still unclear whether the Senate will hold public hearings on the legislation, like the House did on separate portions of the bill. What is clear is that they'll try to move fast. Republicans want to pass the legislation by July 4, which would give them only four working weeks to approve it in the Senate, negotiate across chambers on any differences, squeeze it again through the House, and get it to Trump's desk. The real deadline, however, is the end of July. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has said the United States will hit the debt ceiling sometime in August. He urged Congress to pass the package before then to avoid a catastrophic financial default. The package includes a $4 trillion increase in the debt ceiling. Eyes on Ron Johnson, Rick Scott, Mike Lee and Rand Paul Just as in the House, Senate Republicans have competing demands for changes in the bill. Some Republican senators, such as Sens. Ron Johnson of Wisconsin, Rick Scott of Florida, Mike Lee of Utah and Rand Paul of Kentucky have major concerns with the $3.8 trillion the package would add to the debt over the next 10 years. Others, such as Sens. Susan Collins, R-Maine, and Josh Hawley, R-Missouri, are worried about the potential changes to Medicaid. The bill would cut $625 billion from the low-income health care program while pushing an estimated 7.6 million Americans off coverage, in part by implementing new work requirements for able-bodied adults without children. And senators such as Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska; John Curtis, R-Utah; and Thom Tillis, R-North Carolina, are worried about the package rolling back renewable energy tax credits implemented under Democrats' Inflation Reduction Act that their states' businesses have benefitted from. John Thune is on the hot seat Senate Majority Leader John Thune of South Dakota will have to deal with a narrow margin in order to get the bill across the finish line: He can lose only three Republican votes and still get the majority necessary to pass it presuming no Democrats cross party lines to support the legislative package. Democrats have slammed the package as a giveaway to the wealthiest Americans while stripping benefits from low-income people. "When rural hospitals close because of this bill, when drug treatment clinics close in Iowa and rural America because of this bill, more people will die at a younger age," Sen. Chris Murphy told CNN in a June 1 interview. Any changes made in the Senate will have to be negotiated again alongside the House before going back through the lower chamber, where Republicans can afford to lose only three votes and still pass the bill without any Democrats.