Delhi HC rejects Turkish firm Celebi's plea against security clearance revocation on national security grounds
According to a PTI report, Justice Sachin Datta rejected the petitions filed by Celebi Airport Services India Pvt Ltd and Celebi Delhi Cargo Terminal Management India Pvt Ltd, which handle ground operations and cargo terminal management at multiple airports across the country. The verdict was reserved on May 23.
BCAS had revoked Celebi's security clearance on May 15, shortly after Turkey publicly supported Pakistan and condemned India's anti-terror operations across the border. The central government had defended its decision, stating it was taken in the "interest of national security" and based on specific intelligence inputs that continuing Celebi's services could pose a security risk.
PTI reported that the government's counsel emphasised the "unprecedented" threat to aviation security and justified the prompt revocation of security clearance.
Celebi's legal team argued that the government's decision violated principles of natural justice and claimed that the Director General of BCAS should have given the company an opportunity to be heard, after giving notice of "proposed punishment" and subsequently given reasons for their action.
However, the Centre, as per PTI, maintained that in matters involving national security, procedural safeguards can justifiably be bypassed when there is credible intelligence of potential risks.
The security clearance for Celebi's Indian operations, part of Turkey's Celebi group, had been granted in November 2022. The company has been present in India's aviation sector for over 15 years and employs more than 10,000 people, operating at nine airports.
The revocation order from BCAS had clearly stated: "…the security clearance in respect of Celebi Airport Services India Pvt Ltd is hereby revoked with immediate effect in the interest of national security."
(With inputs from PTI)
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
44 minutes ago
- Hans India
India has huge rare earth metal reserves, but production is low
'Rare earth elements' (REEs) are not actually rare in the Earth's crust, but their extraction and processing are challenging. Hence, making them economically and strategically is more important. India has the fifth-largest REE reserves globally, particularly in coastal and inland placer sands. However, despite these substantial reserves, India's contribution to global REE production is less than one per cent. This is due to limited investment in mining and refining infrastructure, as well as challenges in extracting REEs from low-grade deposits and developing advanced separation and refining technologies, particularly compared to China, the US, and Japan. India possesses significant REE reserves, estimated at 6.9 million metric tons, making it the fifth-largest globally. However, its production remains low, with less than one per cent of global REE output. India is the fifth-largest rare earth resource globally, with significant deposits in the monazite minerals. There are around 13.07 million tonne of REEs, mainly found in the monazite sand, which contains 55-60 per cent total Rare Earth Elements oxide. India's primary REE deposits are found in coastal beach sands, which often contain low mineral content. India's decision to cordon off its rare earth output set the tone for a nervous week in critical mineral markets. New Delhi ordered Indian Rare Earths Limited (unlisted) to halt neodymium exports to Japan, a dramatic break with a 13-year supply pact and a reminder that Chinese licensing controls have given every producer political leverage. Although India mined only 2,900 tonne of neodymium oxide last year, officials now pledge to reserve enough for a future magnet industry and to sweeten domestic processing with incentives. Beijing answered from the shadows. Satellite imagery and local reports show the United Wa State Army—long backed by China—ring-fencing freshly opened dysprosium and terbium-rich deposits in Myanmar's Shan State. Trucks already carry concentrate across the border, offsetting supply lost to fighting farther north and tightening China's grip on the heavy rare earths that temper heat in electric-vehicle (EV) motors and precision-guided munitions. While exploration efforts are underway, particularly in Rajasthan, commercially viable deposits of magnet-grade REEs haven't been verified yet. India lacks the technology and infrastructure for large-scale mining and processing of REEs, leading to reliance on imports, particularly magnets, mainly from China. The Indian government is actively working to develop a self-reliant REE supply chain through the National Critical Mineral Mission and exploration projects. Efforts are being made to develop advanced separation and refining technologies to process REEs domestically, reducing reliance on imports and increasing domestic production.
Hans India
an hour ago
- Hans India
No support in Justice Varma matter till probe set up against Yadav: Sibal
The Opposition must not support any move by the government to impeach Justice Yashwant Varma till an inquiry is set up under impeachment proceedings against Justice Shekhar Yadav for his 'communal' remarks, Rajya Sabha MP Kapil Sibal said on Saturday. In an interview with PTI, Sibal contended that the case of Varma, who is embroiled in a row following the discovery of burnt wads of currency at his residence after a fire incident, was not one of corruption and so the parties thinking that they should support action against the judge as it is graft matter should review their position. He also said that the opposition should first seek the setting up of an inquiry against Justice Yadav under impeachment proceedings after the opposition MPs in December 2024 submitted a notice in the Rajya Sabha to move an impeachment motion against him for allegedly making 'communal remarks' last year at a VHP event. The Independent Rajya Sabha MP claimed there could be two motives of the government in moving ahead with bringing an impeachment motion against Varma -- they are unhappy with with him because he is 'one of the most independent High Court judges' and alternatively they may be thinking that this is a 'great opportunity to put pressure on the courts' and try to bring another form of the National Judicial Appointments Commission (NJAC). 'I think the institution has broad enough shoulders to withstand such moves of the government,' he said. Asked if the situation arises would he be ready to defend Varma in Parliament during impeachment proceedings, Sibal, who is also a senior advocate, said, 'This is just an academic issue, first the judge has to ask me.' Sibal's remarks come amid the government beginning the exercise of collecting signatures of MPs to move a motion in Parliament to remove Justice Varma. Sources said signatures of many MPs from the Lok Sabha have been collected for the impeachment exercise, an indication that the motion may be moved in the Lower House. Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju has said that a motion to remove Varma will be brought in Parliament's next session, beginning from July 21. Slamming the government for moving ahead with collecting signatures, Sibal said, 'First of all, what has the government got to do with this? Under the Constitution, either 100 members of the Lok Sabha or 50 members of the Rajya Sabha can move a motion for impeachment. The Constitution process dehors the government.' The fact that the government is collecting signatures means that it is interested as an entity to move the motion and impeach him, whereas the Constitutional process dehors the government, he said. 'I am a bit surprised but this is what happens when you have governments moving impeachment motions. Obviously, they don't want the judge for reasons that they know best,' Sibal told PTI. Asked what would be his message to opposition parties, Sibal said this is not an issue of parties at all and even the government is erroneously moving through by collecting signatures. 'It has nothing to do with the government, it has nothing to do with opposition parties. It is something to do with members of Parliament. If the opposition parties give a diktat, fifty MPs will sign. And if a government gives a diktat, a hundred will sign. But the question is, this itself is constitutionally impermissible,' he contended.
NDTV
an hour ago
- NDTV
Viral X Post Dismisses Kannada, Tamil As Languages Of "Poor Economies", Draws Sharp Rebuke
A viral X post disparaging Indian regional languages, such as Kannada and Tamil, labelling them as unworthy of learning and associating them with "poorer economies" and "poor quality of life," has sparked widespread outrage, particularly among users in southern cities like Bengaluru and Chennai. The user claimed that he would learn Japanese if moving to Japan or Chinese if moving to China, but would stick to English in Bengaluru or Chennai, dismissing the value of learning local languages like Kannada or Tamil due to their association with less prosperous economies and lower quality of life. "If I moved to Japan, I would learn Japanese. If I moved to China, I would learn Chinese. If I moved to Bangalore, I would rather speak English. If I moved to Chennai, I would rather speak English. No point in learning languages of poorer economies and poorer quality of life," the post read. See the post here: If I moved to Japan, I would learn Japanese. If I moved to China, I would learn Chinese. If I moved to Bangalore, I would rather speak English. If I moved to Chennai, I would rather speak English. No point in learning languages of poorer economies and poorer quality of life. — Toka (@TokaTakes) July 11, 2025 The user also argued that discussions about regional languages are overblown and urged companies to restrict investments in cities like Bengaluru and Chennai to small-scale industries to prevent what they called language-based harassment of migrants. This stance has fueled further controversy, drawing sharp criticism from southern city residents. The broad claim that Indian languages are less worthy of learning compared to those of wealthier nations provoked a strong backlash. One user wrote, "Respecting,learning & use state language is a must if you are there for longterm. If you are a visitor or there for short-term, manage with english. No hindi/urdu whatsoever. Learn or leave." Another commented, "There are enough people who act civil, learn and respect local languages. Even foreigners do it fluently and proudly." A third said, "Language harassment is getting out of hand. People should live how they want. If city dwellers have a problem with it, then it's not a proper city, just an overgrown town."
