Fossil of prehistoric marine reptile discovered in Argentina field
The Brief
A landowner in Argentina's Neuquén province reported the discovery of fossilized remains
Authorities confirmed the find as an ichthyosaur, a prehistoric marine reptile
Crews worked with cultural heritage officials to recover the remains safely
A quiet stretch of rural Argentina became the site of an ancient discovery after a landowner came across what turned out to be fossilized remains of a prehistoric marine creature.
According to the Argentine National Gendarmerie, the discovery was made in the province of Neuquén by a private field owner, who notified local authorities after spotting the unusual find.
The backstory
With assistance from the Neuquén Cultural Heritage Directorate, members of Squadron 31 in Las Lajas worked to safely recover the fossil, which was later identified as belonging to an ichthyosaur—a marine reptile that lived during the Mesozoic era.
Ichthyosaurs were porpoise-like aquatic reptiles and distant relatives of modern-day lizards and snakes, according to Encyclopedia Britannica. They thrived millions of years ago when much of the Earth was covered in oceans and are known for their streamlined bodies and powerful tails, adapted for fast swimming.
While details on the fossil's age and condition are still emerging, experts say the discovery contributes to the region's rich paleontological record.
The Source
This report is based on information released by the Argentine National Gendarmerie and the Neuquén Cultural Heritage Directorate. Scientific details about ichthyosaurs are sourced from Encyclopedia Britannica.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
12 hours ago
- Yahoo
Ancient fossils show how the last mass extinction forever scrambled the ocean's biodiversity
About 66 million years ago – perhaps on a downright unlucky day in May – an asteroid smashed into our planet. The fallout was immediate and severe. Evidence shows that about 70% of species went extinct in a geological instant, and not just those famous dinosaurs that once stalked the land. Masters of the Mesozoic oceans were also wiped out, from mosasaurs – a group of aquatic reptiles topping the food chain – to exquisitely shelled squid relatives known as ammonites. Even groups that weathered the catastrophe, such as mammals, fishes and flowering plants, suffered severe population declines and species loss. Invertebrate life in the oceans didn't fare much better. But bubbling away on the seafloor was a stolid group of animals that has left a fantastic fossil record and continues to thrive today: bivalves – clams, cockles, mussels, oysters and more. What happened to these creatures during the extinction event and how they rebounded tells an important story, both about the past and the future of biodiversity. Marine bivalves lost around three-quarters of their species during this mass extinction, which marked the end of the Cretaceous Period. My colleagues and I – each of us paleobiologists studying biodiversity – expected that losing so many species would have severely cut down the variety of roles that bivalves play within their environments, what we call their 'modes of life.' But, as we explain in a study published in the journal Sciences Advances, that wasn't the case. In assessing the fossils of thousands of bivalve species, we found that at least one species from nearly all their modes of life, no matter how rare or specialized, squeaked through the extinction event. Statistically, that shouldn't have happened. Kill 70% of bivalve species, even at random, and some modes of life should disappear. Most bivalves happily burrow into the sand and mud, feeding on phytoplankton they strain from the water. But others have adopted chemosymbionts and photosymbionts – bacteria and algae that produce nutrients for the bivalves from chemicals or sunlight in exchange for housing. A few have even become carnivorous. Some groups, including the oysters, can lay down a tough cement that hardens underwater, and mussels hold onto rocks by spinning silken threads. We thought surely these more specialized modes of life would have been snuffed out by the effects of the asteroid's impact, including dust and debris likely blocking sunlight and disrupting a huge part of the bivalves' food chain: photosynthetic algae and bacteria. Instead, most persisted, although biodiversity was forever scrambled as a new ecological landscape emerged. Species that were once dominant struggled, while evolutionary newcomers rose in their place. The reasons some species survived and others didn't leave many questions to explore. Those that filtered phytoplankton from the water column suffered some of the highest species losses, but so did species that fed on organic scraps and didn't rely as much on the Sun's energy. Narrow geographic distributions and different metabolisms may have contributed to these extinction patterns. Life rebounded from each of the Big Five mass extinctions throughout Earth's history, eventually punching through past diversity highs. The rich fossil record and spectacular ecological diversity of bivalves gives us a terrific opportunity to study these rebounds to understand how ecosystems and global biodiversity rebuild in the wake of extinctions. The extinction caused by the asteroid strike knocked down some thriving modes of life and opened the door for others to dominate the new landscape. While many people lament the loss of the dinosaurs, we malacologists miss the rudists. These bizarrely shaped bivalves resembled giant ice cream cones, sometimes reaching more than 3 feet (1 meter) in size, and they dominated the shallow, tropical Mesozoic seas as massive aggregations of contorted individuals, similar to today's coral reefs. At least a few harbored photosymbiotic algae, which provided them with nutrients and spurred their growth, much like modern corals. Today, giant clams (Tridacna) and their relatives fill parts of these unique photosymbiotic lifestyles once occupied by the rudists, but they lack the rudists' astonishing species diversity. Mass extinctions clearly upend the status quo. Now, our ocean floors are dominated by clams burrowed into sand and mud, the quahogs, cockles and their relatives – a scene far different from that of the seafloor 66 million years ago. Ecological traits alone didn't fully predict extinction patterns, nor do they entirely explain the rebound. We also see that simply surviving a mass extinction didn't necessarily provide a leg up as species diversified within their old and sometimes new modes of life – and few of those new modes dominate the ecological landscape today. Like the rudists, trigoniid bivalves had lots of different species prior to the extinction event. These highly ornamented clams built parts of their shells with a super strong biomaterial called nacre – think iridescent pearls – and had fractally interlocking hinges holding their two valves together. But despite surviving the extinction, which should have placed them in a prime position to accumulate species again, their diversification sputtered. Other types of bivalves that made a living in the same way proliferated instead, relegating this once mighty and global group to a handful of species now found only off the coast of Australia. These unexpected patterns of extinction and survival may offer lessons for the future. The fossil record shows us that biodiversity has definite breaking points, usually during a perfect storm of climatic and environmental upheaval. It's not just that species are lost, but the ecological landscape is overturned. Many scientists believe the current biodiversity crisis may cascade into a sixth mass extinction, this one driven by human activities that are changing ecosystems and the global climate. Corals, whose reefs are home to nearly a quarter of known marine species, have faced mass bleaching events as warming ocean water puts their future at risk. Acidification as the oceans absorb more carbon dioxide can also weaken the shells of organisms crucial to the ocean food web. Findings like ours suggest that, in the future, the rebound from extinction events will likely result in very different mixes of species and their modes of life in the oceans. And the result may not align with human needs if species providing the bulk of ecosystem services are driven genetically or functionally extinct. The global oceans and their inhabitants are complex, and, as our team's latest research shows, it is difficult to predict the trajectory of biodiversity as it rebounds – even when extinction pressures are reduced. Billions of people depend on the ocean for food. As the history recorded by the world's bivalves shows, the upending of the pecking order – the number of species in each mode of life – won't necessarily settle into an arrangement that can feed as many people the next time around. This article is republished from The Conversation, a nonprofit, independent news organization bringing you facts and trustworthy analysis to help you make sense of our complex world. It was written by: Stewart Edie, Smithsonian Institution Read more: Megalodon sharks ruled the oceans millions of years ago – new analyses of giant fossilized teeth are helping scientists unravel the mystery of their extinction As climate change and pollution imperil coral reefs, scientists are deep-freezing corals to repopulate future oceans Growing quickly helped the earliest dinosaurs and other ancient reptiles flourish in the aftermath of mass extinction Stewart Edie receives funding from the Smithsonian Institution.
Yahoo
30-05-2025
- Yahoo
Birds have been nesting in the Arctic Circle for almost 73 million years, newly discovered fossils reveal
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. Birds have been nesting in rugged Arctic environments for almost 73 million years, new research finds — more than 25 million years longer than was previously thought. A collection of more than 50 fossils found in northern Alaska, which include embryos and hatchlings, suggest some of the early ancestors of modern birds either migrated or adapted to the harsh polar environment in the Mesozoic era, the age of dinosaurs. "The common conception is they're too primitive to be exhibiting this advanced behavior," Lauren Wilson, lead author of the study and a doctoral student of paleontology at Princeton University, told Live Science. "So you're either dealing with [Arctic winters] as an itty-bitty, freshly hatched bird, or you're 3 months old, and having to fly about 2,000 kilometers [1,240 miles] to get to a point where it makes sense to even migrate," Wilson explained. "I don't think we would expect either of those things from these birds that don't belong to that modern lineage of birds." Whether the birds migrated south or hunkered down for the winter, the research provides the earliest known evidence of either behavior in birds. And while some modern birds, like the ivory gull (Pagophila eburnea) and snowy owl (Bubo scandiacus) are known to nest in the frigid Arctic, there is now evidence that this behavior started millions of years before the meteor that wiped out non-avian dinosaurs crashed into Earth, if not earlier. "Many birds nest in the Arctic today, and they are key parts of Arctic communities and ecosystems and food webs," Steve Brusatte, a professor of paleontology and evolution at the University of Edinburgh who peer-reviewed the study but was not involved in it, told Live Science in an email. "These fossils show that birds were already integral parts of these high latitude communities many tens of millions of years ago, and thus that these communities are a long-term norm of Earth history, not a recent ecological innovation of modern times." The fossils in the collection come from at least three different families of bird: the extinct, loon-like hesperornithes; ichthyornithes, an extinct bird that resembled seagulls; and several species resembling ducks that are within or very similar to neornithes, the group containing all modern birds. Related: Hoatzin: The strange 'stinkbird' born with clawed wings that appears to be an evolutionary 'orphan' Notably, the researchers did not find any fossils of the dominant bird group of the Cretaceous period (145 million to 66 million years ago) — enantiornithes, now-extinct birds that typically had teeth in their beaks and claws on their wings. But a few factors reveal why they likely didn't live in the Arctic. They likely took longer than other birds to incubate their eggs, they took several years to reach full adult size (where most modern birds grow to adult size within weeks) and they "may have had a period where they're almost naked because they molted their feathers simultaneously," which is not helpful during an Arctic winter, said study co-author Daniel Ksepka, a paleontologist and curator of the Bruce Museum in Connecticut. The world was warmer in the Late Cretaceous than it is today, but the region the birds were found in likely experienced freezing temperatures, snow and roughly four straight months of winter darkness. Growing to adulthood so quickly allowed modern birds to practice long-range migration and prosper during those ancient Arctic summers, which boasted around six months of 24-hour daylight and a burst in insect populations. But the weather wasn't the only challenge. They lived alongside "probably about 12 or 13 different kinds of typical dinosaurs," like the Pachyrhinosaurus, a relative of Triceratops that was about 16 feet (5 meters) long and weighed 2 tons (1,800 kilograms). Other dinosaurs like Troodon, an 11-foot tall meat-eater with short, serrated teeth, "would have happily taken advantage of a bunch of these little cute little chicks for dinner," said Patrick Druckenmiller, director of the University of Alaska Museum of the North and advising author of the study. RELATED STORIES —Chickens sprouted dino-like feathers when scientists messed with the Sonic Hedgehog gene —Why don't all birds fly? —Ancient duck-like creature discovered in Antarctica may be the oldest modern bird ever discovered To get to the fossil sites in the Prince Creek Formation in Northern Alaska, the researchers drove 500 miles (800 km) from Fairbanks, chartered a small aircraft to fly to the Colville River, then took inflatable motorboats up the river before setting up camp, Druckenmiller said. There they would look for an "orangey, pebbly, sandy" layer of sediment that contains small bones and teeth, and often lay on the permafrost to "excavate with little dental picks and small tools" from the layer itself. Now that the Prince Creek Formation is "one of the major North American Cretaceous bird sites," according to the researchers, Wilson says the next step is simply to find more fossils. "The more bones we find, the more confident we can be in exactly what types of birds we have," she said. "We might even still find a random bone that's from a bird we didn't know was there."
Newsweek
08-05-2025
- Newsweek
Giant waves beneath the Atlantic reveal the ocean formed earlier than thought
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Scientists have discovered giant mud waves buried deep below the Atlantic Ocean around 250 miles off the coast of Guinea-Bissau, a country in west Africa. Made of mud and sand, these massive underwater sediment waves lie around 3,280 feet below the seabed, researchers reported in a new study. They were formed in the "Equatorial Atlantic Gateway"— the seaway that resulted from South America and Africa splitting apart, which created the Atlantic Ocean. The findings of the study, published in the journal Global and Planetary Change, suggest that the Atlantic Ocean may have formed millions of years earlier than previously thought, igniting a period of climate change. Using seismic data and cores from wells drilled as part of the Deep Sea Drilling Project in 1975, the researchers found five layers of sediment that they used to reconstruct the tectonic processes that divided the ancient continent of Gondwana in the Mesozoic era, when dinosaurs dominated the Earth. A stock image of an aerial view of waves in the Atlantic Ocean. A stock image of an aerial view of waves in the Atlantic Ocean. iStock / Getty Images Plus "This direct sedimentary evidence shows the establishment of a marine connection started at around 117 million years ago, significantly earlier than previous estimates, and coinciding with the onset of global climate cooling," the researchers wrote. "These findings show the dynamic interplay between gateway opening, ocean circulation and climate change during the middle Cretaceous [period], highlighting the pivotal role of ocean gateways in Earth's climate system," the researchers added. One striking layer of sediment included vast fields of sediment waves and "contourite drifts," which are mud mounds that form under strong bottom currents, noted Uisdean Nicholson, one of the two geologists from the School of Energy, Geoscience, Infrastructure and Society who discovered the waves. "Imagine one-kilometer [around 3,280 feet]-long waves, a few hundred meters [around 328 feet] high—a whole field formed in one particular location to the west of the Guinea Plateau, just at the final 'pinch-point' of the separating continents of South America and Africa," Nicholson said in a statement. These waves were formed from the strong contrast in density between the fresh waters of the open Central Atlantic waters in the north and the salty waters in the south. The dense, salty water spilled out from the newly formed gateway, Nicholson said. He added: "Think of it like a giant waterfall that formed below the ocean surface." The researcher explained: "Just before this time, huge salt deposits were laid down in the South Atlantic. When the gateway opened, fresh water poured into these narrow basins, and the denser, more saline water flowed out to the north, forming these giant waves." The study's findings put a new date on the opening of the Equatorial Atlantic Gateway and its impact on climate regulation. The gateway was previously believed to have opened between 113 and 83 million years ago. However, the discovery of the sediment waves indicated that the opening began earlier: from around 117 million years ago. Paper co-author and geologist Débora Duarte explained that up until 117 million years ago, the Earth had been cooling for a while, with vast amounts of carbon stored in most likely lakes and other emerging basins of the Equatorial Atlantic. "But then the climate warmed significantly from 117 to 110 million years ago," Duarte said in a statement. "And we think that this was likely because of the first connection through this gateway and the inundation of seawater into these emerging basins." The efficiency of carbon burial was initially reduced as the gateway opened, which would have had a warming effect. A full Atlantic circulation system was formed as the gateway grew deeper and wider, and the climate entered a period of long-term cooling during the Late Cretaceous era. "This shows that the gateway played a really important role in global climate change during the Mesozoic," Duarte noted. "Understanding how past ocean circulation influenced climate is crucial for predicting future changes," Nicholson said, adding: "Today's ocean currents play a key role in regulating global temperatures, and disruptions, such as those caused by melting ice caps, could have profound consequences." Do you have a tip on a science story that Newsweek should be covering? Do you have a question about geology? Let us know via science@ Reference Duarte, D., Erba, E., Bottini, C., Wagner, T., Aduomahor, B., Jones, T. D., & Nicholson, U. (2025). Early Cretaceous deep-water bedforms west of the Guinea Plateau revise the opening history of the Equatorial Atlantic Gateway. Global and Planetary Change, 249.
