logo
Palestine Action is a threat to British democracy

Palestine Action is a threat to British democracy

Telegraph23-06-2025
Charlie Falconer believes that the attack by kayiffeh-botherers Palestine Action on RAF Brize Norton last week does not, of itself, justify the reported decision by the Government to proscribe it as a terrorist organisation.
'I am not aware of what Palestine Action has done beyond the painting of things on the planes in Brize Norton. They may have done other things I didn't know,' he told Sky News yesterday morning.
It's as if the former Lord Chancellor and Justice Secretary is deliberately minimising the behaviour of Palestine Action: 'the painting of things' sounds like nothing more serious than a nursery school activity, or at worst the kind of thing that bored teenage boys do when they find a can of spray paint in the street and decide to adorn a nearby wall with their 'tag'.
But Palestine Action are not bored teenage boys. They are political activists who are prepared to take whatever form of 'direct action' they believe is required in order to get their way.
It is difficult to believe that Lord Falconer is unaware of the millions of pounds of damage deliberately caused by the organisation to aircraft, or that he is incapable of using Google to discover what other activities of which the group might be accused. Later this year, for example, some of its members will go on trial for allegedly ram-raiding their way into the premises of a defence company in Bristol – the sort of tactics usually employed by violent bank robbers.
And the motivation of its founder is helpfully transparent. Huda Ammori has talked of her political awakening in 2015. 'The renewal of hope was alive, with Jeremy Corbyn, a committed anti-imperialist activist and politician, elected as leader of the Labour Party.' (Don't remind me.) Corbyn's Labour presented an opportunity as 'the most promising and frankly the only avenue of implementing an embargo [on Israel] through political parties'.
But, as with so many on the hard Left, optimism and hope rarely survive the inevitable collision with reality. When voters sent Corbyn and Labour packing at the 2019 general election, Ammori co-founded Palestine Action. 'From the black hole of politics, a new light through direct action and grassroots mobilisation took its place', she wrote. It was time to stop 'asking and begging' the Government, she said. Instead, they'd use 'our own bodies'. And other people's property, of course.
What Ammori calls 'asking and begging', most other people would call 'voting'. But for a certain kind of political activist, democracy is not fit for purpose if it doesn't deliver a tiny minority exactly what they want immediately, irrespective of the impact on other people, particularly, in this case, workers who earn an entirely respectable and legitimate living from the defence industry. It's hardly surprising that an organisation that lends so much moral support to the Islamist terrorists of Hamas shares that organisation's antipathy to the democratic process.
We've seen the pattern of behaviour before. Indulged children who have grown into indulged adults who cannot fathom why they should ever be denied anything that they want, who then take to the streets to demand it anyway because naturally their priorities should be everyone's priorities. And if the powers that be continue not to do as they're instructed by these indignant 20-somethings, then direct action is the only route left open to them.
But there's a big difference between gluing yourself to a busy road in order to cause as much distress and inconvenience to a public that you hold in utter contempt, and sabotaging RAF jet fighters, putting their pilots and other service personnel at personal risk. Such behaviour could hardly be further away from 'the painting of things'.
It's time we end the indulgence of those who have set themselves against democratic and social norms. It's time to stop turning a deaf ear to those who volubly and publicly call for support for proscribed terrorist groups and who celebrate the deaths of 'Zionists' at the hands of Islamist savages.
If naming Palestine Action a terrorist group empowers our police and security forces to deal with them more efficiently and ruthlessly, so much the better. Continued tolerance of pro-Hamas, pro-Islamist and anti-democratic individuals and organisation should have been recognised long before now as self-defeating and corrosive to British society.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Fears new Labour property tax will hit the hardest workers, as Rachel Reeves's minister refuses to rule out controversial new levy to replace stamp duty
Fears new Labour property tax will hit the hardest workers, as Rachel Reeves's minister refuses to rule out controversial new levy to replace stamp duty

Daily Mail​

time25 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Fears new Labour property tax will hit the hardest workers, as Rachel Reeves's minister refuses to rule out controversial new levy to replace stamp duty

faced a furious backlash yesterday over a possible and highly controversial shake-up of property levies. The Chancellor was warned that proposals to replace stamp duty with an annual charge on homes worth more than £500,000 would damage the market as well as punish people who have worked hard to own their houses. And one of her Treasury ministers refused to rule out the possibility of her introducing the radical change in the Budget as she seeks to fill a £50 billion black hole in the public finances. Labour vowed before the last election that it would 'not increase taxes on working people', ruling out rises in National Insurance, income tax or VAT. But that language seemed to soften yesterday. Shadow Chancellor Sir Mel Stride said: 'Labour can equivocate all they like, but we know they are drawing up plans to raise taxes yet again at the Autumn Budget. ' Keir Starmer and Rachel Reeves promised not to raise taxes on working people, then introduced a £25 billion Jobs Tax – which will leave the average working household £3,500 worse off. 'Now, after their botched welfare reforms and economic mismanagement, they are clearly gearing up to do it all over again this autumn. 'The British public simply cannot afford Labour. Only the Conservatives believe in sound money and low taxes.' As part of her efforts to fill the Government's coffers and boost economic growth, Ms Reeves is understood to have asked officials to look at a potential overhaul of property taxes. She has already been called on by economists to scrap the current system in which buyers having to pay thousands of pounds in stamp duty on house sales, which they say deters people from moving. The Guardian reported that owners of houses worth more than £500,000 could have to pay a 'proportional property tax' based on the value of their properties when they sell up. However, sources played down the claims that Treasury officials are looking at this proposal or threshold. Sources also moved away from suggestions that civil servants are drawing on the findings of a report published last year by think-tank Onward, which proposed that only future owners could pay an annual tax based on the value of the property instead of stamp duty. Under the plan put forward by economist Professor Tim Leunig, current homeowners would not be hit by the charge but if they do sell up in future, their buyers would pay the levy each year instead of stamp duty at the point of purchase. Kirstie Allsopp, the TV presenter who fronts Location, Location, Location, led a furious backlash over the reported plans It is intended to open up the property market by making it less expensive to move and encouraging those in large homes to downsize. TV presenter Kirstie Allsopp warned the Chancellor not to risk destabilising the market by 'flying kites' about potential new property taxes, telling Times Radio: 'It's not Rachel's to go after because it's their homes. 'It's the roof over their head. And this Government seems to want to punish people for making the sacrifices they've made to buy their own homes.' James Browne, senior economic policy adviser at the Tony Blair Institute, said: 'While replacing stamp duty with a new annual property levy on homes worth more than £500,000 is economically sensible, it would be politically challenging. 'Either long-standing homeowners who are asset-rich but cash-poor would be hit with much larger bills or, if it only applied after a property changed hands, would discourage moving just as much as stamp duty does at the moment.' Treasury minister Torsten Bell told Sky News: 'Tax decisions are made by the Chancellor. I'm not going to start speculating on individual taxes.' Last night a Treasury spokesman said: 'We are protecting payslips for working people by keeping our promise to not raise the basic, higher or additional rates of income tax, employee National Insurance or VAT.' What are the plans for a 'national property tax'? What is being proposed? The Treasury is said to be considering plans for a national property tax on the sale of homes worth more than £500,000. What would this replace? This tax would replace stamp duty on owner-occupied homes. Buyers pay stamp duty under the existing framework, if they purchase property worth more than £125,000. How would the new tax work? The new levy would be paid by owner-occupiers on houses worth more than £500,000 when they sell their home, with the amount due determined by the value of the property and a rate set by the Government. What figures could be involved? This has not been confirmed. But a report by think tank Onward last year suggested replacing stamp duty with an annual 'national proportional property tax' levied on homeowners of houses with a value above £500,000, at a rate of 0.54% - plus a 0.278% supplement on values over £1million. A separate local property tax set at 0.44% of the house value up to £500,000 and with a minimum of £800 per household per year could replace council tax. What are current stamp duty rates? Stamp duty rates for buying a single property are currently 2% from £125,000; 5% from £250,001; 10% from £925,001; and 12% from £1.5million.

Couple are jailed after victim was raped on camera - but only found out when blackmailer sent her footage and demanded £5,000
Couple are jailed after victim was raped on camera - but only found out when blackmailer sent her footage and demanded £5,000

Daily Mail​

time25 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Couple are jailed after victim was raped on camera - but only found out when blackmailer sent her footage and demanded £5,000

A couple has been jailed after a man raped an unconscious woman while his partner filmed it. Their victim only found out what had happened when one of the pair blackmailed her by sending her the footage and demanding £5,000. Indre Bruziene, 40, and her partner Vasile Radacanu, 33, invited the woman to their address in Sheerness, Kent on September 18, 2020. They downed alcoholic drinks together at the property, causing the victim to become intoxicated. Radacanu then raped her during which she was, at one point, unconscious. Bruziene filmed the incident throughout, first from through a window and later from inside the home. Radacanu clearly was aware he was being recorded as he made gestures towards the camera on several occasions. The victim then woke up in her own bed the next morning with no recollection of what had happened to her. In March 2021, she received a call from Bruziene accusing her of breaking up her family before sending her the clip of the rape. She asked the woman for £5,000 and claimed that if she did not pay her she would send the video to the victim's husband. The victim refused to pay the sum of money and told her family about the ordeal before calling the police. Radacanu, from Romania, and Bruziene, from Lithuania, were both arrested the next day. Their phones were seized by investigators and Radacanu was later charged with two rapes, attempted rape and two sexual assaults. Bruziene was charged with blackmail. The pair pleaded not guilty at Maidstone Crown Court but were convicted of these on January 28, 2025, following a trial. Radacanu was sentenced to 12 years and six months in prison on Thursday, and Bruziene was jailed for three years and three months. Detective Constable Hollie Brown said: 'The criminal actions of Radacanu and Bruziene were unspeakably vile as they took advantage of a vulnerable victim who was not aware of what was happening to her. 'As soon as the victim received the video of her abuse from Bruziene she showed great courage in disclosing her ordeal to her family and then contacting the police. 'Detectives then swiftly secured the offenders phones and they have now, quite rightly, been brought to justice.'

Great Ormond Street Hospital ‘breached fundraising regulations'
Great Ormond Street Hospital ‘breached fundraising regulations'

Times

timean hour ago

  • Times

Great Ormond Street Hospital ‘breached fundraising regulations'

The Great Ormond Street Hospital (Gosh) Charity has been found guilty of 11 fundraising code breaches after an undercover Times investigation. The children's charity referred itself to the Fundraising Regulator last year, after The Times exposed that people going door-to-door to collect for it had been taught pressure-selling techniques. One senior fundraiser at IBA Global, a third-party marketing firm, admitted to creating the impression that he was deaf to get members of the public to answer the door. Trainee fundraisers earned commission instead of an hourly wage and were taught to use psychological motivators and to pre-empt objections on the doorstep. The regulator's investigation, which will be published on Wednesday, found a performance culture at IBA Global 'focused more on successful sign-ups than on following the fundraising standards'.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store