Captured Australian Oscar Jenkins given 13-year prison sentence by Russia for helping defend Ukraine
Russian authorities have handed captured Australian Oscar Jenkins a 13-year sentence for helping to defend Ukraine.
Mr Jenkins, 33, was taken prisoner by Russian troops near Makiivka, in Ukraine's Luhansk region, late last year.
In January, reports emerged the Melbourne-born teacher had been executed, but Australian officials determined he remained alive and was being held in Russia.
Despite calls from the Australian government demanding his release, Mr Jenkins was subsequently put on trial as a "mercenary" and was handed a guilty verdict on Friday night, local time.
Russian-installed prosecutors deliberately charge foreign-born combatants as mercenaries as it allows for them to be convicted under the country's criminal code, rather than treated as prisoners of war with rights under the Geneva Convention.
In a statement, prosecutors said Mr Jenkins had taken part in "combat operations against Russian military personnel between March and December 2024" and would carry out his sentence "in a strict regime penal colony".
They had also claimed the 33-year-old was paid a "monthly reward" of between $11,400 and $15,000.
A video of the hearing appeared to show Mr Jenkins standing within a glass cage in the courtroom, his hands behind his back, and looking fatigued and distraught.
It is not immediately clear how the sentence will impact diplomatic efforts from the Albanese government to secure the 33-year-old's freedom.
In a statement following the announcement of charges against Mr Jenkins, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese vowed to use "whatever avenues we have at our disposal" in order to return the captured Australian home.
"We'll continue to make representations to the reprehensible regime of Vladimir Putin on behalf of Mr Jenkins," he said.
"We will stand up and use whatever avenues we have at our disposal to continue to make those representations."
There have been suggestions Australia could engage in a prisoner swap to deliver Mr Jenkins to freedom, including from a pro-Kremlin influencer currently hiding in the Russian consulate.
Despite this, the government has declined to comment on the likelihood of any swap, leaving the fate of Mr Jenkins uncertain.
Skynews.com.au has contacted the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade for comment.
This is a developing story. More to come.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Perth Now
39 minutes ago
- Perth Now
Russia accuses Ukraine of postponing prisoner exchange
Ukraine has unexpectedly postponed exchanging prisoners of war and accepting the bodies of killed soldiers for an indefinite period, Kremlin aide Vladimir Medinsky says. Russia and Ukraine held the second round of peace talks in Istanbul on Monday, agreeing to exchange more prisoners - focusing on the youngest and most severely wounded - and return the bodies of 12,000 dead soldiers. "In strict accordance with the Istanbul agreements, on June 6, Russia began a humanitarian operation to hand over to Ukraine more than 6000 bodies of killed Ukrainian servicemen, as well as to exchange wounded and seriously ill prisoners of war and prisoners of war under the age of 25," Medinsky said on Telegram. He said 1212 bodies of killed Ukrainian soldiers were in refrigerated containers at the exchange point. Russia has also handed over to Ukraine the first list of 640 prisoners of war, categorised as "wounded, seriously ill and young people", to begin the exchange, Medinsky said. "The Russian Defence Ministry's contact group is on the border with Ukraine," he said, adding that Ukrainian negotiators were not at the exchange location. Ukrainian officials responsible for the exchanges did not respond to a request for comment. Medinsky urged Ukraine to strictly adhere to the schedule and the agreements and to immediately proceed with the exchange. "We are on site. We are fully prepared to work," he said. "International TV channels, news agencies and correspondents are welcome to come and see for themselves that this is indeed the case."
The Age
an hour ago
- The Age
‘Progressive patriot' prime minister faces his call to arms
'In today's Australia, the new default should be that patriotism is a love of country that is democratic and egalitarian. It is something that includes those of different races and backgrounds,' he wrote in this masthead a couple of weeks ago. 'With his political authority unquestioned, Albanese has an opportunity to craft a nation-building agenda. The significance is more than just national. At the moment, parties of the centre-left are struggling to find compelling alternatives to Trumpist populism.' Albanese's defiance of America doesn't come out of nowhere. It rings a Labor bell. It resonates with the decision by Labor's celebrated wartime leader, John Curtin, to defy Australia's great and powerful friend of his time, Britain. 'I'm conscious about the leadership of John Curtin, choosing to stand up to Winston Churchill and say, 'No, I'm bringing the Australian troops home to defend our own continent, we're not going to just let it go',' Albanese said last year as he prepared to walk the Kokoda Track, where Australia and Papua New Guinea halted Imperial Japan's southward march of conquest in World War II. Defiance of allies is one thing. Defeat of the enemy is another. In a moment of truth-telling, the Chief of the Defence Force, Admiral David Johnston, this week said that Australia now had to plan to wage war from its own continental territory rather than preparing for war in far-off locations. 'We are having to reconsider Australia as a homeland from which we will conduct combat operations,' Johnston told a conference held by the Australian Strategic Policy Institute. 'That is a very different way – almost since the Second World War – of how we think of national resilience and preparedness. We may need to operate and conduct combat operations from this country.' He didn't spell it out, but he's evidently contemplating the possibility that China will cut off Australia's seaborne supply routes, either because it's waging war in the Taiwan Strait or South China Sea, or because it's seeking to coerce Australia. 'The chief of the defence force is speaking truth,' says Professor Peter Dean, co-author of the government's Defence Strategic Review, now at the US Studies Centre at Sydney University. 'There's a line in the Defence Strategic Review that most people overlook – it talks about 'the defence of Australia against potential threats arising from major power competition, including the prospect of conflict'. And there's only one major power posing a threat in our region.' History accelerates week by week. Trump, chaos factory, wantonly discards America's unique sources of power and abuses its allies. China's Xi Jinping and Russia's Vladimir Putin are emboldened, seeing America's credibility crumbling. British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, alarmed at the rising risks, this week declared a campaign to make Britain 'battle ready' to 'face down Russian aggression'. Loading Starmer plans to enlarge the army, commission up to a dozen new nuclear-powered submarines jointly built with Australia under AUKUS, build six new munitions factories, manufacture 7000 long-range weapons, renew the nuclear warheads on Britain's strategic missiles, and put new emphasis on drones and cyberwar as war evolves daily on the battlefields of Ukraine. Starmer intends to increase defence outlays to the equivalent of 2.5 per cent of GDP with an eventual target of 3 per cent. Ukraine's impressive drone strike on Russia's bombers this week knocked out a third of Moscow's force, with AI guiding the drones to their targets. The Australian retired major-general Mick Ryan observes that Ukraine and Russia are upgrading and adapting drone warfare weekly. 'The Australian government has worked hard to ignore these hard-earned lessons and these cheaper military solutions,' he wrote scathingly in this masthead this week, 'while building a dense bureaucracy in Canberra that innovative drone-makers in Australia cannot penetrate in any reasonable amount of time.' At the same time, the FBI charged two Chinese researchers with attempting to smuggle a toxic fungus into the US. It's banned because it can cause mass destruction of crops. A potential bioweapon, in other words. What would John Curtin do today? 'Curtin, like Albanese, was from the left of the Labor Party,' says Dean. 'He was not an internationalist, he was very domestic focused.' Indeed, he was an avowed Marxist who believed that capitalism was in its late phase and bound to fail, leading to world peace. He abandoned his idealism when confronted by the reality of World War II. 'He realised that a leader has to lead for his times. He had to bend his interests from the domestic sphere to the international.' Curtin famously wrote that, after Britain's 'impregnable fortress' of Singapore fell to the Japanese in just a few days, Australia looked to America as its great and powerful friend. 'Albanese can't repeat that,' observes Dean, 'because there's no one else to turn to.' 'A modern John Curtin,' says the head of the National Security College at ANU, Rory Medcalf, 'would take account of the strategic risk facing the unique multicultural democratic experiment of Australia. He'd unite the community and bring the trade unions, industry, the states and territories together in a national effort. 'It's certainly not about beating the drums of war, but we do need a much more open conversation about national preparedness. Australia might be directly involved in war, but, even if we aren't, we will be affected indirectly [by war to our north] because of risks to our fuel security, risks to the normal functioning of the economy and risks to the cohesion of our society. Is there scope to use national cabinet' – which includes the states and territories – 'to talk about these issues?' And the defence budget? Albanese is dismissive of calls to peg spending by set percentages of GDP. Apply that to any other area of the budget and you'd be laughed out of the room. The prime minister prefers to decide on capability that's needed, then to fund it accordingly. How big a gun do you need, then find money to pay for it. Medcalf endorses this approach of deciding capability before funding, but says that risk should come before both. 'And if you look at risk first, it will push spending well above 2 per cent of GDP and much closer to 3 or 4 per cent.' Regardless of what the Americans say or do. Do they turn out to be dependable but demanding? Or uselessly absent? 'Australia will need to spend more either way,' says Medcalf. 'The only future where we don't need to increase our security investment is one where we accept greatly reduced sovereignty in a China-dominated region.'
Sky News AU
4 hours ago
- Sky News AU
Arizona Governor blasted for vetoing bill limiting Chinese land ownership near military bases
Government Accountability Institute President and author Peter Schweizer says it should have been a 'no-brainer' for Arizona Governor Katie Hobbs to pass a bill for which she is coming under fire for vetoing. Ms Hobbs is being scrutinised for vetoing a bill which would have banned the Chinese government from owning a stake of 30 per cent or more of any property in the state of Arizona. 'Look at what just happened, what Ukraine just did with Russia,' Mr Schweizer told Sky News host James Morrow. 'They were able to smuggle in drones … and take out major aircraft at Russian military bases. 'If you own a vacant lot near military installations, there's no reason … that China could not execute the exact same type of operation. 'This is looking at the realities of warfare today. 'Drone technology and other advanced technologies would allow China to use these strategic locations near US military installations to launch military strikes.'
