
Most Britons do not know scale of UK's involvement in slavery, survey finds
The poll, released to coincide with Tuesday's UN International Day of Remembrance of the Victims of Slavery and the Transatlantic Slave Trade, was commissioned by the Repair Campaign, which is working with Caricom to secure reparatory justice for member states through health, education and infrastructure projects.
The sample of more than 2,000 people representative of the UK population found 85% did not know that more than 3 million people had been forcibly shipped from Africa to the Caribbean by British enslavers.
It also found 89% were unaware British merchants had enslaved people in the Caribbean for more than 300 years and that 75% did not know it was after 2000 that British taxpayers finished paying off the money borrowed by UK government in 1833 – equivalent to 40% of the government's total annual expenditure at the time – to compensate enslavers for their 'loss of property'.
Nonetheless, the survey found support for some form of reparations is growing, with 63% now agreeing that Caribbean nations and descendants of enslaved people should receive a formal apology, up 4% from last year's poll, while support for financial reparations has also increased, with 40% now in favour. Ninety percent of those in favour of financial reparations said they should be directed toward long-term education, health and infrastructure projects.
Bell Ribeiro-Addy, a Labour MP and chair of the all-party parliamentary group for Afrikan Reparations, said she was 'not surprised' about the lack of understanding about the scale of slavery, and that reparative justice also required education.
'People point to reparations and think merely in financial terms, but one of the most important things is correcting the record – because until people learn what happened there will not be that widespread, public will to make reparation possible,' she said.
The Labour government has said the UK will not pay cash reparations, but is working with Caribbean partners on issues such as security, growth and climate change.
Ribeiro-Addy said there had to be a 'willingness to listen' from the UK government, which is yet to make a formal apology for slavery, faced with a 'large chunk of the world' that was unified on the need for reparative justice. 'For us not to listen is disgraceful and could have consequences of its own,' she added.
Walker Syachalinga, a solicitor at the law firm Leigh Day, which is investigating claims against institutions, companies and families, said of the survey's findings: 'They speak to what has been a feature of English law and commerce – this idea of offshoring the more unpalatable aspects of our history while retaining the benefits.'
Denis O'Brien, Repair Campaign's founder, said the poll showed 'heartening' growth in public support for an apology and reparations, but also 'how little people in Britain really know about the country's past.'
Dr Hilary Brown, a programme manager at Caricom Secretariat, said: 'Our shared humanity demands justice for the horrific crimes committed. Addressing the knowledge gap in the UK on the country's history of trading and enslaving Africans is urgent.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
High court asylum hotels ruling leaves Cooper scrambling for alternatives
Yvette Cooper, thanks to Tuesday's high court ruling, is facing potentially explosive decisions over where to house asylum seekers if courts rule that they must leave hotels. The Home Office, usually under Conservative ministers, has been struggling for five years to find an alternative to hotels so they can house a growing number of asylum seekers reaching these shores. Labour has said that it expects to empty the 200-odd hotels housing asylum seekers by 2029. Ministers may be forced to rip up that plan and move at a rapid pace because of the ruling's implications. If councils take to the high court to complain about the use of a hotel for housing asylum seekers – and many will be under immense political pressure from the public to do so – it could force officials to find alternative housing for thousands of people. Legal sources believe that there will be similar grounds to launch applications for interim injunctions from a number of councils. This case has centred on an alleged breach of planning laws by owners of the Bell hotel, who it was claimed did not get permission to switch use from a hotel to hostel-style accommodation. Other hotel owners are thought to be in similar positions to Somani Hotels Limited, which originally housed families in the Bell, but faced a legal challenge after the asylum seekers were switched to single men. Ominously for the government, the Reform UK deputy leader, Richard Tice, said his party would look at pursuing similar cases regarding hotels within the 10 council areas it controls, which include both North and West Northamptonshire councils, Doncaster, and Kent and Staffordshire county councils. And the high court rulings can require a rapid response. Epping's application for an interim was launched on 12 August. By 4pm on 12 September, all asylum seekers will have to be removed from The Bell hotel. There may yet be a lifeline for the government. They could convince the court of appeal to overturn the decision. The fact that the Home Office was not allowed to intervene in a case which was directly related to the home secretary's duties to house asylum seekers could well be seized upon by government lawyers. If they fail to overturn the decision, they will face the same dilemma as successive Tory home secretaries going back to Priti Patel, who promised and failed to find alternatives to hotels to house asylum seekers. The number of asylum hotels soared to 400 under successive Tory home secretaries because of a shortage of housing, a growing backlog in asylum applications, and a failure to establish large accommodation sites in buildings such as disused military barracks. Since coming to power, Labour has increased the speed at which applications are processed, by using more 'dispersal accommodation' such as flats and housing in the community. Questions will no doubt be asked inside the department as to why it took the Home Office until Monday to try to intervene in the case. If it had done so last week, when the case came to court, it would have stood a better chance of preventing the injunction. The political implications of the ruling will continue to unsettle Cooper and No 10. Yet again, the government has been caught flat-footed on an immigration-related issue, as it struggles with soaring numbers of small boats crossing the Channel. Anti-asylum seeker protesters will see this as a victory in response to their demonstrations across the country this summer. Reform UK and its leader, Nigel Farage, currently leading in most polls, will be buoyed by the prospect of further embarrassment for the government.

The National
an hour ago
- The National
I have no intention of reshuffling Cabinet, says John Swinney
More than 20 SNP MSPs are set to leave Holyrood, including some of his current ministerial team, when voters go to the polls next year. Deputy First Minister Kate Forbes is among them, along with Finance Secretary Shona Robison, Transport Secretary Fiona Hyslop, and Rural Affairs Secretary Mairi Gougeon. However, Swinney made clear he has no plans to reshape his top team in the light of the planned departures. READ MORE: Labour refuse to release files on secret meeting with Gideon Sa'ar Speaking at an event in Edinburgh organised by the think tank Enlighten, the First Minister said: 'I have no intention of reshuffling my team before the election.' While he spoke about his 'regret' about fellow MSPs leaving Holyrood, including 'close colleagues, friends and confidantes', he said he had reshuffled his Cabinet team after government minister Mairi McAllan returned to work earlier this year following her maternity leave. In June, McAllan was given the newly created post of Housing Secretary, with Swinney tasking her with tackling the housing 'emergency' in Scotland. Asked if the impending departure of senior members of his government would bring about a reshuffle ahead of May's Scottish elections, the SNP leader said he had 'decided, actively and purposefully' that he had people in his Cabinet with 'experience and expertise in a number of roles that would help me to deliver to government's programme before the election'. (Image: PA) And he argued that if he was to 'put in a whole host of new faces' then 'it would take a while to get things back up to the level of delivery' 'I have no plans to reshuffle the government,' he insisted. His comments came as he spoke of his 'regret' over SNP MSPs leaving Holyrood, with the First Minister saying he 'very much' regretted Forbes' decision to quit the Scottish Parliament. The Skye, Lochaber and Badenoch MSP announced earlier this month she would not be running for election next year, saying she did not want to 'miss any more of the precious early years of family life'. Meanwhile, former first ministers Nicola Sturgeon and Humza Yousaf are also stepping down. READ MORE: Thousands object to Tesla bid to supply energy in UK – how to sign the petition Swinney said: 'Some of my colleagues are stepping down because they have done a very long shift.' While he said he was the 'longest serving' parliamentarian at Holyrood, having been first voted in as an MP 28 years ago before being elected as an MSP in the first devolved elections, he noted a number of those quitting had also been first elected in 1999. However, he added some MSPs were leaving because of the 'tough' nature of politics. 'We have to acknowledge that for many, I think particularly younger women, the climate is horrendous,' Swinney said. He continued: 'The social media endurance is hard to bear for some people, and it makes public service look frankly unattractive at times.' In these circumstances, he said, he tries to 'support my colleagues, understand and be an ally'. But the SNP leader added: 'Ultimately, I can not protect people from what is thrown at them, and some of the behaviours are appalling, so that affects a number of people as well.' Swinney also told the event he has to 'focus on the country and the future' as he refused to comment on claims Sturgeon made about her predecessor Alex Salmond. Swinney said while he has read some extracts from the former first minister's memoirs, Frankly, which were published last week, he has not yet read the entire book.


Evening Standard
an hour ago
- Evening Standard
Thousands object to Tesla bid to supply energy to UK homes
'British people are rightly against Musk being anywhere near our electricity supply and that's why we are encouraging more people to make their views known before Friday by using our online tool to write to Ofgem and say they oppose this power grab – it only takes two minutes.'