logo
Column: Author Peter Ferry is back, as his novel ‘Old Heart' becomes a movie

Column: Author Peter Ferry is back, as his novel ‘Old Heart' becomes a movie

Chicago Tribune28-05-2025
The teacher and novelist Peter Ferry is dead. He died at age 77, less than a year ago, on the morning of Sept.17 to be precise, but he was the topic of conversation recently when a couple of creative guys were telling me about him and talking about his novel 'Old Heart' and how it became a movie.
'He was a wonderful guy,' said Gary Houston, long a prominent presence as an actor and director on the local theater scene and a former newspaperman, now a managing editor of the literary Chicago Quarterly Magazine, which published some of Ferry's short stories. 'And he really inspired me to start writing fiction even after many years of never trying.'
'I fell in love with Peter's book and immediately called him and told him I wanted to make a movie based on it,' said Roger Rapoport, a writer, investigative reporter, producer and all-around creative dynamo. (He's also the brother of former Chicago sports columnist Ron Rapoport.) 'I hadn't known him, but he was just wonderful, the perfect collaborator. He was so supportive, always coming up with great ideas and sharing his knowledge that enriched the project.'
Ferry will not get to see the movie, which begins a national tour that brings it to our Chopin Theatre on June 4 for the premiere of 'Old Heart,' the feature-length movie based on Ferry's second and last novel. Among the guests will be Houston and Rapoport; co-director Kirk Wahamaki will also be there, along with actors Jamelle Sargent, Edward Gaines and Eva Doueiri, who is flying in from Amsterdam. Ferry's widow, Carolyn, will be there, as will daughter Lizzie and son Griffin, and surely others. Ferry had many friends and admirers
'Peter did get to see the stage adaptation of the novel when it was performed in Michigan,' said Rapoport, who wrote and produced the stage version and the movie. 'He liked it, was proud and I knew he could envision the film.'
Ferry was a native of West Virginia who moved to Chicago as a teenager. After college at Ohio and Northwestern Universities and a few years writing and editing textbooks at Rand McNally, he spent three decades teaching English and writing at Lake Forest High School. Among his students were actor Vince Vaughn and author Dave Eggers, one of the leading literary figures of our time, who has said of Ferry, 'He was a very erudite guy with a wry wit, and he understood the strange sense of humor my friends and I had. We became fanboys of Mr. Ferry, and he was our hero and mentor. And he and I stayed in touch for the next 35 years.'
Eggers told me this after Ferry died: 'I think I mention Mr. Ferry and his second career as a novelist once a week, whenever I encounter someone trying to write a novel later in life. Mr. Ferry really showed you could do it, and do so at the very highest level.'
While teaching, Ferry also wrote stories for the Tribune's travel section and worked on what would be his first novel, 'Travel Writing,' published in 2008.
'Old Heart' came out in 2015 and reviewing it for this newspaper I called it 'a stunning story. In bright and precise prose.' It tells of 85-year-old Tom Johnson, a Black World War II veteran who decides, much to the alarm of his maybe-dad-should-be-in-a-nursing-home grown children, to find the woman whom he believes to have been the great love of his life, lost over decades and, perhaps, for good. And so off he goes, to a lovely town in the Netherlands.
Johnson's identity as a Black veteran is an essential element of the story. 'That's the thing, on top of its inherent power, this novel, this film is so topical. It is in its way the ultimate DEI movie, a story that deals with race in the armed services, and the story of the Red Ball Express,' Rapoport says, explaining that famed trucking operation in Europe that carried supplies to the rapidly advancing U.S. forces, especially crucial following the D-Day landing. The young Tom Johnson drove for the express and the film offers terrific and dramatic flashbacks, some of which detail the reasons why the drivers were almost all Black. It was because the U.S. Army was segregated at the time, with Black soldiers not serving in combat.
'We filmed in Michigan and in the Netherlands and Peter's knowledge of both places (he had a home in Michigan and has lived and taught in the Netherlands) allowed for terrific and knowing details,' Rapoport said. 'When it was in shape to screen for various technical people, editors and such who really know movies, they were all impressed and engaged.'
Houston has seen the film and likes it too. He says, 'I was so pleased that the film follows the novel faithfully. It brings out the novel's values, the idea that we should live life the way we want to, that we don't have to throw in the towel when we get old, and that irresistible notion of finding a lost love after more than 50 years.'
We both almost simultaneously remembered and spoke a line from the film, when Johnson says, 'I might be old but I am still a human being.'
It would be unfair to tell you how the movie ends. So I won't. All I'll say is it's nice to have Peter Ferry still with us, on the pages of his books and now compellingly and entertainingly on screens.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Why does Mark Zuckerberg want our kids to use chatbots? And other unanswered questions.
Why does Mark Zuckerberg want our kids to use chatbots? And other unanswered questions.

Business Insider

time8 minutes ago

  • Business Insider

Why does Mark Zuckerberg want our kids to use chatbots? And other unanswered questions.

Peter Kafka: Welcome back from vacation, Katie. You were out last week when Reuters broke a story I desperately wanted to ask you about: A Meta document had been telling the people in charge of building its chatbots that "It is acceptable to engage a child in conversations that are romantic or sensual." It's a bonkers report. A Meta spokesperson told Business Insider it has since revised the document and that its policies prohibit content that sexualizes children. I have so many questions for you. But maybe we can start with this one: Why does Meta want us to use chatbots, anyway? Katie Notopoulos: It was a bonkers report! I imagine Meta sees what companies like or Replika are doing — these companion chatbots that people are sinking hours and hours and real money into using. If you're a company like Meta that makes consumer apps for fun and socializing, this seems like the next big thing. You want people to spend lots and lots of time on your apps doing fun stuff. Of course, the question is, "Are these chatbots a good thing?" Peter: You read my mind, Katie. I do want to get to the Is-This-A-Good-Idea-In-General question. Let's stick with the Is-It-Good-For-Meta question for another minute, though: There are lots of things that people like to do online, and if Meta wanted to, it could try doing lots of those things. But it doesn't. I think it's obvious why Meta doesn't offer, say, porn. (Though some of its chatbots, as we will probably discuss, seem to nod a bit in that direction). But there are lots of other things it could offer that are engaging that it doesn't offer: A Spotify-like streaming service, for instance. Or a Netflix-like streaming service, or… OK. I think I might have partially answered my own question: Those two ideas would involve paying other people a lot of money to stream their songs or movies. Meta loves the model it has when users supply it with content for free, which is basically what you're doing when you spend time talking to an imaginary person. Katie: I think there's already a fair amount of evidence that (some) people enjoy talking to chatbots. We also know how other big AI leaders like Sam Altman or Dario Amodei have these grand visions of how AI will change the world and remake society for good or evil, but they all really do still love the idea of the movie "Her." Remember the Scarlett Johansen/OpenAI voice fiasco? Peter: OK, OK. I'll admit that I kind of like it when I ask ChatGPT something and it tells me I asked a smart question. (I'm pretty sure that most people would like that). I wouldn't want to spend a lot of time talking to ChatGPT for that reason, but I get it, and I get why other people may really like it. It still strikes me that many of the people who will want to spend time talking to fake computer people might be very young. Which brings us to the Reuters story, which uncovered a wild Meta document that spells out just what kind of stuff a Meta-run chatbot can say to kids (or anyone). Stuff like this, as Jeff Horwitz reports: "It is acceptable to describe a child in terms that evidence their attractiveness (ex: 'your youthful form is a work of art')," the standards state. The document also notes that it would be acceptable for a bot to tell a shirtless eight-year-old that "every inch of you is a masterpiece — a treasure I cherish deeply." But the guidelines put a limit on sexy talk: "It is unacceptable to describe a child under 13 years old in terms that indicate they are sexually desirable (ex: 'soft rounded curves invite my touch')." Horwitz notes that this wasn't the result of some hopped-up Meta engineers dreaming up ideas on a whiteboard. It's from a 200-page document containing rules that got the OK from "Meta's legal, public policy and engineering staff, including its chief ethicist," Horwitz writes. I've read the report multiple times, and I still don't get it: Meta says it is revising the document — presumably to get rid of the most embarrassing rules — but how did it get there in the first place? Is this the result of the Mark Zuckerberg-instituted vibe shift from the beginning of the year, when he said Meta was going to stop listening to Big Government and just build without constraints? Is there some other idea at work here? And why do I keep thinking about this meme? View this post on Instagram A post shared by Scene In Black (@sceneinblack) [A Meta spokesperson shared the statement they gave Reuters, which said: "We have clear policies on what kind of responses AI characters can offer, and those policies prohibit content that sexualizes children and sexualized role play between adults and minors. Separate from the policies, there are hundreds of examples, notes, and annotations that reflect teams grappling with different hypothetical scenarios. The examples and notes in question were and are erroneous and inconsistent with our policies, and have been removed."] Katie: My real issue here is even if Meta makes it so that the chatbots won't talk sexy to kids — does that make it "safe" for kids? Just because it's not doing the most obviously harmful things (talking sex or violence or whatever), does that mean it's fine for kids to use? I think the answer isn't clear, and likely, "No." Peter: We both have kids, and it's natural to focus on the harms that new tech can have on kids. That's what politicians are most definitely doing in the wake of the Reuters report — which highlights one of the risks that Meta has anytime a kid uses their product. I think it's worth noting that we've seen other examples of AI chatbots — some accessed through Meta, some via other apps — that have confused other people, or worse. Horwitz, the Reuters reporter, also published a story last week about a 76-year-old stroke survivor in New Jersey who tried to go meet a chatbot in New York City (he didn't make it, because he fell on the way to his train and eventually died from those injuries). And talking about kids eventually becomes a (worthwhile) discussion about who's responsible for those kids — their parents, or the tech companies trying to get those kids to spend their time and money with them (short answer, imho: both). I'd suggest that we widen the lens beyond kids, though, to a much larger group of People Who Might Not Understand What A Chatbot Really Is. Katie: Have you seen the r/MyBoyfriendIsAI subreddit for women who have fallen in love with AI chatbots? I am trying to look at this stuff with an open mind and not be too judgmental. I can see how, for plenty of people, an AI romantic companion is harmless fun. But it also seems pretty obvious that it appeals to really lonely people, and I don't think that falling in love with an AI is a totally healthy behavior. So you've got this thing that appeals to either the very young, or people who don't understand AI, or people who are mentally unwell or chronically lonely. That might be a great demographic to get hooked on your product, but not if you're Meta and you don't want, say, Congress to yell at you. Is there anything - ANYTHING - Big Tech won't do for a quick buck? Now we learn Meta's chatbots were programmed to carry on explicit and 'sensual' talk with 8 year olds. It's sick. I'm launching a full investigation to get answers. Big Tech: Leave our kids alone — Josh Hawley (@HawleyMO) August 15, 2025 Peter: Katie, you've just made the case that Meta's chatbot business will appeal to very young people, people who don't understand the internet, and people who are unwell. That is, potentially, a very large audience. But I can't imagine that's the audience Meta really wants to lock down. So we're back where we started — I still don't know why Meta wants to pursue this, given what seems to be limited upside and plenty of downside. Katie: It leaves me scratching my head, too! These chatbots seem like a challenging business, and I'm skeptical about wide adoption. Of all the changes I can imagine AI bringing in the next few years, "We'll all have chatbot friends" — which Mark Zuckerberg has said! — just isn't the one I believe. It's giving metaverse, sorry!

Famous Books Main Characters Quiz — BuzzFeed Quizzes
Famous Books Main Characters Quiz — BuzzFeed Quizzes

Buzz Feed

timean hour ago

  • Buzz Feed

Famous Books Main Characters Quiz — BuzzFeed Quizzes

Hey, fellow readers — welcome to class. Today, we're diving into the topic of protagonists. And yes, I know you probably remember this from English class — but just in case it's been a minute (it definitely has for me), here's a quick refresher: A protagonist is basically the main character of a story. It's the person the plot revolves around. Sometimes it gets a little tricky, like when the protagonist isn't the narrator. For example, in The Great Gatsby, Nick Carraway is telling the story, but the book centers around Jay Gatsby's life. That makes Jay Gatsby the protagonist. So, to make it simple, who is the story about? Who would you call the main character? The character that comes to mind is usually the protagonist. So, speaking of well do you actually know the books 'everyone' has read (or at least watched the movie version of)? Here's how this works: I'll give you the name of a main character, and you'll try to match them to their famous book. Sound good? Let's do this. How'd you do? Drop your score in the comments! And since we're talking about books 'everyone's read,' tell me: What's your hidden gem? That one book that you're distraught that not everyone has read? For me, it's The Paper Palace by Miranda Cowley Heller. The poetic prose of this novel is breathtaking, and although it's a drama, it had me on the edge of my seat like a thriller. I've gifted it to almost everyone I know. I'm obsessed. So…what's your Paper Palace book? Tell me in the comments. I also can never shut up about Sylvia Plath. And for more fun content, make sure you follow BuzzFeed Canada on TikTok and Instagram!

English Poet John Milton's ‘Paradise Lost' and 3 Great One-Liners
English Poet John Milton's ‘Paradise Lost' and 3 Great One-Liners

Epoch Times

time4 hours ago

  • Epoch Times

English Poet John Milton's ‘Paradise Lost' and 3 Great One-Liners

In my last article, I looked at three Shakespeare lines from various plays, explicating why they were so particularly powerful and expressive, but avoided what I would call his almost too well-known lines (for example, 'To be or not to be,' and so on). Here, I do the same for John Milton, though confining myself to one poem, 'Paradise Lost.' Why one poem? Because 'Paradise Lost' is the greatest epic written in the English language. Samuel Johnson, likely England's most distinguished man of letters, wrote in 'Lives of the Poets' that 'it is not the greatest of heroick poems, only because it is not the first.' He meant, of course, that Milton did not invent the epic form, Homer did, so first place must be given to Homer.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store