KSHEC's new textbook on Kerala's knowledge systems sparks objections from teacher bodies
Titled Knowledge Systems of Kerala, the textbook is intended as a compulsory multidisciplinary course of the four-year undergraduate programme. However, critics argue that the council is overstepping its bounds by infringing on the authority of statutory academic bodies in universities that are mandated with curriculum development.
KSHEC maintains that the textbook offers an introductory framework on Kerala's indigenous knowledge systems, developed over centuries.
According to council vice-chairperson Rajan Gurukkal P.M., the bilingual publication (in English and Malayalam) brings together a wide spectrum of Kerala's traditional knowledge, encompassing performing arts, cultural practices, oral narratives and documented literary sources.
The book comprises nine chapters, covering themes such as regional knowledge systems, traditional knowledge of ethnic communities, embedded knowledge in crafts and architecture, Ayurvedic practices, and the emergence of new knowledge in the State. Chapters highlighting the contributions of social reformers like Sree Narayana Guru, Ayya Vaikundar and Poykayil Yohannan are among the key features of the textbook.
While the publication aligns with the University Grants Commission's (UGC) directive to integrate Indian Knowledge Systems into higher education curricula, the council insists that the proposed content is tailored to Kerala's regional context, offering students locally grounded perspectives within the national framework.
The Vice-Chancellors of State universities have been requested to direct their respective Boards of Studies to consider the textbook as a foundational resource for course design and syllabus preparation. The council has also encouraged universities to adopt this textbook in place of existing multidisciplinary courses such as Kerala Studies and Kerala Culture.
However, Left-leaning teacher bodies have raised concerns over what they describe as a lack of consultation prior to the decision. They argue that the proposed text leans heavily on historical narratives, while neglecting other significant dimensions of Kerala's diverse traditions and legacy.
Countering such allegations, Prof. Gurukkal pointed out the course is not confined to any one academic discipline. He added that the book is structured as a complete course, with clearly defined learning outcomes and reference materials that would reduce the burden of universities to develop such content independently.
KSHEC plans to organise a faculty development programme to train teachers in delivering the new course material.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
3 hours ago
- Indian Express
Authorities allegedly ‘take away' top Chinese diplomat: What to know about Liu Jianchao
Senior Chinese diplomat Liu Jianchao has been 'taken away by authorities for questioning,' according to a report from The Wall Street Journal on Saturday (August 9) that cited people familiar with the matter. Indian External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar met Liu less than a month ago, when he visited China for the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) Council of Foreign Ministers meeting. Liu, 61, has earlier been tipped as China's future Foreign Minister, given his years of experience in the Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MFA), his perception as a party loyalist, and aspects of his functioning that differentiated him from other officials. Currently, Wang Yi, 71, holds that portfolio, having been reinstated in 2023 after his predecessor Qin Gang was abruptly removed within seven months of being at the job. The report of Liu's questioning further raises questions about the integrity and stability of China's foreign affairs institutions. According to a CV shared by the think tank Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), Liu graduated in English from the Beijing Foreign Languages Institute in 1986 and joined the Chinese foreign ministry in the same year. He also studied international relations at the University of Oxford from 1986 to 1987 and later worked in various translation and interpretation departments of the MFA. In 2015, Liu joined the National Bureau of Corruption Prevention. This was a few years after Xi Jinping became the most powerful figure in China, from 2012 onwards, and began his anti-corruption campaign. Liu became the Minister of the International Department of the Communist Party of China Central Committee in 2022. The IDCPC has been in charge of the party's external relations (particularly with other Communist states, like Cambodia). Since its founding in 1951, it has come under the direct leadership of the CPC Central Committee, an important political body with more than 200 party members. How has he been perceived? Beyond his official roles, Liu has been seen among Western commentators and media as the 'new face' of China's attempts to present a 'friendlier image' to the world, as The New York Times put it in February 2024. The report came soon after Liu visited the United States and Europe to discuss his country's economic and international affairs. The NYT's report described him as having 'a knack for defending Beijing's most ardent positions, like its claims to the self-governing island of Taiwan, without being acerbic.' It contrasted his approach with 'wolf warrior' diplomacy, characterised by the aggressive language and tone of many Chinese diplomats during the Xi era. Those who met Liu said he was 'more informal and engaging than other Chinese officials, seemingly comfortable going off script.' For instance, Liu engaged in a 40-minute conversation with CFR President Michael Froman in January 2024, including a section of audience questions. At the end of it, Froman said, 'I think China is very fortunate, Mr. Minister, to have you in this position… I go as far as to say, you're a wolf warrior in sheep's clothing.' What does The Wall Street Journal's report claim? It states that Liu was taken away 'after returning to Beijing in late July from a work trip overseas'. The official IDCPC website mentions his recent official engagements, but only upto July. While the report doesn't provide any concrete reason for his detention, it notes why the Chinese state may have had problems with him. His 2024 engagements 'raised eyebrows back in Beijing, where it would have been seen as politically incorrect for Liu to present himself as the foreign-minister-in-waiting before any formal announcement that he would be taking that role,' the report says. What's the larger context here? There are questions of internal stability and transparency, which also arose during former minister Qin's disappearance. He was a young leader who quickly rose up the ranks until he suddenly disappeared from public view in 2023. While the initial official response was that he had health issues, it later shifted to denial about any information concerning him. The Financial Times later reported that Qin had an extramarital affair with a journalist and they had a child in the United States, and he eventually resigned from the Parliament. Rumours of the state downgrading the position of a prominent public figure often make the rounds in China, thanks to its largely opaque political setup. However, not all of them turn out to be true. Or, in some cases, people have reappeared after some time, including billionaire Jack Ma and film star Fan Bingbing. Still, it is a fact that in just a few years, two Ministers of Defence, one Minister of Foreign Affairs, senior defence officials and several other key figures in the Chinese state have been purged. Official confirmation in such cases only comes months later, with corruption often indicated as the reason. Although corruption has long been a problem for the Chinese state, critics also allege that it has sometimes been used as a smokescreen under Xi's regime to remove potential rivals or punish those who don't toe the party line. Analysts say that it points to some major problems within the system, if senior officials are not being trusted and suddenly expelled. But, it also shows Xi maintaining his grip on power, if he can continue doing so without any major opposition. Rishika Singh is a Senior sub-editor at the Explained Desk of The Indian Express. She enjoys writing on issues related to international relations, and in particular, likes to follow analyses of news from China. Additionally, she writes on developments related to politics and culture in India. ... Read More
The Hindu
4 hours ago
- The Hindu
SEP: Two-language policy will be applicable in 90% of schools; three-language teaching in linguistic minority schools
The two-language policy proposed by the State Education Policy (SEP) Commission in its final report submitted to the Karnataka government recently will be applicable to all government, aided and private Kannada and English medium schools in the State. However, teaching of three languages will continue in Urdu, Marathi, Tamil, Telugu, Malayalam and other linguistic minority schools. In linguistic minority schools, the learning of a 'third language' is optional. Unlike in the Central Board of Secondary Education (CBSE) model, the third language is not considered for assessment. 'There is no confusion in the implementation of the two-language policy in the State. Kannada and English are taught as the first and second languages in all Kannada and English medium schools. However, in linguistic minority schools, three languages are taught along with Kannada and English, including the mother tongue of the students. The third language is optional and is not considered for the examination,' Sukhadeo Thorat, chairman, SEP Commission told The Hindu. Implementation process The SEP Commission has abandoned the three-language formula that includes Hindi in the State's education system. Accordingly, English is taught as the first language and Kannada as the second language in English medium schools with English as the medium of instruction. In Kannada medium schools, Kannada is the first language and English is the second language with Kannada is the medium of instruction. However, there are six linguistic minority schools in the State, including Urdu, Telugu, Tamil, Marathi, Hindi, and Malayalam. Steps have been taken to make Kannada compulsory as the first or second language in these schools, and the medium of instruction will be the respective mother tongue. If students choose their mother tongue as the first language, Kannada will be the second language in those schools. English will be taught optionally as the third language. If students need English, they should take Kannada as the first language and English as the second language. Or, if English is taken as the first language, Kannada will be the second language. In this case, students are allowed to learn their mother tongue as the third language. V.P. Niranjanaradhya, one of the members of the SEP Task Force (School Education), said, 'About 90% of the schools in the State are Kannada and English medium schools, where implementing the two-language policy is not difficult. However, in the remaining 10% linguistic minority schools, it was decided to teach three languages after serious discussions for about 15 days to ensure that children are not deprived of learning their mother tongue.' Not to be neglected 'Since the third language is optional and is not considered for assessment, the government cannot neglect it. Instead, teachers of the respective language should be appointed and priority should be given to effective learning by providing books and other materials. If Tulu, Konkani, Kodava and other regional language students want to learn in their mother tongue, that is also allowed,' he added. Further, he explained that the SEP report has emphasised on the mother tongue as the medium of instruction. 'In 2014, there was no NEP, and the rules for the RTE Act-2009 were not framed. Therefore, the government lost in court on the issue of mother tongue medium of instruction. The court had ruled that the medium of instruction was the choice of the parents. However, now the NEP and RTE have clearly indicated that primary education should be in the mother tongue. In addition, recently the CBSE has also issued a circular regarding providing education in the mother tongue up to the foundation level. Therefore, there will be no setback for learning Kannada in schools in the State,' stated Mr. Niranjanaradhya.
Economic Times
4 hours ago
- Economic Times
Asim Munir's seminary education shapes his world view & India policy
Pakistan army chief Field Marshal Asim Munir's repeated references to religion while analysing foreign policy and relations with India is a reflection of his seminary education that shapes his world is the only Pakistani army chief so far who has had a stint in a seminary as a student and takes pride in the fact that he is a 'hafiz' (one who can recite Quran by heart). His father was a school principal, a mohajir who came to Rawalpindi from Jalandhar in 1947 and also served as an imam at a mosque. He went to Markazi Madrasah Dar-ul-Tajweed, an Islamic seminary in Rawalpindi, for his early education, indicating that Munir was raised in a deeply religious at public events, including those involving Pakistani diaspora, Munir often incorporates Quranic verses and Islamic theology into his speeches, switching between English, Urdu and classical Arabic. This is uncommon even by the standards of the Pakistani military history. Munir reportedly quoted verses from Quran several times during a diaspora meet in the US during his recent visit there. Munir often quotes religious texts and contexts from history to describe current events and relations with India, reviving memories of the two-nation theory. He openly brandished religion with a goal to pit Pakistan against India based on the theory of partition. Munir has all characteristics of positioning himself on the lines of Md Ali Jinnah, Gen Zia-ul-Haq and Gen Pervez Musharraf as the 'administrator' of Pakistan. But critics alleged that while Munir's predecessors have promoted jihadists and Islamists against India, most of them were suave compared to him. While Munir has positioned himself as Pakistan's chief diplomat in the post-Sindoor period, he does not appear to operate in a modern nation state construct, according to a Pakistan Pakistan's creation in 1947, the country has awarded the five-star rank of field marshal only once—to Ayub Khan. Munir has become the second field marshal of the country. And when he speaks, it is with deep emotion and conviction.
