
Exclusive-NATO to ask Berlin for seven more brigades under new targets, sources say
G36 rifles are lined up on military premises where German reservists undergo shooting training, in Beelitz near Berlin, Germany, March 6, 2025, as NATO looks to boost its strength after Russia's invasion of Ukraine. REUTERS/Nadja Wohlleben/ File Photo
BERLIN (Reuters) - NATO will ask Germany to provide seven more brigades, or some 40,000 troops, for the alliance's defence, three sources told Reuters, under new targets for weapons and troop numbers that its members' defence ministers are set to agree on next week.
The alliance is dramatically increasing its military capability targets as it views Russia as a much greater threat since its 2022 full-scale invasion of Ukraine.
Exact figures for NATO's targets - either overall or country by country - are hard to verify as the information is highly classified.
One senior military official who, like the other sources spoke on condition of anonymity, said the target for the total number of brigades that NATO allies would have to provide in future will be raised to between 120 and 130.
This would mean a hike of some 50% from the current target of around 80 brigades, the source said. A government source put the target at 130 brigades for all of NATO.
Neither the German defence ministry nor NATO responded immediately to requests for comment.
In 2021, Germany agreed to provide 10 brigades - units usually comprising around 5,000 troops - for NATO by 2030. It currently has eight brigades and is building up a ninth in Lithuania to be ready from 2027.
Providing a further 40,000 active troops will be a big challenge for Berlin, however. The Bundeswehr has not yet met a target of 203,000 troops set in 2018, and is currently short-staffed by some 20,000 regular troops, according to defence ministry data.
Last year, Reuters reported that NATO would need 35 to 50 extra brigades to fully realise its new plans to defend against an attack from Russia and that Germany alone would have to quadruple its air defence capabilities.
Furthermore, the new NATO targets do not yet reflect any provisions for a drawdown of U.S. troops in Europe, sources said, the prospect of which has rattled Europeans due to NATO's defence plans that rely heavily on U.S. assets.
Washington has said it will start discussing its reduction plans with allies later this year. U.S. President Donald Trump's administration has told Europeans that the United States can no longer be primarily focused on European security.
During the Cold War, Germany maintained 500,000 troops and 800,000 reserve forces. Today, alongside Poland, it is tasked by NATO with providing the bulk of ground forces that would be first responders to any Russian attack on the alliance's eastern flank.
SPENDING INCREASE
NATO members have massively increased defence spending since Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022 and have been urged to go further by Trump, who has threatened not to defend countries lagging behind on defence spending.
At a summit in The Hague next month, the alliance's head Mark Rutte will seek an agreement from national leaders to more than double their current spending target from 2% of GDP to 5% - with 3.5% for defence and 1.5% for more broadly defined security-related spending.
In a historic shift, Germany recently loosened its constitutional debt brake so that it can raise defence spending, and it has backed Rutte's 5% target.
German Chief of Defence Carsten Breuer has ordered his country's forces to be fully equipped by 2029, by which time the alliance expects Moscow to have reconstituted its military forces sufficiently to attack NATO territory.
(Reporting by Sabine Siebold, editing by Andrew Gray and Hugh Lawson)
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Star
an hour ago
- The Star
Sudanese military says rival paramilitary forces, backed by Libya's Haftar forces, attacked border posts
CAIRO (Reuters) -The Sudanese military said that rebel paramilitary Rapid Support Forces (RSF), backed by eastern Libyan forces under military commander Khalifa Haftar, had attacked Sudanese border posts on the Egyptian and Libyan frontiers on Tuesday, according to a statement. (Reporting by Menna Alaa El-Din and Jaidaa Taha; Editing by Kevin Liffey)


New Straits Times
an hour ago
- New Straits Times
Dangerously unprepared Asean needs own nuclear 'deterrence'
THE proliferation of nuclear powers in Asia is no longer confined to Cold War-era rivalries. It now includes China, India, Pakistan, North Korea and potentially Iran. Even South Korea flirts with the idea of an indigenous deterrent. Invariably, the Australia-United Kingdom-United States (AUKUS) security pact, which provides nuclear-powered submarines to Australia, signals the irreversible arrival of nuclear propulsion technologies in Southeast Asian waters. Asean, bound by the 1995 Treaty on the Southeast Asia Nuclear Weapon-Free Zone (SEANWFZ), finds itself encircled by these shifts. Without urgent steps to reinforce its unity, voice and institutions, Southeast Asia risks becoming collateral damage in an era of nuclear brinkmanship. The logic is simple: nuclear proliferation requires collective non-nuclear resilience. With no integrated missile defence, no mutual defence treaty and little capacity to respond to nuclear escalation scenarios, Asean stands dangerously unprepared. Any nuclear clash would send shockwaves through Asean. Economies would suffer. Diplomatic space would shrink. Populations could be displaced. Yet Asean has no coherent contingency framework for such scenarios. What makes the situation more precarious is that Asean's security platforms— like the Asean Regional Forum— are now being sidelined by exclusive minilateral pacts. The Quad, AUKUS, and trilateral dialogues involving the US, Japan and South Korea increasingly define regional security priorities, sidelining Asean's once-vibrant forums. These new clubs dictate terms on deterrence and defence cooperation while Asean remains absent from the room where nuclear security decisions are made. To remain relevant, Asean must reclaim space in regional dialogue. It must articulate a common position on arms control, non-proliferation and strategic transparency. Failure to do so leaves Asean in the role of a bystander, watching its strategic environment change without its input or consent. Asean's nuclear-free status also suffers from a long-standing credibility gap. The SEANWFZ Treaty has yet to be signed by any of the five permanent members of the United Nations Security Council — China, US, UK, France and Russia — who worry about its impact on their naval and aerial freedom of operation. However, as nuclear-powered submarines traverse Southeast Asian waters and US and Chinese military vessels shadow each other near Asean coastlines, this gap becomes glaring. Asean must restart its diplomacy with these powers, not only to safeguard Asean's nuclear-free identity but also restore its global credibility as a normative leader in arms restraint. Confidence-building measures (CBMs) offer another avenue. Asean could propose missile test notification systems, crisis communication hotlines and rules against the deployment of tactical nuclear weapons near or within its maritime zones. The Asean Defence Ministers' Meeting Plus provides an existing platform to implement such initiatives. What's lacking is the collective political will. As the US and China engage in intensified rivalry, some Asean states face growing temptation or pressure to align militarily with one side. Such alignment may bring with it security guarantees but could also involve hosting military infrastructure that undermines the region's nuclear-free ethos. Maintaining neutrality is not about silence or indecision — it requires coordinated diplomacy and strategic coherence. A stronger Asean gives member states the ability to resist external coercion, uphold regional norms and avoid becoming pawns in nuclear gamesmanship. Equally urgent is the need to address rising technological vulnerabilities. Nuclear threats today are not only from bombs but also from cyber manipulation of nuclear infrastructure, surveillance systems and command-and-control mechanisms. As small modular reactors and artificial intelligence-powered early warning systems proliferate, the region needs an institutional upgrade. Asean must build capacity for nuclear oversight, crisis simulation, and technical coordination with global agencies such as the International Atomic Energy Agency. Finally, public education must not be neglected. Deterrence theory and arms control are often locked away in policy circles. Yet in an age of social media disinformation, misperceptions about nuclear policy can inflame domestic debates, push nationalist agendas and provoke poor decision-making. Asean's nuclear-free status must be grounded in both legal frameworks and widespread public understanding. Asean's only sustainable response lies in becoming stronger, more agile and more credible. It must speak not only for peace, but with the capacity to preserve it.


The Star
2 hours ago
- The Star
France to test adding security gates at schools after aide stabbed to death, PM says
FILE PHOTO: French Prime Minister Francois Bayrou leaves following the weekly cabinet meeting at the Elysee Palace in Paris, France, June 4, 2025. REUTERS/Abdul Saboor/ File Photo PARIS (Reuters) -French Prime Minister Francois Bayrou on Tuesday said the government plans to test adding security gates at schools after a 14-year-old student allegedly stabbed a school assistant to death in the town of Nogent during a bag search for weapons. Police were questioning the teenager, who was being held at the gendarmerie in Nogent in the northeast, the Haute-Marne Prefecture said. The killing of the 31-year-old school assistant was roundly condemned by France's political class, sparking soul searching about how such a violent act could be carried out by a minor. "While watching over our children in Nogent, an educational assistant lost her life, the victim of a senseless wave of violence," President Emmanuel Macron wrote on X. "The nation is in mourning and the government is mobilized to reduce crime." The Chaumont public prosecutor Denis Devallois said the alleged suspect had stabbed the school assistant several times with a knife. The killing was not an isolated incident, Bayrou told lawmakers, and France could not afford to ignore this wave of child violence. "We cannot remain indifferent and watch this advancing wave with our arms lowered," he said. "The government intends to move towards experimenting with security gates at the entrance to schools," Bayrou said, adding that he wanted to ban certain blades, as currently "a certain number of these knives are not considered weapons." The attack came on the same day that a gunman in Austria killed at least nine people at a secondary school in the southern city of Graz. Police did not publicly identify the suspect, but Austrian media cited unconfirmed reports as saying he was a former pupil. (Reporting by Dominique Vidalon and Gabriel Stargardter; Editing by Bernadette Baum)