
NordVPN is the most popular VPN amongst UK politicians – but they're not getting the best deals
Seeing as NordVPN tops our best VPN list, we're pleased to see UK MPs subscribing to a safe and secure VPN service, but they don't appear to be getting the best VPN deals.
No matter the provider, two-year VPN deals always work out cheaper per month than annual or one month subscriptions. Expenses data shows multiple MPs taking out annual plans and therefore not getting the cheapest deals.
Furthermore, only nine out of a possible 650 MPs expensed VPN subscriptions, an alarmingly low uptake.
VPNs have been a hot topic amongst UK politicians in recent weeks. VPN usage in the country has skyrocketed thanks to people looking to bypass age verification checks implemented as part of the controversial Online Safety Act.
NordVPN: our best VPN overall
We rate NordVPN as the #1 VPN for most people. It's fast, secure, great for streaming, and can protect up to 10 devices on one plan. Plans start at $2.91 / £2.31 per month ($81.36 / £64.56 up front pre-tax).
Until August 12, all subscriptions come with a 4 extra months of protection for free. Premium NordVPN plans come with free Amazon gift cards worth up to $50 / £50. There's also a 30-day money-back guarantee and the two-year deal is the best value for money.
650 MPs sit in the House of Commons, and publicly available data shows nine of them have expensed VPN subscriptions in recent years.
NordVPN was the most popular provider, with five MPs expensing plans. Labour MP Jonathan Reynolds, the UK government's current Secretary of State for Business and Trade, is the most high-profile MP to expense a NordVPN subscription.
Reynolds claimed £80.68 for a two-year NordVPN plan in April 2024 and is one of the only MPs to take advantage of the better value two-year deal.
Fellow Labour MP Alex Sobel claimed £83.99 for a one-year NordVPN plan in December 2023 and made the same claim in December 2024.
Labour MP Kate Osamor made four claims labelled "NORDVPN" or "NORD PRODUCTS" between 2020 and 2024.
Conservative MP Gareth Davies also claimed for an annual NordVPN subscription, worth £76.99 in December 2023. Conservative colleague Chris Heaton-Harris claimed £120.53 for an annual NordVPN subscription in February 2020 – the most expensive VPN claim out of any MP.
There were also a number of claims for unidentified or potentially unsafe VPNs.
Labour MP Luke Pollard claimed £9.99 for Secure VPN in March 2023. There are a number of VPN providers with the name "Secure VPN" so it's unclear which one Pollard subscribed to – however none are recommended by Tom's Guide.
Pollard also claimed £9.99 back for an expense titled "VPN for Shadow Ministerial visits abroad" once in November 2023 and once in February 2024. We can't say for certain that this was also "Secure VPN" but it's the same price.
Former Conservative MP Ben Wallace, who stood down at the 2024 general election, submitted the most VPN-related expenses.
Between May 2019 and February 2020 he submitted eight claims, ranging from £10.33 to £11.16. They were titled "VPN access", "VPN service", "VPN usage", and "VPN". We don't know which service Wallace was subscribing to at the time.
A claim was submitted almost every month and it would have been far cheaper for Wallace to take out a single one or two-year VPN plan.
It appears as though he did eventually do that. In May 2020 he claimed £84.61 for an ExpressVPN subscription and did so again in May 2022, at a cost of £83.97.
Another former Conservative MP, Michael Fabricant, submitted two claims worth £116.16 each for "Netshade (Rayner) VPN and Proxy" and "Security software VPN" in July 2022. He claimed £112.62 in July 2019 for "Rayner Netshade Software subscription for UK VPN for iPad."
We cover all manner of VPNs here at Tom's Guide, but Netshade is not one we have ever tested or reviewed, so we can't recommend the provider. A quick search suggests it only supports iOS and Mac, has 24 servers, and costs between $2 and $5 per month.
This data leaves us wondering how secure MP's tech is and how clued up UK politicians are on cybersecurity practices.
We'd like a little more context to this data. Are VPNs provided for MPs and these expenses simply extras? Or is it up to the individual to purchase a VPN for themselves? If the latter is true, nine out 650 protecting their data with a VPN is a worryingly low figure. Although we don't know how many MPs subscribe to a VPN and choose not to claim the cost back.
Not everyone needs a VPN, but they can be very useful for those working with sensitive information – MPs would fall into that category.
They will deal with important and potentially sensitive data, want to communicate securely, and won't want to become the victim of a data breach. VPNs encrypt your data and protect it from hackers and third-parties. Using one, alongside other cybersecurity tools, can create a robust defence against cyber crime.
Research by Proton, the team behind Proton VPN, suggests cybersecurity education may be lacking amongst not just UK politicians, but also those in the EU and US.
It found the emails of 443 MPs (68%) had been breached and leaked on the darkweb, along with 284 passwords. The EU parliament had 309 emails breached (44%) and 195 passwords exposed. 3,191 emails (20%) and 2,975 passwords belonging to US political staffers were also discovered on the dark web.
Tom's Guide has contacted the House of Commons and the House of Lords, as well as individual MPs, to find out more information on cybersecurity education amongst UK politicians.
A UK Parliament spokesperson said: "UK Parliament takes the cyber security of Members of both Houses extremely seriously."
"We provide advice, hands on support, and make cyber security software available to Members, to inform them of the risks and how to manage their digital safety, however we do not comment on specific details of our cyber security controls and policies."
We therefore can't say for sure if the software made available to politicians includes VPNs.
As mentioned earlier, VPNs have become a major talking point in the UK over the last two weeks. The newly introduced Online Safety Act means sites and apps hosting explicit material or content deemed unsafe for children must carry out age verification checks on their users.
There is evidence that VPNs can bypass these checks and as a result some have been wondering if the UK government will ban VPNs.
The Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, Peter Kyle, has ruled out a VPN ban but has said he'd look "very closely" at how they're being used in relation to the new law.
Kyle has been widely criticised for saying those attempting to bypass age verification checks by using a VPN are "on the side of predators."
Many of those opposing the law are doing so because of the cybersecurity risks involved in handing over the sensitive personal data needed to verify age. Cybersecurity experts have called it a "disaster waiting to happen."
Prior to the Online Safety Act becoming law, Labour MP Sarah Champion tried to pass an amendment which would give OFCOM power to investigate VPN usage that undermined regulations. In July 2025, she tweeted her frustration over the surge in VPN usage in response to the law.
Champion was one of the MPs who expensed a VPN subscription. In October 2024, she claimed £12.36 for Norton VPN, although it's unclear for what purpose.
We test and review VPN services in the context of legal recreational uses. For example: 1. Accessing a service from another country (subject to the terms and conditions of that service). 2. Protecting your online security and strengthening your online privacy when abroad. We do not support or condone the illegal or malicious use of VPN services. Consuming pirated content that is paid-for is neither endorsed nor approved by Future Publishing.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Iceland blames Rachel Reeves for price rises
Iceland has blamed Rachel Reeves for fuelling higher food prices, months after its Labour-backing chairman told businesses to stop complaining about the Budget. Bosses said the supermarket 'will inevitably have to pass [some cost increases] on to consumers' after food makers were struck by an increase in both employers' National Insurance contributions and the National Living Wage. Iceland said: 'We are doing our utmost to offset the growing input cost pressures caused by suppliers seeking to recover the increase in their own labour costs arising from last autumn's Budget, but will inevitably have to pass some of these on to consumers, where we can do so without weakening our own price position in the marketplace.' In accounts published this week and signed off in July, the company said it was now expecting UK food price inflation to peak at between 4pc and 5pc in the next six months. The comments follow warnings over the rising cost of the weekly shop, with the Bank of England this week saying it was expecting increases for the rest of the year. Officials said supermarket price rises had been fuelled by government policy, pointing to the increase in the minimum wage, the Chancellor's tax raid and a net zero packaging levy. Faster than expected increases in food prices are set to send the overall rate of inflation to a peak of 4pc in September. The higher prices at Iceland come after the supermarket's chairman Richard Walker previously urged rival grocery bosses to stop 'wallowing' and 'complaining' about Ms Reeves' tax raid. Mr Walker, a former Tory donor who changed allegiance in January 2024, said in December: 'This isn't a time for businesses to wallow… The Government isn't going to change its mind. It was a tough Budget, but we adapt.' Credit rating agency Fitch recently raised concerns over Iceland's profitability, suggesting the supermarket chain would have to invest in price cuts this year at a time when it is battling higher costs. It said the supermarket, which employs more than 30,000 people, would face 'momentary profit pressure'. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
'People are very upset': Independent candidate challenging Poilievre in Alberta byelection
Federal Conservative leader Pierre Poilievre is trying to get back into the House of Commons by winning a byelection in the rural Alberta riding of Battle River-Crowfoot, which is considered a safe Tory seat. But not everyone is happy about it. Heather Yourex-West explains why independent candidate Bonnie Critchley is working hard to defeat Poilievre.
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
Colombian presidential hopeful in critical condition again: doctors
A Colombian presidential candidate shot at a campaign event in June has deteriorated to critical condition due to a new cerebral hemorrhage, doctors treating him said Saturday. Conservative Senator Miguel Uribe, 39, was speaking to supporters in the capital, Bogota, when a gunman shot him twice in the head and once in the knee. He has been in intensive care since then, and undergone multiple surgeries. In recent weeks his relatives had welcomed progress in his care. But now Uribe has been put back under deep sedation, the Santa Fe Foundation hospital said in a statement. Uribe needs "new neurosurgical procedures" after presenting with a hemorrhage in his central nervous system, the statement said. "His condition is critical." Authorities have arrested six suspects in the attack. They believe the 15-year-old shooter was a hired gun and that dissident members of the defunct FARC guerrilla group are behind the attack. The government of leftist President Gustavo Petro initiated peace talks with the dissident group in mid 2024 in Venezuela, but the talks made little progress and have since been suspended. Uribe was the favored candidate of the right for the 2026 presidential elections. The attack in June stunned Colombia and raised fears of a return to the country's bloody past of political, cartel and paramilitary violence. vd/ksb/md Solve the daily Crossword