Newsmax host claims the ‘Deep state' is using two-term limit to keep Trump ‘under their thumb'
Newsmax star Greg Kelly has claimed that the 22nd Amendment, which prevents a president from serving more than two full terms, 'might be unconstitutional itself' and is 'a way the deep state keeps the presidency under their thumb.'
The MAGA-boosting host's claim comes as the president and his supporters continue to float the notion of Trump running for a third term, which now includes the Trump Organization selling hats and t-shirts emblazoned with 'Trump 2028' and the phrase '(Rewrite the Rules)' for $50.
In a recent interview with The Atlantic, meanwhile, Trump played coy and left the door open to having the Justice Department investigate whether it would be legal for him to run for the White House again in 2028.
'Was this the rare democratic norm he was unwilling to shatter?' The Atlantic noted. ''That would be a big shattering, wouldn't it?' he mused, laughing. 'Well, maybe I'm just trying to shatter.' He noted, twice, that his supporters regularly shout for him to seek a third term, but concluded, 'It's not something that I'm looking to do. And I think it would be a very hard thing to do.''
During the Monday night broadcast of his primetime Newsmax program, Kelly applauded the Trump family's company offering merchandise teasing another Trump term. On top of that, he insisted that despite the Constitution explicitly outlawing another presidential campaign for Trump, that doesn't mean it can't happen.
'Donald Trump for president in 2028. Why not? Well, the Constitution says not, but maybe the Constitution is wrong,' the far-right host exclaimed. 'President Trump has been playing with this, and he's been playing with it for years. And it's kind of amusing, and it's kind of serious at the same time.'
Telling his viewers to 'take a look at this,' Kelly pointed out the new Trump 2028 'hat modeled by Eric Trump,' letting them know they could buy one for '50 bucks a pop.' Adding that it is 'really getting some people very upset,' Kelly gleefully noted that 'it's all fun.'
After airing clips of Trump suggesting that he could serve another term in office, Kelly wondered if Trump is 'trying to make a constitutional point' because the '22nd Amendment about not being able to run for a third term just might be unconstitutional.'
Kelly went on to grouse that there are no term limits for members of Congress before continuing to complain that presidents currently face limits on how long they can occupy the White House.
'Why do we have presidential term limits? Well, George Washington kind of started the tradition of two terms, but it wasn't mandated by the law,' he said. 'FDR, Franklin Delano Roosevelt, got carried away, was actually elected to a fourth term, and Republicans didn't like it. And some Democrats sued, and they got together to pass the 22nd Amendment.'
Adding that it is a 'big deal to change the Constitution,' Kelly then claimed that the 22nd Amendment 'might be unconstitutional itself' and that 'it should be looked at' by Trump and his administration.
'This is a way the deep state keeps the presidency under their thumb,' the Newsmax host fumed. 'Only two terms. Nobody else in federal government, other than the vice president, I guess is — no, I don't know if it applies to the vice president anyway.'
Still, despite his concerns about 'deep state' operatives preventing Trump from serving in perpetuity, Kelly insisted that 'Trump is not running in 2028.' But, according to the Trump loyalist, this 'looks to me and some other constitutional heavyweights' as something that 'should be explored.'
While one GOP lawmaker has proposed a long-shot resolution to pave the way for Trump to attempt a third term, the president cannot circumvent the two-term limit set by the Constitution.
Unless a new amendment is put forth by Congress, which would require two-thirds of both chambers just to propose it, and it is then passed by three-fourths of all state legislatures, Trump is unable to seek re-election in 2028.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Politico
18 minutes ago
- Politico
Supreme Court limits outside access to DOGE records
The Supreme Court has reined in a lower-court order that allowed a watchdog group wide-ranging access to records of the Trump administration's Department of Government Efficiency. The high court's majority said a judge's directive allowing Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington to examine DOGE's recommendations for cost savings at executive branch agencies was 'not appropriately tailored.' In a two-page order Friday, the Supreme Court said such access was not a proper way to resolve an ongoing dispute about whether DOGE is a federal agency subject to the Freedom of Information Act or operates as a presidential advisory body that does not have to share its records with the public. 'Separation of powers concerns counsel judicial deference and restraint in the context of discovery regarding internal Executive Branch communications,' the court's majority wrote. All three of the court's liberal justices indicated they disagreed with the decision, but none provided an explanation of her views.
Yahoo
19 minutes ago
- Yahoo
‘Over the finish line': Tuberville says passing spending bill bolster economic growth
ALABAMA (WHNT) — As the Big Beautiful Bill is under consideration in the Senate, an Alabama Senator says his top priority is to get the spending bill passed. U.S. Sen. Tommy Tuberville said Thursday the legislation is likely to undergo some significant changes while in the Senate, but he said his ultimate goal was to get the bill over the finish line. Alabama Agriculture Commissioner Rick Pate to run for lieutenant governor 'The number one priority in this bill is getting the jobs and tax cuts done,' Tuberville said. The spending bill has received criticism from conservatives over the past few days, including the former head of the Department of Governmental Efficiency. Elon Musk has called the bill an 'abomination,' posting on social media platform X about how the spending bill will significantly increase the national debt. 'The problem that Elon Musk looks at, I look at it different,' Tuberville told members of the press on Thursday. 'Number one, the way to grow this country is to get the tax cuts done and that tax cuts are in this bill and we need to make them permanent.' Tuberville said he and his colleagues have complained that Democrats spend too much money. He said he wants to cut back on how much can be cut from this bill. 'There's a lot of things the federal government, in this bill, is trying to send down to the states,' Tuberville said. 'We can't afford it in Alabama. We can't afford to pick up the tab for a federal government agency that was started years ago by the federal government. We don't need it in the state.' Tuberville said he is looking to the future to make changes. 'Remember, we will do another reconciliation after this,' Tuberville said. 'We have two more in the next year and a half, so whatever we don't get done in this bill, hopefully we can get done in the next.' The president has given Republicans in the Senate a tight deadline to pass the spending bill, asking them to have it on his desk by July 4th. The Tax Foundation estimates the bill passed by the House of Representatives will add more than $2 trillion to the national deficit over the next 10 years. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
19 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump administration to pay nearly $5M in wrongful death lawsuit of Jan. 6 rioter shot by police
The Trump administration will pay a $4.975 million settlement in the lawsuit over the wrongful death of Ashli Babbitt, who was killed by a U.S. Capitol Police officer after storming the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021. Babbitt — a 35-year-old from California and veteran of the Air Force who went to Washington for President Donald Trump's rally — was among an early group of rioters that reached the doors of the Speaker's Lobby, adjacent to the House chamber, while lawmakers were still evacuating. Details of the settlement were released by Judicial Watch, a pro-Trump advocacy group that represented her estate and family members in the lawsuit. The Department of Justice did not immediately respond to request to comment. The settlement is likely to inflame tensions on Capitol Hill over the riot. Outgoing Capitol Police chief Thomas Manger blasted the reported settlement last month, saying it 'sends a chilling message to law enforcement nationwide, especially to those with a protective mission like ours.' As members of the mob standing near Babbitt pounded on the doors and cracked glass window panes, outnumbered police officers stepped aside and ceded the hallway to the rioters. Moments later, Babbitt is seen on video attempting to enter the lobby through a shattered window. That's when Capitol Police officer Michael Byrd fired the fatal shot. Byrd was investigated and cleared by local and federal authorities. Babbitt was the only rioter killed by police, but several others died either during or in the hours immediately after the protest. Over 100 Capitol Police officers were injured during the protest. The lawsuit was filed in California by Babbitt's family in 2024, claiming wrongful death, assault and battery, as well as negligence claims. The lawsuit was set to go to trial in 2026, but both parties agreed to the settlement. A joint filing Friday from government attorneys and Babbitt's acknowledged that a settlement was reached, but did not disclose details. 'This fair settlement is a historic and necessary step for justice for Ashli Babbitt's family. Ashli should never have been killed, and this settlement destroys the evil, partisan narrative that justified her outrageous killing and protected her killer,' said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton in a press release on the settlement. Trump has repeatedly praised Babbitt, portraying her as an innocent patriot and decrying her death at the hands of Capitol police. It's part of the Trump administration's efforts to repaint the protest on Jan. 6 as a day of patriotism and freedom of expression, rather than an unprecedented insurrection widely denounced in 2021 by Republicans and Democrats. Trump issued sweeping pardons for nearly all of those charged or under investigation for their actions on Jan. 6, including over 300 charged with assaulting the police. Numerous Jan. 6 rioters have been arrested on unrelated charges since. Kyle Cheney contributed to this report.
