Question raised over timing of Puri temple servitor's suspension
Ramakrushna Dasmohapatra
over his alleged role in the Digha temple naming controversy has given rise to heartburn. The suspension, from May 11 to June 10, overlaps only briefly with the servitor's annual service period — June 9 to July 8 — effectively restricting him from just two days of active duty.
"The suspension timeline makes no sense as Daitapati servitors do not have any assigned service to the deities during this period. Their annual seva begins with Debasnan Purnima, followed by Rath Yatra and Niladri Bije. This year, Debasnan Purnima falls on June 11, while Dasmohapatra's suspension ends on June 10," said Bibhuti Bhusan, a devotee from Puri."The servitor should have been suspended till the end of Rath Yatra, during which Daitapati servitors offer seva," wrote Ramanath Mishra on X. While Dasmohapatra could not be reached for his comment,
SJTA officials
defended their decision. "The servitor has been barred from entering the temple during the month-long suspension. He cannot perform his seva inside the temple on June 9 (Daitapati Prabesh) and June 10 (Senapata Lagi)," a senior SJTA official said. Some servitors supported the action. "Any harsher punishment would not have been appropriate," said Hajuri Ramakrushna Khuntia, a temple servitor.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
6 days ago
- Hans India
Law to curb taking spy cameras inside Puri temple mooted
Puri: The Odisha government on Tuesday said it was contemplating amending the Shree Jagannath Temple Act, 1955, to make provision for carrying spy cameras and taking pictures or video inside the 12th-century shrine in Puri as a cognisable offence with provision of punishment. This was stated by Odisha Law Minister Prithithiviraj Harichandan while reacting to frequent trespassing of individuals into the temple, taking hidden cameras in different ways. The minister said, 'There should be a proper law to curb such a situation. It is very difficult to identify the people carrying spy cameras inside the temple. The police can know about the spy camera only when there is a flashlight while taking pictures. Therefore, a law is most essential.' Meanwhile, the Shree Jagannath Temple Administration (SJTA) convened a high-level meeting over the frequent incidents of spy cameras being taken inside the temple and suggested that the State government formulate a law to prevent it. 'We have given four proposals to the Law department, which include penalties and jail term for unauthorised photography and taking spy equipment and other electronic gadgets inside the temple,' said SJTA Chief Administrator Arabinda Padhee. 'We have suggested to the State government to amend the Shree Jagannath Temple Act, 1955 and make taking mobile phones, video cameras, spy cameras and others a cognisable offence, any activities that hurt religious sentiments to have a provision of imprisonment, and flying drones above the temple a non-bailable offence. The government will take the final decision over our proposal,' Padhee told reporters here. On Tuesday morning, security personnel in Jagannath Temple nabbed a man identified as Pratish Pal of Paschim Bardhaman district in West Bengal for taking a mobile phone and spy glasses inside the temple. He was detained and his mobile and spy glasses were seized. Bipul Patel, a native of Gujarat, was caught on Monday while entering the temple with spy camera-equipped glasses. A week ago, a man from Puri town, identified as Abhijit Kar, was intercepted in a similar incident. The Puri man admitted that he had taken the spy camera-fitted spectacles to capture visuals of deities and interiors. In all three cases, the police had to release the alleged offenders due to lack of proper legislation to punish such people, a police officer said. Puri SP Pinak Mishra admitted that it was a real challenge for the police to locate people taking spy camera inside the temple. He said such incidents are being dealt with strictly. The security personnel are told to keep a vigil on such cases, and discussions are held with the Shree Jagannath Temple Administration (SJTA) on bringing in a specific law to curb such activities. The SP said taking mobile phones, video cameras and capturing pictures of the interior of the temple are strictly prohibited.
Time of India
05-08-2025
- Time of India
Govt mulling law amendment to make filming in Puri shrine a punishable offence: Min
Puri: Law minister Prithiviraj Harichandan Tuesday said the state govt was contemplating amending the Shree Jagannath Temple Act, 1955, to make provision for carrying spy cameras and taking pictures or video inside the 12th-century shrine in Puri as a cognisable offence with provision of punishment. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now The minister made the statement after a devotee from West Bengal was detained on Tuesday for allegedly attempting to enter the shrine with a hidden camera embedded in his spectacles, the third such incident within a week. "There should be a proper law to curb such a situation. It is very difficult to identify the people carrying spy cameras inside the temple. The police could know about the spy camera only when there is a flashlight while taking pictures. Therefore, a law is most essential," Harichandan said. Partish Pal from West Burdwan was caught at the shrine's west gate by cops on Tuesday. A spy camera-equipped spectacle and his mobile phone were seized. Pal is in police custody. The incident comes just a day after Bipul Patel (55), from Gujarat's Surat, was caught filming inside the temple using a spectacles fitted with a concealed camera. He was apprehended near Kirtana Chakada at 5:30pm on Monday. The device was connected to his smartphone, which was later seized from his hotel room. On July 29, a local, Abhijit Kar, was caught taking photographs inside the temple with a hidden camera in his glasses. All three incidents are being investigated by police. The repeated violations prompted the shrine administration to convene a high-level meeting, which was attended by Chhatisa Nijog servitors, Puri district collector Dibya Jyoti Mishra and chief administrator of Shree Jagannath Temple Administration (SJTA), Arabinda Padhee. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Following the meeting, Padhee said that a proposal will be sent to the state govt seeking amendment of the temple Act. One key proposal is to introduce up to seven years of imprisonment and non-bailable warrant for individuals attempting to damage the sanctity of Jagannath culture, including through unauthorised filming or use of electronic devices. "Anyone caught using spy cams, drones or hidden devices will face strict legal action. Only security personnel will be allowed to use mobile phones inside the temple, and that too in designated zones for official communication," Padhee said. He clarified that no servitor or official would be permitted to carry phones on the temple premises. The meeting also decided that a standard rate chart for Mahaprasad will soon be displayed at Ananda Bazaar, addressing growing concerns about administration also resolved to ensure that only Omfed ghee will be used for all temple rituals to maintain purity and quality.
New Indian Express
01-08-2025
- New Indian Express
Development commissioner Garg submits Puri stampede probe report to CM Majhi
BHUBANESWAR: Development commissioner Anu Garg on Thursday submitted the inquiry report on the stampede near Gundicha temple during Rath Yatra in Puri to Chief Minister Mohan Charan Majhi. The report comes after a month-long investigation into the tragic incident that resulted in the loss of three lives including two women devotees. The chief minister ordered an administrative inquiry into incident on June 30, hours after the stampede occurred in the wee hours of the day due to massive crowding at the Gundicha temple for darshan of Lord Jagannath. The inquiry led by Garg was asked to submit a report within a month. She was tasked to find out the reason behind the incident and suggest measures that can be taken so that such mishaps do not repeat in future. While findings of the inquiry has not been revealed, it is expected that the report may have pointed to significant security lapses, lack of coordination of temple administration with servitors on fixing timings for darshan and lapses on the part of the district administration in crowd management, which led to the mishap. The state government is likely to take further action based on the findings and recommendations outlined in the report.
