Court rules against antigay bakery in California
An appeals court in California ruled a Kern County baker violated the rights of a gay couple when she refused on religious grounds to bake a cake for their wedding, Cal Matters reports.
The case started in August of 2017 when Eileen and Mireya Rodriguez-Del Rio visited Tastries Bakery in Bakersfield to purchase a cake for the upcoming wedding. According to court documents, the couple were helped by staff and chose a pre-designed cake with 'three tiers with white buttercream frosting without any writing, symbols, engravings, images or toppers.' Staff told the couple it was a popular choice for 'birthdays, baby showers, weddings, and quinceaneras,' but then refused to sell the prepare or sell the cake when they learned it was for their same-sex wedding.
California's Civil Rights Division filed suit against Tastries and its owner, Catharine Miller, in 2018.
Tastries Bakery has 18 employees and is owned by Catharine Miller, a devout Christian.
The case rests in large measure on whether the cake in question is a generic item or a custom creation. The state and the Rodriguez-Del Rios claim that it is generic, while Tastries considers the cake to be a custom creation.
Tastries 'sells a variety of baked goods, which are available daily in a display case and can be purchased by anyone without restriction.' The display case can also accommodate 'single-tiered cakes that are meant for last-minute purchasing.' All other cakes, including the generic three-tiered cake ordered by the Rodriguez-Del Rios, must be pre-ordered.
'Tastries's policy is that all preordered baked goods are considered 'custom,' regardless of the type of product or its design specifications. If a customer wants a cake identical to one in the daily display case, but wants the cake prepared for a specific date, it is considered by Tastries to be a 'custom' cake.'
A lower court agreed with Miller and Tastries, noting Miller referred the couple to another bakery that would meet their request and that the couple were able to find a similar cake for their wedding.
The ruling issued this week found the lower court erred and sided with the state and the Rodriguez-Del Rios.
'Application of the policy here pivots upon the sexual orientation of the end user – the policy cannot apply or operate until the same-sex status of the couple is identified. Despite that the underlying rationale for the policy is rooted in a sincerely held religious belief about marriage, held in good faith without ill will or malice, the policy nonetheless requires a distinction in service that is based solely on, and because of, the end users' sexual orientation. The relevant and undisputed facts about the policy and its application here necessarily establish intentional discrimination.'
Miller's attorneys at the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty told Cal Matters they will appeal the ruling and take their fight to the U.S. Supreme Court.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
8 hours ago
- Yahoo
Towne Mall site receives $2.5M for cleanup and remediation
Jun. 11—The former Towne Mall site in Middletown has received a $2.5 million boost from the Ohio Department of Development for cleanup and remediation in preparation for a substantial redevelopment project. The grant was requested by the Warren County Port Authority on behalf of the city of Middletown. The project will abate asbestos-containing materials and demolish multiple unsafe structures, according to ODOD, and the 32-acre site will be prepared for commercial and light industrial redevelopment. It is likely the majority of Towne Mall owned by the city will be demolished and redeveloped into a new structure or structures, according to Luis Rodriguez, assistant director of community and economic development for the city. Part of the redevelopment plan includes keeping Planet Fitness as a tenant, though the location of the gym could move to another spot on the site in a new structure, according to Rodriguez. An estimated 500 jobs are expected for when the redevelopment is complete at Towne Mall and adjacent businesses. The start date for the project has not been finalized. The city is in negotiations on a preliminary development plan with Midland Atlantic Properties for redevelopment. Rodriguez said there is "nothing set in stone," but the city is "optimistic." City council approved the issuance of $7.9 million in 30-year bonds to fund part of the acquisition cost in its June 3 meeting. The bonds will cover a bond anticipation note, or BAN, issued last August to fund the acquisition on a temporary basis. The previous BAN was approximately $7.5 million. The new amount of $7.9 million "reflects the rolling over of outstanding interest," according to a city staff report. The BANs are meant to be a "temporary situation as the city works to execute a final development agreement for the site that will pay off most or all of the outstanding debt." Most recently, Middletown hosted a Towne Mall liquidation auction, featuring items that were left in stores when the city bought the 380,000-square-foot site in July 2024 for $10 million. Purchasing the mall was part of an effort to guide what goes on the land in the middle of surging Interstate 75 development. Since then, Middletown has hosted a Town Hall at the Towne Mall, which was attended by approximately 80 people; a city council strategic work session; and a request for qualifications, or RFQ, presentation — all with the purpose of redeveloping the site and listening to what the community wants. A total of $57.7 million for 34 cleanup/remediation projects was announced alongside the $2.5 million for the Towne Mall site as part of the 10th round of funding since the Ohio Brownfield Remediation Program was created in 2021. "Over the years, we've helped transform hundreds of unsafe, blighted and abandoned sites into new centers of opportunity across Ohio," said Governor Mike DeWine. "Through this program, we're building stronger, safer neighborhoods and turning yesterday's liabilities into tomorrow's assets."
Miami Herald
13 hours ago
- Miami Herald
State Senators Overwhelmingly Vote to Raise Car Dealership Fees 488%
California's state Senate has approved legislation allowing car dealers to charge buyers up to 1% of a vehicle's purchase price in document processing fees, with a $500 cap. This $500 limit represents an increase of nearly 500% from the current cap of $85, and the average starting price of a new car in May was $48,656, Cox Automotive reports. The bill passed with only one Senator voting against it, and its supporters, including California's New Car Dealers Association, say the fee is necessary since the $85 cap hasn't kept pace with the state's rising business costs over the decades. Processing paperwork that the added costs would help pay for includes loan documents, fraud protection forms, and Department of Motor Vehicles registration. Anthony Samson, the California New Car Dealers Association's lobbyist, said in April that other businesses can recoup similar costs through service charges, but dealers can't. "If we believed we could simply recover our costs and the price of the vehicle, I assure you that we would not be here today asking for your support on this measure," Samson said, according to Cal Matters. However, Senator Dave Cortese said he's working with the California New Car Dealers Association to lower the fee's ceiling when it's heard in the Assembly. Senator Henry Stern was the only Senator who voted against the bill, noting he feels that car sellers have undermined the state's efforts to protect consumers and the environment with actions like lobbying for the U.S. Senate to pass federal legislation blocking California's electric vehicle mandates. "The car dealers haven't earned the trust to justify this major increase in junk fees," Stern said, according to Cal Matters. Ray Shefska, CarEdge Co-Founder, added that "This bill reinforces that in America, whether it be national, state, or local, we have the best politicians money can buy. When things are already barely affordable, let's by all means make it even more difficult for people buying cars in California." The California New Car Dealers Association has donated $2.9 million to the state's lawmakers since 2015, according to Digital Democracy's database. One California Senator, Carolyn Menjivar, didn't vote on Tuesday but stated: "If we're looking to help everyday Californians with affordability, why are we looking at helping an industry that is making a healthy profit?" California is one of the most expensive states to buy a car since it charges the highest sales tax rate at 7.25% and imposes significant registration fees. The document processing fees vote occurred amid reports of auto dealers using incentive strategies to sustain profits without raising vehicle prices in reaction to Trump's tariffs. State government vehicle purchases are exempt from the document charge. House Assembly members still have to vote on the car dealer fees bill before it heads to California's Governor for approval or veto. If the House Assembly approves the legislation in its current form, a $500 cap could increase Governor Newsom's chances of vetoing it. Florida has the highest car dealer document fees in the U.S., with its $999 cap, followed by Virginia at $799, and Colorado registering third at $699. Copyright 2025 The Arena Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
New York Post
15 hours ago
- New York Post
How NYC renters could begin saving thousands in fees
If a new New York City rental law goes through as expected, New Yorkers can expect to pay a lot less to rent an apartment. Unless there is a last-minute reversal by a judge, the Fairness in Apartment Rental Expenses (FARE) Act is scheduled to take effect on Wednesday. The law will end the process of passing along the broker's fee to tenants. From now on, unless a tenant explicitly hires a broker to find an apartment, the landlord will have to eat this cost, which ranges from one month's rent to up to 15% of the annual cost of renting an apartment. What brokers think about the new law 'There has been a lot of talk about this issue. As a broker, I am glad that there will be no commission charge by a landlord if someone wants to lease their apartment,' Sonia I. Christian-Bendt, a broker with Berkshire Hathaway HomeServices New York Properties, tells 'I think this is a win-win move for both sides.' 4 It's forecasted that broker's fees will not longer be passed to tenants once this law goes into effect. Getty Images/iStockphoto She says the broker's fee was so onerous that even the wealthy weren't happy with it. 'In the past two rentals that an owner called me to represent, [the landlord] offered to pay the commission without even being asked,' says Christian-Bendt. 'It made it easier to lease her units—and attracted a lot of qualified renters who didn't mind paying a high rent, but who were relieved they didn't have to pay one month's rent commission or 15% of the annual rent as a broker's commission.' Nor does she think landlords will raise the rent to regain the fee. 'They have to remain competitive,' she says. But Douglas Elliman top 1% rental agent Keyan Sanai, who spoke in front of the City Council about the measure, disagrees. He asserts that tenants will end up paying more in the long run than if they'd simply paid a one-time flat fee, because landlords will not only raise rents the first year to regain the fee, but also keep it higher. 4 Even wealthy apartment owners were unhappy with the excessive broker's fee. Getty Images 'If you stay in an apartment for more than a year, then you've just paid more in rents than if you'd paid that broker's fee,' he tells Couldn't landlords raise the rent for a year until the fee is repaid, then lower the rent? 'We're talking about landlords here,' he says. Additionally, he says that while higher rents will affect all tenants, the broker's fee can be avoided, as only about half of the rentals in the city carry it. 'If you want to live on Perry Street in the West Village and have your 'Sex and the City' lifestyle, then that apartment probably has a broker's fee because the demand is higher to live in the West Village,' he says. 'But if you want to live in Hudson Yards, you probably won't have to pay a fee.' He concludes: 'The law is a short-term gain for long-term pain.' Danielle Nazinitsky, founder and CEO of Decode Real Estate, agrees the fallout won't be good for anyone. 'For landlords, there's now a new fixed expense in a declining-value market where they're already dealing with rising property taxes, wages, and insurance costs,' she tells 4 Only about half of the rentals in New York City carry broker's fees. Getty Images/iStockphoto 'For real estate agents and brokerages, this means lower margins in an already high-turnover, low-margin segment, and that means you will get lower quality agents over time. For tenants, the broker's fee cost doesn't disappear; it will get absorbed into upfront premiums and rent increases.' The cost of the broker's fee for tenants The broker's fee hit about half of the 2.3 million apartments in the city, including those units that are rent-stabilized. When nonprofit attorney Elizabeth Gyori and her partner were apartment hunting in Brooklyn last year, they coughed up about $4,000 to a broker—or 12% of their annual rent. 'We could have used that money for other things,' Gyori tells 'It could have gone toward savings to buy our own place, an emergency fund, or a higher general rent for a place that would have suited us better. 'I'm sad we don't get to take advantage of the change in law, but it will be really helpful for other people,' she says. 'I think it's fantastic that the law was passed.' What New York City renters can expect While the final word on the new law will be up to a judge overseeing the lawsuit filed by the Real Estate Board of New York and some brokerages, the board seems to expect the shift to happen. On its website is a fact sheet preparing landlords for what appears to be the inevitable. According to the new law, brokers representing a landlord can no longer charge tenants a fee in connection with a rental transaction. The exception is when the tenant specifically hires a broker to find them an apartment, and landlords are allowed to pay the tenant's broker. 4 The broker's fee hit about half of the 2.3 million apartments in the city, including those units that are rent-stabilized. Christopher Sadowski Additionally, rental listings must include all fees paid by the prospective tenant for the rental of the unit. This could include lost key, pet, first and last deposits, and move-in/move-out costs. Violations of the FARE Act may result in financial penalties of up to $2,000 and will be enforced by the New YC Department of Consumer and Worker Protection. (Complaints can be filed at 311.)
