logo
A Magnetar's Birthplace Deepens The Mystery of Its Origins

A Magnetar's Birthplace Deepens The Mystery of Its Origins

Yahoo23-04-2025
On the outskirts of the Milky Way, one of the rarest kinds of stars in the galaxy has just become even more mysterious than it was before.
Astronomers have used the Hubble and Gaia telescopes to study the surroundings of SGR 0501+4516, a type of neutron star known as a magnetar. The investigation reveals that we still have no clear idea of how magnetars form – the lead we thought we had on their birth mechanism is completely unrelated to SGR 0501+4516.
However, what the researchers did, or rather, did not find, suggests that we may have been wrong about how we thought magnetars came about.
Neutron stars are among the densest objects in the Universe, beaten out only by black holes, and they form in a similar way. When a massive star runs out of fuel to fuse in its core, its core can no longer support itself by the outward pressure of fusion, and collapses under gravity in a violent event known as a core-collapse supernova.
A magnetar is pretty much the same thing, with an added distinction: the magnetic field of a magnetar is the most powerful known in the Universe, around a thousand times more powerful than a normal neutron star's magnetic field, and a quadrillion times more powerful than Earth's.
It's not clear how magnetars form, but, because they are a subspecies of neutron star, astronomers had thought that they must form from core-collapse supernovae too. SGR 0501+4516 appeared to be proof of this.
When massive stars go supernova, the evidence hangs around for some time after in the form of a supernova remnant. SGR 0501+4516's position is very close to a supernova remnant called HB9. In addition, no other neutron stars have been detected in HB9's vicinity. So astronomers had thought that the two objects were related, which is honestly a pretty fair assumption.
Now, the combined observations of the Hubble Space Telescope and the recently retired Gaia mission have cast significant doubt on this assumption.
Gaia was a space telescope whose mission was to precisely map the objects within the Milky Way galaxy using precision parallax measurements, including positions in three dimensions and proper motions. Hubble images taken using Gaia data as a reference frame enabled a research team led by astronomer Ashley Chrimes of the European Space Agency to very finely map the movement of SGR 0501+4516 in the sky.
The velocity and proper motion of the magnetar were such that there is no way it could be associated with HB9. In addition, there are no other supernova remnants nearby that could be related to SGR 0501+4516.
This could mean one of several things.
The first is that the magnetar, thought to be around 20,000 years old, is actually far older – old enough for its associated supernova remnant to have dissipated. The problem with this is that magnetars are thought to be a temporary phase in the life of a neutron star, lasting a few tens of thousands of years before settling down into a more staid existence.
The other option is that SGR 0501+4516 did not form via core-collapse supernova, but a merger of some kind. This could involve two low-mass neutron stars colliding; or it could be something else, a white dwarf. That's a step down from neutron stars on the density scale, an object that forms from the collapsed core of a low-mass star, rather than a massive one.
White dwarfs commonly have binary companions from which they slurp mass. If a white dwarf slurps up too much mass, it becomes unstable.
"Normally, this scenario leads to the ignition of nuclear reactions, and the white dwarf exploding, leaving nothing behind," explains astronomer Andrew Levan of Radboud University in the Netherlands and the University of Warwick in the UK.
"But it has been theorised that under certain conditions, the white dwarf can instead collapse into a neutron star. We think this might be how SGR 0501 was born."
It's difficult to gauge, really. What does seem clear, however, is that a core-collapse supernova is now the least likely explanation for the magnetar's formation, making SGR 0501+4516 the best candidate out of the fewer-than-30 magnetars in the Milky Way for a non core-collapse formation pathway.
And that is incredibly cool.
"Magnetar birth rates and formation scenarios are among the most pressing questions in high-energy astrophysics," says astronomer Nanda Rea of the Institute of Space Sciences in Spain, "with implications for many of the Universe's most powerful transient events, such as gamma-ray bursts, superluminous supernovae, and fast radio bursts."
The findings have been published in Astronomy & Astrophysics.
This Melting Planet Laid a Trail of Destruction Over 5 Million Miles Long
Red Planet's Core May Explain Strange Mystery of Ancient Magnetic Field
Unusual Gas on Alien World Sparks Hope of Life, And Healthy Skepticism
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Congressperson Urges NASA to Send Its Jupiter Probe Chasing in Pursuit of the Weird Visitor Coming From Interstellar Space
Congressperson Urges NASA to Send Its Jupiter Probe Chasing in Pursuit of the Weird Visitor Coming From Interstellar Space

Yahoo

timea day ago

  • Yahoo

Congressperson Urges NASA to Send Its Jupiter Probe Chasing in Pursuit of the Weird Visitor Coming From Interstellar Space

Earlier this year, astronomers spotted a mysterious interstellar object, dubbed 3I/ATLAS, hurtling through the solar system at a blistering speed. It's only the third confirmed interstellar object to have ventured into our solar system — all over the past few years, owing to more sophisticated space-observing technology — and scientists are eager to have a closer look. Besides detailed observations by the Very Large Telescope in Chile and NASA's Hubble Space Telescope, Harvard astronomer and alien hunter Avi Loeb called on using the space agency's Juno spacecraft to intercept the object's path to get a first-hand look. Loeb, who made headlines last month after suggesting 3I/ATLAS may be an alien probe sent by an intelligent civilization, argued in a blog post that the "close encounter of 3I/ATLAS to Jupiter provides a rare opportunity to shift Juno from its current orbit around Jupiter to intercept the path of 3I/ATLAS at its closest approach to Jupiter." The unique opportunity caught the attention of Representative Anna Paulina Luna (R-FL), who sent a letter to acting NASA administrator Sean Duffy, encouraging the agency to follow Loeb's suggestion. "It is recommended that NASA conduct a study to assess how much fuel is left in Juno's engine, and I support an extension of the Juno mission at least until mid-March 2026 at a cost of about $15M per 6 months from the current expiration date of mid-September 2025," the letter reads. Experts, however, were quick to throw cold water on Loeb's plan, which happens to resemble the plot of Stanley Kubrick's 1968 sci-fi epic "2001: A Space Odyssey." "Juno does not have enough fuel to visit 3I/ATLAS," Penn State astronomy professor Jason Wright tweeted. "Its main engine is also malfunctioning. [Loeb] does (or should) know this because his team was in touch with [Juno principal investigator Scott Bolton]." "An extended mission for Juno would be awesome, but a visit to 3I/ATLAS makes no sense," he added. The spacecraft was launched almost exactly 14 years ago, entering a polar orbit of Jupiter roughly five years later. It was only planned to study the planet until 2018, but it has since doubled the length of its originally planned mission. Not everybody agrees that a mission to visit 3I/ATLAS is out of the question, though. Juno's "current orbit allows it to view Jupiter up close, and its visits to Io [a moon of Jupiter] in 2023 [and] 2024 exposed it to a lot of radiation," University of Kent space professor Mark Burchell told New Scientist. "So it is no surprise it is now showing anomalies in performance that need rebooting." "Could it be re-tasked?" he added. "In theory, if it can be done, and the instruments work, then there is novel data there." Unsurprisingly, intercepting an interstellar visitor that's screaming through outer space at 37 miles per second would be no easy feat even with brand new hardware. Any mission would need a lot of fuel and time to get anywhere near it. According to a yet-to-be-peer-reviewed paper by a team from Michigan State University, a new mission would need to accelerate at 15 miles per second on the day of discovery — which was July 1, so the clock is ticking — to get there in time. However, "spacecraft at Mars could be used to make valuable observations" around late November, when 3I/ATLAS hits its perihelion, or when it makes its closest approach to the Sun. "The perihelion of 3I/ATLAS will not be easily observable from Earth-based observatories, as the object will be on the opposite side of the Sun and at a low solar elongation angle," the paper reads. "However, the object will approach within 0.19 au [or 17.6 million miles] of Mars, and we encourage nearby spacecraft equipped with visible, UV, and IR spectrographs and cameras to attempt to capture data on this object's closest approach." The European Space Agency's Jupiter Icy Moons Explorer (JUICE) may also be able to get a look. The agency's Luca Conversi told New Scientist that "we are aware of this precious opportunity and are currently exploring the technical feasibility." "I'm not sure it is feasible to send it to the comet: unfortunately astro-dynamics is more complicated than what we see in sci-fi movies," he added, "and it is not easy to change the course of spacecraft." Time is quickly running out, and visiting 3I/ATLAS is starting to look like a Herculean task. But to scientists, it's an endeavor worth exploring nonetheless. "The closest approach to Earth will be in December," said coauthor and fourth-year Michigan State undergraduate Atsuhiro Yaginuma in a press release last month. "It would require a lot of fuel and a lot of rapid mobilization from people here on Earth." "But getting close to an interstellar object could be a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity," he added. More on the object: Existing NASA Spacecraft Could Intercept the Weird Interstellar Object Cruising Into Our Star System Solve the daily Crossword

Congressperson Urges NASA to Send Its Jupiter Probe Chasing in Pursuit of the Weird Visitor Coming From Interstellar Space
Congressperson Urges NASA to Send Its Jupiter Probe Chasing in Pursuit of the Weird Visitor Coming From Interstellar Space

Yahoo

timea day ago

  • Yahoo

Congressperson Urges NASA to Send Its Jupiter Probe Chasing in Pursuit of the Weird Visitor Coming From Interstellar Space

Earlier this year, astronomers spotted a mysterious interstellar object, dubbed 3I/ATLAS, hurtling through the solar system at a blistering speed. It's only the third confirmed interstellar object to have ventured into our solar system — all over the past few years, owing to more sophisticated space-observing technology — and scientists are eager to have a closer look. Besides detailed observations by the Very Large Telescope in Chile and NASA's Hubble Space Telescope, Harvard astronomer and alien hunter Avi Loeb called on using the space agency's Juno spacecraft to intercept the object's path to get a first-hand look. Loeb, who made headlines last month after suggesting 3I/ATLAS may be an alien probe sent by an intelligent civilization, argued in a blog post that the "close encounter of 3I/ATLAS to Jupiter provides a rare opportunity to shift Juno from its current orbit around Jupiter to intercept the path of 3I/ATLAS at its closest approach to Jupiter." The unique opportunity caught the attention of Representative Anna Paulina Luna (R-FL), who sent a letter to acting NASA administrator Sean Duffy, encouraging the agency to follow Loeb's suggestion. "It is recommended that NASA conduct a study to assess how much fuel is left in Juno's engine, and I support an extension of the Juno mission at least until mid-March 2026 at a cost of about $15M per 6 months from the current expiration date of mid-September 2025," the letter reads. Experts, however, were quick to throw cold water on Loeb's plan, which happens to resemble the plot of Stanley Kubrick's 1968 sci-fi epic "2001: A Space Odyssey." "Juno does not have enough fuel to visit 3I/ATLAS," Penn State astronomy professor Jason Wright tweeted. "Its main engine is also malfunctioning. [Loeb] does (or should) know this because his team was in touch with [Juno principal investigator Scott Bolton]." "An extended mission for Juno would be awesome, but a visit to 3I/ATLAS makes no sense," he added. The spacecraft was launched almost exactly 14 years ago, entering a polar orbit of Jupiter roughly five years later. It was only planned to study the planet until 2018, but it has since doubled the length of its originally planned mission. Not everybody agrees that a mission to visit 3I/ATLAS is out of the question, though. Juno's "current orbit allows it to view Jupiter up close, and its visits to Io [a moon of Jupiter] in 2023 [and] 2024 exposed it to a lot of radiation," University of Kent space professor Mark Burchell told New Scientist. "So it is no surprise it is now showing anomalies in performance that need rebooting." "Could it be re-tasked?" he added. "In theory, if it can be done, and the instruments work, then there is novel data there." Unsurprisingly, intercepting an interstellar visitor that's screaming through outer space at 37 miles per second would be no easy feat even with brand new hardware. Any mission would need a lot of fuel and time to get anywhere near it. According to a yet-to-be-peer-reviewed paper by a team from Michigan State University, a new mission would need to accelerate at 15 miles per second on the day of discovery — which was July 1, so the clock is ticking — to get there in time. However, "spacecraft at Mars could be used to make valuable observations" around late November, when 3I/ATLAS hits its perihelion, or when it makes its closest approach to the Sun. "The perihelion of 3I/ATLAS will not be easily observable from Earth-based observatories, as the object will be on the opposite side of the Sun and at a low solar elongation angle," the paper reads. "However, the object will approach within 0.19 au [or 17.6 million miles] of Mars, and we encourage nearby spacecraft equipped with visible, UV, and IR spectrographs and cameras to attempt to capture data on this object's closest approach." The European Space Agency's Jupiter Icy Moons Explorer (JUICE) may also be able to get a look. The agency's Luca Conversi told New Scientist that "we are aware of this precious opportunity and are currently exploring the technical feasibility." "I'm not sure it is feasible to send it to the comet: unfortunately astro-dynamics is more complicated than what we see in sci-fi movies," he added, "and it is not easy to change the course of spacecraft." Time is quickly running out, and visiting 3I/ATLAS is starting to look like a Herculean task. But to scientists, it's an endeavor worth exploring nonetheless. "The closest approach to Earth will be in December," said coauthor and fourth-year Michigan State undergraduate Atsuhiro Yaginuma in a press release last month. "It would require a lot of fuel and a lot of rapid mobilization from people here on Earth." "But getting close to an interstellar object could be a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity," he added. More on the object: Existing NASA Spacecraft Could Intercept the Weird Interstellar Object Cruising Into Our Star System

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store