BMA hits back after NHS says less than a third of resident doctors joined strike
But the British Medical Association rejected this, saying complex work schedules and doctors taking leave make this information 'almost impossible to know'.
NHS England said it maintained care for an estimated 10,000 more patients during the latest doctors' strike compared with last year's, and 93% of planned operations, tests and procedures went ahead.
In previous walkouts, the majority of non-urgent care was postponed.
Health Secretary Wes Streeting said: 'A majority of resident doctors didn't vote for strike action and data shows that less than a third of residents took part.
'I want to thank those resident doctors who went to work for their commitment to their patients and to our shared mission to rebuild the NHS.'
He said it is time to 'move past the cycle of disruption'.
He added: 'I want to end this unnecessary dispute and I will be urging the BMA to work with the Government in good faith in our shared endeavour to improve the working lives of resident doctors, rather than pursuing more reckless strike action.'
The BMA said it recognised the efforts that senior doctors and healthcare workers made during the strike to provide care to patients, but it disputed the figure set out by the NHS.
It said: 'NHS England's claim that the majority of England's 77,000 resident doctors chose to 'join the NHS-wide effort to keep the services open' requires a huge stretch of the imagination, given it is almost impossible to know the exact number of residents working on any given day because of complex work patterns, on-call schedules and the strike spread across a weekend.
'Added to that, in July many doctors are using up their remaining annual leave before their new posts start and would therefore not show up as striking.
'We look forward to seeing hard and fast data on NHS England's claim.
'The strike could have been averted, as could any future ones, if Mr Streeting had come, and will come, to the table with a credible offer that resident doctors in England can accept.'
NHS chief executive Sir James Mackey noted care was still disrupted for thousands of people and said a repeat of strike action will be 'unacceptable'.
'I would urge the resident doctors committee to get back to the negotiating table and work with us and the Government on the meaningful improvements we can make to resident doctors' working lives.'
NHS Providers, which represents hospital trusts, said the walkout took a toll and trusts are concerned about potential wider industrial action in the health service.
Saffron Cordery, NHS Providers deputy chief executive, said: 'This dispute can't drag on.
'The union says resident doctors want this to be their last strike. With talks due to resume, let's hope so. Bringing disruptive strikes – where the only people being punished are patients – to an end must be a priority.
'We're concerned, as trusts worked hard to minimise disruption and to keep patients safe during the resident doctors' strike, by the threat of wider industrial action in the NHS.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
2 minutes ago
- BBC News
New cervical screening sessions in Wolverhampton pilot scheme
A new pilot programme has been launched in Wolverhampton to boost cervical screening the city's sexual health service, is offering new sessions to encourage people, particularly those aged 25 to 34 who are overdue for their cervical screening, to attend their screenings will take place across three Embrace clinics and provide an alternative to booking an appointment through a part of the provision, people would also be offered a free sexually transmitted infection (STI) screening, to help ensure their sexual health needs were up to date, The Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust said. Cervical screenings, previously known as smear tests, check the health of the cervix. The tests were being offered to women and people with a cervix aged 25 to 64, the trust the screening appointment, a small sample of cells is taken from the sample is then tested for certain types of human papillomavirus (HPV) that can cause changes to cervical cells. These are known as high-risk types of three Embrace clinics are on Fowler Centre, West Park Hospital and Bilston Health director in sexual health and HIV Dr Prita Banerjee said "we have to recognise that it can be difficult to find the time, outside of work and family commitments, to book an appointment".Dr Banerjee added the programme hoped to make cervical screening as accessible as possible "by offering flexible daytime and evening appointments". Follow BBC Wolverhampton & Black Country on BBC Sounds, Facebook, X and Instagram.
Powys County Times
3 hours ago
- Powys County Times
Wes Streeting warned alcohol measures ‘are not sufficient' to stop harm
Government plans to tackle problem drinking 'are not sufficient to address the scale and complexity of harm', leading health experts have warned. Academics, medics and charities from around the country have urged ministers to take 'ambitious' action to tackle the 'scale of the current crisis'. The Government recently set out plans to improve the health of people in England over the next decade. But in a letter to Health Secretary Wes Streeting, shared with the PA news agency, experts said that the public 'want and deserve' more action to tackle the harms. 'As experts from across alcohol policy, health and treatment, we urge you to revisit the current approach to tackling alcohol harm and commit to an ambitious, evidence-based strategy that reflects the scale of the current crisis,' the letter states. 'The 10-Year health plan for England offered a once-in-a-generation opportunity to shift gear and deliver genuine preventative action that would reverse the rising rates of alcohol-related hospitalisations and deaths we have seen in recent years. 'While the introduction of mandatory alcohol labelling and increased support for community-led schemes is welcome, these measures alone are not sufficient to address the scale and complexity of harm.' The letter has been signed by 34 health leaders from leading health organisations including the Alcohol Health Alliance; the Royal College of Physicians; the Royal College of General Practitioners and the Royal College of Emergency Medicine. The 10 Year Health Plan for England, which was published last month, sets out plans to tackle harmful drinking through alcohol labelling, which will include health warning messages. The document also sets out proposed changes to no and low (NoLo) alcohol products and pledged support for community-led schemes to reduce alcohol harm. Before the 10 Year Plan was released there was speculation over whether the plan would include a ban on alcohol advertising. It was also reported that ministers were exploring the possibility of minimum unit pricing (MUP), a policy which sets the lowest price an alcoholic drink can be sold for. In the new letter, experts have called for a series of measures to tackle alcohol harms, including: – A call for the introduction of MUP in England, as seen in Scotland and Wales. Minimum unit pricing for alcohol was associated with a 13% decrease in deaths from alcohol consumption in Scotland, according to a new study. Read this and more in our latest issue: — The Lancet (@TheLancet) April 21, 2023 – Giving local authorities the power to regulate hours of sale and online deliveries of alcohol. – For advertising regulations for alcohol to be 'aligned' with those for foods high in fat, salt and sugar. – A change to alcohol tax, linking duties to inflation and ending 'cider exceptionalism'. – More funding and support for local alcohol care teams. The group stresses that 'alcohol is not just the problem of a few'. It points out that every year alcohol contributes to more than a million hospital admissions. And the experts said that across the UK, 30% of the adult population engage in 'risky drinking', and almost one in 25 of all new cancers are estimated to be linked to alcohol. The 10 Year Plan states: 'While many people enjoy a drink in moderation, 4% of people drink as much as 30% of alcohol consumed each year.' But it adds that the estimated total 'societal cost' of alcohol harm in England was £27.4 billion per year in 2021/22. The authors conclude: 'The public want and deserve action, and we stand ready to work with Government to deliver real progress. 'By taking meaningful and co-ordinated action now, the burden of alcohol harm can fall significantly within the term of this Government, with visible results for families, the NHS, crime, and the economy.' The Department of Health and Social Care said it will continue to consider the most effective interventions to reduce alcohol harms. A spokesperson said: 'As we shift from sickness to prevention through our 10-Year Health Plan, we will make it mandatory for alcoholic drinks to display health warnings and nutritional information. 'To improve drug and alcohol treatment services and recovery support in England, the Government has also provided an additional £310 million in 2025/26, on top of the public health grant.' A spokesperson for the Portman Group said: 'Whilst overall alcohol consumption and harms such as binge drinking, underage drinking and anti-social behaviour continue to fall, and the vast majority of people drink within the chief medical officer's low-risk guidance or not at all, we share concerns around rising deaths and those who continue to drink to harmful levels. 'We support further targeted and tailored measures aimed at this group to manage the complex, often interrelated issues underlying harmful consumption and back calls for the further rollout of alcohol care teams and greater integration of care pathways. 'As the alcohol industry regulatory body for marketing, we welcome the chance to work constructively with the Government on the proposals within its 10 year plan to help more consumers make an informed choice and drink moderately.' – Other signatories on the letter include representatives from: the Institute of Alcohol Studies; Alcohol Change UK; the Royal College of Surgeons of England; the Royal Society for Public Health; the British Society of Gastroenterology; World Cancer Research Fund; the Association of Anaesthetists; the Association of Directors of Public Health; the British Association for the Study of the Liver; the Medical Council on Alcohol and the British Medical Association.
The Guardian
4 hours ago
- The Guardian
OpenAI stops ChatGPT from telling people to break up with partners
ChatGPT will not tell people to break up with their partner and will encourage users to take breaks from long chatbot sessions, under new changes to the artificial intelligence tool. OpenAI, ChatGPT's developer, said the chatbot would stop giving definitive answers to personal challenges and would instead help people to mull over problems such as potential breakups. 'When you ask something like: 'Should I break up with my boyfriend?' ChatGPT shouldn't give you an answer. It should help you think it through – asking questions, weighing pros and cons,' said OpenAI. The US company said new ChatGPT behaviour for dealing with 'high-stakes personal decisions' would be rolled out soon. OpenAI admitted this year that an update to ChatGPT had made the groundbreaking chatbot too agreeable and altered its tone. In one reported interaction before the change, ChatGPT congratulated a user for 'standing up for yourself' when they claimed they had stopped taking their medication and left their family – who the user had thought were responsible for radio signals emanating from the walls. In the blog post, OpenAI admitted that there had been instances where its advanced 4o model had not recognised signs of delusion or emotional dependency – amid concerns that chatbots are worsening people's mental health crises. The company said it was developing tools to detect signs of mental or emotional distress so ChatGPT can direct people to 'evidence-based' resources for help. A recent study by NHS doctors in the UK warned that AI programs could amplify delusional or grandiose content in users vulnerable to psychosis. The study, which has not been peer reviewed, said the programs' behaviour could be because the models were designed to 'maximise engagement and affirmation'. The study added that even if some individuals benefited from AI interactions, there was a concern the tools could 'blur reality boundaries and disrupt self-regulation'. OpenAI added that from this week it would send 'gentle reminders' to take a screen break to users engaging in long chatbot sessions, similar to screen-time features deployed by social media companies. OpenAI also said it had convened an advisory group of experts in mental health, youth development and human-computer-interaction to guide its approach. The company has worked with more than 90 doctors, including psychiatrists and paediatricians, to build frameworks for evaluating 'complex, multi-turn' chatbot conversations. 'We hold ourselves to one test: if someone we love turned to ChatGPT for support, would we feel reassured? Getting to an unequivocal 'yes' is our work,' said the blog post. The ChatGPT alterations were announced amid speculation that a more powerful version of the chatbot is imminent. On Sunday Sam Altman, OpenAI's chief executive, shared a screenshot of what appeared to be the company's latest AI model, GPT-5.
