logo
Bill Belichick's UNC contract buyout dramatically reduced. What does it mean?

Bill Belichick's UNC contract buyout dramatically reduced. What does it mean?

Fox News3 days ago

When Bill Belichick agreed to become North Carolina's next head football coach in December 2024, many were surprised for a variety of reasons. There was one thing in particular that stood out about his five-year, $50 million contract that called into question Belichick's long-term fit with the program.
The buyout on his contract would dramatically decrease on June 1, falling from $10 million to $1 million. As that detail became known, many speculated just how invested Belichick, 73, was in remaining in Chapel Hill for the long haul.
However, the curiosity surrounding that date in Belichick's contract gained further attention for a different reason over the past month. Belichick's relationship with his girlfriend, 24-year-old Jordon Hudson, has drawn national headlines, leading some to speculate whether UNC would be willing to cut ties with him at some point this offseason.
That said, June 1 has arrived, and Belichick is still employed by the Tar Heels, but could that change soon?
Here's everything you need to know about Belichick, UNC and the June 1 buyout date.
While some have speculated that North Carolina could move on from Belichick due to the decrease in his buyout, it's actually only applicable if Belichick leaves on his own accord. So, if Belichick left to coach in the NFL, resigned or retired from coaching at any time beyond June 1, he would owe the school $1 million. Prior to Sunday, Belichick would've owed UNC $10 million if he left on his own volition.
North Carolina would have to pay Belichick substantially more money if it ended the relationship this summer. The first three years of Belichick's contract are fully guaranteed if he's fired without cause before the end of 2027. If he were to get fired this offseason, Belichick would be owed $30 million as he has a yearly salary of $10 million on his contract.
Despite the speculative noise surrounding a potential exit, Belichick and UNC have remained committed to each other, even as the six-time Super Bowl-winning head coach has created some awkward headlines over the last month.
Hudson seemingly became a household name in the college football world when she interjected when Belichick was asked a question about their relationship during his interview with "CBS Sunday Morning" in April. That interview led some to call into question just how involved Hudson is with not just Belichick's life, but also with UNC's football program. Emails obtained by The Assembly in March showed that Belichick asked UNC staff to copy Hudson on every email sent to him.
In the aftermath of the "CBS Sunday Morning" interview, Meadowlark Media's Pablo Torre reported in May that Hudson was barred from UNC's football facility. UNC denied that was the case, though.
"While Jordon Hudson is not an employee at the University or Carolina Athletics, she is welcome to the Carolina Football facilities," the school said in a statement on May 9. "Jordon will continue to manage all activities related to Coach Belichick's personal brand outside of his responsibilities for Carolina Football and the University."
Later in May, Belichick told ESPN that Hudson "doesn't have anything to do with football," but admitted that he talked to the players about the off-field distraction. UNC athletic director Bubba Cunningham didn't have any concerns about Belichick when he spoke with ESPN during the ACC spring meetings.
"Bill [has] been great to work with," Cunningham said. "He talked about practicing like a pro and he runs a professional organization that is teaching students how to be professional in all aspects of their life. He is a very determined, professional individual, and that's the way he carries himself and the way he conducts the program."
Later in May, Cunningham told Axios that UNC had sold out its season tickets for the 2025 season despite a price hike of 25% — something it didn't do in 2024 — and credited Belichick.
Former UNC coach Mack Brown, who Belichick replaced, made headlines in May when he told SiriusXM College Sports Radio's "Dusty and Danny In the Morning," that the school had loosened up its academic requirements and made more investments into the football program ever since Belichick's hiring in December.
"As far as North Carolina and Bill Belichick now, he's arguably the best coach ever," Brown said. "They've committed money to it. They've helped him with academics. They've lowered those standards some. So, there's absolutely no reason they shouldn't be successful … and they've changed the roster. I think they've signed maybe 60-something new transfers.
"So, you've got a chance to succeed at the highest level, and I expect him to do that, and I'm proud for him."
As there were rumors of Belichick asking for an increased name, image and likeness (NIL) budget contingent on his hiring, there was an expectation that it would be upwards of $20 million, CBS Sports reported in December. That seemed to help Belichick in the transfer portal this offseason, helping UNC land the ninth-best class, per 247 Sports.
In terms of high school recruiting, Belichick helped UNC land the 36th-best recruiting class in 2025 and the program has the 20th-best recruiting class in 2026 as of Sunday, according to 247 Sports.
Considering the success Belichick has had and the improved talent on the roster, it's easy to think that UNC should improve its record from the 6-7 record it posted in 2025. However, its win total is set at 7.5 wins at DraftKings Sports as of Sunday. Additionally, it has the sixth-best odds to win the ACC.
Belichick and UNC will open its season against TCU, hosting the Horned Frogs in the final game of Week 1.
Belichick's five-year deal with UNC includes a variety of bonuses and perks. Here's a closer look:
Want great stories delivered right to your inbox? Create or log in to your FOX Sports account, follow leagues, teams and players to receive a personalized newsletter daily.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Nikita Kucherov voted Ted Lindsay Award winner as NHL's most outstanding player
Nikita Kucherov voted Ted Lindsay Award winner as NHL's most outstanding player

New York Times

time16 minutes ago

  • New York Times

Nikita Kucherov voted Ted Lindsay Award winner as NHL's most outstanding player

Tampa Bay Lightning forward Nikita Kucherov has been named the recipient of the 2024-25 Ted Lindsay Award, given to the league's most outstanding player according to a vote of his peers in the National Hockey League Players' Association. By winning his second career Ted Lindsay, the 31-year-old Kucherov beat out a pair of teammates in fellow finalists Cale Makar and and Nathan MacKinnon of the Colorado Avalanche. MacKinnon was the winner of last year's award. Nikita Kucherov was surprised by his @TBLightning teammates with the Ted Lindsay Award, presented by the @NHLPA "to the most outstanding player in the NHL". Watch the #NHLAwards on June 12 at 6p ET on @NHL_On_TNT and @Sportsnet before Game 4 of the #StanleyCup Final! — NHL (@NHL) June 4, 2025 Kucherov led the league with 121 points, edging MacKinnon by five to secure his third Art Ross Trophy in the process. The Russian winger also scored 37 goals in 78 games, earning a nomination for the Hart Trophy for the league's most valuable player. The Hart Trophy will be announced on June 12 prior to Game 4 of the Stanley Cup Final. Kucherov last won the Ted Lindsay Award, previously known as the Lester B. Pearson Award, back in 2018-19.

Cincinnati Reds place starter Hunter Greene on IL, sign veteran lefty Wade Miley
Cincinnati Reds place starter Hunter Greene on IL, sign veteran lefty Wade Miley

New York Times

time16 minutes ago

  • New York Times

Cincinnati Reds place starter Hunter Greene on IL, sign veteran lefty Wade Miley

CINCINNATI — Just minutes before a scheduled MRI, the Cincinnati Reds placed starter Hunter Greene on the injured list with a right groin strain. Greene said he felt discomfort on his last two pitches in the fifth inning of Tuesday's victory over the Milwaukee Brewers and left the game. Tuesday was his third start back from the IL, which was one of the reasons the team returned him to the IL. Advertisement 'We stayed here for a while last night, we talked to him, we talked to trainers,' Reds manager Terry Francona said. 'Since it happened once and this is twice, we've got to figure this out. And then his lower back was starting to (affect him) and we're trying to figure out if it's related. We've got to get him healthy. It was kind of an easy decision even without seeing the MRI.' The Reds signed veteran left-hander Wade Miley to fill Greene's spot in the rotation and transferred right-hander Rhett Lowder to the 60-day injured list. Sunday, Miley exercised the opt-out of his minor-league deal and became a free agent. The 38-year-old is coming back from a hybrid ulnar collateral ligament surgery, which combines traditional Tommy John surgery with an internal brace, that he underwent last May while with the Brewers. Miley made seven minor-league starts this year, including a five-inning, two-run performance last Friday for the Triple-A Louisville Bats. Because he wouldn't be ready to pitch again until Wednesday, Miley said Reds president of baseball operations Nick Krall told him he'd have a place in the team's bullpen, but wanted to let Miley explore an opportunity to start elsewhere. Miley said he talked to a couple of other teams, but was happy to return to the Reds. Miley's family is in Cincinnati for the season, so he spent the time 'being dad' and coaching baseball games and practice for his son Jeb. Miley was already expected to be in the Reds' bullpen on Wednesday, but Greene's injury created an opening for him in the rotation. Francona said Miley would be available to pitch out of the bullpen Wednesday, but if he didn't, he'd start Monday in Cleveland. In 2021, Miley threw a no-hitter for the Reds against then-Cleveland manager Francona's Guardians at Progressive Field. Advertisement 'It was a situation where the five starters here were throwing the ball great, and I was pretty open with Nick, like I don't want to mess with that,' Miley said. 'Physically, I think I'll be fine in the bullpen, but they allowed me to see if there were any starting jobs out there, and at the end of the day, here we are.' Miley, a Red in 2020 and 2021, was a consistent and popular figure in spring training, and Wednesday's news generated excitement in the Reds' clubhouse. 'He was in full uni at 8:30 this morning when I thought I was the only one here,' Francona said. 'It's really welcome. We've been waiting for him, there's no getting around it. He's a bright light, man.'

Perplexity's CEO Sees AI Agents as the Next Web Battleground
Perplexity's CEO Sees AI Agents as the Next Web Battleground

WIRED

time17 minutes ago

  • WIRED

Perplexity's CEO Sees AI Agents as the Next Web Battleground

Jun 4, 2025 12:25 PM Aravind Srinivas says agents need access to apps and claims that letting OpenAI take control of Chrome would be a disaster for the open Web. Aravind Srinivas attends the 2025 Breakthrough Prize Ceremony at Barker Hangar on April 05, 2025, in Santa Monica, California. Photo-Illustration: WIRED Staff; Photograph:Perplexity has tapped into the power of generative artificial intelligence—with all its problematic tendencies—in an effort to challenge Google as the dominant way people find information online. The AI search tool rose in prominence in 2024 and was lauded as a promising alternative to Googling. Like other AI players though, the service has been sued for alleged copyright infringement. It has been accused by Forbes of plagiarizing its news articles, closely paraphrasing other websites, and hallucinating incorrect information. Despite the furor, Perplexity today says that its service gets 650 million queries per month and is said to be chasing investment that would value the company at $18 billion. The company is pushing AI assistants for mobile devices and working on its own web browser. In April, Motorola announced that Perplexity would come bundled with its new Razr Ultra phones. Last month the company partnered with PayPal to make it easier for users to buy products using its assistant. Samsung is also said to be in talks to possibly include Perplexity on its devices, according to a report from Bloomberg. (Perplexity declined to comment on this after the interview.). Perplexity CEO Aravind Srinivas spoke with Will Knight, senior writer at WIRED, by phone and email. This conversation has been edited for clarity and brevity. WIRED: The PayPal deal seems important to the vision that everyone has for agents. Is ecommerce the killer 'agentic' app? Aravind Srinivas: Agents are the killer app for everything. Agents allow users to have the experience that's best for them. Some people like shopping and researching, and some people want it done for them. There's a spectrum in between, and our focus is what is the best experience for the user. Speaking of the experience, agents still make mistakes. What happens when they buy something by accident? Merchants and buyers have adapted to every new technology since ancient times. We just show both of them what is possible, and they choose. Every successful technology has had to take security and error-resolution very seriously, and that won't change. Integrating AI with personal devices is another big theme. Why does the Motorola deal matter to you? It's a big deal because Motorola is one of the largest phone brands in the world. This partnership gives us the ability to make trustworthy AI more accessible than ever. Now, by introducing Perplexity to millions of people around the world, in a native and seamless way, more people will get to see how much more really is possible with search. Would you consider developing your own devices eventually? We are focused on building the best AI assistant and answer engine. Motorola will offer other AI assistants, so how will Perplexity distinguish itself? As AI assistants become more common, accuracy and trust will become even more important. An assistant isn't very useful if it's unreliable. Worse, if an assistant is misleading or sycophantic, then it isn't an assistant—it's a manipulator. That's not just useless, it's dangerous. Inaccurate AI has a negative compounding effect, and we have always been the leader in developing AI and AI assistants focused on accuracy and verifiability. That will have a positive compounding effect. Wait though … Perplexity—like other AI search engines—has been criticized for hallucinating and getting things wrong. We welcome this criticism, because it's the best way for us to continually improve. In reality, errors account for a small fraction of results, and our answers are far more accurate than 10 blue links polluted by decades of SEO-optimized content. [In response to a follow-up request, Perplexity did not provide further details on error rates, but Jesse Dwyer, a spokesman, said that reliability is improving constantly]. But the fact is, accuracy and trust will only become more important as AI integrates into more of our lives, so this is something we're relentlessly focused on. We can't get there without this feedback. Perplexity also cribs from copyrighted news articles with its 'discover' section. Do you understand why some publishers are upset? We've answered that before. See our blog post on how we respect [a file added to websites that specifies whether web crawlers should access their content]. The Perplexity assistant for Android and iOS seems 'agentic' because it can take actions. How big of a shift is this? AI is pretty good at answering questions now. What really needs to be done is get AI to take actions. People use the word 'agents'; you can go with whatever you want—'agent' or 'assistant'—but in the end, it needs to string together tools and execute actions. That's why we're [also building a] browser, and an assistant on iOS, Android. Do Apple and Google have too much control over their mobile platforms compared to outsiders looking to build agents? With iOS it's particularly challenging, because you have to string together a bunch of event APIs. On iOS, Mail, Calendar, Reminders, Podcasts, all that stuff is natively available through the Apple SDK [software development kit used to build applications], so you can actually at least draft emails, schedule meetings, move meetings, set reminders, all this stuff, open podcasts pretty easily. You can do searches for podcasts … 'get me the one where Mark Andreessen discusses de-banking with Joe Rogan.' It can get you that pretty quickly. It's mostly difficult because you cannot access other apps. iOS is not very different from Android, because AI cannot access most apps on Android either (meaning that the Perplexity assistant can interact with some apps more easily than others). [But] third-party apps can build their SDKs to be accessible on the Android SDK. For example, our Android system can display a song on Spotify. On iOS, you can only link to a specific Spotify song, and you have to manually start playing the audio. Oh, so it's app-makers that are holding AI agents back? That's the challenge. If people are offering us APIs—say, Open Table, Uber, DoorDash, or Instacart—where we can access information within the app without even having to open the app. On the back end, that's pretty powerful. For example, if we can access information on Uber and find that Uber comfort doesn't cost more than 5 or 10 percent of Uber X, then we can just book Uber comfort for you—if that's a preference that you set on Perplexity. Or similarly [we can] find the best Thai place near you and get me a dash [delivery] a lot faster than going to DoorDash app, searching for Thai food and scrolling through all these options, reading all those reviews and then putting your address, doing the checkout, all that stuff. We could honestly do all that in our system and just make the experience a lot more seamless and simple. I think that's where things are headed, but people need to open up their apps to us, and we'll have to see who's willing to do what. Isn't the biggest problem that AI agents just aren't very smart and useful yet? My analogy [for AI agents] is that we are at a point where Perplexity was in 2022 [just before it took off]. It's not like we got all the answers right, people made fun of hallucinations and some people call it 'Google in macro seconds.' It was not quite there. It only took off many months later, when models got better, and I expect the same trend with the agents and assistants. There's going to be some set of things that really work, daily use cases, and there'll be a long tail of things that don't work, that we're going to keep fixing over time. But that's exactly why we are building a [web] browser, because the browser front end will let you do the work on your own too, if you're not happy with what the AI did. So, then we can learn from that and fix that over time. Waymo and Tesla self driving did not work for a long time. Now, people take them for granted. I think it is a similar trajectory for us. Is this why you floated the idea of Perxplexity taking control of Chrome—if Google were forced to divest it? We're not saying we're interested in buying Chrome. We're saying that if there's no other path, if Google is put in a situation where they have to divest Chrome, then we'd be open to running it. But Google should not have to divest Chrome, because Chrome and Chromium are tied to each other. Chromium is an open source project that's being run very [well] by Google, and it is the reason for Microsoft Edge and the Brave browser. OpenAI has also shown an interest in taking control of Chrome. Giving ownership of Chrome or Chromium to a company like OpenAI would be a disaster, because open source and OpenAI are an oxymoron at this point. [OpenAI did not respond to a request for comment. The company says it will release an open source AI model this summer.] There are only two companies that can really potentially run Chrome: Microsoft and Meta. Honestly, Microsoft would spoil it, just like it spoiled Edge. And transferring Chrome to Meta is transferring Chrome from one monopoly to another. [The FTC has filed a lawsuit that accuses Meta of acting as a social networking monopoly; the company argues this is not the case.] What do you expect agents to be useful for first? I think [they will make] a lot of your personal searches a lot better. Like asking, 'What was the article I read last week about this one particular company?' or 'Can you summarize my X feed for me so that I know what's trending?' because you don't want to go to X and get distracted by it. Or 'Can you schedule this meeting for me with this person and if there's a conflict send them an email asking for a different time?' All these boring things, I feel we will be able to automate [them] pretty quickly [in future].

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store