Hernando couple looking for suspect that drove into their property
HERNANDO, Miss. — A Hernando couple could be out of thousands of dollars after someone crashed into both of their vehicles and their garage over the weekend and took off running.
That couple is now calling on the community to help them find the driver.
The Garrity Family said shock was their initial reaction after they were awakened by the sound of their property being hit.
They said it's a situation you just can't make up.
The moment you see the dark-colored SUV hit their vehicle is about the same time their dog began to alert them.
The vehicle, believed to be a Chevy Equinox or something similar, was seen driving away moments after the collision.
Accidental photo captures moment MS man saves couple from burning truck
By the time the couple got outside to assess the damage, the SUV was gone and their truck and Jeep were damaged, their garbage can was crushed, their garage was totaled and even some potential structural damage inside.
The family said that while this has been a lot to process, their community has been there to support them as they look for answers.
'We've got neighbors right behind us that came over the very next day or the same day actually and we were all playing super sleuth, driving around looking for the car, walking down the street picking up the parts that had fallen off of their car and stuff like that, trying to find the matches,' Mike Garrity said. 'That's how we ended up finding what kind of vehicle it was because one of the part numbers was lying on a piece that was in our driveway.'
'And the bigger pieces, the police took [them] with them once they came and took the report,' Bobbie Garrity said.
The family said that due to it being a holiday, they will have to wait to get estimates on the damages.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fox News
2 hours ago
- Fox News
The Shooting Of J.P. Morgan Jr.
The year was 1915, and the world was in the midst of the 'Great War.' Though the United States was neutral at the time, one German nationalist, Erich Muenter, was determined to create chaos, setting his sights on one of the nation's richest men. Professor at St. John's University Mary Noe discusses the attempted assassination of Jack Morgan, and the many lives of the man who tried to kill him, as detailed in her book, The Man Who Shot J.P. Morgan. Follow Emily on Instagram: @realemilycompagno If you have a story or topic we should feature on the FOX True Crime Podcast, send us an email at: truecrimepodcast@ Learn more about your ad choices. Visit
Forbes
2 hours ago
- Forbes
Password Attack — The North Face Confirms Data Breach
The North Face confirms data breach. When it comes to outdoor apparel, fashion brands don't come much bigger than The North Face. When it comes to data-stealing attacks, hackers don't get it much easier than using credential-stuffing tactics. The North Face has now confirmed that just such an easy path has been taken by password attackers who managed to steal names, addresses, purchase histories and telephone numbers from affected customers. Here's what you need to know. The North Face is a major player in the fashion industry, boasting an annual revenue of over $3 billion. It should come as no surprise, then, that it is on the radar of cybercriminals. The American retailer, part of the VF Corporation group, which also owns brands such as Dickies, Timberland, and Vans, has confirmed that it suffered a data breach on April 23. As data breach notifications begin to arrive for affected customers, it becomes possible to reveal what has happened. Confirming that unusual activity was detected on The North Face website, VF Outdoor, LLC, said that 'an attacker had launched a small-scale credential stuffing attack' on April 23. A credential-stuffing attack is when a hacker has access to usernames and passwords from previous breaches, and there are billions of these available online, against other accounts. If your login details are shared across more than one site or service, you are at risk of such an attack. When one account is breached, all others using the same credentials can be compromised by a determined attacker. 'Hackers can get started with credential stuffing attacks by investing as little as $500 in credential stuffing software, access to email and password combo lists, and the use of both public and private proxy services for obfuscation,' Benjamin Fabre, CEO of DataDome, said. The North Face disclosure stated that it quickly disabled passwords to halt the attack, and all users will need to create a new and unique password on the website if they have not already done so. 'We strongly encourage you not to use the same password for your account at our website that you use on other websites,' The North Face said. Information that was compromised included: name, purchase history, shipping address, email address, date of birth and telephone number. However, payment information has not been compromised as a third-party provider handles all site payments. I have reached out to VF Corporation for a statement regarding the password attack impacting customers of The North Face.
Fox News
2 hours ago
- Fox News
Alex Marquardt's exit from CNN 'obviously' tied to network's costly defamation trial, insiders say
CNN parted ways with its chief national security correspondent, Alex Marquardt, Monday and many of his now-former colleagues say it's "obviously" tied to the network's costly defamation trial earlier this year. "Obviously, the court case is a core reason why, that is obvious," one CNN insider told Fox News Digital. Marquardt was at the center of a defamation case brought against him and CNN in January by U.S. Navy veteran Zachary Young. A Florida jury found that CNN defamed Young and ruled that he could seek punitive damages as a result of a November 2021 report by Marquardt. The report branded Young as a shady profiteer who exploited "desperate Afghans" trying to flee Afghanistan during the Biden administration's chaotic military withdrawal from the Taliban-run country, implying Young was operating on a "black market." The jury had initially awarded Young $5 million in financial and emotional damages before Young and CNN reached an undisclosed settlement, suggesting the network gave Young significantly more money. The jury foreman later told Fox News Digital they were prepared to make CNN pay "somewhere in the neighborhood of $50 million to $100 million" in punitive damages. "He has not done anything else that is wrong. So if he was terminated, that has to be a core reason why. It's just the logical thing," the CNN staffer said. Despite the certainty among CNN staff that Marquardt's departure was directly linked to Young's settlement, they remained puzzled by the timing since it came nearly five months after the trial. The first staffer said, "I'm not sure how much strategizing is going into things these days." It seemed like Marquardt was in good standing with CNN even after the trial as he continued making regular on-air appearances, most recently last Tuesday. He even served as a fill-in anchor on Memorial Day. "Alex is on our air because he is an experienced, veteran reporter with valuable insights on the news," a CNN spokesperson told Fox News Digital in late January after the trial. But according to the Status newsletter, Marquardt's dismissal was the result of a "post-settlement ethics compliance review" launched by CNN earlier this year in which he and others involved in the defamatory report were interviewed. Marquardt was informed about the network's decision on Friday, citing "unspecified editorial differences." The bar for proving defamation in court is historically high as many lawsuits are either dismissed or result in a settlement before going to trial. Young's lawsuit against CNN was a rare instance where a jury did find the network liable for defamation, yet a settlement was later reached. Perhaps it was because of the damning evidence Young's legal team gathered during discovery, much of it involving Marquardt himself. "[W]e gonna nail this Zachary Young mf---er," Marquardt told a colleague in a 2021 message exchange before finishing the report. That comment was repeatedly referenced by Young's attorneys throughout the trial. "I always thought he was a professional. But those internal messages left CNN with no other choice," a second CNN staffer told Fox News Digital. The second CNN staffer insisted, "It's hard in my mind not to make a connection" between Marquardt's abrupt exit and the defamation trial. "He was a chief correspondent. A chief. There was no send off. Nothing like that at all. It all went into the quiet goodnight," the second CNN insider said. "He was a great reporter in the field, really good in war zones. That's what makes it a shame." Marquardt was vague about his sudden exit from CNN, posting on X, "Some personal news: I'm leaving CNN after 8 terrific years. Tough to say goodbye but it's been an honor to work among the very best in the business. Profound thank you to my comrades on the National Security team & the phenomenal teammates I've worked with in the US and abroad." CNN declined to comment, citing a policy not to discuss "personnel matters." The network did not respond to additional requests for comment. Marquardt did not respond to requests for comment. In a post-trial interview, Young said he hadn't forgiven Marquardt, calling him out for remaining defiant on the witness stand at the trial. "We've given Mr. Marquardt plenty of opportunities during deposition and then again at trial to apologize. And, you know, the answer was no," Young told Fox News Digital. "He still stands behind his work. He's very proud of what he did. His hit piece on me to destroy my life." "He's not my biggest fan," Young added. On the witness stand, Marquardt insisted his report was not a "hit piece" on Young and that he was proud of his work. "I wasn't looking to take anyone down. I didn't take anyone down," Marquardt testified. CNN issued an on-air apology in March 2022 after Young threatened to take legal action. But throughout the trial, Marquardt and several CNN staffers testified they didn't feel the apology was necessary. CNN senior vice president Adam Levine admitted to the jurors that the apology was merely a legal decision. "Alex Marquardt had put in an email, 'I'm going to nail this Zachary Young.' At that point it seemed as though he had put a target on Mr. Young's back, and he was not going to let up until he reached his goal… It was obvious to the entire jury that he was out to get him," jury foreman Katy Svitenko told Fox News Digital in February. That was the moment Svitenko decided it was defamation with malice. "The jury pretty much agreed… those emails among the CNN employees were pretty bad. And not just one, it was several, at various levels throughout the corporation," she said.
