Harvard and Trump admin await judge's decision as deadline ticks closer
The institution requested that Judge Allison D. Burroughs make a decision before September 3, when much of the damage from the Trump administration's billions in research grant and other funding cuts would be irreversible.
Burroughs has yet to make a decision since a court date on July 21 during oral arguments, when she said she will get an opinion out as soon as possible.
However, during the court date, she expressed her uncertainty with the Trump administration's actions, calling the lawyer's arguments 'a little bit mind-boggling.'
During the hearing, Burroughs pushed back on whether the federal government could cancel grants across the institution en masse without substantially proving that researchers or labs had engaged in antisemitism.
She added that the 'consequences of that in terms of the constitutional law are staggering to me.'
President Donald Trump, for his part, took to Truth Social to take aim at Burroughs the same day, calling her a 'TOTAL DISASTER' and an 'automatic 'loss' for the People of our Country.'
He also signaled that the federal government would appeal her decision if she sides with Harvard. Legal experts believe the case could wind up going as far as the Supreme Court.
Read more: Is Harvard considering a $500M deal with Trump? Faculty don't think so
Harvard's second lawsuit over the federal government's attacks against international students is more settled.
Read more: Trump admin appeals federal judge's decision rejecting ban of foreign Harvard students
Burroughs granted two preliminary injunctions related to the case in late June. One preliminary injunction rejects a Trump administration attempt to ban Harvard foreign students from entering the country to study. This decision was appealed by the Trump administration and will now go to the First Circuit Court of Appeals.
The other preliminary injunction allows Harvard to host international students. No appeal has been filed on that decision.
What has happened between the Trump admin and Harvard?
The Trump administration has gone after Harvard since April, cutting billions of dollars.
Demanding an overhaul of Harvard's leadership structure, admissions and hiring — the federal government warned the school could risk losing $9 billion in funding.
Harvard rejected those demands, stating they seek to 'invade university freedoms long recognized by the Supreme Court.'
Then the fight over funding occurred.
It began with a $2.2 billion funding freeze on April 14 after the school refused to comply with the federal administration's demands.
In response, Harvard filed a lawsuit on April 21, arguing that its constitutional rights had been violated by the government's threats to pull billions of dollars in funding.
Harvard President Garber also signed onto a letter with hundreds of other university presidents pushing back against 'government overreach and political interference' by the Trump administration.
At the beginning of May, the Trump administration said it would bar Harvard University from acquiring new federal grants while the school continues to refuse to comply with the administration's demands for change on its campus.
A few days later, eight federal agencies cut $450 million in grants and then the United States Department of Health and Human Services cut $60 million in grants from the university.
Harvard went on to amend its lawsuit against the Trump administration.
Read more: Trump used her story to attack Harvard. She says 'don't destroy the university in my name'
On May 16, a wave of nearly one thousand federal research grant terminations began, amounting to more than $2.4 billion, according to an analysis by Nature.
In response, Harvard established a new Presidential Priorities Fund, asking for donations in the midst of federal cuts.
Some of Harvard's schools, including its School of Public Health, took to social media to ask for donations after nearly every single federal grant had been terminated.
Other investigations and threats have been made against the institution, some of which have focused on threatening the university's ability to enroll international students.
This prompted Harvard to open a second lawsuit against the Trump administration over its ability to accept international students.
Most recently, the State Department opened an investigation into Harvard University's use of international visas.
The Department of Homeland Security has also subpoenaed Harvard over its failure to provide documents concerning the misconduct or criminal actions of foreign students.
More Higher Ed
'They fear deportation': University student newspaper sues Trump admin over free speech
Is Harvard considering a $500M deal with Trump? Faculty don't think so
Here's who is pushing Trump to upend higher ed — and what they want
Trump admin brings Harvard antisemitism case to Justice Dept. after 'fruitless' discussions
Trump used her story to attack Harvard. She says 'don't destroy the university in my name'
Read the original article on MassLive.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
a minute ago
- Yahoo
Pam Bondi was a regular on Fox News – but hasn't appeared since the Epstein files backlash started
Attorney General Pam Bondi hasn't appeared on Fox News since backlash to the Trump administration's handling of the Jeffrey Epstein files started. Bondi, once a regular on the cable giant, was last on-air as a guest with Sean Hannity on June 30, just days before the Justice Department and FBI dropped a bombshell memo about the Epstein case that ignited weeks of chaos, Mediaite first noted. The memo poured cold water on the theory that Epstein had a client list, concluded that he died in a New York jail cell by suicide, and said that no further documents in the case would be released to the public. It was the beginning of weeks of uproar over the administration's failure to release the full Epstein files despite making numerous promises to do so, and Bondi was in the middle of the MAGA firestorm. Fox News has largely followed President Donald Trump's lead and focused its attention on anything other than the controversy, which has dominated coverage at other outlets. Bondi has played a central role in the Epstein files saga. She told Fox News that the Epstein files were sitting on her desk back in February, but the comment came back to haunt her after the memo was released on the Fourth of July weekend. 'It's sitting on my desk right now to review,' Bondi told John Roberts in February, who asked if the Justice Department would release the list of clients. 'That's been a directive by President Trump.' Fox News White House correspondent Peter Doocy challenged Trump's press secretary Karoline Leavitt about Bondi's comment at a press conference in July, following the DOJ and FBI memo. 'So, what happened to the Epstein client list that the attorney general said she had on her desk?' Doocy asked Leavitt. 'Well, I think if you go back and look at what the attorney general said in that interview, which was on your network, on Fox News—' Leavitt said, before Doocy interrupted her to repeat Bondi's quote from February. Leavitt pushed back and said that Bondi was referring to 'the entirety of all of the paperwork, all of the paper in relation to Jeffrey Epstein's crimes.' Bondi also infuriated MAGA after she invited right-wing influencers to the White House and gave them 'Phase 1' binders. The binders contained information already in the public domain. Some of the headlines Fox has run about Bondi since have been less than favorable. 'Bondi under siege after DOJ reveals no Epstein client list,' a July 7 headline read, which again railed against the comment about the files being on her desk. The network also covered the reported feud between Bondi and Deputy Director Dan Bongino, headlined: 'Inside Dan Bongino's tense meeting with White House officials over Jeffrey Epstein fallout.' Despite some noise that he could walk over frustration with the Epstein case, Bongino remained in his role. Bondi briefly spoke with Fox correspondent David Spunt on July 18 during a tour of Alcatraz Island, but she did not appear as a guest as she has done many times previously. As Florida's Attorney General, Bondi was also the co-host of The Five and was a regular commentator for years.
Yahoo
a minute ago
- Yahoo
Exclusive-Harvard patents targeted by Trump administration
By Jonathan Stempel (Reuters) -The Trump administration on Friday ordered a comprehensive review of Harvard University's federally funded research programs, and threatened to take title to or grant licenses from the school's lucrative portfolio of patents. In a letter to University President Alan Garber and obtained by Reuters, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick accused Harvard of breaching its legal and contractual requirements tied to the research programs and patents. Lutnick also said the Commerce Department has begun a "march-in" process under the federal Bayh-Dole Act that could let the government take ownership of or grant licenses to Harvard's patents. That law ensures that Americans benefit from inventions funded through taxpayer dollars, a senior administration official said. The letter demands that Harvard provide by September 5 a list of all patents stemming from federally funded research grants, including how the patents are used and whether any licensing requires "substantial U.S. manufacturing." Harvard did not immediately respond to requests for comment. As of July 1, 2024, Harvard held more than 5,800 patents, and had more than 900 technology licenses with over 650 industry partners, according to a university website. President Donald Trump has made bolstering the country's manufacturing and economic competitiveness a priority of his second White House term, including by raising tariffs on dozens of countries. The letter ratchets up the White House's pressure on Harvard, which it has accused of civil rights violations for failing to address antisemitism on campus. Harvard sued in April after the administration began stripping or freezing billions of dollars of federal research money. Other schools that have faced funding losses have included Columbia University, which last month agreed to pay more than $220 million to settle the government's antisemitism claims. The New York Times has said Harvard was open to spending up to $500 million to settle similar claims. Many civil rights experts, faculty and White House critics believe the administration's targeting of schools is a pretext to assert federal control and threaten academic freedom and free speech.
Yahoo
a minute ago
- Yahoo
Fox News whips up another Sydney Sweeney ‘controversy' by claiming left is ‘melting down' over old ice cream ad
After helping to manufacture a nearly two-week-long outrage cycle over the Sydney Sweeney 'good jeans' American Eagle commercial, Fox News appears to be trying to prolong the so-called 'controversy' by suggesting that liberals are also 'melting down' over a month-old ice cream ad featuring the Hollywood star. During Friday's broadcast of the midday roundtable show Outnumbered, the panel devoted an entire segment to the 'buzz' surrounding a resurfaced Baskin-Robbins spot featuring the Euphoria star unveiling her own 'signature scoop' and 'signature fizz,' known as 'Sweet on Sydney' offerings. The intent of the Fox News discussion, however, wasn't to put the spotlight on the new 'It Girl for the MAGA crowd' so much as it was to gin up the narrative that yet another Sweeney ad is triggering mass hysteria from the left and Democrats. 'If you are tired of her, sorry, Sydney Sweeney continues to make headlines, but this time not for her American Eagle ad,' Fox News host, and presidential daughter-in-law, Lara Trump declared at the top of the segment. 'Amid the furor over that great jeans campaign, the Baskin-Robbins commercial from a month ago has now resurfaced.' After airing a clip of the ice cream ad, Trump claimed that the 'commercial is now making the rounds on social media' before insisting that it is 'drawing criticism from both sides of the aisle.' The proof of that supposed outrage, though, was two tweets – both apparently from right-leaning accounts. 'One online critic said this is a big fail because 'ice cream tanks your testosterone, spikes your risk of diabetes, and wrecks your metabolism.' I bet our HHS secretary would agree with that,' Trump said, reading a post from a self-described 'canceled scientist' who added that conservatives shouldn't be 'acting like it's some huge win.' 'Another said this ad 'is gonna melt liberal minds,' and now they want to eat ice cream,' Trump continued, reading off another X post. Neither tweet, however, showed someone from the left criticizing the ad. Yet, the rest of the panel conversation centered on how Baskin-Robbins should 'really lean into this' and not 'cave to the woke mob' because American Eagle 'got a boost from President Trump', and saw its stock price jump. 'Are they going to stand by their girl Sydney Sweeney, Baskin-Robbins?' Trump wondered despite the lack of any actual uproar over this month-old commercial. 'I hope they do! I'm not sick of her whatsoever. I think she's amazing,' co-host Emily Compagno reacted. Indeed, as liberal media watchdog Media Matters reported Thursday, the conservative cable giant devoted nearly five hours of airtime to the American Eagle advertisement since July 28. The network, which has made a concerted effort in recent weeks to downplay the ongoing controversy over the Trump administration's handling of the Jeffrey Epstein files, only discussed that story for a total of 40 minutes. 'So, David, liberals are already melting down about this,' Lara Trump claimed, turning to panelist David Webb. 'But to Emily's point, she's cute, she's funny, you've gotta embrace this stuff! Are they really going to start melting down on the left over the ice cream?' Insisting that the 'left just melts down to begin with,' Webb went on to gush over Sweeney and her commercials, describing them as 'so Americana' and a throwback to Brooke Shields' famous Calvin Klein ad campaign -- though he incorrectly claimed Shields was pitching Jordache jeans. 'It was that American girl aspiration. You were a guy who wants to see a girl in her Jordache jeans. This is just advertising, folks. The left just can't help themselves,' he added. Doubling down on what the rest of the panel was selling, Fox News contributor Lisa Marie Boothe noted that while 'David was talking about how the left is melting down,' they also 'bully.' She went on to proclaim that liberals 'lost their ability to do so when President Trump won the popular vote.' After Trump mentioned how much fun she was having reading the comments on the Baskin-Robbins ad's YouTube page -- because conservatives were declaring that 'America is back' -- Fox News correspondent Alicia Acuna weighed in. 'I think that is the point for some of this, because the backlash against the backlash is so fun to watch,' Acuna stated. While MAGA media – and especially Fox News – feasted on the supposed liberal meltdown over the Sweeney ad, the New York Times reported Thursday that analysis of social media data revealed that conservative influencers with large followings were responsible for creating the outrage cycle in the first place. 'In reality, most progressives weren't worked up much at all,' the New York Times noted. 'Criticism of the ad campaign had come almost entirely from a smattering of accounts with relatively few followers, according to an analysis of social media data by The New York Times. Conversation about the ad did not escalate online or in traditional media until days later, after right-leaning influencers, broadcasters and politicians began criticizing what they described as a wave of progressive outrage.' Of course, this isn't a new tactic for the conservative media sphere, which has long specialized in focusing on the hot takes of a handful of little-known progressive accounts or a single op-ed about culture war issues to whip up their audience into a righteous fury, all with the hopes of it breaking through into the national discourse. 'This is a crystal clear illustration of how right-wing media's outrage-industrial complex works,' CNN's Andrew Kirell wrote in Reliable Sources this week. 'It all begins with a viral, often audacious post, typically from an obscure social media account, which then gets amplified by MAGA media influencers who dishonestly declare that it represents the entirety of the 'left.'' He concluded: 'From there, it reaches critical mass at Fox News — the final boss of conservative media — until Trump personally weighs in, generating more coverage and breathing new life into the outrage cycle. Rinse, repeat.'
